Nobel Prize winning report on ‘global warming’ wasn’t peer reviewed after all

What a shocker!

Forty citizen auditors from 12 countries examined 18,500 sources cited in the report – finding 5,600 to be not peer-reviewed.

Contrary to statements by the chairman of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the celebrated 2007 report does not rely solely on research published in reputable scientific journals. It also cites press releases, newspaper and magazine clippings, student theses, newsletters, discussion papers, and literature published by green advocacy groups. Such material is often called “grey literature.”

In November, IPCC chairman Rajendra Pachauri disparaged non-peer-reviewed research in an interview with the Times of India:

“IPCC studies only peer-review science. Let someone publish the data in a decent credible publication. I am sure IPCC would then accept it, otherwise we can just throw it into the dustbin.”

Hey, Raj, I think you mean the blue bin, wot?

As I’ve told you before, these findings are being reported on by independent Canadian journalist Donna Laframboise, who is most certainly NOT employed by any major news organization.

Luckily, she’s writing a book about her research. Sign up to find out when it will be ready to read. I for one can’t wait.