Non-Muslim Muslims and the Jihad Against the West

Pages: 1 2

My name is Bosch and I’m a recovering Muslim.

That is, if Muslims don’t kill me for leaving Islam, which it requires them to do. That’s just one of the reasons I’ve been writing and drawing against Islam and its Jihad for a number of years now. But fortunately for us, Islam hasn’t been able to make every Muslim its slave, just as Nazism wasn’t able to turn every German into a Nazi. So there is Islam and there are Muslims. Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t.

But that doesn’t mean we should consider these reluctant Muslims allies against Jihad. I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam. The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover. They force us to play a game of Muslim Roulette since we can’t tell which Muslim is going to blow himself up until he does. And their indifference about the evil being committed in the name of their religion is a big reason why their reputation is where it is.

So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that. We just have to finally accept it and stop expecting them to come around, while doing our best to kill those who are trying to kill us.

Another problem with Muslims who aren’t very Muslim is that they lead some among us to conclude that they must be practicing a more enlightened form of Islam. They’re not. They’re “practicing” life in non-Muslim countries, where they are free to live as they choose. But their “Islam” is not the Islam. There’s no separate ideology apart from Islam that’s being practiced by these Muslims in name only, there’s no such thing as “Western Islam”.

Non-observant Muslims are not our problem, but neither are they the solution to our problem. Our problem is Islam and its most consistent practitioners. There is nothing in Islam that stays the hand of Muslims who want to kill non-Muslims. If an individual Muslim is personally peaceful, it’s not because of Islam, it’s because of his individual choice, which is why I often say that your average Muslim is morally superior to Mohammad, to their own religion. The very rare Muslim who helps us against Jihad is acting against his religion, but that doesn’t stop some among us from thinking that his existence somehow means that he represents more than himself.

The only reason we’re talking about Islam is because it doesn’t mean peace. Islam wasn’t hijacked by a “small minority of extremists” on 9/11, it was hijacked by a very small minority of moderates whose embarrassment in being associated with such an immoderate religion leads them to engage in moderate truth telling about it, proving their irrelevance as allies.

In addition to these politically active moderates, when you see well-assimilated Muslims in the West, you’re not seeing Islam in action, you’re seeing individuals living up to the old adage, when in Rome, do as the Romans do. They’re essentially post-Islamic Muslims who have rejected Islamic values and have embraced Western ones. But since the process of their assimilation was implicit – as it happened naturally by their exposure to Western, i.e., pro-life, values – both Muslims and non-Muslims alike prefer to generously give Islam some credit for it. But a good Muslim, by our standards is a bad Muslim by Islamic standards. Objectively good human beings, who identify themselves as Muslim, give Islam a good face, one far better then it deserves. This only gives us a false impression about what it is we’re facing, with just another excuse not to face it. And this leads to our acceptance into our culture of stealth jihadists who have figured out how to say what we want to hear, while they scheme behind the scenes to further Islamize the West.

In the name of distinguishing the enemy from Muslims who mean us no harm, far too many Western commentators have avoided using the name “Islam” for the enemy’s ideology, and instead have decided to create their very own terms for the threat we’re facing, terms that are alien to the enemy. Terms such as:

Islamic Fundamentalism.

Islamic Extremism.

Totalitarian Islam.



Political Islam.

Bin Ladenism.

Radical Islam.

Militant Islam.



We didn’t use terms such as “Radical Nazism”, “Extremist Shinto” and “Militant Communism” in the past. “Militant Islam”, Political Islam”, etc., are redundant terms. Our pretending otherwise has proven disastrous. Thousands of American lives, both civilian and military, have been sacrificed because of policies predicated on the myth that “Islam means peace.” We didn’t try to reform Shinto or Nazism during World War II; the major changes in those cultures took place only after we thoroughly de-militarized them.

And it’s no accident that Western analysts of Islam who are most informed about Islam are also most critical of it, while those least informed are least critical. But then there are those who, in their study of Islam, have become so enamored with their subject that, instead of sticking to what Islam is, they often write about what it isn’t, what they hope it might be. They seem preoccupied with doing their part to save Islam from those who have allegedly corrupted it.

The Muslim world is where the true meaning of Islam can be found in practice. Islam – not any alleged deviant form of it – means misogyny, censorship, anti-Semitism, homophobia, wife-beatings, beheadings, honor killings, pedophilia/“child marriages”, murdering infidels, etc. This is evil, and Islam sanctions every bit of it, but we’ve been told that we must respect “one of the world’s great religions” because it’s a religion. Following 9/11, the only thing George W. Bush knew about Islam was that it was a religion, and that apparently was a good enough reason for him to exonerate it as he did. And his advisor on Islam, David Forte, told Bush exactly what he wanted to hear, that “Nothing this evil could come from religion.” But 9/11 did come from a religion. Whatever else 9/11 was, it was an act of faith.

And Bush saying “Islam is peace” shortly after 9/11 gave the enemy a gift they couldn’t have foreseen. Here was the one man who was charged to defend America from their attack and here he was defending the very ideology that motivated the attackers. Honesty is the best policy in general, and when it comes to war, it’s a moral imperative to find out the truth, to tell the truth and to act on the truth, no matter what sacred cow is killed in the process. And so a big part of why nearly 3,000 victims of jihad on 9/11 haven’t been avenged is because of respect for religion, even for a religion that calls for our destruction.

Pages: 1 2

  • John Alway

    Defeating the enemy that is Islam will be good for anyone who values life anywhere. I just read about a muslim girl who was stoned to death for entering a beauty contest. What pure evil, and it's just the sort of thing that defenders of Islam are defending, which shows that they are either cowardly or they don't value human life. Brilliant article by Bosch Fawstin!

  • Beth

    "We need to shift the focus onto our own well-being at the enemy’s expense for a change" (agreed)

    Speaking for Christians: true followers of islam are not enemies…..they are strangers. We are to pray for our eneimies (who is my enemy? Mic 7:6, Mat 10:36) – but not for strangers (Jhn 10:5).

    this is important

    islam calls the Lord of the Christians an abomination and all of His eye-witnesses liars, by one lone acusser who wasn't even there with them, offering no proof but his own say-so….who preaches beheadings and crucifixions of all who don't bow to him. We are not to pray for them…so they need to be called what they really are – Strangers. (strangers who love to murder)

    And for all those who support them…are murderers also. If you support a murderer – you are one. (Just telling it like it is)

    • I_Marz

      Thats contradicting…praying for enemies not strangers? Good people pray for all…for we're all good children.

      I hope you turn your anger/hate towards the real enemy, Satan, who wishes us all, equally, harm and eternal damnation…no? and to his followers; the Illuminati, skulls & bones members, the Bohemian group all whom are high ranking officials, business men, media members mostly in the US. Who spread hate and profit from wars and bloodshed and do all this right under our noses & with our consent because they appear as saviours! Wake up and smell the REAL danger.

