All-American Muslim?

Bruce Bawer is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center and the author of “While Europe Slept” and “Surrender.” His book "The Victims' Revolution: The Rise of Identity Studies and the Closing of the Liberal Mind" is just out from Broadside / Harper Collins.


Pages: 1 2

A few more facts about Al-Marayati, courtesy of the Investigative Project on Terrorism.  He’s described terrorist attacks by Hizballah as “legitimate resistance” and has told Muslims not to cooperate with FBI agents investigating their fellow believers.  Under his leadership, the MPAC has called for the U.S. to remove Hizballah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad from its list of terrorist organizations.   In 1996, when a Palestinian shouting “Allahu Akbar” drove his car into a Jerusalem crowd, killing one and injuring 23, Al-Marayati issued a condemnation – not of the terrorist but of the hero who shot him to death on the spot before he could wreak further damage.  In 2006, Al-Marayati predicted a “storm…coming” for American Muslims that would be “worse than Japanese internment.”  Where did he make this prediction?  At “a fundraising dinner for Palestinian Islamic Jihad member Sami Al-Arian.”

Apparently the ludicrous equation of Islamic values with those articulated in the Declaration of Independence is standard practice for Al-Marayati.  On more than one occasion he has suggested that Patrick Henry, when he said “Give me liberty or give me death,” was perfectly articulating the spirit of jihad.  (This is not a joke.)

It should be clear to any sensate creature what we are dealing with here.  And yet, as it turns out, Al—Marayati has not only been invited to peddle his slippery wares in places like the Times and Wall Street Journal and Huffington Post but has also, among much else, been welcomed as a panelist on Bill Maher’s Politically Correct and interviewed at length, in 2006, on PBS’s Frontline (in which, far from being asked a single remotely challenging question, he was spoon-fed inquiries plainly designed to allow him to serve up his usual spin).  He was even a guest at the Clinton White House on multiple occasions, and has, in his capacity as head of MPAC, played host to White House staffers, as well as State and Defense department officials, at an iftar (Ramadan fast-breaking).

In short, Al-Marayati is yet another example of the dangerous determination of high-level figures in the mainstream media and government, and in sundry institutions ranging from the police to the military, to distort out of all recognition the harsh realities of jihad and sharia and to reimagine Islam as a benign faith that teach a love of peace and freedom – and, of course, to collaborate in this effort with Muslims whose own shady histories testify to the blatant dishonesty of the whole shebang.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.  

Pages: 1 2

  • ObamaYoMoma

    It didn’t seem to matter to the Times that Al-Marayati himself is a longtime associate of and apologist for terrorists.

    Hey Bruce, since non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad is obviously not violent, then it isn't construed as being terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent, and therefore non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad occurs today throughout the West below the radar totally undetected, unacknowledged, and unopposed thanks to PC multiculturalism, since jihad is always routinely conflated and morally equated as being terrorism. In addition, the non-violent varieties of jihad, such as stealth demographic conquest, relative to the violent varieties of jihad are employed against the West by the Islamic world astronomically far more prevalently.

    Hence, why do you FPM writers all insist upon conflating and morally equating jihad with terrorism, per the tenets of PC multiculturalism, since that practice enables the many varieties of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad to occur today below the radar completely undetected, unacknowledged, and unopposed throughout the West? Not to mention that jihad and terrorism are really two mutually exclusive manifestations and in fact two entirely different and very distinct things altogether.

    Indeed, if it isn't perpetrated by Muslims and is not specifically in the cause of Allah, then it is terrorism, Meanwhile, if it is perpetrated by Muslims and specifically in the cause of Allah, then it is jihad. However, when jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, is conflated and morally equated with terrorism, which as its name implies can be only violent, again it enables all the many varieties of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, such as stealth demographic conquest, to be able to occur today below the radar completely undetected, unauthorized, and unopposed since if it is not violent then it is not terrorism.

    Otherwise, Bruce I applaud your outstanding knowledge of Islam.

    • sononthe_beach

      An incredible demonstration of semantic mush. Might even be historical.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Sorry if I was a little too sophisticated for your intellectual level. Anyway, if you want to remain blinded by PC multiculturalism and remain a gullible useful idiot for the rest of your life at the same time, then by all means don't let me stop you from fulfilling your aspirations.

    • jacob

      I always like your comments but this time, you would have been the envy of
      the famous Mexican comedian MARIO MORENO ("CANTINFLAS"), known
      for talking for half an hour and not saying a damned thing….
      But, since we are bordering the issue of violent vs. "moderate" Islam please
      tell me what do you make out from the Muslims dancing and giving out
      candy in their gesture of joy in the streets of QUEENS, NY, while people
      were jumping to their deaths from the WTC windows ????
      Were they also violent or "moderate" Muslims ????

      • ObamaYoMoma

        I apologize. Some of us have already gotten through Islam 101 and both levels of intermediate Islam already and we are actually on the advanced levels of Islam today. Thus, I apologize if my post sailed completely over your head. Maybe, who knows, in about 10 years or so you can return back to this thread and read my post again. Indeed, if you are lucky it may make a little more sense to you the next time around. Until that time though, remember don't take any wooden nickles. I wouldn't want to see you hurt yourself.

    • Sound&Fury

      Your logic is tortured, even if your intent is clear. Jihad & terrorism are not necessarily the same thing, but one begets the other. End of story.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Your logic is tortured, even if your intent is clear. Jihad & terrorism are not necessarily the same thing, but one begets the other. End of story.

        In other words, you don't have a clue what jihad is since per the dictates of PC multiculturalism you always conflate and morally equate it as being terrorism, which as it name implies is always only violet.

        PC multiculturalism is like a cancer, once it spreads it is almost impossible to eradicate. Nevertheless, jihad and terrorism are two separate and mutually exclusive manifestations and in fact two entirely different and very distinct things altogether. Yet, just like PC multiculturalism conflates and morally equates all civilizations, cultures, and societies as all being equal and the same, PC multiculturalism likewise conflates and morally equates jihad with terrorism as also being equal and the same thing, when in reality that is utterly absurd and very self-destructive, because it enables the many varieties of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad – such as stealth demographic conquest – to occur today completely below the radar of scrutiny and totally undetected, unacknowledged, and unopposed.

        Therefore, if you aspire to remain a gullible useful idiot for the remainder of your miserable life, then more power to you.

        • Sound&Fury

          You really like that word "conflate", don't you?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You really are mentally deficient, aren't you?

