The Story of Arab Apartheid

Pages: 1 2

The real “nakba,” the Palestinian-termed great “catastrophe” of the creation of Israel, is the story of Arab apartheid. Tens of millions, among them Jews, suffered from the “nakba,” which included dispossession, expulsion and displacement. Yet only the Palestinians remained refugees because they were treated to abuse and oppression by Arab countries. Below is the story of the real “nakba.”

In 1959, the Arab League passed Resolution 1457, which states as follows: “The Arab countries will not grant citizenship to applicants of Palestinian origin in order to prevent their assimilation into the host countries.” That is a stunning resolution, which was diametrically opposed to international norms in everything pertaining to refugees in those years, particularly in that decade. The story began, of course, in 1948, when the Palestinian “nakba” occurred. It was also the beginning of the controversy of the Arab-Israeli conflict, with the blame heaped on Israel, because it allegedly expelled Palestinian refugees, turning them into miserable wretches. This lie went public through academe and the media dealing with the issue.

In previous articles on the issue of the Palestinians, I explained that there is nothing special about the Israeli-Arab conflict. Here’s why:

First, Arab countries refused to accept the proposal of Israel-Palestine partition, and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel, which had barely been established. All precedents on this matter show that the party that starts the war — and with a declaration of annihilation — pays a price for it.

Second, this entails a population exchange: indeed, between 550,000 and 710,000 Arabs fled the area (the most precise calculation is that of Prof. Ephraim Karash, who calculated and found that their number ranges between 583,000 and 609,000).  A minority were expelled because of the war, and a larger number of about 850,000 Jews were expelled or fled from Arab countries (the “Jewish nakba”).

Third, the Palestinians are not unique in this story. Population exchanges and expulsions were the norm at that time. They occurred in dozens of other conflict points, and about 52 million people experienced dispossession, expulsion and uprooting (see: ”And the World Is Lying”).

And fourth, in all the population exchange precedents that occurred during or at the end of an armed conflict, or against the backdrop of either the establishment of a national entity or the disintegration of a multinational state and the establishment of a national entity, there was no return of refugees to the previous region, which had turned into a new national state. The displaced persons and the refugees, with almost no exceptions, found sanctuary in the place in which they joined a population with a similar background. For example, the ethnic Germans who were expelled from Central and Eastern Europe assimilated in Germany, the Hungarian refugees from Czechoslovakia and other places found sanctuary in Hungary, the Ukrainians who were expelled from Poland found sanctuary in Ukraine, and so forth. The affinity between the Arabs who originated in mandatory Palestine and their neighbors in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon, was, in fact, similar or even greater than the affinity between many ethnic Germans and Germany, sometimes after a disconnect of many generations.

Only the Arab states acted completely differently from the rest of the world. They crushed the refugees, despite the fact that they were their coreligionists and members of the Arab nation. In the words of Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian leader: “The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny, but instead they abandoned them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, imposed upon them a political and ideological blockade and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live in Eastern Europe” (from the official journal of the PLO, Falastin el-Thawra, “What We Have  Learned and What We Should Do,” Beirut, March 1976).

They Arab states, not Israel, instituted a régime of apartheid. So, we must remember that the “nakba” was not caused by actual dispossession, which had also been experienced by tens of millions of others. The “nakba” is the story of the apartheid and abuse suffered by the Arab refugees (it was only later that they became “Palestinians”) in Arab countries.

Apartheid in Egypt

Throughout many eras, there was no real distinction between the inhabitants of Egypt and the inhabitants of the coastal plain. Both were Muslim Arabs, who lived under Ottoman rule. According to the researcher Oroub El-Abed, commercial ties, mutual migration, and intermarriage between the two groups were commonplace. Many of the residents of Jaffa (now in Israel) were defined as Egyptians because they arrived in many waves, like the wave of immigration to Jaffa during the rule of Muhammad Ali and his son over many parts of the coastal plain. Inhabitants of the Ottoman Empire, which became mandatory Palestine, did not have an ethnic or religious identity that differed from that of the Egyptian Arabs.