      As for Christ; we truly believe Christ is God's messenger as mentioned numerous times in the Quran, a prophet like Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon ending with Mohamed (peace be upon them all as we do not differentiate between any of the prophets). However, we DO NOT believe he is God reincarnate or God's son…that is paganism & a great misdeed against the Lord to make such claims…

      And they say: The Beneficent hath taken unto Himself a son. (88) Assuredly ye utter a disastrous thing (89) Whereby almost the heavens are torn, and the earth is split asunder and the mountains fall in ruins, (90) That ye ascribe unto the Beneficent a son, (91) When it is not meet for (the Majesty of) the Beneficent that He should choose a son. (92) There is none in the heavens and the earth but cometh unto the Beneficent as a slave. (93) Taken from Maryam Chapter 19.

      Go ahead challenge your beliefs and read the whole chapter that gives account of Christ's birth & tell all, challenging ones beliefs is the only way to the truth…go ahead Beth, this is a dare :))

      P.S in eye witness accounts, who do you mean? John, Mark, Luke and Mathew where NOT alive during the time of Christ…this is a well known FACT, ask your priest even. As for the Bible, though God inspired yes (the Psalms & Gospel also mentioned in the Quran) is at end of the day man made; over 3000 years and an estimated 400 contributors. Eventually compiled (selected) by Emperor Constantine 300 years after the death of Christ when he wanted to unite the Roman Empire under one religion to save it from disintegrating. Arm yourself with knowledge my sister lest you be misguided!

      Nonetheless, I remain hopeful & will continue to pray for you and everyone.

      Salam (peace)

      • Beth

        No, it is not contradicting I_Marz. Let me give you a good example as to why. Should we pray for those who call the Son of God an abomination to succeed?

        The Judgement was already given (and not by me)…..

        Jhn 3:36 He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.

        I will not pray for the teachings of…


        Mass Murder……………………………009.005 – 033.061
        Gang Rape………………………………033.052
        Telling lies to non-muslims………….003.028
        Cutting off hands and feet…………..005.033

        To pray for those who are advicates of those teachings would be a prayer of abomination…..No?

        You see I_Marz, the Lord of the Bible does not FORCE people into bowing to Him. He gives us all the free choice of doing so or not doing so….unlike your god of the koran.

        That's why there is an appointed time called – the Judgement.

        Hbr 10:30 For we know Him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto Me [not man]

        To pray for the wicked who have clearly made their choice to support darkness who believe it is their duty to carry out evil wicked acts…is an abomination. They are strangers I_Marz….at least – they are for me.


        if the teachings of beheadings and crucifixions aren't (plain and simple) pure evil?…..where does that leave the ones who are supporting such crap?

        it leaves them with no excuse….and no prayers.

        In fact…it makes them responsible for the ills of this world. I have never prayed for them…and I never will. They are strangers to me…those who see no wrong in such teachings. They are strangers to me…..because they are of a mindset that I don't understand…nor do I ever want to understand.

        They have made their own conscientious choice to support evil. I will not FORCE them to change their minds. But, neither will I pray for them.

        Beacuse….Hbr 10:30 we know Him that hath said, Vengeance belongeth unto Me

    • I_Marz

      well again I'm sorry you feel this way & for you as well. I guess only time will tell & by that time it would be too late to change your misguided views, at a time when even Jesus will not stand by you and your beliefs in him;

      5:116 And behold! God will say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of God.?"

      5:117He will say: "Never said I to them aught except what Thou didst command me to say, to wit, 'worship God, my Lord and your Lord'; and I was a witness over them whilst I dwelt amongst them; when Thou didst take me up Thou wast the Watcher over them, and Thou art a witness to all things.


      • Beth

        In no way…..would Jesus EVER defend the teachings of beheadings. I think that is the part that you are not 'getting' I_Marz.

        • I_Marz

          Be-headings are NOT our teachings & we don't support them Neither does Mohamed, Muslims Nor Islam! Its NOT in the Quran and is NOT practised, stop believing the lies/media!

          However, with that said…do believe in the death penalty?

          • Beth

            In the koran:

            047.004 Therefore, when ye meet '''the Unbelievers''' in fight, smite at their necks. Behead them! and the Muslims are commanded to initiate the fight} 002.216 – 009.039 – throughout the earth} 004.101 – 004.100

            This is why we hear reports of muslims beheading others….because of the teachings of the koran. You may not carry out such an evil act I_Marz …but then one should ask…where does that leave you upon examining the following:

            004.095 Not equal are those believers who sit at home and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons… those who strive and fight hath He distinguished above those who sit at home by a special reward.

            002.216 Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing [war] which is good for you and that ye love a thing [peace] which is bad for you?

          • Beth

            I am not the one who calls your prophet a liar I_Marz. But you do by denying the words of your koran. I just simply put forth his words for all to judge for themselves.

            005.047 Let the people of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed

            And so – I shall.

          • I_Marz

            If you're going to quote the Quran then do so objectively & DO NOT omit things;

            5:47 (Asad) Let, then, the followers of the Gospel judge in accordance with what God has revealed therein: for they who do not judge in the light of what God has bestowed from on high-it is they, they who are truly iniquitous!

            47:4 (Picktall) Now when ye meet in battle those who disbelieve, then it is smiting of the necks until, when ye have routed them, then making fast of bonds; and afterward either mercy or ransom till the war lay down its burdens. That (is the ordinance). And if Allah willed He could have punished them (without you) but (thus it is ordained) that He may try some of you by means of others. And those who are slain in the way of Allah, He rendereth not their actions vain.

            SEE you just quote/see what you want to subjectively & denying the truth/virtue within…be FAIR/HONEST;
            1. of course in war there would be killings DUH!
            2. The time for MERCY/ Ransom!
            3. Until the war lay down its burdens = ends = peace/ a truce!

            4:95 (Picktall) Those of the believers who sit still, other than those who have a (disabling) hurt, are not on an equality with those who strive in the way of Allah with their wealth and lives. Allah hath conferred on those who strive with their wealth and lives a rank above the sedentary. Unto each Allah hath promised good, but He hath bestowed on those who strive a great reward above the sedentary; –

            STRIVE NOT FIGHT!!!!!

            and yes its true we were expected to fight for Islam & God, why is that so strange! What do you call the Crusade wars against Muslims…was that NOT ordained and sanctioned by the Pope & Church!? OR WII approved by the Pope & Church as well! So its just alright for you to fight , make inquisitions, deadly missions, crusades, war for oil & NOT alright for us to fight?!!! thats an egocentric, delusional way of thinking…no wonder America is hated so much…not just Muslims, I'm travelling in Australia now & they don't stand the US at the moment! so yes, we will fight those of transgress against them for we are FEARLESS unlike your army that fights with drones and hide behind the technology! I would rather not fight but if the fight comes to us we don't back down.

            here;s what really blows my mind; (a) many historians don't believe in the historical Jesus as there is NO real evidence to him (b) Jews called him a liar/fraud and tried to kill him (c) Hindu, Buddhist, Shinto & atheist don't give a damn…right?!! While (a) Mohamed is the ONLY person to support him (b) Quran is the ONLY other source to mention him (c) Muslims are the ONLY ppl that believe in JC!!!! So how come all teh hate towards us…its divide and conquer tactics of the devil!

            Open your eyes…Mohamed is the last of teh prophets, Islam is the final instalment of the religions, The Quran is the final testament & last chapter


          • Beth

            It is a fact that the koran preaches slaughtering of infidels.

            It is a fact that ht ekoran preaches beheadings and crucifixions.