  • montlasky

    Has the "free world" gone dilly????? Islam is bieng promoted as the world's panacea of virtue and peace whilst hiding a throat slitting knife under their breeches to ensure Sharia law, the abuse of women, gays and other groups whom they want to illiminate. Wake up world!!!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Indeed, what is happening in Europe and also America today with respect to freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and the right to privacy is very scary when you combine it altogether with the massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government that occurred under Bush, ostensibly to protect the homeland from so-called “terrorist” attacks, but in reality to create a false sense of security so that we can continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, at the same time our heretofore constitutionally protected freedom of expression, freedom of speech, and right to privacy have all systematically been usurped. It's like we are slowly being conditioned to become accustomed to totalitarianism.

    Meanwhile, what other immigrant groups besides Muslims did we Americans have to sacrifice our constitutionally protected rights and freedoms in order to accommodate? Indeed, what other immigrant groups besides Muslims have caused the US to double the size, scope, and power of the federal government and to expend hundreds of billions of dollars annually in order to accommodate?

    As a matter of fact, thanks to Bush's massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government in response to the 9/11 jihad attacks, as soon as the economy headed south in 2008, budget deficits and our national debt simultaneously exploded through the roof with the result being that we are on the fast track to becoming the next Greece.

    However, if Bush had simply applied common-sense and outlawed Islam and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage instead, not only would we not be on the fast track to becoming the next Greece like we are today, but all the unfortunate Americans that were killed in domestic jihad attacks – such as the Fort Hood Massacre – would all still be alive and well today. As zero Muslim stealth jihadists living in America as a fifth column would equal zero violent jihad attacks in America. It's not rocket science.

    Nevertheless, Republicans and Dhimmicrats have been fighting all year long to get our financial house back in order, but I have not heard one time either a Republican or a Dhimmicrat proposing to outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage so that we can roll back all the massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government that occurred thanks to Bush in order to get our financial house back in order. Indicating that the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party are really just two sides of the same grossly incompetent or totally corrupt – whatever the case may be – Leftwing coin.

    As a matter of fact, we are today contemplating massive budget cuts, massive tax increases, and implementing severe draconian cuts to our military that inevitably would swing the door wide open for the forces of totalitarianism to become predominant in the world, and we are contemplating doing all of this in order to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage.

    In fact, I'm even starting to get a little paranoid today. I use to believe that 9/11 truthers were kooks, but I'm kind of wondering about that today if it wasn't all maybe by design to create a crisis to justify the massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government and to usurp our heretofore constitutionally protected rights and freedoms as a precursor for the eventual imposition of totalitarianism and one world governance. It kind of makes you wonder what really is happening.

    Indeed, we live in some very strange and weird times today.

    • Sound&Fury

      Our current budget problems are the result of entitlement spending, not defense spending. To suggest that Bush seized the opportunity to expand the federal govt, or perhaps engineered the opportunity, is black helicopter thinking. Would you by chance be a Ron Paul supporter?

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Our current budget problems are the result of entitlement spending, not defense spending. To suggest that Bush seized the opportunity to expand the federal govt, or perhaps engineered the opportunity, is black helicopter thinking. Would you by chance be a Ron Paul supporter?

        With all due disrespect, our current budget problems are a direct manifestation of our federal government being way too damn big, especially since like a Dhimmicrat on steroids, the Bush administration used the 9/11 jihad attacks as a crisis to justify doubling the size, scope, and power of the federal government via the creation of the extremely intrusive Patriot Act, the humongous and totally useless Department of Homeland Security, the incredibly invasive TSA, and the gargantuan and completely incompetent National Intelligence Directorate, which altogether are the biggest federal boondoggles ever created in the history of mankind, while at the same time usurping our heretofore constitutionally protected rights and freedoms in the process, ostensibly to protect the homeland from so-called terrorist attacks, but in reality to create a false sense of security necessary so that we can continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage.

        Now if Bush had been a sane person, he never would have proclaimed Islam to be a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists, especially right after 3,000 innocent Americans had just been killed in a violent jihad attack. A sane person also would never have used the 9/11 jihad attacks as a crisis like a Dhimmicrat on steroids to justify massively expanding the size, scope, and power of the federal government, since sane people know already that expanding government is never the solution for anything much less protecting the homeland from so-called terrorist attacks.

        Indeed, a sane person would have outlawed Islam and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP in response to 9/11 instead, as common-sense dictates that zero Muslim stealth jihadists living in America as a fifth column equals zero possibility of jihad attacks. Hence, if Bush had acted like a sane conservative instead of an insane Leftist, not only would we not be on the fast track to becoming the next Greece today, but all those innocent Americans that died in domestic jihad attacks – such as the Fort Hood Massacre – would all still be alive and well today.

        With respect to entitlement spending, unless we do something to reform and restructure entitlements in the near term, they will become a major problem in the future. However, they are not the reason that the budget deficits and the national debt exploded through the roof the instant the economy headed south in 2008, as that was a direct result of the Bush administration's insane massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government.

        Moreover, I never said anything about defense spending other than that we are contemplating implementing severe draconian cuts to our military that inevitably will swing the door wide open for the forces of totalitarianism to become predominant in the world in order to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage. As we could simply outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, which is really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, and then roll back all of Bush's massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government and get our financial house back in order at the same time.

        Regarding your question of me being a Ron Paul supporter, are you one of Bush's RINO supporters? As Bush not only created the greatest boondoggles in the history of mankind, he also gave us the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history as well via his insane and incredibly counterproductive and exceedingly fantasy based nation-building missions in Afghanistan and Iraq that were both based on false PC multicultural myths and assumptions about Islam and Muslims and were therefore preordained to fail even before they were ever implemented.

        Indeed, thousands of American troops were either killed or maimed and trillions of dollars were wasted all for nothing. Therefore, I sincerely hope that Bush and whoever else in his administration that were responsible for those two greatest strategic blunders ever in America history are eventually held to account and severely punished for their gross malfeasance in office so that it never occurs again.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ JasonPappas

    "it’s not Islam but free speech about Islam that’s in danger in the Western world today."

    Damn right! The MSM is having a love fest with Islam. It's the one religion that they won't criticize. Academia is even more inthralled. They finally found a religion that they can love.

    What is it about Islam? Is it the totalitarian nature of the religion? Is this a substitute for communism?

    Or is it the anti-American attitude. Is this another way to hate America?

    • ObamaYoMoma

      What is it about Islam? Is it the totalitarian nature of the religion? Is this a substitute for communism?

      Although I wouldn't go so for as to label Islam a religion, I would say it is its totalitarian nature as Leftists are collectivists. Therefore, Leftists are totalitarians. Hell, I guess the more draconian the form of totalitarianism the better.