Various records from the end of 1949 show that 202,000 refugees went to the Gaza Strip, primarily from Jaffa, Beer Sheva and Majdal (Ashkelon). That number may be exaggerated because the local poor also joined the list of aid recipients. The refugees went to the place where they were part of the majority group from all standpoints: ethnic, national and religious. Egypt, however, did not think so. At first, back in September 1948, a “government of all Palestine” was established, headed by Ahmad al-Baki. However, it was an organization under Egyptian auspices due to the rivalry with Jordan. The nascent Palestinian government gave up the venture after a decade.

What happened to the people in the Gaza Strip? How did the Egyptians treat them? Strangely, there is almost no research dealing with those days. But it is a bit difficult to hide that not so distant past. The Gaza Strip became a closed camp. It became almost impossible to leave Gaza. Severe restrictions were imposed on the Gazans (the originals and the refugees) in everything connected with employment, education and other matters. Every night, there was a curfew until dawn the next day. There was only one matter in which the Egyptians assisted to the best of their ability: the school books contained serious incitement against Jews. Already in 1950, Egypt notified the UN that “due to the population crowding,” it would not be possible to assist the Palestinians by resettling them. That was a dubious excuse. Egypt thwarted the UN proposal to resettle 150,000 refugees in Libya. Many of the refugees who had fled in the earlier stages and were within Egypt were also forced to move to the giant concentration camp that was forming in the Gaza Strip. In effect, all the settlement arrangements proposed for resettling the refugees were blocked by the Arab countries.

Despite the absolute isolation, there is testimony about what happened in the Gaza Strip during those years. The important American journalist Martha Gellhorn paid a visit to the refugee camps in 1961. She also went to the Gaza Strip. It wasn’t simple. Gellhorn described the bureaucratic ordeal involved in obtaining an entry permit to the Gaza Strip and the days of waiting in Cairo. She also described the “sharp contrast between the amiability of the clerks, and the anti-Semitic propaganda that blossomed in Cairo.” “The Gaza Strip is not a hole,” Gellhorn stated, “but rather one big prison. The Egyptian government and is the warden.” She described a harsh military régime with all the elite of the Gaza Strip expressing enthusiastically pro-Nasser positions. Thus, for example, “For 13 years (1948-1961) only 300 refugees managed to obtain temporary exit visas.” The only thing that the Egyptians gave the Palestinians was hate propaganda.

That is not the only testimony. In 1966, a Saudi newspaper published a letter by one of the inhabitants of the Gaza Strip:

I would be happy if the Gaza Strip would be conquered by Israel. At least that way we would know that the one violating our honor, hurting us and tormenting us – would be the Zionist oppressor, Ben Gurion, and not an Arab brother whose name is Abdel Nasser. The Jews under Hitler did not suffer the way we are suffering under Nasser. In order to go to Cairo or Alexandria or other cities, we have to go through an ordeal.

Radio Jedda in Saudi Arabia broadcast the following:

We are aware of the laws that prohibit Palestinians from working in Egypt. We have to ask Cairo, what is the Iron Curtain that Abdel Nasser and his gang have raised around the Gaza Strip and the refugees? The military governor in Gaza has prohibited every Arab from traveling to Cairo without a military permit, which is valid for only 24 hours. Imagine, Arabs, how Nasser, who claims to be the pioneer of Arab nationalism, treats the wretched Arabs of Gaza, who are starving to death while the military governor and his officers enjoy the riches in the Gaza Strip.

Even assuming that those were exaggerated descriptions in the struggle between Saudi Arabia and Nasser, we are still left with an oppressive régime of two decades. And it is worth noting another fact: when Israel arrived in the Gaza Strip, the life expectancy there was 48 years of age. After a little over two decades, the life expectancy has jumped to 72 years of age, past that of Egypt. More than the fact that this awards points to Israel, it also shows the abyss in which the Gaza Strip found itself during the days of the Egyptian régime.

Refugees from mandatory Palestine also lived in Egypt itself. Many of them did not even feel that they were Palestinians and preferred to assimilate. The Egyptians prevented them from doing so. Except for a short period of time that was considered the “golden age,” during some of the years of Nasser’s rule, which did not include the Gaza refugees. Even those who were in Egypt suffered from restrictions on purchasing land, engaging in certain professions and education (for example, there was a prohibition on the establishment of a Palestinian school). The Egyptian citizenship law allowed citizenship for someone whose father was Egyptian, and later, the law was expanded to anyone whose mother was Egyptian. In actuality, however, restrictions were imposed on anyone considered a Palestinian. Even the decision of an Egyptian court canceling the restrictions did not help.