            There is NO defense, no excuse, no justification for those teachings….no matter if you were able to put forth numerous writings that teach the contrary.

            And that's the difference between the New Testament and the Koran. The New Testament does not contradict itself:

            Rom 13:9 For this, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet; and if there be any other commandment, it is briefly comprehended in this saying, namely, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

            Rom 13:10 Love worketh no ill to his neighbour: therefore love is the fulfilling of the law.

            After that……….there are NO MORE laws given in the New Testament.

            I prefer that my children grow up in a society that knows and accepts the teachings of the New Testament. Since the OIC has 57 nations that abide by the laws that you prefer…..maybe you should consider moving to one of those nations. Because you obviously are not able to see the wrong in the teachings of beheading…….an exceedingly wicked act.

            There is no middle-ground here Marz – not when it comes to violent teachings.

  • steven l

    The Islamophil of today are the same American who blindly supported communism yesterday. The more than a billion is the result of brain washing from the age of three.

  • randy

    Christians stole north america as they murdered the natives. Makes islam look like saints.

    • Durin

      What does this have to do w/ the article?

      Bosch claims that there is a threat today, so you claim that a different group was a threat to some other group in the past. You’ll have to do the math for me to show how this relates to Bosch’s points.

    • tom

      You are a bit naive to assume that this huge continent would remain undiscovered and pristinely intact for the native indians forever. Rejoice and be glad that it was the Christians who discovered and (according to you) "stole" North America, because of which we are enjoying freedoms for all, yes even for the native Indians.
      Did you even stop to think what would happen if the hordes of Arabia ventured in this direction? you would not be having this discussion but rather be home beating your wives, because allah commands it, or subjucating and taxing infidels.

      Islam destroys cultures and and replaces them with the barbaric Islamic Arab one.

      Read carefully what allah prescribes should happen to infidels like us:

      [9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

      I'll bet you wouldn't think Islam was so "saintly" if you were a Copt living in Egypt right now … or would you?

    • aspacia

      Most died of disease not from bullets. Read how Africans feel about the Ottoman Turks for insight.

    • Beth

      Moving along…..

      Please explain why you think the following teachings should be legal randy:

      Taught in the Koran…

      Mass Murder……………………………009.005 – 033.061
      Mass Rape………………………………033.052
      Telling lies to non-muslims………….003.028
      Cutting off hands and feet…………..005.033

      (those teachings are extremely vicious randy…..are they not?)

      Please explain why you think they should be legal.

  • TantoSays

    Excellent work! Two points that I would like to make:

    I have often used the words Islamists and political Islam in my writings when communicating with American citizens. I wholeheartedly agree with your definitions of what Islam is, but there was such a chasm in understanding that using these words as a bridge allowed Americans who treasure the 1st Amendment to accept your words in the context of religious freedoms.

    People had to reconcile their feelings about freedom to worship before they could open their eyes to the evil that you detail so well. Separating religious Islam from political Islam is a tool to move the learning process forward incrementally for people that started at the point of total ignorance about Islam.

    To fight the war that is coming (yes, the real war has only just begun), we need all of our citizens brought to the point where they can fully understand and support the concept that we can identify and fight the evils of Islam while allowing Muslims in America to worship. Otherwise we will be a nation divided at a time that unity is required.

    My second point is that we have to solve the problem globally if the threats are to be eliminated in the long term. We cannot kill 1.4 billion people as a solution, so we have to work to support Muslims in the reformation of their religion and let them do the job of cleansing their ranks of jihadists.

    We use the term 'Separatists' to define people who want to follow the peaceful parts of the Qur'an, worship their god, remain Muslim, but discard all of the evil portions of Islamic writings and history. We have to give them the way out and then support their efforts. Using 1.3 billion followers to identify and neutralize the other 100 million is smart warfare; while we actively destroy the leaders and the active networks in the short term.

    The way out is to encourage them to reform their religion to bring it current with modern times, and separate out the political and violent portions and identify it as part of their past.

    Here is the cover that they need to pull it off: acknowledge that other major religions have had to resolve the same issues with interpretations of their writings and history but moved past it and matured along with society. We have been there, done it, and now it's your turn.

    The world has a long road ahead of it dealing with this issue. Your work is so key to the effort because you have the credibility of having lived it from the inside. Every perspective that moves our country and the world towards understanding the threat and underlying ideology, is critical.

    I write with a team that works to identify these and other issues in an incremental but constant effort to open people's minds to the dangers of Islam, socialism, and overreaching government that infringes upon personal freedoms. Sometimes we have a little fun by using sarcasm and humor, but everything is designed to reach average Americans and get them to wake up. You can check us out at

    I look forward to following your work as your tell such an important story.

  • I_Marz

    While I respect Bosch's right to express his opinion, the more intelligent reader would quickly realize this is NOT an article by any sense of the word! It lacks credibility for failing to quote any source, sight or document any official document, doctrine, events or historical facts. This reads more like ramblings of a paranoid individual propagating hate, racism and bigotry. Its ironic he mentions the Nazis so often when his 'article' sounds all too familiar like Hitler's speech against the Jews during WWII. This is indeed disturbing to say the least that educated people would support such an opinion…a path to the dark side indeed. Rather that spreading hate and mistrust, I as Muslim, Canadian Third Degree Master Mason & a comic book writer am working to spread a message of acceptance, respect, love and unity…for we are NOT our brother's enemy! Humanity's true enemy is Satan who seeks to destroy us by means of 'divide and conquer'…pitting us one against the other! Open your eyes, minds and hearts my friends lest you be blind, arrogant and hateful…

    • Beth

      Taught in your Koran I_Marz …

      Mass Murder……………………………009.005 – 033.061
      Mass Rape………………………………033.052
      Telling lies to non-muslims………….003.028
      Cutting off hands and feet…………..005.033

      Can you understand how hypocritical it is for you to say "….am working to spread a message of acceptance, respect, love and unity" and then you defend those teachings?

      Can you not see how messed up your position is?

      • I_Marz

        obviously it is you you who is messed up (to use your own words)…blinded by hate and crippled by fear! Unfortunately I cannot help you no one can… but you Beth should you decide to 'unlearn' what has been crammed down your throat & start with a fresh clean mind, then the truth will show itself. I just pity you but will pray for you as well…

        • Beth

          "crippled by fear"

          No I_Marz….for if I were truly "crippled by fear" I would not be putting forth the facts.

          Do not pray for me I_Marz….l will not pray for you. I don't pray for strangers…who believe in commands that promote beheadings, gang rape, crucifixions and like brutalities.

          Should I pray for you?…..would that mean barbaric teachings should spread? Yep, I believe such prayers – mean exactly that.

          Jhn 10:5 And a stranger will they (true Christians) not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.

          1Jo 5:16 There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he shall pray for it.

          I'm not your 'average' so-called 'worldly Christian' I_Marz.

          So, no….I will not pray for you. I will abide by the Christian Scriptures FIRST and NOT by what this world preaches.

          You have YET to address THE BRUTALITY that is taught in your own koran (a common theme by the corrupt…because they have no answer).

          Taught in your koran…

          Mass Murder……………………………009.005 – 033.061
          Gang Rape………………………………033.052
          Telling lies to non-muslims………….003.028
          Cutting off hands and feet…………..005.033

          Those are the teachings you are defending I_Marz….are they not?