      In any event, Islam is really a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a faith-based religion in order to dupe the gullible societies it intends to eventually subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme. Thus, Islam is far closer to being a totalitarian ideology like Communism than it is to being a religion, as just like Communism, Islam seeks world domination, and the end result of Islam, exactly like Communism, is totalitarianism and lots and lots of misery.

      Additionally, what faith-based religions punish blasphemy and apostasy under the pain of death other than Islam? Of course, the answer is none of them, irrefutably proving at the same time that Islam is not a faith-based religion as it pretends to be.

      • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ JasonPappas

        Of course, we agree again. Except for David's book, "Unholy Alliance," this connection is even missed in conventional conservative venues. But then again some conservatives (should I mention Dinesh D'Souza?) can't see beyond the faith-based mask.

  • Robert

    I would only ask, how many people did your religion of freedom kill this week?

  • Brujo Blanco

    A devote Muslim by definition lies and cannot be trusted. Islam requires acts of extreme violence for their God.

  • jacob

    OBAMAYOMAMA :

    You are talking about Muslim immigration ???
    What if I would tell you that most clerks at USA consulates in ISRAEL of all places,
    are ARABS ????
    And as to "moderate" Islam, doesn't the "holy" KORAN, which Muslims must obey
    verbatum or else…. preaches deceit when dealing with "infidels" ????
    Unless the above is false of all falsehood, then what kind of morons, idiots or plain
    imbeciles are the ductors of our policy regarding Muslim immigration ????
    Because what they are doing is importing the knives that will slit our throats..! !
    PERIOD

    • ObamaYoMoma

      You are talking about Muslim immigration ???

      Mass Muslim immigration for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest is a form of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad. As Muslims never ever migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter to assimilate and integrate, but instead to eventually subjugate and dominate via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

      In fact, mass Muslim immigration for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, which is the most prevalently employed form of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad today, is able to take place completely below the radar of scrutiny and totally undetected, unacknowledged, and unopposed exactly because per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, is always conflated with terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent. Therefore, if it isn't violent, it isn't construed as being terrorism and hence it is allowed to take place completely unopposed.

      What if I would tell you that most clerks at USA consulates in ISRAEL of all places,
      are ARABS ????

      You wouldn't be telling me anything I haven't known for many years already.

      And as to "moderate" Islam, doesn't the "holy" KORAN, which Muslims must obey
      verbatum or else…. preaches deceit when dealing with "infidels" ????

      Of course, it does, but what does that have to do with the price of tea in China?

      • Western Canadian

        per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, is always conflated with terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent. Therefore, if it isn’t violent, it isn’t construed as being terrorism and hence it is allowed to take place completely unopposed.
        ******

        My, you do go on and on, now don’t you. You are also full of it, as the stealth jihad is being opposed. You are wrong on both sides of your own contrived and irrational argument.

  • Walt2001

    Maybe it is me, but maybe if muslims would stop killing people others would believe they were peaceful. Until the killing by so called extremists stops people will not trust the followers of that pedeophile muhammy.

    • SpiritOf1683

      The mass murders is the most direct means of telling us virtually everything we know about Islam and its unpleasant ways. Even if the killing stopped, that still leaves the treatment of gays, women, infidels, the virulent antisemitism, misogyny, bigotry, intolerance, joyless, cultureless and killjoy spirit of Islam.

  • crypticguise

    It is only possible for this IslamoFascist to make despicable, lying statements like he does because Americans are no educated or familiar with the basic tenets of Islam, the Koran, Sira and Hadith.

    Our colleges and Universtities spread the lies of a peaceful Islam and our politicians and even our security organizations are pre-empted by these liars.

  • effemall

    Yomama, I always agree with you but today you transgressed the old adage, KISS, keep it simple, stupid, and then defended yourself rudely and childishly against critics of your style who were right. Have a drink, get off the podium and relax. The greatest victims of Islam are its followers who would be killed if they tried to distance themselves from it. Many of these are just plain folks like you and me who seek little more than enough income to keep a roof over their heads and food on their table. Unfortunately, because part of their education is taqiyya it would be folly to trust any of them which makes it hard to pick out the benign. The incarceration of American Japanese in WW II has been widely condemned, but if we look back with open eyes we see that it made sense at the time. The Japanese used incredible deception in their foolish attempt to conquer America. Their aircraft carriers sailed towards Hawaii and their bombers took off for their mission of destruction while their diplomats in silk top hats shuffled around to meetings in Washington pretending to negotiate trade deals or whatever. After Pearl Harbor concerns for security dictated that no Japanese could be trusted and so they were rounded up to be held in camps. But America had not been weakened at that time by an overwhelming number of bleeding heart liberals who wear blinders and it hadn't voted in a president who would bow deeply to the enemy's Emperor Hirohito as our Kenyan does to the King of Saudi Arabia. We are far more vulnerable today than we were in '41.

    • SpiritOf1683

      Most Muslims would not give up Islam regardless of the chances to do so. At best only about 5% – 10% of Muslims would give up Islam if every imam, cleric, mullah, mufti, ayatollah and despot on earth all died simultaneously and in addition, every Koran on the planet self-combusted, whilst Mecca and Medina crumbled to dust, and all of this happened at the same time tomorrow. Islam and hatred of the infidel is far too hardwired into their mindset for anything else. The US ambassador to Tripoli observed back in 1799 that Muslims are more afraid of the frowns of a long-dead bigot than what they are of the living despot whose frown would cost them their lives.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Yomama, I always agree with you but today you transgressed the old adage, KISS, keep it simple, stupid, and then defended yourself rudely and childishly against critics of your style who were right. Have a drink, get off the podium and relax. The greatest victims of Islam are its followers who would be killed if they tried to distance themselves from it. Many of these are just plain folks like you and me who seek little more than enough income to keep a roof over their heads and food on their table. Unfortunately, because part of their education is taqiyya it would be folly to trust any of them which makes it hard to pick out the benign. The incarceration of American Japanese in WW II has been widely condemned, but if we look back with open eyes we see that it made sense at the time. The Japanese used incredible deception in their foolish attempt to conquer America. Their aircraft carriers sailed towards Hawaii and their bombers took off for their mission of destruction while their diplomats in silk top hats shuffled around to meetings in Washington pretending to negotiate trade deals or whatever. After Pearl Harbor concerns for security dictated that no Japanese could be trusted and so they were rounded up to be held in camps. But America had not been weakened at that time by an overwhelming number of bleeding heart liberals who wear blinders and it hadn't voted in a president who would bow deeply to the enemy's Emperor Hirohito as our Kenyan does to the King of Saudi Arabia. We are far more vulnerable today than we were in '41.