The new régime in Egypt has recently promised change. The change, even if it happens, cannot erase many years of discrimination, which was tantamount to collective punishment. Thus, for example, in 1978, Egyptian Minister of Culture Yusouf al-Shib’ai was murdered in Cyprus by a member of Abu Nidal’s group. In reprisal, the Palestinians suffered a new wave of attacks, and the Egyptian parliament renewed legislation restricting the Palestinians in education and employment services.

Apartheid in Jordan

Precisely like the identification and unity between the Arabs of Jaffa and southern Israel and the Arabs of Egypt, similar identification exists between the Arabs of the West Bank and the Arabs of Jordan. Thus, for example, the Bedouin of the Majalis (or Majilis) tribe from the al-Karak region are originally from Hebron. During the days of the Ottoman Empire, Eastern Jordan was part of the Damascus district, like other parts of what later came under the auspices of the British Palestinian Mandate. According to the Balfour declaration, the area now called Jordan was supposed to be part of the Jewish national homeland.

The initial distress of the refugees on both sides of the Jordan River was enormous. For example, Iraqi soldiers controlled the area of Nablus, and there is testimony about “the Iraqi soldiers taking the children of the rich for acts of debauchery and returning the children to their families the next day, the inhabitants are frequently arrested.” Indeed, Arab solidarity.

It seemed that Jordan treated the refugees differently. Under a 1954 Jordanian law, any refugee who lived in the area of Jordan between 1948 and 1954 was given the right to citizenship. However, that was only the outward façade. Below is a description of the reality under the Jordanian régime in the West Bank:

We have never forgotten and we will never forget the nature of the régime that degraded our honor and trampled our human feelings. A régime that was built on an inquisition and the boots of the desert people. We lived for a long time under the humiliation of the Arab nationalism and it hurts to say that we had to wait for the Israeli conquest in order to become aware of humane relations with civilians.

It should be noted that these statements were published in the name of critics of the Israeli occupation of the West Bank in an interview with the Lebanese newspaper Al Hawadith on April 23, 1971.

As in all other Arab countries, Jordan did not do a thing to dismantle the refugee camps. While Israel was absorbing hundreds of thousands of refugees from Europe and the Arab countries in similar camps (transit camps), and undergoing a punishing process of rehabilitation, building new settlements and dismantling the camps, Jordan did exactly the opposite and prevented any process of rehabilitation. During those same two decades, not one institution of higher learning was established in the West Bank. The flowering of higher education began in the 1970s, after the Israelis took control.

Even the citizenship that was given to the refugees was mainly for the sake of appearances. Despite the fact that the Palestinians number over 50% of the inhabitants of Jordan, they hold only 18 seats – out of 110 – in the Jordanian parliament, and only 9 senators out of 55, who are appointed by the king. It should also be recalled that during just one month, September 1970, in one confrontation, Jordan killed many more Palestinians than all the Palestinians who have been hurt in the 43 years of Israeli rule over the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

Apartheid in Syria

The first Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations, the first Palestinian Arab conference, was held in Jerusalem in 1919. At the conference, it was decided that Palestine, which had just been conquered by the British, was southern Syria — an integral part of greater Syria. Over the years of the mandate, the immigration from Syria into the British mandate territory increased, for example, the Al-Hourani family, which arrived from the Houran in Syria. The idea of “greater Syria,” which included mandatory Palestine, was also reflected in the growing involvement of Syrians in the great Arab rebellion and in the gangs that arrived from Syria during the War of Independence. The refugees, therefore, were not strangers politically, religiously or ethnically. To the contrary, their fate should not have been different from the fate of other ethnic groups who were expelled to a place in which they constituted the national and cultural majority.

Between 70,000 and 90,000 refugees arrived in Syria, the decisive majority of them from Safed, Haifa, Tiberias and Acre. Thus, in 1954, they were granted partial rights, which did not include political rights. Until 1968, they were prohibited from holding property. Syrian law enables any Arab citizens to obtain Syrian citizenship, provided that his permanent residence is in Syria and he has a proven capacity for economic subsistence. However, the Palestinians are the only ones outside the applicability of the law. Even if they are permanent residents and possess means, the law prevents them from obtaining citizenship.

