<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama-Style Socialism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=obama-style-socialism-2</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie Klunk</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-152451</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jackie Klunk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-152451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social justice in the Catholic faith is vastly different than the social justice espoused by the progressive.  In terms of faith, it refers to VOLUNTARY efforts to help those who are having difficulties (not just financial).  For progressives, it means TAKING from those that the progressives feel have too much, and transferring whatever they decide is &quot;just&quot; to whomever they think is deserving--that&#039;s Marxism.  So don&#039;t cloud the argument by accusing poser of disparaging us Catholics.  Most of us are smart enough to know the distinction. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social justice in the Catholic faith is vastly different than the social justice espoused by the progressive.  In terms of faith, it refers to VOLUNTARY efforts to help those who are having difficulties (not just financial).  For progressives, it means TAKING from those that the progressives feel have too much, and transferring whatever they decide is &quot;just&quot; to whomever they think is deserving&#8211;that&#39;s Marxism.  So don&#39;t cloud the argument by accusing poser of disparaging us Catholics.  Most of us are smart enough to know the distinction. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There IS such a thing as the &quot;public interest&quot; but it seems conservatives will go to any length to deny it. Why?&quot; 
 
There is no definition of &#039;public interest&#039; or &#039;social justice&#039;. These are infinitely elastic phrases which can mean anything. That&#039;s why.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;There IS such a thing as the &quot;public interest&quot; but it seems conservatives will go to any length to deny it. Why?&quot; </p>
<p>There is no definition of &#039;public interest&#039; or &#039;social justice&#039;. These are infinitely elastic phrases which can mean anything. That&#039;s why.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mitchell Langbert</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitchell Langbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was Plato who first argued for the abolition of private property (and private marriages and children).  See Karl Popper, Open Society and Its Enemies I: Plato.  Aristotle was not the first to argue for plurality and flexibility in states, but his argument against Plato&#039;s emphasis on unity in society (totalitarianism, in other words) is among the first arguments against the totalitarian creeds. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was Plato who first argued for the abolition of private property (and private marriages and children).  See Karl Popper, Open Society and Its Enemies I: Plato.  Aristotle was not the first to argue for plurality and flexibility in states, but his argument against Plato&#39;s emphasis on unity in society (totalitarianism, in other words) is among the first arguments against the totalitarian creeds. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not at all. I understand that not everyone is equal and that our country still holds the largest possibility of social mobility. Capitalism works best as an economic system because it is most analogous to nature. But, just like nature, the strong prey on the weak. That is why capitalism needs to be regulated, and why government needs to keep business--specifically, large corporations, in check. But they haven&#039;t been, because those corporations have bought the best access. Conservatives, willingly or unwillingly, have become the &quot;useful idiots&quot; for corporate interests. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all. I understand that not everyone is equal and that our country still holds the largest possibility of social mobility. Capitalism works best as an economic system because it is most analogous to nature. But, just like nature, the strong prey on the weak. That is why capitalism needs to be regulated, and why government needs to keep business&#8211;specifically, large corporations, in check. But they haven&#39;t been, because those corporations have bought the best access. Conservatives, willingly or unwillingly, have become the &quot;useful idiots&quot; for corporate interests. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My problem, Stephen, is this: 
 
Indeed we vote for our representatives in government. 
 
Then we are told &quot;government is not the solution; government is the problem.&quot; But I just voted for the guy! I can discern whether he&#039;s acting in my interests, or my notion of the public interest--and if not, I vote against him next time. So isn&#039;t goverment &quot;the problem&quot; simply because my interests conflict with your interests, democratically, and not for some unalterable ideal of &quot;government=bad?&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem, Stephen, is this: </p>
<p>Indeed we vote for our representatives in government. </p>
<p>Then we are told &quot;government is not the solution; government is the problem.&quot; But I just voted for the guy! I can discern whether he&#039;s acting in my interests, or my notion of the public interest&#8211;and if not, I vote against him next time. So isn&#039;t goverment &quot;the problem&quot; simply because my interests conflict with your interests, democratically, and not for some unalterable ideal of &quot;government=bad?&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 15:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, a lot of those people you disparage gave us the safe food, clean air, safe water, safe medicine, national parks, child labor laws, workplace safety regs, 8 hour work days...shall I go on? 
 