      Hey dude…I responded in kind. Nevertheless don't humor yourself, I could care less what you think about my posts. Moreover, your analogy is pointless and incredibly lame and was a complete waste of my valuable time. Hence, in the future why don't you do yourself a favor and bypass reading my posts, and I will promise to do the same. Thank you very much and have a good day.

  • mrbean

    Dhimmi "Useful Idiots" of Islam don't realize that the Muslims don't want to be tolerant, they don't want allies, they don't want to assimilate, they want to change America to conform to Islam and Sharia law. Useful idiot Dhimmis just want no conflict and the alligator to eat them last. Muck the Fuzzlims! Kill 'em all, wrap 'em in theirprayer rugs and put 'em all in piles, burn 'em all using pork grease for a starter, and let Allah sort 'em out. Oh deaaaarrr, I am just sooooo awful aren't I.

  • SpiritOf1683

    Of course in the US and much of the rest of the West, 11 years old Polish Catholic girls are much more ofd an enemy than scum like Salam Al-Marayati, who belongs in Yemen. And if another 9/11 attrocity gets carried out anywhere in the US, these same PC dolts who infest the US and much of the West will continue to behave as if an 11 year old Polish Catholic girl or a white 90-years-old Jewish granny is more likely to be the culprit than a 25 years old Saudi Muslim male with a long history of infidel-bashing on Youtube videos.

  • RoguePatriot6

    "Today’s anti-Muslim rhetoric is eerily similar to the pre-Nazi rhetoric against Jews….Hate against Muslim children in elementary and secondary schools is on the rise.”

    This isn't the first time someone tried to hijack this old theme of comparing themselves to the holocaust victims. How distasteful!!! The same propaganda tactic is being employed all over Europe now. It's a true sign of how ignorant we as a nation of people have become and how pathetically sad our education system is. I say this because, I can see how this sort of garbage will snare the gullible zombies of our left leaning indoctrination centers we call "schools".

    • joy52

      Schools were ok until teachers unions ruined them.

  • RoguePatriot6

    (cont'd) The difference between the Pre-Nazi Germany and Resentment towards Muslims

    For starters let me point out a few differences between the too groups or situations. Jews didn't enter a country to form "no-go zones", prohibiting only people of their mindset to enter, Islamists did. Jews didn't restrict free speech by making it a criminal act to speak against their beliefs, Islamists did. Jews weren't the perpetrators of numerous gang rapes against women of the host nation they inhabited, Islamists are. Jews didn't incite violence against citizens all over Europe because of a silly cartoon about a man that was nothing more than a self made dictator, Islamists did. The resentment you see in America towards Muslims, isn't based upon the words of a man bent upon jealousy and hatred against the wealth and success of a race of people, Pre-Nazi German was. So, I ask, who are truly the victims? Let me give you a hint, it's not Islamists.

    I hope I'm wrong about the gullibility of our weakened nation so that we won't buy into this sewage.

  • John of Chaldea

    While Obama lets in thousands of Muslims (many of whom hate America & its' freedoms), he lets in very few Christians as refugees, who're being persecuted, assaulted raped & murdered by muslims in muslim majority countries. When the Republicans take control of both houses & the Presidency, All muslim immigration should be BANNED!!!

  • curmudgeon

    if islamists had any sense at all, they would stop all terrorism, and accept the win that the multiculturalists are determined to give them. stealth jihad is winning. in 50 years, the west will be overrun with young muslims, and the final solution-the extermination of all remaining infidels-can be completed according to plan. only the terrorists can upset this fait accompli, by waking up the suicidal multiculturalists of the west before it becomes impossible to expel all muslims from our western countries. in order to survive, the west must somehow aquire some sense, and expel all muslims. there is no safe number of muslims in a country. when they are a tiny minority, they are peaceful, but as they gain population, they become progressively more toxic. would you voluntarily ingest a small does if poison if you thought it would probably not kill you, but would kill your grandchildren? islam is the same–death to your descendants. you might as well murder your own grandchildren as allow muslims in your country.

    • http://nycright.blogspot.com Ron Lewenberg

      They don't do this for two reasons.
      1. Pride/machismo.
      2. They know how sick we are. We killed Bin Laden, but the Islamists one thanks to George Bush standing on a stage with CAIR.

  • LindaRivera

    Above article: "He’s described terrorist attacks by Hizballah as “legitimate resistance” and has told Muslims not to cooperate with FBI agents investigating their fellow believers. Under his leadership, the MPAC has called for the U.S. to remove Hizballah, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad from its list of terrorist organizations."

    Above article: "He was a guest at the Clinton White House on multiple occasions, and has, in his capacity as head of MPAC, played host to White House staffers, as well as State and Defense department officials, at an iftar (Ramadan fast-breaking)."

    Takiyya – lies and DECEIVING infidels is taught in the Koran. The Koran commands all nations and peoples are conquered and that jihad is an obligation for EVERY Muslim.

    Government leaders and media know EXACTLY who this man is. Our government (and other Western governments) know that he and his Muslim brothers' goal is Islamic conquest of America and the world. Our government and other Western governments are COOPERATING FULLY with the Muslim goal.

    We are sold out by our own governments.

  • LindaRivera

    FRONTPAGEMAG: Muslim Persecution of Christians. by Raymond Ibrahim. Dec 27th, 2011.
    "Christians are being refused refugee status [in the U.S.] and face persecution and many times certain death for their religious beliefs under Sharia, while whole Muslim communities are entering the U.S. by the tens of thousands per month despite the fact that they face no religious persecution.” http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/27/muslim-persecu

    It is most URGENT that a huge campaign – emails, petitions, phone calls, meetings with government representatives and HUGE STREET PROTESTS is mounted by ALL Christian, and human rights organizations to protest the VICIOUS and DEADLY PERSECUTION of Christians by the U.S. government and other Western governments for REFUSING to allow into our countries, Christians and other non-Muslims who are SEVERELY persecuted by Muslims.

    • joy52

      Non-muslims need to get vocal.

  • LindaRivera

    John of Chaldea and Frontpagemag readers:

    America's leaders are united with Islam in the WAR against Christians. Iraq's Christians were ruthlessly disarmed by America rendering Christians defenseless prey for barbaric Muslim killers.

    FRONTPAGEMAG: The Plight of Christians in Iraq By: Jamie Glazov
    Wednesday, September 24, 2008

    Murray: More than half of the Christian population has been forced to flee their homes in Iraq because of Islamic violence against them. Their churches have been burned and bombed.

    The official position of the Administration has been that “Coalition Forces assisting the Christians would cause them to be identified with the United States and have even more problems.” As a result they receive no assistance in defending themselves at all.

