Explaining the Stock Market Sell-Off

Pages: 1 2

Last week, President Obama spoke about the causes of the current economic disaster area we are experiencing in America.  “In the last few months, the economy has already had to absorb an earthquake in Japan, the economic headwinds coming from Europe, the Arab Spring and the [rise] in oil prices — all of which have been very challenging for the recovery.”  Obama forgot to blame unicorns, the price of tea in China, and the decay of the moon cheese.

In other words, none of this had very much to do with the state of the economy at all. The economy has been in rotten shape for the entirety of his administration.  He has created no new jobs on net; his policies have not spurred new industries or investment.  In fact, President Obama’s artificial inflation of the economy through measures designed to prop up the real estate market and the financial markets have destroyed our ability to get out of the current recession.  Instead, we’re falling into a double dip – and if we continue these policies, the double dip will become a triple dip.

Don’t be fooled by Friday’s faux unemployment statistics, which suggest that 117,000 jobs were created this month.  Actually, the American work force lost 38,000 workers last month.  The real unemployment rate, which includes “discouraged workers,” is actually at 16.1 percent.  Duration of unemployment is now at 40.4 weeks – once you lose your job, it stays lost.  President Obama has more than doubled the number of unemployed for more than six months during his term.  Nearly 46 million people are on food stamps – just under one sixth of the US population.  Meanwhile, despite the debt ceiling increase we were told would magically fix our problems, Standard & Poor’s downgrade our sovereign long-term credit rating from AAA to AA+.  China is already saying they will begin weaning the US from its borrowing as soon as humanly possible.

President Obama has spent more money than any president in American history — and nothing has come of it.  He has escalated baseline spending by trillions.  He has dumped billions of dollars worth of treasuries on the market in order to grab cash to spend.  He has inflated the currency.  He has offered “solutions” to the real estate crisis that largely amount to keeping those who can’t afford houses in those houses, while those who can afford houses sit on the sidelines.  Then he blames corporations for not offering jobs that shouldn’t exist to people who can’t create value.  Oh yes, and he blames the waves in Japan.

Wonder why so much capital is sitting on the sidelines, President Obama?  It’s because we know that the market hasn’t reached rock bottom yet.

In the late 1970s, America suffered from what was quickly termed “stagflation” – inflation and economic stagnation.  Up until then, many on the left thought that stagflation was a definitional impossibility – if we inflate the currency, their logic goes, then the economy will grow, since we all have more money to spend.  They believed that high unemployment only went hand in hand with deflation – the higher value of money and the higher interest rates associated with it.

Pages: 1 2

  • Amused

    Standard and Poors stated quite clearly their reason for the downgrade- bipartisan bickering , and the sickening display of brinkmanship . They warned about it , and the politicians nonetheless proceeded on their self destructive course .Lack of compromise , intransigence , contentiousness , to such a deree that the confidence on solving the debt crisis looks bleak .And now after that financial blow , the fingerpinting continues . Now Moodys is considering a downgrade . And after all , these rating agencies , see the same thing the American people have been seeing of these bums in Washington , whose only purpose it seems is to denigrate each other and put forward their own political agendas BEFORE the greater good of the United States . 82% of Americans agree with that assessment , and consider the "job " politicos are doing is a DISGRACE .Hope you're all satisfied , there will be no winners in this game .

    • aspacia

      S & P also backed the subprime mortgage market. I do not trust them.

    • tagalog

      I don't have a lot of regard for Standard and Poor's either, but they also made it very clear that they were gauging the credit rating of the United States on Congress controlling the cost of social welfare programs, specifically Medicare. So S&P's were concerned with spending cuts and not tax increases.

    • aharris

      They clearly stated they wanted at least a 4 trillion dollar cut up front. That didn't happen, and we know who can't stomach the thought of spending less.

  • E. H

    I am an affluent person over 70 with no pension who luckily can continue working part time.
    My Con Edison bill has gone fom 220 to 330 per month. on an annualized basis. My fuel from 375? to 475? approximately 1/3 more per month.
    These are basic expenses which I can pay.
    I agree with John Crudele, nypost business columnist that the statistics on inflation are total misrepresentations of what is actually happen. Just wait till the government acknowledges what is happening, and then a crises will arise.

    • aspacia

      Obama fulfills a campaign promise of increased electricity costs.

    • aharris

      Shop for groceries with a clear budget and calculator every week and you know the inflation stats are BS.

  • tanstaafl

    Obamacare needs to be rescinded. But Obama will never agree to it. The election of 2012 is critical.

    • Jim_C

      We were never going to be able to afford health care before "Obamacare." And we've known this, literally, for decades.

      So what did anyone do about it? Well, Nixon tried (essentially Obamacare) and Congress shot it down. Then Hillary tried, and Congress shot it down. When did anyone else EVEN TRY??

      Some Republicans did try–their plans, unfortunately, looked too much like Obamacare for their party leadership's comfort.

      I tend to think it's too watered down to be useful, myself. At least kids and pre-existing conditions can get care, now. But until your side gets serious, and out from under the wings of insurance and pharma, we're screwed. Every other country has this figured out–why can't we?

      • Sound&Fury

        The problem isn't, as you say, an incestuous relationship with big Pharma. When nodiscretionary spending for Social Security, Medicare & Medicaid comprise 57% of the federal budget before even talkikng about Obamacare, THAT's the problem.

      • tanstaafl

        Don't assume I'm a Republican.

        You won't like my idea.

        No government program should be only available to small minority. I propose that the government end Medicare & Medicaid and purchase catastrophic health insurance for the entire population. Very high deductible – $10,000 to 15,000.

        Private insurance could cover the deductible. I know what you're going to say – not everyone has money for the deductible – that, however, is easier than going bankrupt.
        Besides, I have a way to solve that problem.

