How the L-Word Became a 4-Letter Word

Pages: 1 2

Liberals are a lot like the KGB. Every few years, reputation necessitates a name change. So the KGB morphs into the FSK, which morphs into the FSB. Liberals become socialists, socialists become radicals, and so on. Currently, liberals have resurrected a loaded anachronism from the late 19th-century to describe themselves, which isn’t very “progressive,” is it?

Walter Russell Mead, seeing systemic problems with contemporary liberalism, argues for a new liberalism in his piece at the America Interest, “Can the L-Word Be Saved?” This is at odds with the recent liberal tradition, which has tended to ditch labels rather than principles. Their unpopularity, 20th-century true believers contended, stemmed from bad marketing. So, the ideas got rebranded rather than reassessed.

Foreign policy scholar Mead breaks down liberalism into five epochs, characterizing current retreads as 4.0 liberals and their forward-looking replacements as 5.0 liberals, arguing that “5.0 liberals will challenge the right of 4.0 liberals to the magic L-word, seeking both to convince 4.0 liberals to come on back to the future—and denouncing those that don’t as the blinkered reactionaries and speed bumps they are.” Alas, there hasn’t been much “magical” about the L-word in recent decades. And it’s far more likely that reformers like Mead, instead of the calcified 4.0 liberals, find themselves getting denounced as “reactionaries.”

Liberalism just isn’t very popular in America. The semi-annual Gallup political identification poll found a declining percentage of Americans, just 21 percent, adopting the “liberal” label earlier this year. By way of comparison, 42 percent of respondents called themselves “conservative.” Gallup noted in June that if the trend continued for the remainder of 2010, conservatives would boast their largest annual share of the American public since this particular survey’s 1992 origin.

It wasn’t always so. John F. Kennedy, during the high-water mark of 20th century liberalism, could declare “I’m proud to say I’m a liberal” and win election to the presidency less than two months later. Kennedy defined, albeit platitudinously, a liberal as “someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people—their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties—someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad.” It is because what it means to be a liberal has changed so much in the half century since Kennedy uttered those words that liberalism’s fortune has declined so thoroughly.

Pages: 1 2

  • voted against carter

    Call them what you will, they are STILL PROGRESSIVE, LIBRAL, LEFTWING-NUT, LIBRATARD, DUMBOCRAT, A S S WIPES.

    • padraigcolman

      Could you provide a more polite definition of "liberal". I get it it that you detest them but it would be easier to fight them if we had a clearer definition of what they are.

  • GJT

    They are now moving to the No Labels moniker. Its easier to hide behind.

    • Stephen_Brady

      "No Labels" is a label. The term is self-referentially invalidating …

      • Karl

        There's ONLY one thing that makes us all the same, were all DIFFERENT, hence, a label.

  • BS77

    Did you see the liberal morons at NOW making a big fuss over Hooters restaurants, being "degrading to women"…..but not a PEEP about burqas, honor killings, FGM or the second class citizenship of women in the muz world….no, just more liberal silence.

  • MNWilliam

    Well written.

  • Gary from Jersey

    Mead is on to something when he challenges liberals to rethink ideas rather than labels. </>

    That's it in a nutshell. Liberals haven't had an original idea since WWll. They warm up some ancient feel-good bromide, play a guilt card then make a power grab. They then have no idea what to do with that power so they grab for more and demonize those who disagree.

    I have yet to meet a liberal who truly understands democracy, the Constitution or capitalism. Economics are lost on them, their arguments are juvenile emotional outburst of hate, suspicion and fantasy. They can't or won't think for themselves and fear and loathe anyone who challenges them even in the mildest way.

    Mead has a long wait if he thinks liberals can come close to meeting his challenge.

  • BeckNCall

    You can also find members of the LEFT here, I think this is their official club website: http://www.cpusa.org Here is a link if you care to join!

  • Fed_Republic

    Communism/Socialism Marches On!

    Hail to the hammer and sickle
    The fools retreat for the ignorant and fickle
    The long road to social slavery paved with blood
    The the tyranny of National Socialism the coming flood!

    Tell your friends and neighbors to come out of their MGMSM inculcated social stupor!

  • Fed_Republic

    Communism/Socialism Marches On!

    All hail the hammer and sickle
    A fools retreat for the ignorant and fickle!

  • http://starthere.sier.no/ north face store locator

    The interface is colorful, has more flair, and some cool features like ‘Mixview’ that let you quickly see related albums, songs, or other users related to what you’re listening to.