    Immediately after the American invasion of Iraq, the Christian militias were disarmed. They were the only militias to be disarmed. American forces allowed both the Sunnis and Shiites to keep their armed militias.

    Christians first fled from Baghdad to the Nineveh Plains, and then to Jordan and Syria. In Jordan and Syria the American embassies told Iraqi refugees to go to the United Nations because their plight “was not an American problem.” Excuse me?

    Meanwhile the official position of the State Department under Condi Rice​ is that Christians are harassed by “criminal elements” in Iraq and that no persecution exists. That attitude has caused even greater persecution and led our embassies and other nations to be unhelpful. http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?…

  • joy52

    No one cared or thought about islam in the US until 9/11. It was islam that created this problem, not Americans. The whining is not impressing us.

    It is true as commenters noted that muslims work in US embassies and make it very difficult for Christian refugees. Government policy could change that. Instead, our government is propping up islam.

    Muslim immigration should stop and islam should be declared a death cult.

    • RoguePatriot6

      Interesting post. You know, if Christians were guilty of a fraction of what Islam has been guilty of, it would have been declared a death cult a long time ago.

    • SpiritOf1683

      They'd forgotten about it, because people think history datws back to the 1980s. They forgot the words of John Quincy Adams and America's travails with the Barbary Pirates. The Reconquista, Battle of Tours, the Siege of Constantinople in 1453, the big defensive battles against the Jihad from the Battle of Nandorfehervar in 1456 and the Siege of Vienna in 1529 through to the battle of Vienna in 1683 and those in between like the Battle for Malta in 1565, Lepanto in 1571, the Battle for Cyprus in 1570. Had Martel lost at Tours, France and Britain would have been conquered, just like North Africa, Persia and Afghanistan had been in the 100 years following the death of Mohammed. Every country that is Islamic had a Christian, Jewish, Hindu and Buddhist past, and John Wesley described Islam as a destroyer of civilization.

    • Don Kosloff

      Actually many people in the US have cared about and thought about Islam for decades. The US Marine Corps Hymn includes the words "to the shores of Tripoli" which refers to the US wars against the Muslim Barbary Pirates. Many of us know that the standard US armed forces .45 caliber 1911 Colt sidearm was issued to US forces to provide them with a weapon with better stopping power for use againt Muslim insurgents. When I was in high school in the early sixties, I read an article in "True" magazine about the Muslim judicial system and punishments. The Middle East Institute has had an office in Washington DC for decades.

      • SpiritOf1683

        They haven't cared and thought about Islam for the last five or six decades, though. Political correctness and self-loathing has seen to that, just like everywhere else in the West, and that is why Muslims have got away with 9/11 and 18,200+ terrorist atrocities since.

  • Ghostwriter

    I’ll bet Muslim are asking themselves why Americans have such a negative view of their religion. It’s probably because of all the violence that we’ve seen from them over the years that’s why.

  • John_Kelly

    The very term "All American Muslim" is a sickeningly offensive Oxymoron when EVERY Muslim knows their allegiance MUST be to Islam and NOT the American Constitution.

    This religious system is a parasite that sucks the life out of any host nation where they establish roots.

    If the elected officials in Washington had any VISION or COURAGE, all Muslim immigration would be banned forever.

    The Saudi's could not complain as they have established the precedent as NO Non-Muslim is allowed to be a citizen of Saudi Arabia.

    All of the elected officials in Washington D.C. should take heed to the wise words penned by King Solomon 3000 years ago "Where there is no vision, the people perish" (Proverbs 29:18)

  • Joe

    This guy is like all the rest: deny the stealth assault on this nation and keep America asleep until they accomplish their demographic conquest; then, it's too late. Obama helped them by importing 80,000 more Muslims by the stroke of his executive order pen. Denial of jihad is only al Takeyya, the Muslim art of lying to protect themselves and Islam.

    Muhammad was a mass murdering, lying, thieving, raping, mysogynistic, pedophile who spoke the Satanic verses and justified murdering those who oppose Islam, rape of their wives and enslavement of their children. Westerners aren't Islamophobic without reason; we know it isn't a religion but a political ideology like fascism and they have earned our loathing and mistrust by their actions and beliefs.

    The ones who reject violence, reject jihad, love America and believe in the rights and freedoms we have should reject Islam, become Christian and stop following the teachings of a mad man. If they don't like with Christianity, they can leave it and nobody will say a word. If they want to leave Islam, they are supposed to be killed and yet they claim this is a religion of peace? Anyway, stop following Muhammad and see him for the evil man he was.

  • formationrx

    boooooo

  • Rightly Guided Bob

    No, we cannot.

  • SpiritOf1683

    You can stay in infidel-hating Aceh, parasitical Mohammedan scumbag.

  • SpiritOf1683

    Look here and you'll get a deeper knowledge of Islam than almost anywhere else, and its vile and murderous ways. Mohammed is far and away the most evil monster that has walked this earth – far worse than Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot , who look like tame kittens in comparison. And it took rather more than one or two Muslim men to subjugate at least a quarter of the world's population. We are free in the West because we beat back islam. there would be no computers, no medicineds and vaccines, no cars, no trains or planes if Islam had triumphred here. You would all be living in mud huts, but then again, it is what a Mohanmmedan doofus like yourself is happy with. The reason why you and your ilk cannot chop off heads at leisure in Western towns and cities is because we beat back Muslim invaders on battlefields in France, Spain, Austria, Poland and several other European countries.

  • John_Kelly

    Bambang Pamungkas you greatly underestimate the people who frequent this site.

    I like others here have lived in Muslim countries and have an intimate knowledge of the treachery, corruption and vileness associated with this political system disguised as a religion.

    You are living in a dreamworld thinking that Islam will dominate the world and establish a global Caliphate.

  • aspacia

    And just how many unarmed civilians have your brethren murdered, maimed, beheaded, or stoned today?

    When you savage your brethren's savage "misunderstanding" of Islam, perhaps then I will listen. Until then go slither back to your viper nest you traitor.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Still breathing and emoting I see.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Yeah right….don't lose your day job.

  • Stephen_Brady

    Chez, consider the Madrid bombings. The Muslims attack a couple of days before the national elections in Spain, and the Spanish respond by changing their government, which was EXACTLY what the Jihadists wanted.

    Jihadists used a tactic … terrorism … and it worked.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    "Terrorism" is a tactic, nothing more. It is the use of indiscriminate slaughter to effect political change.

    With all due disrespect Moonbat, jihadists are not terrorists. Indeed, they never kill indiscriminately to effect political change for any number of various political causes, as that is the purview of terrorism and terrorists, which is a Western manifestation only.

