Israel’s Strange “Peace Partners”

Pages: 1 2

The poll found that 51% of the interviewees supported this attack and 44% opposed it. It was somewhat more popular in Hamas-run Gaza, where 61% approved of it, than in the West Bank, where a minority of “only” 44% did so. The attack’s popularity clearly was not harmed by the fact that 49% thought Hamas’s motivation was to derail the talks—a goal shared by a large majority of the interviewees in any case.

This does not mean, however, that Hamas itself is popular. Asked whom they would vote for if new presidential elections were held today, 57% chose Abbas and only 36% Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas leader in Gaza. As for legislative elections, 45% would vote for Abbas’s Fatah and only 26% for Hamas. In both cases the results are almost identical to results obtained in June.

That is, Hamas did not gain popularity from the terror attack. It’s the attack itself that is popular among the Palestinians.

In another notable finding, it turns out that if presidential elections were held between Marwan Barghouti and Haniyeh, not only would participation in the elections increase considerably but Barghouti would trounce Haniyeh by 65%-30%. Barghouti, a Fatah figure, was one of the key leaders of the Second Intifada terror onslaught against Israel and is now serving a life sentence in Israel on five counts of murder (he was acquitted on 33 other charges of murder for lack of evidence). Clearly, this not only does not harm his popularity among the Palestinians but enhances it.

Also worthy of note is that, though Hamas-run Gaza is generally considered more dictatorial than the Fatah-run Palestinian Authority, 65% of West Bankers said they cannot criticize their government without fear and just about the identical total—66%—of Gazans said the same about their government.

Seemingly, those who fervently espouse Palestinian statehood in the West Bank and Gaza as a formula for peace should take note of these appalling findings. Supporters of Israel should demand that the Obama administration explain how creating a dictatorship whose population strongly backs terror, and whose leaders are likely to be terrorists, is consistent with American values and interests.

Pages: 1 2

  • stephencuz

    "Supporters of Israel should demand that the Obama administration explain how creating a dictatorship whose population strongly backs terror, and whose leaders are likely to be terrorists, is consistent with American values and interests."
    A precise question David. Will the W.H. answer it? I think they figure they won't have to answer it. You're just a clanging cymbal. The W.H. can endure the brief scrutiny and let it die with the help of the MSM and our public attention span of a gnat.

  • Conservative Ike

    The only peace the Palestinians want is when the State of Israel is demolished and all Jews are killed. Isn't is strange there is no demand for the terrorists to stop killling Jews and for the rockets to stop before talks can continue.

    President Obama's anti-colonialism is showing. Read the book he wrote–Dreams of My Father.

    Anm Old Warrior

    • BoogiesDaddy

      That book is "Dreams FROM my Father". Big difference.

      • Guest

        doesn't matter the name – his goal is his father's dreams…

  • PAthena

    "Peace" talks between Arabs and Israel are ridiculous. There would be peace instantly if the Arabs stopped attacking Israel. The conflict is purely religious. (See Martin Gilbert's new book about Muslim antisemitism – hatred of Jews.)
    The anti-Israel, anti-Jewish crowd, has hijacked the traditional name for Jews, "Palestinian," for non-Jews, a consequence of the founding of the "Palestine Liberation Organization" by the Soviet Union and Egypt in Cairo in 1964.
    The Roman Emperor Hadrian changed the name of Judea to "Palestina" in 135 A.D. after he had defeated the last Jewish uprising under Bar Kochba. He wanted to eradicate all memory of Judea and Judaism (he outlawed Judaism). Since that time, "Palestine" became synonymous with "land of the Jews" or "the Holy Land" (since Jesus was a Jew), and "Palestinian" synonymous with "Jew." That is why the Zionists wanted the "Palestine Mandate" and why Great Britain was awarded the "Palestine Mandate" after World War I as the "homeland of the Jews."
    Israel should certainly not give up any territory, including the propaganda-named "West Bank," namely, Judea and Samaria, for a "Palestinian" state named "Palestine." It should not give up any territory it controls, in any case, for military reasons, and the Arabs, as phony "Palestinians" do not deserve yet another state. The only "Palestinians" are the Jews, with the state of Israel.

    • muchiboy

      "The only "Palestinians" are the Jews, with the state of Israel."

      Down with the Palestinians! Now you can't accuse me of any bias towards the Palestinians.Muchiboy

      • MixMChess

        "Now you can't accuse me of any bias"

        Says the Rhodesian racist….

  • Maria

    VIDEO Stakelbeck on Terror: Fighting the ‘Blame Israel First’ Crowd

    On this week’s edition of Stakelbeck on Terror, CBN News sits down for an exclusive interview with the former president of Spain, Jose Maria Aznar. He says he’s had enough of the “blame Israel first” crowd and has started a major global initiative to fight back against Israel’s critics.

    Then, we head to France for a shocking CBN News exclusive. See how Muslims have taken over the streets of Paris in direct violation of French law.

    Also watch the conclusion of CBN News’ analysis of the Muslim Brotherhood in America and possible solutions for defeating the group’s threat.

    Plus, see part two of the interview with Dani Dayan, chairman of the Yesha Council for Jewish communities in Judea, Samaria and Gaza. In Part one, he discussed the national security disaster that would result if Israel gave up the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Now, Dayan gives a history lesson of the region.

    And in the “Sharia Flaw” segment, radical Muslims join a notorious leftist to raise money for the terrorist group Hamas — inside an American mosque.….

  • badaboo

    "Peace Partners " ? The term in and of itself is a farce . Peace talks are a GAME , that is played out endlessly .Hudna is all that ever will be offered by the Palestinians , and they actaully say as much freely . Temporary peace until they gain enough stregnth to destroy Israel . But the position of the U S has been to engage this game , and all the Presidents have played it to one extent or another .Truman was the only one of them who had nothing to gain in any way by his support …he cared not about the arabs nor their oil, indeed he even defied his own cabinet .

  • muchiboy

    "Supporters of Israel should demand that the Obama administration explain how creating a dictatorship whose population strongly backs terror, and whose leaders are likely to be terrorists, is consistent with American values and interests."

    We have seen this all before,governments being formed by ex terrorist,liberation types.It would be nothing new.As for America supporting dictatorships,read your own modern history and the part the CIA played in foreign interventions when it was in her interest to do so.
    One would have to question American values and interests in light of her partners involvement in the large scale ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people,crimes against humanity and war crimes.Muchiboy

    • MixMChess

      Quit with the lies… the only nation that has ethnically cleansed the Palestinians is Jordan during "black September." Of course you wouldn't know this since you only pretend to know the "history" and "facts" of the region.

  • aspacia

    This will never end until one side annihilate the other, and I hope Israel annihilates Hamas, Fatah, Hizbollah, and any other enemies.