Pages: 1 2

  • EricD

    This is one of the best pieces I have read. I commend the author for his presentation.

  • aspacia

    I have countered Muslims regarding these fact only to be told that those are Zionist Lies. There never will be peace until one side annihilates the other.

    • tanstaafl

      More Islamic projection.

    • ahmadnb

      I happen to be a strong Muslim who is also pro-Israel. This article doesn't surprise me at all…there's a lot more than what this article talks about, which is why I find it completely believable.

      Israel should just annex the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. End of story. And if the Palestinian refugees there refuse to accept Israeli citizenship and quit fighting Israel, they should be expelled. It's what i would do.

      • aspacia

        Awesome, another courageous Muslim:-) Now, write to Zudi Jasser of AIFD, another courageous, patriotic Muslims: http://www.aifdemocracy.org/

        • ahmadnb

          I know of him but haven't contacted him yet. Ever heard of Stephen Schwartz? He was instrumental in turning my opinion in Israel's favor. He's a convert to Islam with a Jewish/Christian/leftist background.

        • ahmadnb

          BTW, thanks for the link.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        I happen to be a strong Muslim who is also pro-Israel.

        For that absurdity to be true, you would have to be dead already, as any Muslim that doesn’t strive and advocate for the annihilation of Israel isn’t a Muslim at all but instead a blasphemous apostate that must be executed, which also unequivocally indicates at the same time, by the way, that you aren’t a Muslim at all

        And if the Palestinian refugees there refuse to accept Israeli citizenship and quit fighting Israel, they should be expelled. It's what i would do.

        Of course, that is what you would do, because as your first statement above indicates, you don’t have the first clue about Islam.

        • ahmadnb

          I wasn't talking to you. Your opinion means as much to me as a yellow dog's growl.

          • aspacia

            Meant as an insult, but you are talking to Americans, usually U.S. citizens who happen to love yellow dogs, especially Golden Retrievers.

          • ahmadnb

            Golden retrievers look nice. What I meant here, as you may have guessed, is a rabid dog. That individual is, in my opinion, rabid. Nothing satisfies it. It's arguments against me are not grounded in anything but ignorance, fear and hatred. There's no logic to them.

          • aspacia

            No, I had no idea. Many in the West love dogs, in contrast most from your neck of the woods consider dogs unclean.

            How about a rat's a$$.

        • ahmadnb

          You know as much about Islam, Islamic hstory and the Qur'an as a chimpanzee knows about nuclear thermodynamics. Your opinions and views mean nothing.

        • aspacia

          Obama, there are actually many articles written by Israeli Muslims in support of Israel, try perusing Israeli media for insight. Granted they are few and far between, and many live in exile, but there are some.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Apparently you don’t understand that Islam is an ideology that first and foremost requires total and complete submission to the will of Allah. Islam is not in any way similar to true faith-based religions where adherents can freely question, challenge, criticize, and denounce the texts and tenets of their respective religions, freely convert to another religion, or otherwise leave the religion altogether, as all of those things in Islam are capital offenses. In fact, Islam doesn’t even allow unbelievers to criticize Islam, as that is also a capital offense when it can be enforced. Thus, any person who questions the will of Allah by definition can’t be a Muslim.

            Of course, all of those restrictions arise out of Islam’s main goal and most fundamental mission, the forceful subjugation of the world into a very draconian form of totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia. Hence, anything less than total and complete submission by allowing adherents to question, challenge, and criticize the texts and tenets of Islam would be self-defeating.

            Hence, the notion that a Muslim can disagree with Islam’s main goal and most fundamental mission and at the same time remain a Muslim is absurd. Such a person is not a so-called moderate Muslim in the eyes of devout Muslims, maybe in your naïve eyes they are, but in the eyes of devout Muslims such persons are blasphemous apostates that must be executed.

            Dr. Zudhi Jasser despite his ludicrous claims is not a devout Muslim, he is a mentally incompetent loon, and if he is a devout Muslim, then he is a taqiyya spewing and very deceptive Muslim.

            He also isn’t a Muslim reformer, because all devout Muslims consider him to be a blasphemous apostate that must be executed. Indeed, if he lived in an Islamic country and promoted the same things he promotes in the USA, he would have already been executed. Indeed, Jasser was even tossed out of his own mosque. Thus, how can he be deemed a Muslim reformer when he has exactly zero following in the Islamic world?

