- FrontPage Magazine - http://www.frontpagemag.com -

Obama’s Pivot-able Moment?

Posted By Rich Trzupek On December 14, 2010 @ 12:11 am In FrontPage | 9 Comments


The jury is still out, but there are indications that Barack Obama is gritting his teeth and doing what many conservatives believed he could never bring himself to do: executing a Clintonesque pivot toward the center. Many on the right doubt the conviction of Obama’s apparent conversion, but even among those who believe that the president is indeed veering away from his cherished far-left path there is a stark difference of opinion on what that might mean. One school of thought [2] maintains that the nation will be spared the worst consequences of implementing even more leftist policies and Obama’s pivot is therefore necessary and welcomed. Another group of conservatives wishes that the president would stubbornly stick to his leftist course and thus drive the nation “out of the ditch” and over a cliff, thereby proving in no uncertain terms how dangerous and disconnected the progressive movement is.

Few issues so united the left in their conviction that George W. Bush was a lackey of the rich and powerful than Bush’s tax cuts. For years, progressives have blamed our current economic woes on those cuts and the president himself embraced the theory. And yet, in the wake of a devastating rejection of his party last month, Obama now not only wants to extend the Bush tax cuts, his chief economic advisor says that it’s vital to do so, unless we want to risk a “double-dip” recession. Sure, the president has dutifully tried to distance himself from that portion of the tax deal that involves “the rich,” but at the end of the day Obama protesteth too much. If the president truly believes that increasing tax rates on job creators would be beneficial to the nation and its economic health, there is no way that he would have gone along with this deal. Obama is trying to have it both ways: supporting the policies that he knows – that everyone knows – represent the shortest path to recovery, even as he tries to assure his far-leftist base that he has little choice in the matter.

The Senate signaled its willingness to go along with the deal, voting 83 to 15 [3] to move the tax bill along in the legislative process. Almost every Senator who approved the measure expressed reservations about particular provisions, but both Democrats and Republicans in the upper chamber believe it’s better to pass a flawed bill than to let tax rates rise. The outcome is less certain in the House, though Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said he was confident it would pass, if there is some increase in the estate tax. That could prove to be a sticking point, since Republican Senators maintain they will not compromise on the issue if the House passes a modified version of the bill. For his part, the President sounded almost happy after the crucial Senate vote. “I am pleased to announce at this hour the United States Senate is moving forward on a package of tax cuts that has strong bipartisan support,” he said. “And this proves that both parties can in fact work together to grow our economy and look out for the American people.” What a difference an election makes. The “party of no” has now become half of the bipartisan formula Obama said he wanted to employ to bring America together. Perhaps one can do business with hostage-takers after all? Though it’s not certain that Obama will continue along the path to the middle, his willingness to work with his political enemies on this issue is at least a step in the right direction.

Obama’s hawkish stance on the war in Afghanistan is even more revealing. Nine years after U.S boots first hit the ground in Afghanistan to help the Northern Alliance oust the Taliban, war weariness in America has clearly set in. A Quinnipiac poll in November [4] showed overall support for the U.S. mission in Afghanistan in negative territory for the first time, with 44 percent of the public supporting the U.S. role, and 50 percent opposing it. Nonetheless, in a recent surprise visit with troops serving on the front line, Obama spoke of taking the fight to the enemy [5], rather than defensively reacting to our opponents’ desires. “We said we were going to break the Taliban’s momentum,” Obama told the troops. “And that’s what you’re doing. You’re going on the offense, tired of playing defense, targeting their leaders, pushing them out of their strongholds.”

We’ve been here before. Bill Clinton toyed with the idea of using leftist ideology as a roadmap of governance when he was elected president in 1992. America decisively rejected such a dramatic shift in 1994, embracing the conservative principles that Newt Gingrich so articulately defined in the GOP’s “Contract With America.” From the Democrats’ perspective, the election of 1994 left their party and their causes in smoking ruins. But Bill Clinton, who has never hesitated to embrace a strategy that benefitted Bill Clinton, saw the writing on the wall and swung toward the center will a seemingly effortless ease.

Clinton abandoned “Hillarycare,” embraced welfare reform and – in large part if not in every detail – moved toward the middle in order to reap the benefits of the anti-leftist sentiments that were then sweeping the county. Bill Clinton was and is no ideologue. He did and continues to do whatever is necessary to advance the fame and fortune of Bill Clinton. He remains a hero on the left, even though his record demonstrates that he’s far less committed to the progressive agenda than he is to self-aggrandizement. No matter. With his administration and his progressive goals in deep, deep trouble, Barack Obama turned to Bill Clinton [6] to rescue the current administration during a press conference on Friday. The result was a study in contrasts. The politically savvy ex-President effortlessly assumed the leadership role [7], fielding questions with typical grace and style, using his disarming public persona to put everyone at ease.

On the other hand, Barack Obama fled the podium soon after Bill Clinton started talking. While Clinton smoothly engaged reporters, the president of the United States escaped to attend a Christmas party that was apparently far more important than the nation’s business. The bottom line seems to be that Barack Obama wants to find a way out of the ideological cul-de-sac that he has driven his nation, but doing so galls him. His conciliatory words following Monday’s Senate vote probably came hard for the President, but had he continued to publicly lash out at conservatives and progressive purists it would have only made him seem even more childishly petulant and bitter. If Obama is to continue moving toward the center, Republican’s will have to keep up the pressure. This deeply narcissistic president won’t like that a bit, but the citizens of the nation he is supposed to be leading will much happier than they are at the moment.

Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://www.frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2010/rich-trzupek/obama%e2%80%99s-pivot-able-moment/

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://frontpagemag.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/Obama_Clinton_Will_t300.gif

[2] One school of thought: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/251097/gingrich-obama-has-six-months-pivot-robert-costa

[3] voting 83 to 15: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/13/tax-cut-package-faces-senate-test/

[4] A Quinnipiac poll in November: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obama-makes-surprise-trip-afghanistan/story?id=12303710&page=2

[5] Obama spoke of taking the fight to the enemy: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101203/ap_on_re_as/as_obama

[6] Barack Obama turned to Bill Clinton: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/10/facing-anger-left-obama-meet-clinton/

[7] effortlessly assumed the leadership role: http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/scott-whitlock/2010/12/13/networks-thrill-over-awesome-amazing-atmosphere-bill-clinton-press-c

Copyright © 2015 FrontPage Magazine. All rights reserved.