          And let me add, please, those are the sickest teachings that were ever bestowed upon mankind……No?

          Will you EVER give an answer to the facts laid befor you I_Marz? (I think not…but, please, prove me wrong)……

          You have YET to address THE BRUTALITY that is taught in your own koran

  • Anna

    "I am speaking to those who, though not stupid or evil, are wallowing in prudence and doubt. And to them I say: "Wake up, people. Wake up!!" —you don't understand or don't want to understand that a reverse–Crusade is in progress. You don't understand or don't want to understand that if we don't oppose them, if we don't defend ourselves, if we don't fight, the Jihad will win. And it will destroy the world that for better or worse we've managed to build, to change, to improve, to render a little more intelligent, that is to say, less bigoted—or even not bigoted at all. And with that it will destroy our culture, our art, our science, our morals, our values, our pleasures."
    —Oriana Fallaci, (1929 – 2006) Italian journalist, author, and political interviewer, to her editor after the 9/11/01 terrorist attacks

    “Ever since the religion of Islam appeared in the world, the espousers of it…have been as wolves and tigers to all other nations, rending and tearing all that fell into their merciless paws, and grinding them with their iron teeth; that numberless cities are raised from the foundation, and only their name remaining; that many countries, which were once as the garden of God, are now a desolate wilderness; and that so many once numerous and powerful nations are vanished from the earth! Such was, and is at this day, the rage, the fury, the revenge, of these destroyers of human kind.”
    —-John Wesley (1703-1791) England, Methodist leader and renown theologian

    ”[Islam] is essentially an obstructive, intolerant system. It has consecrated despotism; it has consecrated polygamy; it has consecrated slavery. It has declared war against every other creed; it has claimed to be at least dominant in every land. When it ceases to have an enemy to contend against, it sinks into sluggish stupidity and into a barbarism far viler. It must have an enemy; if cut off from conflict with the infidel, it finds its substitute in sectarian hatred of brother Moslems…”
    —-Edward Augustus Freeman (1823-1892) British historian, Regius Professor of Modern History at Oxford, non-resident professor at Cornell University.

    "Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."
    —- Manuel II Palaiologos, (1350 – 1425) Byzantine Emperor

    "The true Islamic concept of peace goes something like this: "Peace comes through submission to Muhammad and his concept of Allah" (i.e. Islam). As such the Islamic concept of peace, meaning making the whole world Muslim, is actually a mandate for war. It was inevitable and unavoidable that the conflict would eventually reach our borders, and so it has.
    —-Vernon Richards, (19 July, 1915 – 10 December 2001) Italian anarchist, editor, author

  • Anna

    “In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad], the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE (Adams's capital letters)… Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant… While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and goodwill towards men."
    —John Quincy Adams (1767-1848) Sixth President of the United States

    “How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia [rabies] in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. …The fact that in Mohammedan law [sharia] every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities—but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”
    —Winston Churchill (1874-1965) British Prime Minister

    “Today [1950], the hatred of the Moslem countries against the West is becoming hatred against Christianity itself. Although the statesmen have not yet taken it into account, there is still grave danger that the temporal power of Islam may return and, with it, the menace that it may shake off a West which has ceased to be Christian, and affirm itself as a great anti-Christian world power.”
    —Fulton J. Sheen (1895-1979) Renowned Catholic Bishop

    “Qur’an… an accursed book… So long as there is this book there will be no peace in the world.”
    —William Gladstone (1809-1898) Prime Minister of Great Britain 1868 – 1894

    “Will not perhaps the temporal power of Islam return and with it the menace of an armed Mohammedan world, which will shake off the domination of Europeans — still nominally Christian — and reappear as the prime enemy of our civilization? The future always comes as a surprise, but political wisdom consists in attempting at least some partial judgment of what that surprise may be. And for my part I cannot but believe that a main unexpected thing of the future is the return of Islam.”
    —Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953) French Author/Historian and political activist

  • Anna

    “The Greeks who triumphed at Marathon and Salamis did a work without which the world would have been deprived of the social value of Plato and Aristotle, of Aeschylus, Herodotus, and Thucydides. The civilization of Europe, America, and Australia exists today at all only because of the victories of civilized man over the enemies of civilization, because the victories stretching through the centuries from the days of Miltiades and Themistocles to those of Charles Martel in the eighth century and those of John Sobieski in the seventeenth century.”

    “During the thousand years that included the careers of the Frankish soldier and the Polish king, the Christians of Asia and Africa proved unable to wage successful war with the Moslem conquerors; and in consequence Christianity practically vanished from the two continents; and today nobody can find in them any "social values" whatever, in the sense in which we use the words, so far as the sphere of Mohammedan influence. There are such "social values" today in Europe, America, and Australia only because during those thousand years the Christians of Europe possessed the warlike power to do what the Christians of Asia and Africa had failed to do – that is, to beat back the Moslem invader.”
    —Teddy Roosevelt (1858 -1919) Twenty-sixth President of the United States

    "I am afraid that God has sent these men to lay waste the world".
    —-Patriarch Cyrus of Alexandria, while negotiating the surrender of Alexandria to the Muslims, 640 AD

    "These impious people boast of having got the better of the Romans by their love of God. They live by the bow, the sword and debauchery, finding pleasure in taking slaves, devoting themselves to murder, pillage, spoil,and not only do they commit these crimes, but even — what an aberration — they believe that God approves of them. This is what I think of them [Muslims], now that I know precisely about their way of life."
    —-Gregory Palamas of Thessalonica, 1354

    "I studied the Kuran a great deal … I came away from that study with the conviction that by and large there have been few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammed. As far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world, and, though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion infinitely more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress."
    —-Alexis de Tocqueville, (1805-1859) French political thinker and historian, known for authoring "Democracy in America"

  • Anna

    "The precept of the Koran is perpetual war against all who deny that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force".
    —-John Quincy Adams, 1829

    “Islam was not a torch, as has been claimed, but an extinguisher. Conceived in a barbarous brain for the use of a barbarous people, it was – and it remains – incapable of adapting itself to civilization. Wherever it has dominated, it has broken the impulse towards progress and checked the evolution of society.
    —-Andre Servier, 1922— Algerian historian who wrote "Islam and the Psychology of the Musulman" translated by A.S. Moss-Blundell, 1924.