            The truth is Jasser is a media whore and the lamestream media is enamored with him exactly because he legitimizes their false narrative, which is that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists.

            Hence, while you may be duped by Jasser’s game, please excuse me if I’m not.

            Moreover, anyone who has studied the evolution of Islam in depth knows that Islam is not even a religion and is therefore impossible to be reformed since Islam is far more a totalitarian ideology than it is a religion, and just because Christianity was eventually reformed and modernized, it doesn’t mean that it could happen again. Not to mention that the texts and tenets of Islam are also immutable and anyone seen as altering just one word of it would instantly be declared a blasphemous apostate and executed for his offense.

            Hence, with respect to those so-called Israelis you claim are Muslims, they are no more Muslims than Jasser is a Muslim or that pretender above masquerading as being a Muslim but who clearly doesn’t have the first clue about Islam except for what he naively and stupidly assumes. Anyway, if Israeli Muslims are writing articles in support of Israel, then by all means please post links to those alleged articles. I want to read them and know whom they are. Sorry Christian Arabs with Arab names don’t count.

          • aspacia

            Obama, this is not about me and what I believe; it is about Muslims and what they believe. Who are you or I or Spencer or Geller to tell a person what faith they are? I am a Deist, and who better to define what I am than myself. Jasser believes himself to be a devout Muslim, so did bin Lauden.

            You claim that Islam is about total control without questioning, and to do so makes a person a heretic, this was true regarding most Christian faiths until Martin Luther and the Reformation, and even after with both
            Catholics and Protestants burning heretics at the stake. This was reform, so why can't Islam reform? Because you say so? Get Real! You are not that important.

            As you claim extremist will murder those they consider heretics. Guess what, so did Lenin with communist heretics. What about environmental extremists? Extremists do not need religion to be extreme. Actually, you are quite extreme and your absolutism and knowing your are right. Have you ever doubted yourself?

            How odd that you call an honorably discharged, military combat veteran and surgeon a loon and a media whore because of his beliefs. He only acted after 9/11 when he realized Muslims were not protesting the attacks.

            Look, the Pope forbids birth control except the rhythm method, however many Catholics practice birth control You logic dictates that they are not Catholics. Take a step back and think for once, instead of continuous, hate filled rants.

            Try reading some Israeli Media for insight. Israeli Arab Muslims periodically post articles regarding the positives of Israel. It is important to remember, that their Muslim brethren threaten them for doing so, and they write these articles at considerable risk to their families and themselves.

  • g_jochnowitz

    Is there any way this information could get into the mainstream press? Perhaps a shorter version of this articlee could be an Op-ed in the Washington Post.

    • aspacia

      Neither the Post or NYTimes will publish this.

  • Weiserite

    Excellent!!! I went on several trips to Syria from 2003 – 2006 – specifically the Rif Dimashq area south of Damascus near the town of Kiswe. I was looking to start an agricultural project. The workers on the farms were Palestinians living in special camps, without Syrian citizenship, and who had been there since '47 – 55 years. My Baathi handlers explained to me frankly that they could not allow them citizenship because they wanted to keep alive the light of their returning to Palestine. Of course no one had ever asked these poor people what they individually may have wanted. .

    This is all sick, sick

  • Weiserite

    Let me tell another story. My son, attending the American school in the Arab country I live in, brought a friend home one day. He spoke perfect American, but when I asked him where he was from he mentioned a town in Palestine. I said, nicely, OK, but from where in the "interval" between. He said San Gabriel CA. and was of course an American citizen from an affluent family, his father was working in this same Arab country. I asked him if he was ready to leave the USA and return to that town when it was "liberated". I let the kid off the hook when he couldn't answer. He was only a kid. But I still wanted to whack the little smart ass.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Overall it’s a very enlightening article, especially if you didn’t already know the truth. However, the article deliberately left out the underlying motivation that under girds everything that happens in the Middle East and also throughout the Islamic world, which is Islam’s main goal and fundamental mission of subjugating the world into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia.

    First, Arab countries refused to accept the proposal of Israel-Palestine partition, and they launched a war of annihilation against the State of Israel, which had barely been established. All precedents on this matter show that the party that starts the war — and with a declaration of annihilation — pays a price for it.