There IS such a thing as the &quot;public interest&quot; but it seems conservatives will go to any length to deny it. Why? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, a lot of those people you disparage gave us the safe food, clean air, safe water, safe medicine, national parks, child labor laws, workplace safety regs, 8 hour work days&#8230;shall I go on? </p>
<p>There IS such a thing as the &quot;public interest&quot; but it seems conservatives will go to any length to deny it. Why? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 14:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not at all. I understand that not everyone is equal and that our country still holds the largest possibility of social mobility. Capitalism works best as an economic system because it is most analogous to nature. But, just like nature, the strong prey on the weak. That is why capitalism needs to be regulated, and why government needs to keep business--specifically, large corporations, in check. But they haven&#039;t been, because those corporations have bought the best access. Conservatives, willingly or unwillingly, have become the &quot;useful idiots&quot; for corporate interests. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not at all. I understand that not everyone is equal and that our country still holds the largest possibility of social mobility. Capitalism works best as an economic system because it is most analogous to nature. But, just like nature, the strong prey on the weak. That is why capitalism needs to be regulated, and why government needs to keep business&#8211;specifically, large corporations, in check. But they haven&#039;t been, because those corporations have bought the best access. Conservatives, willingly or unwillingly, have become the &quot;useful idiots&quot; for corporate interests. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39962</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 14:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right. And your imaginative plan is &quot;Nothing to see here; I got mine!&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right. And your imaginative plan is &quot;Nothing to see here; I got mine!&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim C.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39964</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Then that&#039;s a lot of Catholics you just disparaged, since &quot;social justice&quot; is an explicit plank in Catholic teaching. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then that&#039;s a lot of Catholics you just disparaged, since &quot;social justice&quot; is an explicit plank in Catholic teaching. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Cal Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39313</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[So Cal Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 03:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone willing to use the phrase &quot;social justice&quot; with a straight face is either an idiot or a liar.  
Ask 1000 people what the term means and get ready to write 1000 different answers.  
That&#039;s why con men and dictators love it so much as do useful idiots.  
Jim C. if I were you, I&#039;d go back to where you were brainwashed and stupified and demand a refund FAST.        ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone willing to use the phrase &quot;social justice&quot; with a straight face is either an idiot or a liar.<br />
Ask 1000 people what the term means and get ready to write 1000 different answers.<br />
That&#039;s why con men and dictators love it so much as do useful idiots.<br />
Jim C. if I were you, I&#039;d go back to where you were brainwashed and stupified and demand a refund FAST.        </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Cal Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39312</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[So Cal Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 03:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hal, 
Let&#039;s vote on if it&#039;s ok to eat your family or you.   
Or perhaps we can just vote to make you slaves because we &quot;need to stop global warming.&quot;   
Or even better, let&#039;s vote to decide if it&#039;s permissible to eat cheese on Sunday or wear white socks on Saturday.   
Let&#039;s vote.  
How much faith and confidence do you really have in the outcome of voting?  
Up to some point THAT TRULY INVOLVES COLLECTIVE INTEREST WE SHOULD VOTE but so much private SPECIAL INTEREST gets put before the citizens in the name of the public interest, this process needs to be limited to truly public interests.  
On top of that, our politicians and news writers have mastered the language of promoting the &quot;public interest&quot; as their own that fewer than 8 or 9 out of 10 can actually discern which is which.      
today an ambitious liar can simply claim to care about health, the environment, children, endgangered species or people and 9 out of 10 are lost like a free safety on a good juke.  
See Ya!             ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hal,<br />
Let&#039;s vote on if it&#039;s ok to eat your family or you.<br />
Or perhaps we can just vote to make you slaves because we &quot;need to stop global warming.&quot;<br />
Or even better, let&#039;s vote to decide if it&#039;s permissible to eat cheese on Sunday or wear white socks on Saturday.<br />
Let&#039;s vote.<br />
How much faith and confidence do you really have in the outcome of voting?<br />
Up to some point THAT TRULY INVOLVES COLLECTIVE INTEREST WE SHOULD VOTE but so much private SPECIAL INTEREST gets put before the citizens in the name of the public interest, this process needs to be limited to truly public interests.<br />
On top of that, our politicians and news writers have mastered the language of promoting the &quot;public interest&quot; as their own that fewer than 8 or 9 out of 10 can actually discern which is which.<br />
today an ambitious liar can simply claim to care about health, the environment, children, endgangered species or people and 9 out of 10 are lost like a free safety on a good juke.<br />
See Ya!             </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty-Clinger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39263</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty-Clinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 02:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39263</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The word equal in the American Declaration of Independence refers to natural equal rights and equal application of just law securing those rights; not unnatural forced equal social and economic outcome. Forced equality of outcome represents social-engineering empowered by the injustice of unequal rights and inequality before law; leading to excessive collectivization of some people&#8217;s labored-for property - into the communal hands of self-serving Marxist-type government - which &#8220;re-distributes&#8221; that property to the labor-challenged in return for votes. All individuals are endowed with equal unalienable rights to life, liberty and labored-for property, and to equality before equal rights securing law &#8211; all men and women made equal in value and rights by the Creator and Great Equalizer &#8211; and all, except for the disabled, should therefore be taxed equally. If man is not made in the image of God then some will become, as in Animal Farm, &#8220;more equal than others&#8221; &#8211; a new elite ruling class of not-to-be-equalized equalizers &#8211; legal superiority based on unequal rights and unequal law. Equal rights and equal law is the essence of justice; unequal rights and unequal law is the essence of tyranny. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The word equal in the American Declaration of Independence refers to natural equal rights and equal application of just law securing those rights; not unnatural forced equal social and economic outcome. Forced equality of outcome represents social-engineering empowered by the injustice of unequal rights and inequality before law; leading to excessive collectivization of some people&rsquo;s labored-for property &#8211; into the communal hands of self-serving Marxist-type government &#8211; which &ldquo;re-distributes&rdquo; that property to the labor-challenged in return for votes. All individuals are endowed with equal unalienable rights to life, liberty and labored-for property, and to equality before equal rights securing law &ndash; all men and women made equal in value and rights by the Creator and Great Equalizer &ndash; and all, except for the disabled, should therefore be taxed equally. If man is not made in the image of God then some will become, as in Animal Farm, &ldquo;more equal than others&rdquo; &ndash; a new elite ruling class of not-to-be-equalized equalizers &ndash; legal superiority based on unequal rights and unequal law. Equal rights and equal law is the essence of justice; unequal rights and unequal law is the essence of tyranny. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rib/eve</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rib/eve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sure we won&#039;t agree on what is torture ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m sure we won&#039;t agree on what is torture </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rib/eve</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39299</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rib/eve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all my dear liberal, switch the brain on, before you write anything in public. 
 