    “The religion of Islam above all others was founded upon the sword … Moreover it provides incentives to slaughter, and in three continents has produced fighting breeds of men – filled with a wild and merciless fanaticism”.
    —-Winston Churchill, 1899

    "Unlike Christianity, which preached a peace that it never achieved, Islam unashamedly came with a sword."
    —-Steven Runciman, (1903-2000) English historian who wrote "The History of the Crusades" 1951-1954

    "ISLAM HAS A TOTAL ORGANIZATION OF LIFE THAT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM OURS; it embraces simply everything. There is a very marked subordination of woman to man; there is a very tightly knit criminal law, indeed, a law regulating all areas of life, that is opposed to our modern ideas about society. ONE HAS TO HAVE A CLEAR UNDERSTANDING THAT IT IS NOT SIMPLY A DENOMINATION THAT CAN BE INCLUDED IN THE FREE REALM OF A PLURALISTIC SOCIETY."
    —-Pope Benedict XVI

    "Islam, more than any other religion human beings have devised, has all the makings of a thoroughgoing cult of death. As a matter of doctrine, the Muslim conception of tolerance is one in which non-Muslims have been politically and economically subdued, converted, or put to sword. The penalty for apostasy is death. We would do well to linger over this fact for a moment, because it is the black pearl of intolerance that no liberal exegesis will ever fully digest. There are other ideologies with which to expunge the last vapors of reasonableness from a society's discourse, but Islam is undoubtedly one of the best we've got. The truth that we must finally confront is that Islam contains specific notions of martyrdom and jihad that fully explain the character of Muslim violence."
    —-Sam Harris, September 20, 2006, Liberal American author, philosopher and neuroscientist

    "Islam deserves criticism on account of the logical consequences of its dogma, namely, that the murder of fellow human beings is to be rewarded with sensual pleasure in a hedonistic 'Paradise'- a concept born in the fantasies of an Arab rebel some fourteen centuries ago. The religion of Mohammed is a dangerous system when the teachings and example of the 'prophet' are believed and followed."
    —-Richard Dawkins

    "…But care is taken not to say how Islam expanded, how countries 'passed into [Muslim] hands.'…Regarding this expansion, little is said about jihad. And yet it all happened through war!…the jihad is an institution…that is to say it is a part of the normal functioning of the Muslim world…The conquered populations change status (they become dhimmis), and the shari'a tends to be put into effect integrally, overthrowing the former law of the country. The conquered territories do not simply change 'owners.'"
    —-Jacques Ellul (1912 – 1994) French philosopher, law professor, sociologist and theologian

  • Anna

    "…my correspondence with liberals has convinced me that liberalism has grown dangerously out of touch with the realities of our world — specifically with what devout Muslims actually believe about the West, about paradise and about the ultimate ascendance of their faith.
    "On questions of national security, I am now as wary of my fellow liberals as I am of the religious demagogues on the Christian right. This may seem like frank acquiescence to the charge that "liberals are soft on terrorism." It is, and they are.
    "A cult of death is forming in the Muslim world — for reasons that are perfectly explicable in terms of the Islamic doctrines of martyrdom and jihad. The truth is that we are not fighting a "war on terror." We are fighting a pestilential theology and a longing for paradise.
    "It is time we admitted that we are not at war with “terrorism”; we are at war with precisely the vision of life that is prescribed to all Muslims in the Koran. This is not to say that we are at war with all Muslims, but we are absolutely at war with millions more than have any direct affiliation with Al Qaeda, We are at war with those who believe that death in defense of the faith is the highest possible good, that cartoonists should be killed for caricaturing the prophet and that any Muslim who loses his faith should be butchered for apostasy… Unfortunately, this religious extremism is not a fringe phenomenon.
    "Every person living in a western democracy should read the Koran and discover the relentlessness with which non-Muslims are vilified in its pages. The idea that Islam is a “peaceful religion hijacked by extremists” is a dangerous fantasy—and it is now a particularly dangerous fantasy for moderate Muslims to indulge.
    "Given the degree to which religious ideas are still sheltered from criticism in every society, it is actually possible for a person to have the economic and intellectual resources to build a nuclear bomb — and to believe that he will get 72 virgins in paradise. And yet, despite abundant evidence to the contrary, liberals continue to imagine that Muslim terrorism springs from economic despair, lack of education and American militarism…Sawing the heads off of civilian contractors, humanitarian workers, and journalists is not “resistance” to oppression. It is the work of men who left their hearts in the 7th century.
    "I don't know how many more engineers and architects need to blow themselves up, fly planes into buildings or saw the heads off of journalists before this fantasy will dissipate. The truth is that there is every reason to believe that a terrifying number of the world's Muslims now view all political and moral questions in terms of their affiliation with Islam. This leads them to rally to the cause of other Muslims no matter how sociopathic their behavior. This is solidarity born of religious delusion, and it must end—or a genuine clash of civilizations will be unavoidable. This benighted religious solidarity may be the greatest problem facing civilization and yet it is regularly misconstrued, ignored or obfuscated by liberals.
    "To say that this does not bode well for liberalism is an understatement: It does not bode well for the future of civilization."
    —-Sam Harris, September 20, 2006, liberal American author, neuroscientist

    "Our life here is truly hellish. Fortunately, my soldiers are very brave and tougher than the enemy. What is more, their private beliefs make it easier to carry out orders which send them to their death. They see only two supernatural outcomes: victory for the faith or martyrdom. Do you know what the second means? It is to go straight to heaven. There, the houris, God's most beautiful women, will meet them and will satisfy their desires for all eternity. What great happiness! This is Islam, an absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, a rotting corpse which poisons our lives."
    —-Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, 1881–1938, revolutionary statesman, writer, and the first President and founder of modern Turkey.

    "The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex of order and freedom, culture and peace, can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without or multiplying within."
    —- Will Durant, 1885 – 1981, American writer, historian, and philosopher. He is best known for "The Story of Civilization"

  • Anna

    "A very important factor which is making it almost impossible for Hindu-Muslim unity to become an accomplished fact is that the Muslim cannot confine their patriotism to any one country. I had frankly asked the Muslims whether in the event of any Mohammedan power invading India, would they (Muslims) stand side by side with their Hindu neighbours to defend their common land or join the invaders. I was not satisfied with the reply I have obtained from them – 'under no circumstances is it permissible for any Mohammedan, whatever be his country, to stand against any Mohammedan.' "
    —- Rabindranath Tagore (1861 – 1941, Indian Author, Painter, Nobel Laureate)

    "Over a billion people believe in Allah without truly knowing what Allah supposedly stands for or what he really demands of them. And the minority that do understand continue to be Moslems because they have redefined their morality and ethics to fit within the teachings of Islam, which are floridly lacking in morality. They therefore redefine what is good and evil in order to fit their lives into what is preached by Islam, instead of examining Islam to see if it fits within the good life. Backwards thinking, imposed by a backward religion."
    —- Bertrand Russell (British philosopher, historian, logician, mathematician, and pacifist)

    "The object of jihad is to bring the whole world under Islamic law. In an Islamic state, there is in principle no law other than the shar'ia, the Holy Law of Islam. The idea that any group of persons, any kind of activities, or any part of human life is in any sense outside the scope of religious law and jurisdiction is alien to Muslim thought."
    —- Bernard Lewis, British-American Historian born May 31, 1916, academic expert on Islam and its interaction with the West

    "The most successful lecherous man who used religion for his personal gain is Prophet Mohammed. Islam is a cult with its complete irrational belief in Allah created by Muhammed who was a liar, thief, murderer and rapist till his last breath."
    —- Dr. Khushwant Singh, born 2 February 1915, prominent Indian novelist and journalist, professor, former lawyer and parliamentarian

