In the Debt Crisis, Moral Equivalence Is Moral Evasion

Pages: 1 2

For Democrats to insist, then, on $1 trillion in tax hikes without any substantive reform of entitlement spending was to negotiate in bad faith, not to mention forgetting their own President’s admonition about raising taxes during a recession. Nor should we think that $1.2 trillion of spending cuts over ten years triggered by the committee’s failure is going to solve our problems––assuming Congress does nothing to stop the cuts, something John McCain has vowed to do. According to Veronique de Rugy of the Mercatus Center, the so-called “spending cuts” are actually reductions in overall growth. Projections show that over the next decade, spending will increase $1.7 trillion without the cuts, and $1.6 trillion with them. Given the enormity of our debt and future commitments, this amounts to a rounding error.

Finally, blaming a “do-nothing Congress,” as Obama does, or cursing both parties for partisan “gridlock” let’s all of us off the hook. The President clearly intends to run a class-warfare campaign that blames heartless Republicans for our woes because they want to protect their wealthy patrons at the expense of the poor and elderly. We had a preview this May in the New York special congressional election, when ads appeared showing a Paul Ryan look-alike pushing an old lady in a wheelchair over a cliff, and New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote that the Republicans’ demands for budget cuts “are literally stealing food from the mouths of babes.” Obama himself had set the stage for such rhetoric when he claimed that the Ryan plan embodied a “vision that says America can’t afford to keep the promises we’ve made to care for our seniors,” who the President alleged would have to pay $6,000 more for health care to finance “tax cuts for the wealthy.” But these Mediscare and class-warfare tactics will succeed only if enough voters endorse their dishonest logic. Unfortunately, a critical mass of Americans are addicted to government spending, and so are invested in keeping entitlement spending high and continuing other redistributions of income. Like the democratic mob in Polybius’ history of Rome, these voters prefer a government that uses its power to benefit those who are “habituated to feed at the expense of others, and to have [their] hopes of a livelihood in the property of [their] neighbors.”

Moral equivalence, then, is an evasion of our own responsibility. As the details of the super-committee collapse show, the contrast between the parties is clear: the Republicans want to cut spending without tax increases that inhibit economic growth; the Democrats want to raise taxes and increase spending without making substantial or meaningful reductions in the big three entitlement programs––which is another way of saying that they want to continue to redistribute wealth whatever the long-term cost. If the Democrats prevail, the fault will ultimately lie with those who put them in office.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • StephenD

    You make much sense but…I do blame the Republicans too. Why? Because they went along with the foolishness of a "super committee" in the first place. I'm sorry, but if they don't take their collective head out of their a– they may as well go home. It seems the American People are getting pretty fed up with talk. Talk is cheap. The Republicans in office need to call it like it is and steadfastly promote their ideas…or give up and go home.

  • Gamaliel

    No one bothers explaining to the entitlement addicts that their money is losing value and will become worthless if spending isn't cut. The next Republican ad should have an elderly person going to the supermarket and trying to pay for a quart of milk with a $10 dollar bill and being laughed at because it has gone up to $100.00.

    • Spider

      A great point – the only possible outcome of this debt crisis mess is that the government will simply devalue the dollar until the monies they owe will be worth nothing and hence they effectively pay nothing back to their debtors upon repayment. In the meantime our currency will be destroyed along with our buying power and livelyhood.

  • al222

    moral equivalence, or more accurately, moral relativism, is the mother's milk of progressivism. without it, they are finished politically–and they know it. Americans should ask themselves a simple question: what's the "split the difference" position between national bankruptcy and fiscal solvency?

  • tanstaafl

    There ain't no such thing as a free lunch. We've had generations of politicians who know that water flows downhill, but don't believe that it will reach the bottom.

    You cannot compromise with disaster.

  • BS77

    It may be able to balance the budget…..but, the budget now MUST include the enormous deficits and debts incurred over the past decade….when you put this on the ledger, balancing the spending budget is meaningless. Even if every American was taxed 100% of their income, it would be insufficient to pay off the debts…..the interest alone is astronomical. I don't know what's ahead but devaluation of the dollar seems inevitable. Also, what the heck is Patty Murray doing on the super committee? Read Ann Coulter's evaluation of Sen. Murray.