Democrats just utter some fluffy words to make you feel that everyone will prosper and like a fool you believe it!  Did you ever give one minute of consideration to the depth of oppression the government will have to deal out to make everybody &quot;equal&quot;? 
 
Yes, I would like to be the arbitrator of who decides what is fair for you, and you and you.  And like a just arbitrator I&#039;m going to start with Steven because you opened your yap first and loudest!  Now lets see what you&#039;ve got!  What nifty things do you have that we need to distribute? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all my dear liberal, switch the brain on, before you write anything in public. </p>
<p>Democrats just utter some fluffy words to make you feel that everyone will prosper and like a fool you believe it!  Did you ever give one minute of consideration to the depth of oppression the government will have to deal out to make everybody &quot;equal&quot;? </p>
<p>Yes, I would like to be the arbitrator of who decides what is fair for you, and you and you.  And like a just arbitrator I&#039;m going to start with Steven because you opened your yap first and loudest!  Now lets see what you&#039;ve got!  What nifty things do you have that we need to distribute? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trickyblain</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39283</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trickyblain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 23:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, your none of those things. But you do cite to a website that&#039;s written by hacks, so I won&#039;t be calling you &quot;smart,&quot; either. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, your none of those things. But you do cite to a website that&#039;s written by hacks, so I won&#039;t be calling you &quot;smart,&quot; either. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty-Clinger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty-Clinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 23:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Natural equal rights (life, liberty, creative pursuit of happiness including labored-for private property) secured by equal law naturally leads to unequal outcomes - some people are smarter and some work harder. This is American Revolutionary Equality; and guess what - you are free because equal rights and equal law makes everyone free.  
 
Unnatural inequality of rights and unequal law is required to deliver unnatural equal property outcome. This is French/Marxist Revolutionary Equality; and guess what - you are not free because unequal rights and law binds down the creative laborer. It also turns out that the whole Marxist scheme requires collectivization of labored-for property. Those in charge of the pot are - as the Pigs of Animal Farm - &quot;More Equal Than Others&quot; - Superior in rights - Superior before law - Superior in property. 
 