      • aharris

        You likely won't like my solution either.

        Buy catastrophic health insurance for a person at birth (or even conception). That policy follows them like a life insurance policy and covers traumatic care and catastrophic illness. A person would also be able to purchase riders to add to that policy for coverage of chronic conditions.

        Everything else would be covered out of pocket. Routine checkup? Out of pocket. Broken arm? Out of pocket – even the x-rays. No middle man between you and your health care provider. You can expand the HSA programs for this purpose.

      • Jim_C

        I would do it this way: everyone HAS to purchase insurance from a private company; government pays for anything over something like 7% of your income. Insurance companies cannot profit on this basic plan. But they can offer supplementary products for profit and compete in that realm.

        Consider: If the government subsidzes anything over 7%, that means that they've agreed on a goal that health care should essentially cost around 7% of GDP, which is on the high side of per capita health care costs in most of the developed world.

        And HALF what our current average is!

  • Cuban Refugee

    Alinsky, Marx, Mao and Cloward howl with delight from the flames of hell, while the reptilian monster George Soros and the evil witch Frances Fox Piven laugh up their malodorous sleeves. Whoever says that Barack Hussein Obama is a failure has no idea that he performed his mission to the letter: to effect the destruction of the greatest country the world has ever known in order to institute a socialist global government. Congratulations, Barry, you have come a long way from your Indonesian madrassa and your Marxist parents, associations, and mentors, but your early learning has served you well in the demolition of our republic. You and your coterie of '60's radicals and malcontents eventually will join the rest of the malevolent actors in this tragedy who have passed on, but you will be unable to deceive your way through the Final Judgment.

    • EOwens

      This sounds like someone is finally getting the picture. I hope enough people are awaken to reverse the course of our nation.

  • MBA NJ

    Obama, the usurper and puppet, has done his role of helping weaken our Constitutional Republic and the irony is that when he is finally legally deposed ideally by impeachment for crimes of treason, some folks will whine that we should leave things as they are, out of laziness. What the corpulent contented selfish and short sighted folks don't realize is that any short term benefits were done as he mortgaged our future.

    • Jim_C

      You can't possibly have a real MBA, can you?

  • mike B

    Give the Obamessiah some credit. He is making progress. He blamed the tsunami and Arab Spring before he got around to blaming "my predecessor." This is a step in the right direction. </sarcasm off>

  • Amused

    just as it was in mid-evil times , the ignorant need a devil to blame . people haven't changed much , only in that they have more sophisticated means at their disposal .your error herte , which will propel Ob ama into a second term , is that you chose to allow idiots to take control of the republican party .no matter what you say , the republican party is going to take the hit for whatever the ultimate consequences of the rating downgrade may be .you can cut spending all you like , the US will not climb out the whole without raising revenues , and THAT is not a matter of "if " , but only "when " . so play your games, spew your contentious rhetoric , put your heads in the sand and blame the other side …..if that supports your delusions .

    • Eowens

      The problem with raising revenue is that the people in charge at this point will not use the new revenue to benefit the nation but only to due further damage. You have to understand that they are using money to destroy us. Don't give more gas to the arsonist.

  • tagalog

    Yes, idiots did take control of the Republican Party. So now the battle lines are drawn between the idiots and the crazies.

    Idiots can be taught, but crazy people are just crazy. So I go with the idiots because they have some potential.

    • trickyblain

      lol, that's about where I see it, too. Only I see the Republicans as crazy idiots, while dems are crazy dreamers.

      Don't really agree that idiots can be taught, though. Like that comedian (name escapes me) says, "you can't fix stupid."

      • Jim_C

        I would call the dems "sane p*ssies."

        • trickyblain

          You're probably right, on a federal level. I must have been thinking about the lege of my home state, California.

  • Alpha Dog

    What are you going to do to fight voter fraud? Why does it take so long to shut down ACORN? That's why Obama will win. Can your facts and studies. By hook or crook, or Chicago campaign management, he's taking over the world.

  • Amused

    OMIGOSH …THE WHOLE WORLD !!!! BWWWWAAAAAAAA!!!!! Run for cover Alpha Doggy ! On the way get some more prozac .

  • Amused

    In the meantime , lets see how far down the Teabaggers can bring the market Everyone will remeber them come election days , and their republican cohorts . All you need now to guarantee a democrat for next POTUS is run batsheet crazy Bachman .

  • Sound&Fury

    Today Obama is asking himself, what would Fidel do?

  • Amused

    Oh yea , I'm sure that's precisely what he 's thinking . Man you must be a clairvoyant !

  • GKC

    Revenue Enhanced Enough Already, there Amused. Maybe you just need a mandible displacement.

  • http://www.moneyteachers.org/StockMarketForSuckers.htm Craig

    Behind the expensive suits and the talking heads and the constant reassurances there is a simple truth. The Stock Market is and has always been a suckers game!

    Consider the following:

    1. The S&P 500 is a big barrel of money. When the money gets to a certain level, the Psychopaths drain it off. In order to get it to a certain level, you have to buy the B.S. and turn your life savings over to them.

    2. Only a few insiders actually buy and sell stocks. These institutional investors and market makers bring the market down by selling stock into the market.

    3. The S&P 500 represents 75 cents of every dollar invested in the stock market. That means 500 company stocks to sell when they want the market to crash. Not that hard to accomplish when you think about it.

    4. The other branch of the Satanic Psychopaths catch all that falling money buy buying Put Options against the S&P. AS the S&P goes down, they are capturing all of that lost wealth.

    5. My Clients have made anywhere from 20-50% returns over the last week by also shorting the stock market. One client made $2400 profit from a $3500 investment. Can your stock broker do that? If so, why aren't they doing it? Instead, they are standing idly by while you lose money!