    The above paragraph should be rewritten to reflect the actual reality and facts on the ground. The Islamic world, which happens to include most but not all Arabs, launched a genocidal jihad of conquest against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel, and one of many such jihads of conquest that the Islamic world are also waging perpetually against many unbelievers around the world, because the establishment of Israel in 1948 represented the re-establishment of the Dar al Harb (the realm of jahiliyya (ignorance) on what was formerly the Dar al Islam (the realm of submission and enlightenment), and any land that was once part of the Dar al Islam according to Islam must always forever remain part of the Dar al Islam.

    That was also the case at a conference of refugees that was held in 1957 in Homs in Syria, where it was declared that “any discussion of the refugee issue that does not promise the right to the annihilation of Israel will be deemed a desecration of the Arab nation and treason.”

    Indeed, anything less than the total and complete annihilation of Israel would be sacrileges and blasphemous, not because of Arabism, but instead because of the dictates of Islam. Thus, the jihad of conquest being waged against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel by the Islamic world is permanent and will continue to be waged perpetually for as long as Israel continues to exist and regardless of any and all fake peace processes used by the Islamic world to weaken Israel and to dupe gullible useful idiots. Exactly like the greater global jihad at large that is being waged against all unbelievers throughout the world is also permanent and will also continue to be waged perpetually as long as unbelievers continue to exist that haven’t been forced to submit to the authority of Islam.

  • Fred Dawes

    I can see in all our futures a civil and race war soon with billions dead, just keep walking down the path.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Aspacia

    Apparently you don’t understand that Islam is an ideology that first and foremost requires total and complete submission to the will of Allah. Islam is not in any way similar to true faith-based religions where adherents can freely question, challenge, criticize, and denounce the texts and tenets of their respective religions, freely convert to another religion, or otherwise leave the religion altogether, as all of those things in Islam are capital offenses. In fact, Islam doesn’t even allow unbelievers to criticize Islam, as that is also a capital offense when it can be enforced. Thus, any person who questions the will of Allah by definition can’t be a Muslim.

    Of course, all of those restrictions arise out of Islam’s main goal and most fundamental mission, the forceful subjugation of the world into a very draconian form of totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia. Hence, anything less than total and complete submission by allowing adherents to question, challenge, and criticize the texts and tenets of Islam would be self-defeating.

    Hence, the notion that a Muslim can disagree with Islam’s main goal and most fundamental mission and at the same time remain a Muslim is absurd. Such a person is not a so-called moderate Muslim in the eyes of devout Muslims, maybe in your naïve eyes they are, but in the eyes of devout Muslims such persons are blasphemous apostates that must be executed.

    Dr. Zudhi Jasser despite his ludicrous claims is not a devout Muslim, he is a mentally incompetent loon, and if he is a devout Muslim, then he is a taqiyya spewing and very deceptive Muslim.

    He also isn’t a Muslim reformer, because all devout Muslims consider him to be a blasphemous apostate that must be executed. Indeed, if he lived in an Islamic country and promoted the same things he promotes in the USA, he would have already been executed. Indeed, Jasser was even tossed out of his own mosque. Thus, how can he be deemed a Muslim reformer when he has exactly zero following in the Islamic world?

    The truth is Jasser is a media whore and the lamestream media is enamored with him exactly because he legitimizes their false narrative, which is that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists.

    Hence, while you may be duped by Jasser’s game, please excuse me if I’m not.

    Moreover, anyone who has studied the evolution of Islam in depth knows that Islam is not even a religion and is therefore impossible to be reformed since Islam is far more a totalitarian ideology than it is a religion, and just because Christianity was eventually reformed and modernized, it doesn’t mean that it could happen again. Not to mention that the texts and tenets of Islam are also immutable and anyone seen as altering just one word of it would instantly be declared a blasphemous apostate and executed for his offense.

    Hence, with respect to those so-called Israelis you claim are Muslims, they are no more Muslims than Jasser is a Muslim or that loon above masquerading as being a Muslim but who clearly doesn’t have the first clue about Islam except for what he naively and stupidly assumes. Anyway, if Israeli Muslims are writing articles in support of Israel, then by all means please post links to those alleged articles. I want to read them and know whom they are. Christian Arabs with Arab names don’t count.