    "All religions are exclusive, but Islam is quite notably so, and immediately it developed into a state which seemed to be all of a piece with the religion. The Koran is its spiritual and secular book of law. Its statutes embrace all areas of life…and remain set and rigid; the very narrow Muslim mind imposes this nature on many nationalities and thus remolds them for all time (a profound, extensive spiritual bondage!) This is the power of Islam in itself… The very reason and excuse for existence, the holy war, and the possible world conquest, do not brook any other form. The strongest proof of real, extremely despotic power in Islam is the fact that it has been able to invalidate, in such large measure, the entire history (customs, religion, previous way of looking at things, earlier imagination) of the peoples converted to it. It accomplished this only by instilling into them a new religious arrogance which was stronger than everything and induced them to be ashamed of their past."
    —-Jacob Burckhardt, aka Carl Jacob Christoph Burckhardt (1818 – 1897), Swiss theologian, scholar and prominent historiographer of art and cultural history

  • Anna

    "In the case of the Mohammedan world, religion has seemingly affected every detail of life with its prescriptions and requirements…[N]o other religion, as it conquered new territory, has so completely and quickly wiped out even the culture of the conquered people and imposed upon their total life new ways and customs, often a new language, as has the Mohammedan religion…Islam can truly be described as totalitarian. By a million roots, penetrating every phase of life, all of them with religious significance, it is able to maintain its hold upon the life of the Moslem peoples."
    —-Dr. Charles R. Watson (1871 – 1948) born and raised in Egypt, the founder and first President of the American University in Cairo.

    "Its [Islam's] governments are not governments. It makes life barren and empty. It encourages a savage pride and cruelty. It makes men tyrants or slaves, women puppets, religion the submission to an infinite despotism."
    —-James Freeman Clarke, American abolitionist, theologian, author of “Ten Great Religions—An Essay in Comparative Theology”, 1871

    "There is no such thing as Islamophobia. Bigotry and racism exist, of course—and they are evils that all well-intentioned people must oppose. And prejudice against Muslims or Arabs, purely because of the accident of their birth, is despicable. But like all religions, Islam is a system of ideas and practices. And it is not a form of bigotry or racism to observe that the specific tenets of the faith pose a special threat to civil society. Nor is it a sign of intolerance to notice when people are simply not being honest about what they and their co-religionists believe… It is not at all clear how we should proceed in our dialogue with the Muslim world. But deluding ourselves with euphemisms and pandering to the religious sensitivities of Muslims is not the answer. There is much about Islamic culture that should appall us. The treatment of women in Muslim communities throughout the world is unconscionable. All civilized nations must unite in condemnation of a theology that now threatens to destabilize much of the earth. Muslim moderates, wherever they are, must be given every tool necessary to win a war of ideas with their coreligionists. Otherwise, we will have to win some very terrible wars in the future."
    —-Sam Harris, September 20, 2006, liberal American author, neuroscientist

    The Muslim conquests, down to the 16th century, were for the Hindus a pure struggle of life and death. Entire cities were burnt down and the populations massacred, with hundreds of thousands killed in every campaign, and similar numbers deported as slaves. Every new invader made (often literally) his hills of Hindus skulls. As a contribution to research on the quantity of the Islamic crimes against humanity, we may mention that the Indian population decreased by 80 million between 1000 (conquest of Afghanistan) and 1525 (end of Delhi Sultanat).
    —-Konreraad Elst (Belgian Historian)

  • I_Marz

    This is not intense debate…this is intense hate!? I pity you people with such dark hearts…then you have the nerve to call Islam/Muslims violent when you can think/write such horrid thoughts? I'm glad you're but a minority in the world & will, because of your narrow perspectives, remain as such even dwindling in number! That's better than any victory a sword or a gun can achieve ;) peace y'all

    • al-amin

      you’re not really reading the qur’an.. i have.. i’m an ex-muslim, and i wholeheartedly agree to what this article says.. if you’re brave, you would read not just some portions of qur’an that you like, but also portions that you don’t like. read all of it again.. and while you’re at it, also read hadith completely, not just hadith that you always considered good…

      • I_Marz

        Well you're twice mistaken my friend…I read the Quran several times, as well as the Bible as I was previously an atheist and a none believer. I don't ever refer to the hadith as its after all, man made, much like the Bible though both perhaps are God inspired. What I get from both scriptures, the most prevailing message "do unto your brother…" and that we are all each others keepers. All true Muslims adhere to this message & most EDUCATED people know thats a FACT! So I suggest if you are truly seeking wisdom, go back and read the Quran again and see all the beautiful, peaceful advise within. After all, ALL monotheistic religions are from the SAME God…no?

  • Ky'Zan'

    Magnificent job! This is the strongest and finest article I've read by Bosch Fawstin so far. It also subtly frames the argument well, and made me rethink a few minor points. He's a powerful and impressive cultural warrior. The forces of evil and illiberalism better watch out! :-)

    I especially like the way he notes non-activist Muslims are "not on our side either," and that it is "the very rare Muslim who helps us against Jihad." Other good points are "behind their boast that they love death is the fact that they hate life," and "post-9/11, the defense of our culture, our values, our very lives has been optional, but our defense of Islam has been absolute." This article also accurately states that "our problem is not 'Islamophobia' but Islamophilia," and highlight "today's Big Lie, 'Islam means peace'." Finally, among the many other well-written and rather coruscating observations, this piece observes "We've tried everything since 9/11 except real war. War is the answer to Jihad."

    That said, as a true radical and firebrand, there are a few tiny points I would slightly take issue with.

    Firstly, I think it's more accurate and helpful to identify them as "non-activist Muslims," rather than non-Muslim or non-practicing Muslims. The obvious problem with these guys is that even the nicest and best among them are a continuous objective threat to become "religious" and turn activist.

    Second, the article didn't point out the concrete and practical need to hammer and bomb the leadership of the dictatorships of Pakistan, Iran, and Saudi Arabia, among others. The nukes of Pakistan are an especial menace.

    Third, it didn't didn't point our the need for, and efficacy of, loud, energetic propaganda and an intellectual war against the philosophy of Islam. This would cost little in money and lives, and could win the War On Islam all by itself, and quickly. All those Muslim tyrannies need to be swamped in pro-Western liberal and anti-Islamic radio, t'v', and internet education.

    This high-quality piece inspires other lightly-differing, nuanced ideas and bullet points as well. Maybe about the value of deportation and immigration control, as well as the philosophic and cultural protection mainstream Christianity lends to Islam.

    Still, a truly outstanding article in a major publication!!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    <l>My name is Bosch and I’m a recovering Muslim.

    In other words, you are a blasphemous apostate, that must be executed per the dictates of Islam. Indeed, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A few of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, and the few that are not jihadists like you, for instance, are not Muslims at all but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of Islam must be executed.

    <l>Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslims who don’t aren’t. </l>

    Muslims who take Islam seriously are at war with us and Muslim [apostates] who don’t aren’t.

    <l>I’ve been around Muslims my entire life and most of them truly don’t care about Islam. </l>

    Most of them? According to what empirical evidence? Your singular perception and assumptions? Yeah right. Sorry, but that's not good enough. Indeed, without empirical evidence to support your personal observations no one in their right mind can believe what you are claiming.

    <l>The problem I have with many of these essentially non-Muslim Muslims, especially in the middle of this war being waged on us by their more consistent co-religionists, is that they give the enemy cover. </l>

    Here's your problem Bosch, even Muslim apostates like you living in the West can become blinded by PC multiculturalism to a certain degree over time. As what you are naively mislabeling as being non-Muslim Muslims are actually non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists.

