Learning From Winston Churchill – by Tony Blankley

churchillDM0302_468x542

Over the Christmas holiday, I read a couple of books that, at least for me, may provide some guidance in the upcoming tumultuous and probably consequential year. The first book was Munich, 1938 by David Faber (grandson of former British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan), by far the most authoritative book on that world-changing event.

Beyond the obvious policy point that appeasement is generally bad, the value of the book is in its dissection of how the experienced leadership class of the then-leading power — the British Empire — was able to think, talk and deceive itself to a catastrophically bad policy decision. The author reveals in minute example how domestic politics, leaks and counter leaks to major newspapers shaped — and misshaped — both vital foreign policy judgment and how the world construed and misconstrued British strategic thinking.

The author also reveals in fresh details the well-known story of how Winston Churchill, Duff Cooper and a handful of others — in and out of government — dissented from the policy.

The other half of the story of Munich, 1938 was events in Germany, where, unlike in Britain, the problem was a war policy advocated by Hitler that was opposed by most of the institutional leadership (including many of the very top generals) and by the general public, which feared another war. (As Hitler paraded his armored columns through Berlin in preparation for entering Czechoslovakia, according to a witness, “(T)he people of Berlin ducked into subways, refused to look on, and the handful that did stood at the curb in utter silence. It was the most striking demonstration against the war I’ve ever seen.” Hitler watched it from a window and, in furious contempt of the German people, complained that “With such people I cannot wage war.” Of course he did, in part because of what the author points out was Hitler’s “exceptional insight into the tendency of men torn between conscience and self-interest to welcome what made it easier to opt for the latter.”)

The second book is a new short biography of Winston Churchill by the prolific English writer Paul Johnson. It has the advantage of being probably the last Churchill biography that will be written by an author who personally knew the great man — and is filled with personal tidbits that bring further color to the well-known story of Churchill’s life.

At a mere 166 pages, the book, among other things, encapsulates how to dissent on the great policies of war and peace by a politician who is both personally ambitious and honorable.

 

It also brings to life how such a man fights on in the face of overwhelming public opposition and elite scorn. These are lessons we need to learn and practice here in America in 2010.

The author identifies five Churchillian attributes that guided his eventual success: 1) He aimed high, but never cadged or demeaned himself to gain office or objectives, 2) there was no substitute for hard work — even though he was brilliant, 3) Churchill “never allowed mistakes, disasters — personal or national — accidents, illnesses, unpopularity, and criticism to get him down. His powers of recuperation, both in physical illness and in psychological responses to abject failure, were astounding,” 4) Churchill wasted extraordinarily small amounts of energy on hatred, recrimination, malice, revenge grudges, rumor mongering or vendettas. Energy expended on hate was energy lost to productive activity, and 5) he always had something other than politics to give joy to his life.

My old boss Newt Gingrich used to say that he studied history as a practical guide for a working politician and political activist. And it is with that in mind that I offer the foregoing.

2010 is going to be a tough year. We are going to have huge struggles over terrorism, war, shockingly large new deficits and public debt policies, crushing tax proposals on energy, income, health care and many other human activities. We have every right to dissent, and to do so vigorously even on such matters as terrorism policy.

Contrary to White House and Democratic Party complaints in the last few days, there is nothing partisan or improper about sharply criticizing such administration policy. As a loyal conservative Republican, I nonetheless wrote an entire book in 2005 criticizing Bush’s anti-terrorism policy and operations. As did many other conservative Republicans dissent. At a much, much grander level, Winston Churchill in the 1930s powerfully dissented from a policy of appeasement that Britain’s leaders at the time were convinced were vital to secure the peace. Dissenting with honesty, ferocity and courage is one of Churchill’s lessons to us today.

And, whether fighting as an underdog in a political struggle or trying to keep things together as a breadwinner in this second hard economic winter, Churchill’s last words in his last speech in Parliament as prime minister in 1955 are sturdy guides to conduct: “Meanwhile, never flinch, never weary, never despair.”