    Instead, jihadists, in stark contrast to terrorists, specifically target non-Muslim unbelievers as opposed to indiscriminately killing to effect political change like terrorists, and their acts of jihad, in stark contrast to acts of terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent, can be both violent and non-violent, Additionally, unlike terrorism which can be for any number of political causes, jihad, on the other hand, is always ONLY in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme per the texts and tenets of Islam.

    Muslims and non-Muslims alike employ such a tactic.

    Yeah right in the spirit of PC multiculturalism that not only conflates and morally equates all civilizations, cultures, and societies as all being equal and the same, but also conflates and morally equates jihad and terrorism, which are really two very separate and mutually exclusive manifestations and in fact two entirely different and very distinct things altogether as equal and the same.

    Can we say PC multiculturalism run amuck. Yet, like a Moonbat you deny being a leftist and addicted to emoting. Give me a break!

    The tactic of terrorism is used by Muslims to further their Jihad, as are many other tactics, including non-violent ones. In no way are terrorism and Jihad mutually exclusive (except in the mind of a rigid demagogue with a disconnect from reality and a pathological need to keep repeating the same erroneous points day after day).

    PC multicultural gobbledegook. Like I said, don't lose your day job moonbat. You are pathetic!

  • John_Kelly

    AWESOME COMMENT SpiritOf1683 ….keep em coming !!!!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Jihadists used a tactic … terrorism … and it worked.

    Indeed, like that moonbat Chez, you are blinded by PC multiculturalism. In your case though I'm not surprised.

    Anyway, Jihad is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, in stark contrast to terrorism can be both violent, as in the Madrid Train Bombing, and non-violent, as in mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, targets specifically non-Muslim unbelievers, both civilian non-combatants like in the Madrid Train Bombing and military combatants like US troops in Afghanistan and Iraq, and is always fought by mainstream orthodox Muslims only called jihadists or mujahideen.

    Whereas terrorism, on the other hand and in stark contrast to jihad, which is always only in the cause of Allah, can be for any number of political causes unlike jihad, and as its name implies is always only violent as opposed to jihad which can be both violent and non-violent. In addition, terrorism indiscriminately targets civilian non-combatants as opposed to jihad that specifically targets primarily non-Muslim unbelievers, and is always perpetrated by Western extremists that are called terrorists.

    Indeed, Jihad is a manifestation of the Islamic world only, while terrorism, on the other hand, is a manifestation of the Western world only. In fact, Muslims never ever perpetrate acts of terrorism because it is a Western manifestation only and therefore un-Islamic and blasphemous. Incidentally, it is also the reason why Muslims can honestly denounce terrorism with a straight face.

    Thus, jihad and terrorism are two separate and mutually exclusive manifestations and in fact two entirely different and very distinct things altogether. Yet, just like PC multiculturalism conflates and morally equates all civilizations, cultures, and societies together as all being equal and the same, PC multiculturalism likewise also conflates and morally equates jihad with terrorism together as also being equal and the same, when the obvious reality is not all civilizations, cultures, and societies are equal and the same, and jihad and terrorism are obviously actually two separate and mutually exclusive manifestations and in fact two entirely different and very distinct things altogether. Hence if like a gullible useful idiot you prefer to adhere to the tenets of PC multiculturalism, that is your prerogative, but please don't continue to pretend like you are a conservative, because you obviously are not. Not even close.

  • aspacia

    Spain is turning right again.

  • StephenD

    I just don't get it. I thought we were pretty much all in agreement. Islam is the enemy. Period. Why this bitterness between and amongst ourselves? I would expect this from our enemies…not us. ObamaYoMoma, you make many valid points…as does the other posters. Please stop with your condescension. It accomplishes…nothing.

  • Stephen_Brady

    It's a simple concept, OYM. I don't see why you're having so much trouble with it.

    The first … Jihadism … has been part and parcel of Islam since the beginning of the religion. Muslims are encouraged by their Imams, the Koran, and the Hadiths to go on Jihad and kill the "infidel".

    The second … terror … is a tactic used by Jihadists to accomplish their ends. Mass immigration, on the other hand, is also a tactic, but it is not terror.

    I'm sorry for you that you can't take opposition to your views, especially when your views are in error. But we learn and we grow when we take constructive criticism from other people. You haven't learned to do this, yet.

    You are simply wrong on this issue, and calling people names and insulting their intelligence when they disagree with you is not productive, and is simply childish.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Please correct me if I'm wrong, but you started it. Indeed, you remind me of Newt, although he started attacking Mitt first, when Mitt started attacking him back he went into crybaby status. Damn…it's becoming more and more apparent why you support Newt so much.

    Not to mention that while Newt hypocritically tried to attack Mitt on Massachusetts' healthcare solution during the Nevada debate in which Mitt made him eat his own words, apparently in 2006 Newt had endorsed Mitt's healthcare solution as the Wall Street Journal reported yesterday.

    In any event, I don't care who you are, if you are wrong I'm going to point it out. Thus, don't falsely claim to be a conservative if you adhere to the tenets of PC multiculturalism, as that is the purview of delusional Leftists.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    I just realize I responded to you by accident. I actually thought you were someone else. Nevertheless, you automatically want me to stop responding condescendingly in kind in response to their condescending posts. In fact, I was minding my own business until they ganged up together and collectively preemptively started attacking me, but yet somehow I'm the only one that is not supposed to respond in kind. Yeah right….thanks for piling on.

  • Stephen_Brady

    This has been such a large thread, I had trouble finding your comment, after reading it, yesterday.

    You're completely right. There should be no argument between any of us, here, on the subject of the artcile we responded to. If you'll look closely, you'll see there's no bitterness between most of us. That's encouraging.

    By the way, I want to wish you a happy New Year.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Damn…you still have a serious problem with emoting. Once a Leftist always a Leftist I guess.

    Anyway, I thank Stephen for his service and offer my condolences for the lost of his two sons.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Exactly Stephen…any rational person could ascertain as much.

    Right any PC multicultural Leftist adherent can ascertain as much.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    It's the truth!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Sorry dude I never make up stories and unlike you I never emote.

  • Western Canadian

    No, it is not the truth. It is smoke, or less then smoke. Jihad can be both non-violent, and ultra-violent. And mo himself acknowledged his success was due to terrorism.

  • Western Canadian

    No, I am not a ‘typical’ canadian, i am quite a bit more familiar with our history, especially our military history, than most. My loathing for ‘our’ so called ‘human rights commissions’ is remarkably extreme, and i loath the left more than you do. However, i do study the left more than you do, and find you have destroyed any credibility you may have had, with your weird and unique to you confusion over jihad, and your pathetic name calling in defence of it.
    Your knowledge of canada and canadians is as pathetically deficient as your knowledge in all other areas.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    I see….so our Skippy who can barely construct a sentence is an "executive"??? How gullible do you think we are?