    Indeed, jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, can be both violent and non-violent. As a matter of fact, non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad relative to violent jihad occurs astronomically far more prevalently today than does the violent varieties of jihad. Yet because jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism is always conflated and morally equated with terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent, the non-violent stealth and deceptive varieties of jihad as a result occur today completely completely under the radar unopposed, undetected, and unacknowledged. In other words, because your perception has been impaired to a certain extent by PC multiculturalism, you consider violent jihadists to be terrorists and non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists to be those non-Muslim Muslims you are sounding the alarm about.

    Thus, to a degree because you are a Muslim apostate and have a lot of experience with interacting with Muslims, you are at least aware of the problem. However, you need to tweak to a certain extent your understanding of the situation to cancel out the ill effects of PC multiculturalism on your perception. As a matter of fact, the many varieties of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad being employed by the Islamic world today relative to the violent varieties of jihad are actually far more detrimental in the long run to the future security of the West than the violent varieties.

    In addition, the faction of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists relative to the faction of violent jihadists is astronomically far larger. Further, the non-violent stealth and deceptive faction of jihadists see violent jihad attacks – like the 9/11 jihad attacks – as being extremely counterproductive and potentially harmful because it invites unwanted close scrutiny, attention, and focus on Islam.

    For instance, the most prevalent form of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad employed by the Islamic world against the West today that occurs completely unopposed, undetected, and unacknowledged, thanks to PC multiculturalism that pervades and infects our society, is mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, and violent jihad attacks like the 9/11 jihad attacks, which inevitably invites unwanted close scrutiny, attention, and focus on Islam, could potentially lead to Islam being outlawed in the West and mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage being banned and reversed. Which would deal an extremely severe blow to the Islamic world's stealth global jihad.

    Hence, the first and foremost priority needs to be education to make Americans aware of the true reality of Islam as opposed to the current false PC multicultural paradigm whereby Islam is believed to be a so-called Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists that is being crammed down everyone's throats by both political parties and the so-called MSM, which, by the way, includes Fox News.

    –continued below

  • ObamaYoMoma

    So while I understand that most Muslims are not at war with us, they’ve proven in their silence and inaction against jihad that they’re not on our side either, and there’s nothing we can say or do to change that……While it’s true that jihadists don’t represent most Muslims, they do represent Islam.

    Actually, that perception is completely false, thanks again to the impact that PC multiculturalism has had on your perception of the world. The reality is per the dictates of the sixth and most important pillar of Islam, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH have an obligatory duty in Islam to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. Indeed, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for RADICAL MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for EXTREMIST MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for ISLAMIST MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, while at the same giving an exemption and free pass to MODERATE MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah. Instead the sixth and most important pillar makes it an obligatory duty for ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. No exceptions.

    Hence, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A tiny minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, and the few of them like you, for instance, that are not jihadists are not Muslims at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of Islam must be executed.

    Islam wasn’t hijacked by a “small minority of extremists” on 9/11, it was hijacked by a very small minority of moderates whose embarrassment in being associated with such an immoderate religion leads them to engage in moderate truth telling about it, proving their irrelevance as allies.

    Actually, the existence of moderate Islam, peaceful Islam, radical Islam, and extremist Islam, just like the existence of peaceful Muslims, moderate Muslims, radical Muslims, extremist Muslims, and Islamist Muslims are all false PC multicultural myths. In reality there is on MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM and MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS.

    –continued below

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Following 9/11, the only thing George W. Bush knew about Islam was that it was a religion, and that apparently was a good enough reason for him to exonerate it as he did…“Nothing this evil could come from religion.” But 9/11 did come from a religion. Whatever else 9/11 was, it was an act of faith. But then why don’t most Muslims engage in jihad?

    Actually, the word ISLAM in Arabic means “submission” and the word MUSLIM in Arabic means “one who submits.” As a matter of fact, Islam is not a faith-based religion, since Islam requires total, complete, and unconditional submission to the will of Allah.

    Thus, unlike in true faith-based religions where adherents are perfectly free to question and even challenge the texts and tenets of their respective religions and to even leave their respective religion or even convert to another religion altogether if they so desire, in Islam, on the other hand, because the freedom of conscience is forbidden, those same actions, blasphemy in the first instance and apostasy in the second, are capital offenses.

    Indeed, what true faith-based religions also punish blasphemy and apostasy under the pain of death? The answer, of course, is none of them, irrefutably proving at the same time that Islam is not a true faith-based religion.

    Therefore, since Islam is not a true faith-based religion as it masquerades as being, what exactly is Islam? The answer is Islam is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe the gullible societies it intends to eventually subjugate into a very draconian from of Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

    As a matter of fact, Islam is far closer to Communism than it is to being a religion, as just like Communism, Islam seeks world domination, and the end result of Islam, exactly like Communism, is totalitarianism and lots and lots of misery.

    Hence, it is imperative that Islam be outlawed in America and mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, which is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, be banned and reversed ASAP.

    As a matter of fact, Muslims never ever migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter to assimilate and integrate, but instead to eventually subjugate and dominate via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

    In fact, anywhere and everywhere mass Muslim immigration is occurring today in the world, just like clockwork the vast overwhelming majority of Muslim immigrants flat out refuse to assimilate and integrate and instead form segregated Muslim enclaves that in time eventually morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia as fifth columns and in direct contravention to the laws of the states in which they reside. Indeed, the government of France a few years ago identified 758 Muslim no-go zones in France alone.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    And Bush saying “Islam is peace” shortly after 9/11 gave the enemy a gift they couldn’t have foreseen.

    Indeed, instead of proclaiming Islam to be a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists in response to the 9/11 jihad attacks that killed 3,000 innocent Americans and to also pander for Muslim votes, GWB should have outlawed Islam and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP, as common sense dictates that zero Muslim jihadists living in America as a fifth column equals zero jihadist attacks in America.

    Then to make matters far worse, GWB used the 9/11 jihad attack like a Dhimmicrat on steroids as a crisis to justify doubling the size, scope, and power of the federal government via the creation of the very intrusive Patriot Act, the gargantuan and totally useless Department of Homeland Security, the extremely invasive TSA, and the humongous and completely incompetent National Intelligence Directorate, ostensibly to protect the homeland, but in reality to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage via the creation of a false sense of security. Indeed, each Muslim immigrant we allow into America incrementally increases the probability of violent jihad attacks and at the same time also facilitates stealth demographic conquest. Thus, the truth is we are really more vulnerable to violent jihad attacks today than we were before 9/11.

    Then inevitably the first time the economy headed south in 2008, predictably federal budget deficits and the national debt both skyrocketed through the roof. Yet, no one in the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party today are proposing that we outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage as a way of getting our financial house back in order.

    Thus, we are considering massive budget cuts, massive tax increases, and even implementing draconian cuts to our military today that will inevitably open the door for the forces of totalitarianism to become predominant in the world, and we are doing all of this contemplating unfortunately to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. Not to mention as well, can anyone point to another immigrant group besides Muslims that cost nearly as much to accommodate?

    Indeed, it couldn’t be any more obvious that the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party today are really two sides of the same completely incompetent Leftwing coin.