  • wildjew

    I've got a few books written by conservative pundits like Tony Blankley. I must confess to not having yet read Blankley's 2005 book entitled, “The West's Last Chance: Will We Win the Clash of Civilizations?” I've got to question Blankley's assertion that he “wrote an entire book in 2005 (sharply) criticizing Bush’s anti-terrorism policy and operations.” I've not seen any conservative or Republican conservative whom I consider credible sharply criticize Mr. Bush's appeasement policies. Sure Obama is much, much worse. Obama is a liberal democrat; maybe even a marxist. There is no excuse for Bush's appeasement policies nor his misleading the American people about the enemy.

    Just a couple of reviews of Blankley's book at Amazon lead me to question his assertion:

    1) “The author begins by exposing our disorganized and weak response (to radical Islam) which he attributes to a flaw of human nature…..”

    A flaw in human nature. A flaw in human nature is not a sharp criticism of President Bush's policies.

    2) “Tony Blankley's The West's Last Chance is a wake-up call for the West to recognize the dangers it faces from radical Islam. It draws heavily upon history and current events to illuminate this threat, makes its case convincingly, and concludes with a recommended course of action.

    “My only reservations about the book (not significant enough to deny it 5 stars) are that Blankley can get a tad politically correct himself when analyzing Islam, and for all his passion about how Islamofascism needs as robust a response as the West gave Nazism and Japanese imperialism, he pulls his punches.

    “On the subject of endless jihad, he makes the same fundamental, erroneous assumption that many in the commentariat make: that the fundamentalist front line terrorists are some sort of aberration from mainstream Islam, which is somehow, by contrast, passive and pacific. This is the Big Lie that Muslims have so far been very successful at propagating, with Tony Blankley just another victim. An honest assessment is that the Islamist terrorists' actions are not based on some sort of poison injected into Islam by Whahabbists or the Muslim Brotherhood. Instead, everything they say comes straight from the Koran…..”

    This is the falsehood that President Bush propagated for eight long years, which the reviewer attributes to Mr. Blankley as well. Namely, “that the fundamentalist front line terrorists are some sort of aberration from mainstream Islam, which is somehow, by contrast, passive and pacific.”

  • http://www.compellingconversations.com Eric the sceptic

    Informative, illuminating, and helpful during these difficult times of profound political misleadership.

    Thank you. And I will try to follow Churchill's advice: “Meanwhile, never flinch, never weary, never despair.”

  • USMCSniper

    Obama will have to learn from Churchill – (slightly modified)

    “If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of victory. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, nd only a small chance of survival.”

  • ozdragon

    This is a great Churchill quote, but I must correct it:
    “If you will not fight for the right when you can easily win without bloodshed; if you will not fight when your victory will be sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a small chance of victory. There may even be a worse case: you may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, (for it is better to die than to live as a slave).”

  • USMCSniper

    I said slightly modified….and this was to fit the nature of our enemies.

  • xyz

    Sniper, As usual, you are correct. Unfortunately, Obama returned the sculpture of Churchill to Britain. Does this tell us anything?

  • http://hubpages.com/hub/Test-Drive-Unlimited-CD-Key Test Drive Unlimited CD Key

    I’m having a little bit of trouble viewing your site in Internet Explorer, but it may just be my computer. Apart from that, I love your site. I plan on surfing around and checking out some more posts!

  • Pete Stepovich

    Tony,

    I too am a Churchill admirer. Churchill was an amalgam of the human experience, British aristocracy or not. Stiff upper lip and an aire of upper class privilege, yet a concern for the common man and societies ills. He was a 20th century renaissance man and a pragmatist. He had the tools for the job at hand.

    More than most of today’s leaders he actually lived a life that embodied the experiences of a wide spectrum of society. Aristocrat, rebel, student, soldier, politician(both winner and loser),leader, painter, husband, father. The full plate of human experience. Therein lay his greatest asset, which allowed him to so masterfully relate to the events and crises of the day.