    Barely construct a sentence? Excuse me, but I do pretty damn good, and what would that have to do with the topic at hand? Indeed, every time you challenge me, like clockwork you end up getting your butt handed to you, as you can't come close to competing with me on an intellectual level. Thus, to compensate for your intellectual deficiency and to attempt to salvage your pride and ego, just like clockwork you always resort to what Leftists do best, emoting and personally attacking me for everything under the sun except the subject at hand even though you don't have the first clue who the hell I am.

    Indeed, go back and read all your unhinged posts in this thread moonbat, and with the exception of one infantile idiotic post, everyone of your posts have been personal attacks. Dude…you have serious ego problems.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    It's a simple concept, OYM.

    You are right about that, not only is your knowledge of Islam and jihad exceedingly infantile, but you are also blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism. Which kind of also explains your many misconceptions with respect to Bush's so-called “War on Terror” that inevitably became the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history. As some of us on FPM have been warning was inevitable for years, while at the same time being repeatedly personally attacked by RINOs exactly like you.

    I'm sorry for you that you can't take opposition to your views, especially when your views are in error.

    Don't make me laugh! Can't take opposition? Give me a break, I forgot more than you will ever come close to knowing about the subject at hand, but nonetheless you apparently want me to forget everything I know and reduce my intellectual level down to a neophyte like you that is utterly blinded by PC multiculturalism and who has an infantile level of knowledge about the subject at hand. Yeah right….why don't you go challenge university professors and after they dismiss you for being a buffoon, claim that they can't take opposition. Dude…you need to grow up.

    But we learn and we grow when we take constructive criticism from other people. You haven't learned to do this, yet.

    Constructive criticism is one thing; idiocy is something entirely different, and condescending personal attacks indicate that you have serious issues with respect to your perception, self-esteem, and ego.

    You are simply wrong on this issue, and calling people names and insulting their intelligence when they disagree with you is not productive, and is simply childish.

    Yeah right, I'm simply wrong according to a complete neophyte totally blinded by PC multiculturalism like you, and yeah, I'm sorry but there is nothing wrong with responding sarcastically in kind to less than astute posters like you. If you don't like the way I respond, then don't be rude and sarcastic, because I have an exceedingly thick skin and I can also dish it out as good as I get.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Okay…I get it, you don't like it when I respond in kind to sarcastic personal attacks from you and others. You know what Moonbat, I could care less what you like. Nevertheless, what does your post have to do with the subject at hand? Nothing whatsoever as usual. Can we say addicted to emoting. Indeed, once a Leftist, always a Leftist.

    Keep it up…it's just fodder for a new essay.

    What essay? Is this some sort of threat?

  • ObamaYoMoma

    You are a typical Canadian, as you are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism. Must be something in the ice water up there or maybe it is the result of a mind freeze.

  • StephenD

    Right back atchya Brother!

  • Stephen_Brady

    Having read your rants for some weeks, now, I am ready to deliver my diagnosis on you …

    Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental illness characterized by a lack of empathy, a willingness to exploit others, and an inflated sense of self-importance. In popular discourse

    Your inability to take any criticism is the first clue. A normal person is content to take criticism, as long as that criticism is perceived as constructive. With you, criticism is seen as an assault upon your view of the self. It cannot be taken. Anything that assaults the inflated view of self is an attack, in your view. How many times have we witnessed this, at FPM?

    You also have a need to dominate any and all discourse. This is why you write so many extremely long and rambling posts. I have personally seen you write a single paragraph over 500 words, with only one convoluted sentence. Why do you do this? In order to turn off any discussion, and dominate.

    You will note that many of history's most notorious figures, including Hitler, Musslolini, Stalin, Mao, and others, could drone on for hours, demanding that millions hinge their own lives upon their words.

    Your personal attacks are another sympton of NPD. Having an inflated sense of self, you have a need to "cut down" others. In your last post to me, in one paragraph, you called me "complete neophyte", "blinded", "less than astute poster", "rude and saracastic". Still stung by what you saw as an attack on your ego, you then emphasized your superiority by saying you can "dish it out as good as I get".

    Tomorrow, when you get out of bed, go to the mirror and look at your favorite "intellectual" on the planet. You know who I mean: The fellow looking out of the mirror back at you. And then, get some help, please, if not for yourself, then for the sanity of everyone here …

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Muslims slaughter fellow Muslims as readily as they do non-Muslims in the service of their Jihad. This is common knowledge to anyone with even a rudimentary understanding of geo-politics. Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Darfur,…all ready-made examples of Muslim-on-Muslim slaughter.

    To people blinded by PC multiculturalism like you, Muslims slaughter fellow Muslims as readily as they do non-Muslims in the service of their Jihad. However, for people unaffected by PC multiculturalism like me, we know that Muslims never ever attack fellow Muslims, since that would be a one way ticket to hell.

    Sunnis attack Shiites and Shiites attack Sunnis because each side considers the other side to be blasphemous apostates and raphidite dogs. Sunnis and Shiites, however, also attack blasphemous apostates who they previously have declared takfir, i.e., un-Islamic. Indeed, if people are declared takfir, i.e., un-Islamic, then it is in Allah's cause to kill them. Not to mention that people declared takfir are not Muslims at all but blasphemous apostates.

    Indeed, in Iraq, Shiites kill Sunnis and Sunnis kill Shiites because both sides consider the other side to be blasphemous apostates. In Pakistan and Indonesia, Ahmadis are killed all the time because they are not considered to be Muslims but un-Islamic blasphemous apostates. In Darfur, Muslims kill black syncretic Darfurian Muslims, because they are syncretic Muslims and therefore un-Islamic blasphemous apostates.

    But Skippy claims the slaughter is NOT indiscriminate and is directed ONLY at non-Muslims.

    Because it is true. Muslims only target non-Muslim unbelievers, either civilian non-combatants like in the Madrid Train Bombings, or military combatants like in Afghanistan and Iraq.

    You know you really are glutton for punishment. I guess this means I'm going to have to wade through another 20 personal attacks now. Dude…do like me, keep your mouth shut until you actually know what the hell you are talking about. I don't see how you can habitually make a fool out of yourself all the time the way you habitually do. If I was that undisciplined, I'd shoot myself in the head to put myself out of misery. Sucks to be you.

    Just one more sample of your blind ignorance.

    Yeah right…take a hike you loser.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Not a threat Skippy. Just an expose on your loathsome combination of ignorance and arrogance.