    In addition, instead of implementing a new American strategy of containment to contain the growth, spread, and expansion of Islam, GWB launched a new war on the Western manifestation only of terrorism, which indicates that GWB was more than just a few cards short of a full deck, which, by the way, inevitably turned into the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history that caused thousands of American troops to be either killed or maimed and at the same time trillions of dollars to be wasted all for nothing.

    Meanwhile, instead of the RINO Republicans accepting and acknowledging their responsibility for creating the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history, they are instead trying to lay the blame for their inevitable failures on Obama. Indeed, this country is like a soap opera.

  • effemall

    Am deeply grateful for this comprehensive article from the horse's mouth which confirmed all my suspicions and assumptions and clarifies the whole issue. The only salvation for the world will be mass apostasy by the world's Muslims which, of course, is a dream. The alternative will be another Crusade that may reduce the global population by 25%. A good example of taqiyya in the comment columns is the response by I_Marz who simply copied and pasted the same b.s. over and over again in response to various comments, heavy-handedly exercising the Hitlerian theory that a lie big enough and told often enough will be accepted as truth.

  • John Baily

    Why on earth are we talking about these primitive thugs. The truth is there for all to see and the author of this article is right in his assertions. Its time we called it for what it is…..evil. Remember one of Mohamed's wives was just 6 years old and that makes him a pedophile. Any religion or movement which holds that up as God given is sick.

  • kartik


  • rakesh


  • Bosch_Fawstin

    "ILLITERATE"? It was *Mohammad* (IF he existed) who claimed to be illiterate, which would make the Koran illiterature.

  • Carolyn

    Those who claim to be Muslim, if they are following Islam are jihadists-their aim is to wipe out all who are not Muslim. What a well written piece this is.

  • Carlos SpicyWeener

    This is, very likely, the best essay ever penned about Islam. This should be the preamble to every book published in the West from now until the final defeat of Islam. It should be immortalized in film, in monuments, engraved in buildings everywhere to make us think, reflect and remember who we are and what we’re not.
    The only way that Nazism was defeated in Germany was because it was discredited and scrubbed out of Germany’s institutions, legal codes and social mores. Same with Shinto.
    Alas, this was not done after the fall of Communism in Russia. And to all those countries that were liberated since 9/11. No wonder that they are all crawling back to their old head-chopping/stone-throwing/acid-throwing habits of yore.

    • Billy Saunders

      I agree. It puts my thoughts into words better than I could myself.

  • givemeliberty

    There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim. Those who do call themselves moderate Muslims are ignorant of Islam, a terrorist cult that seduces people to come in but forbids them to leave. Those Muslims who know Islam are terrorists, everyone one of them.

    • SafetyDave

      Absolutely. 30 years ago a few people tried to convert me. They gave me a koran. The more I read the more I knew it was wrong!

    • DonnaBianca

      givemeliberty wrote:
      “There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim.”

      No, I’m afraid you missed the first main point of this excellent essay.

      MOST Muslims are moderates.
      But there is no such thing as “moderate Islam.”

      Islam the religion, Islam the ideology of monotheistic conquest — that is a product of the Muslim scriptures: the Quran, the Hadith and the Sunnah. Muslims, the people, are a product of many different influences — including Islam. Most Muslims are moderate and peaceful, and their sin against the non-Muslim world is mainly one of omission: that is, they don’t oppose or speak out against shariah law, against the tyrants and the jihadists.

      Maybe the moderate Muslims stay silent because they know that the scriptures of their religion mandate shariah law and violent jihad, and they don’t want to oppose the Quran and become infidels themselves. (Apostasy is punishable by death in Islam. So is heresy, at least any significant heresy.) Maybe they fear persecution from other Muslims, or maybe they even fear persecution from non-Muslims if the truth about the violent nature of true Islam were better known.

      There could be many reasons for their silence; but none of them is an adequate moral excuse. Sadly, moral cowardice is a pervasive human condition, a sickness of the psyche or soul that is not limited to Muslims.

      “Don’t judge the Muslims that you know by Islam,
      and don’t judge Islam by the Muslims that you know.”

      This essay might be helpful in understanding the distinction:

  • Steve from Oregon

    I love your posting! What I, as a non-muslim, don’t understand, is the following.
    Wikipedia describes one who believes in Islam a Muslim.
    Please educate me/us.
    Thank you!

    • SafetyDave

      You have to read the Koran AND the Haddiths. only a few chapters and you will understand all you need. Yes, it is that evil!

    • DonnaBianca

      Wikipedia is permeated with Political Correctness on most social topics, which gets in the way of real truth. It’s a good place to start doing research on many things, because you can often find links and references there. But you need to be judicious in reading wikipedia, and sort the wheat from the chaff. Anyone can edit wikipedia, and most of the people who spend their time doing that are on the “progressive” left.

  • DogmaelJones1

    As Fawstin ably demonstrates, it’s either/or concerning Islam. Never the twain shall meet between Western civilization and Islam.

  • drdias

    “The only peace and tolerance Islam delivered is to the dead!”

    “We must stop enabling this death cult known as Islam!

    “Islam is an Ideology of death not a religion!”

    Islam the Ideological cult of Enslavement and Death!

    “Islam is an overly deprave Ideology that was fabricated by a group of completely barbaric semi illiterate mass murdering pillaging lying misogynistic whore mongering syphilitic profane warlords and pedophiles to subjugate then enslave those who they deem easily conquerable or infrahuman to sadistically feed their demented sexual orientations!”

  • Martin Konvička

    This is destined to be tough for them, since islam breeds, in its more serious adherents, uneasy mixture of supermacism (we muslims and islam are the best),vulberability (what if we are not?) and paranoia (what if other muslims find out about my doubts? what if the unbelievers are after me, and what is shaitan is?)

    Surely, we need uneasy and self-doubting muslims!
    It is said that alcoholic must hit the bottm first…

  • Blaze Pascal

    I wish I had a better idea of how I personally can act to weaken outfits like CAIR etc. What can I do to help the resistance? Or is it basically just blogging and letter writing?

  • Blaze Pascal

    thanks Chezwich, these are good. I'm in for the duration.

  • aspacia

    Its inbreeding also causes mental and physical defects.

  • aspacia

    Go to Anti-Cair for starters. Whitehead keeps abreast about what this group is doing and who is acting against them.

  • aspacia

    Sure, we have bad apples, but you have many more in your brethren:

    What about the Israeli who had his eyes spooned out while he was still alive. What about all the videos of Muslims literally mob attacking one or two Jews and literally ripping them apart.

    Stop the Straw Man game, reform your violent brethren and leave us alone.

  • aspacia

    Watch some intelligent critiques of Islam and the ME nightmare .

  • Beth

    that link is nothing but Propaganda I_Marz

  • LibertarianToo

    I'm not anyone's brother, least of all yours. It's a shame you decided to live in the free secular world. Wouldn't you be more comfortable in the god-addled, male supremicist, Muslim one? Of course you've already been infected with anti-Muslim values –as indicated by your stated respect for the right of others to speak their opinions –followed immediately by your assertion that anyone who isn't stupid agrees with you. But I'm sure you're trying.

    And no. No unity for me, thanks. I prefer individual liberty.

  • I_Marz

    Fair enough…to each his/her own & that's all the effort you deserve from me!