Wake up and make your choice:  American Equality or Marxist Equality. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Natural equal rights (life, liberty, creative pursuit of happiness including labored-for private property) secured by equal law naturally leads to unequal outcomes &#8211; some people are smarter and some work harder. This is American Revolutionary Equality; and guess what &#8211; you are free because equal rights and equal law makes everyone free.  </p>
<p>Unnatural inequality of rights and unequal law is required to deliver unnatural equal property outcome. This is French/Marxist Revolutionary Equality; and guess what &#8211; you are not free because unequal rights and law binds down the creative laborer. It also turns out that the whole Marxist scheme requires collectivization of labored-for property. Those in charge of the pot are &#8211; as the Pigs of Animal Farm &#8211; &quot;More Equal Than Others&quot; &#8211; Superior in rights &#8211; Superior before law &#8211; Superior in property. </p>
<p>Wake up and make your choice:  American Equality or Marxist Equality. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judahlevi</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39233</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Judahlevi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 23:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives do not &quot;fear&quot; any term or phrase.  They are passionate about defending their freedoms.  Social justice, which can be interpreted as &quot;equal outcomes,&quot; is a false premise designed purely as a power play.  We all know that there can be no such thing as &quot;equal outcomes&quot; without the state using police power to strip you of earnings you created to give to those who did not have the creativity, work ethic, or ambition to create their own.   
 
Capitalism does not reward the &quot;strong&quot; it rewards the creative.  To use the terms &quot;strong&quot; and &quot;weak&quot; is a pathetic attempt at pity, a tactic used by those who cannot reason an argument so they attempt to distort any subject by some messy emotionalism.  If that is the extent of your mind, please spare us any further discussions.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Conservatives do not &quot;fear&quot; any term or phrase.  They are passionate about defending their freedoms.  Social justice, which can be interpreted as &quot;equal outcomes,&quot; is a false premise designed purely as a power play.  We all know that there can be no such thing as &quot;equal outcomes&quot; without the state using police power to strip you of earnings you created to give to those who did not have the creativity, work ethic, or ambition to create their own.   </p>
<p>Capitalism does not reward the &quot;strong&quot; it rewards the creative.  To use the terms &quot;strong&quot; and &quot;weak&quot; is a pathetic attempt at pity, a tactic used by those who cannot reason an argument so they attempt to distort any subject by some messy emotionalism.  If that is the extent of your mind, please spare us any further discussions.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty-Clinger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty-Clinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Democracy will inevitably devolve into a tyranny of the majority - a majority intent on subjugating any convenient minority - a majority coveting the property of the minority. The Founding Fathers rejected Democracy in favor of a Representative Constitutional Republic. This video explains the difference between Democracy and Republic, and the difference between &quot;Right&quot; and &quot;Left.&quot; 
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJfwa9XKZQ&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJfwa9XKZQ&lt;/a&gt; 
 
 
 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Democracy will inevitably devolve into a tyranny of the majority &#8211; a majority intent on subjugating any convenient minority &#8211; a majority coveting the property of the minority. The Founding Fathers rejected Democracy in favor of a Representative Constitutional Republic. This video explains the difference between Democracy and Republic, and the difference between &quot;Right&quot; and &quot;Left.&quot;<br />
 <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJfwa9XKZQ" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ODJfwa9XKZQ</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty-Clinger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Liberty-Clinger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights (along with the majority), which equal laws must protect...&quot;   Thomas Jefferson - First Inaugural Address 
 &lt;a href=&quot;http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/jefinau1.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/jefinau1....&lt;/a&gt; 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Bear in mind this sacred principle, that though the will of the majority is in all cases to prevail, that will, to be rightful, must be reasonable; that the minority possess their equal rights (along with the majority), which equal laws must protect&#8230;&quot;   Thomas Jefferson &#8211; First Inaugural Address<br />
 <a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/jefinau1.asp" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/jefinau1" rel="nofollow">http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/jefinau1</a>&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halliburton</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/david-horowitz/obama-style-socialism-2/comment-page-1/#comment-39261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halliburton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 22:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=59416#comment-39261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you voted against Carter, you voted against the only administration of his time that refused to condone torture.  That makes you a direct proponent of torture ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you voted against Carter, you voted against the only administration of his time that refused to condone torture.  That makes you a direct proponent of torture </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 694/717 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 06:08:26 by W3 Total Cache -->