- FrontPage Magazine - http://www.frontpagemag.com -
Swiss Minarets and European Islam – by Daniel Pipes
Posted By Daniel Pipes On December 8, 2009 @ 12:10 am In FrontPage | 26 Comments
What importance has the recent Swiss referendum to ban the building of minarets (spires next to mosques from which the call to prayer is issued)?
Some may see the 57.5 to 42.5 percent decision endorsing a constitutional amendment as nearly meaningless. The political establishment being overwhelmingly opposed to the amendment, the ban will probably never go into effect. Only 53.4 percent of the electorate voted, so a mere 31 percent of the whole population endorses the ban. The ban does not address Islamist aspirations, much less Muslim terrorism. It has no impact on the practice of Islam. It prevents neither the building of new mosques nor requires that Switzerland’s four existing minarets be demolished.
It’s also possible to dismiss the vote as the quirky result of Switzerland’s unique direct democracy , a tradition that goes back to 1291 and exists nowhere else in Europe. Josef Joffe , the distinguished German analyst, sees the vote as a populist backlash against the series of humiliations the Swiss have endured in recent years culminating in the seizure of two businessmen in Libya  and the Swiss president’s mortifying apology  to win their release.
However, I see the referendum as consequential, and well so beyond Swiss borders.
“Our Lady of the Rosary,” Qatar’s first Christian church, lacks cross, bell, dome, steeple, and signage.
First, it raises delicate issues of reciprocity in Muslim-Christian relations. A few examples: When Our Lady of the Rosary, Qatar ‘s first-ever church opened in 2008, it did so minus cross, bell, dome, steeple, or signboard. Rosary’s priest, Father Tom Veneracion, explained their absence: “The idea is to be discreet because we don’t want to inflame any sensitivities.” And when the Christians of a town in Upper Egypt , Nazlet al-Badraman, finally after four years of “laborious negotiation, pleading, and grappling with the authorities,” won permission in October to restore a tottering tower at the Mar-Girgis Church, a mob of about 200 Muslims  attacked them, throwing stones and shouting Islamic and sectarian slogans. The situation for Copts is so bad, they have reverted to building secret churches .
Why, the Catholic Church  and others are asking, should Christian suffer such indignities while Muslims enjoy full rights in historically Christian countries? The Swiss vote fits into this new spirit. Islamists, of course, reject this premise of equality; Iranian foreign minister Manouchehr Mottaki  warned his Swiss counterpart of unspecified “consequences” of what he called anti-Islamic acts, implicitly threatening to make the minaret ban an international issue comparable to the Danish cartoon  fracas of 2006.
Iran’s Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki warns of “consequences” for anti-Islamic acts.
Second, Europe stands at a crossroads with respect to its Muslim population. Of the three main future prospects  – everyone getting along, Muslims dominating, or Muslims rejected – the first is highly improbable but the second and third seem equally possible. In this context, the Swiss vote represents a potentially important legitimation of anti-Islamic views. The vote inspired support across Europe, as signaled by online polling sponsored by the mainstream media and by statements from leading figures. Here follows a small sampling:
Although not scientific, the lop-sidedness of these (and other ) polls, ranging from 73 to 93 percent majorities endorsing the Swiss referendum, signal that Swiss voters represent growing anti-Islamic sentiments throughout Europe. The new amendment also validates and potentially encourages resistance to Islamization throughout the continent.
For these reasons, the Swiss vote represents a possible turning point for European Islam.
Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://www.frontpagemag.com
URL to article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2009/daniel-pipes/swiss-minarets-and-european-islam-by-daniel-pipes/
URLs in this post:
 direct democracy: http://direct-democracy.geschichte-schweiz.ch/
 Josef Joffe: http://www.zeit.de/2009/50/Zeitgeist-50?page=all&print=true
 two businessmen in Libya: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8351246.stm?ad=1
 Swiss president’s mortifying apology: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/6073643/Swiss-governments-apology-over-Hannibal-Gaddafis-arrest-sparks-angry-backlash.html
 Qatar: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,338014,00.html
 Egypt: http://www.copts.com/english/?p=3643
 mob of about 200 Muslims: http://www.freecopts.net/arabic/2009-06-28-16-57-25/42-rokstories/1395-2009-10-30-22-27-16
 secret churches: http://www.ebnmaryam.com/vb/showthread.php?p=52207
 Catholic Church: http://www.danielpipes.org/3729/the-vatican-confronts-islam
 Manouchehr Mottaki: http://www.irna.ir/En/View/FullStory/?NewsId=826171&IdLanguage=3
 Danish cartoon: http://www.meforum.org/1437/after-the-danish-cartoon-controversy
 three main future prospects: http://www.danielpipes.org/4323/europes-stark-options
 Le Figaro: http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2009/11/30/01016-20091130QCMWWW00619-faut-il-interdire-la-construction-de-nouveaux-minarets-en-france-.php
 L’Express: http://www.lexpress.fr/opinions/sondages/?idSondage=831955
 Ivan Rioufol: http://blog.lefigaro.fr/rioufol/
 Nicolas Sarkozy: http://www.france24.com/fr/20091202-sarkozy-interdiction-minarets-reaction-crainte-populations-pays-denature-identite-islam?autoplay=
 Der Spiegel: http://www1.spiegel.de/active/vote/fcgi/vote.fcgi?voteid=6471&choice=1&aktion=setcookie
 Die Welt: http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article5382070/Sind-wir-eigentlich-auch-Schweizer.html
 20 Minutos: http://www.20minutos.es/encuesta/3991/0/0/
 El Mondo: http://www.elmundo.es/debate/2009/11/2519/prevotaciones2519.html
 other: http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2009/12/around-the-world-.html
Copyright © 2015 FrontPage Magazine. All rights reserved.