    Where to start…with the exception of your first post, every post you have posted in this thread since then have all been off topic personal attacks, yet you deny your addicted to emoting. Give me a fricking break. It's not my fault that you are habitually mentally incompetent! Go look in the mirror; it's your damn fault.

    Dude…calm down and try to catch your breath! Indeed, you are obviously severely mentally deranged and apparently totally obsessed as well, so obsessed as a matter of fact, that you are even resorting to attempting to intimidate me by threatening to expose me, like I'm worth exposing and never mind the fact that you don't even have the first clue who the hell I am, by writing some sort of silly, asinine, idiotic, and rambling scathing expose of me or something, and if that doesn't downright prove that you are severely mentally deranged and very delusional among other things, then nothing does.

    Dude…you are psycho, extremely fricking psycho! Seek mental help for your severe mental issues. Indeed, you must be some sort of crazed stalker or something. Take your meds, I don't even know who the frick you are dude and could care less, but it is very clear that you do have severe mental issues, especially when it comes to controlling your emotions. Damn, no wonder you tried to attack me once by trying to attack my wife, and you don't even know who the frick she is as well.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Well, since the topic at hand is your mental illness, it indicates the extent to which you will go to try and augment your limited credibility with outright lies. Please tell us more about your career as an "executive". Tell us more about the "tons" of like-minded Skippies you have hired.

    Let's see with the exception of your first post in this thread, every post since then have all been off topic personal attacks, and indeed you have even resorted to attempting to intimidate me by threatening to write some sort of scathing idiotic expose about me even though you don't have the first fricking clue who I am. Yet, you also have the audacity to claim that the topic at had is allegedly my mental illness. I hate to rain on your mentally deranged parade Moonbat, but the topic of this thread is the folly of conflating jihad with terrorism. Hell, apparently you are so mentally deranged and totally obsessed that you don't even know what the topic of this thread is about.

    Please tell us more about your career as an "executive".

    What the frick does my career or lack there of have to do with the topic at hand Moonbat? Nothing, not a damn thing. Yet, according to you, you never emote or resort to personal attacks. Take your meds, seek mental help for your severe delusions, and cease trying to intimidate and stalk people like a mentally deranged psycho. You have very severe mental issues son and I strongly suggest that you seek mental help before you lose all control.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Having read your rants for some weeks, now, I am ready to deliver my diagnosis on you …

    Narcissistic Personality Disorder. Narcissistic personality disorder is a mental illness characterized by a lack of empathy, a willingness to exploit others, and an inflated sense of self-importance. In popular discourse

    Hey…I didn't know you were a psychiatrist Stephen. You learn something new every day. In any event, what would your diagnosis be for two mentally deranged and exceedingly unhinged stalkers that are following me and repeatedly making coordinated unprovoked off topic personal attacks against me, and to be on the safe side, should I buy a bullet proof vest and a pistol for self-protection? Just how dangerous are you two unhinged and mentally deranged stalkers?

    Oh…since apparently you haven't quite figured it out yet, I have a very thick skin and I can give it back as good as I get. However, I only respond in kind. If a poster responds to me in a rude and sarcastic fashion the same way you and your mentally deranged buddy habitually do, then I respond in kind rudely and sarcastically, and if you two crybabies don't like it. Sue me.

    With respect to the remainder of your unprovoked off topic personal attack against me, I'm sorry but I don't see anything in it pertaining to the folly of conflating jihad with terrorism. Hence, I'm afraid I won't be able to respond any further, as I can't waste anymore time on two mental incompetents. Have a nice day.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    What is an approach to remove US constitutional protection from the so-called "Great Religion of Peace' referred to by President Bush?

    There is no such constitutional protection for Islam as Islam is simply not a faith-based religion. For instance, in Islam blasphemy and apostasy are both capital offenses. What faith-based religions likewise make blasphemy and apostasy capital offenses? The answer, of course, is none, proving irrefutably at the same time that that Islam is not a faith-based religion.

    Therefore, if Islam is not a faith-based religion, what is it? It's a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

    In fact, Islam is far closer to other totalitarian ideologies such as Communism than it is to being a religion, as just like Communism, Islam seeks world domination, and the end result of Islam, exactly like Communism, is totalitarianism and lots and lots of misery.

    Thus, since Islam is not a faith-based religion and isn't protected under the constitution it should be outlawed and mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, which is really for stealth demographic conquest, should be banned and reversed ASAP.

  • Stephen_Brady

    You also like the word "conflate", and its permutations. Is this your "word of the week"?

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Uhm….in your coordinated campaign of Internet stalking together with your liberal buddy in a feeble attempt to try and intimidate me, like your cohort in crime repeatedly does, you composed a rather lengthy off topic personal attack above with not one mention of the subject matter at hand. With all due disrespect, how is that not a personal attack and how is that not mentally unhinged and deranged to say the least? Like I keep telling your mentally deranged liberal partner in crime, Chez the Moron Mac, do yourself a favor and seek mental help for your collective severe mental issues before it is too late.

    And if you two moonbats in crime want to continue believing the fantasy that the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world are so-called moderate Muslims and keep the door for mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage per the tenets of PC multiculturalism wide open, More power to you, as I could care less. Just don't pretend to be a conservative, because you moonbats obviously are not.

  • Stephen_Brady

    In the “lengthy” post to which you refer, the diagnosis is not mine. My PhD is in philosophy, not in psychology. Rather, it is the diagnosis … tentative, of course … of a psychiatrist who attends my church. I gave him 22 of the threads in which you have posted, and he came to the conclusion that you suffer from NPD, with a touch of paranoia. However, since philosophy and psychology are related, I tend to agree with this diagnosis.

    Chez, who you identify as a “moron”, among other things, is one of the most intelligent posters at this website. You would do well to listen to him. You could learn a thing or two. I take pride in my friendship with him, and I still don’t entirely understand the enmity you hold for him and for me.

    On topic, I am … in fact … opposed to Muslim immigration. I think that most Muslims are peaceful people who simply wish to live their lives out, just as we do. However, American mosques are hotbeds of radicalism, and the chances of a Muslim immigrant being pressed into service, as it were, employing the tactic of terror, is accordingly much higher.

    Therefore, either we violate our principle of the separation of church and state by gaining control of these mosques, or we simply ban the immigration of Muslims.

    PC multiculturalism? This coming from someone who supports Mitt Romney, arguably the King of PC (who once called himself a “progressive”)?

    Have a happy New Year!

  • Western Canadian

    You have introduced a false difference between jihad and terrorism, as well as islam and the west. It is blatantly obvious that you do NOT know what you are talking about, and instead of merely talking, you are shrieking and name calling like a spoiled child. If any reference to jihad and terrorism could be classed as pc, it would be your own utterly pathetic delusion in regards that subjec t.