- FrontPage Magazine - http://www.frontpagemag.com -

Bill Maher Rewrites and Ignores History to Pit the Founding Fathers Against the Tea Party

Posted By Calvin Freiburger On January 17, 2011 @ 2:00 pm In NewsReal Blog | Comments Disabled

Left-wing satirist Bill Maher is taking his hatred of the Tea Party movement to the next level. Evidently epithets like crazy, stupid, and racist no longer satisfy him, and he’s decided it’s time to hit “teabaggers” where it really hurts: by mocking their reverence for America’s Founding Fathers, suggesting the Founders’ values aren’t their own:

“[T]he Founding Fathers would have hated your guts…and what’s more, you would have hated them. They were everything you despise. They studied science, read Plato, hung out in Paris, and thought the Bible was mostly bullshit.”

Maher got a crack in at the Founders as well, saying they had a moral code, but it didn’t come from the Bible…”except for the part about, ‘it’s cool to own slaves.’”

Here, Maher is repackaging the ridiculous straw man that conservatism is not only incompatible with reason and science, but that right-wingers actually pride themselves on disregarding the insights of modern intellectuals in favor of gut instinct and unchanging tradition. But this is a complete distortion of conservative arguments.

We have no problem with true intellectualism or reevaluating our positions in light of new evidence; what we object to is the arrogance of societal elites who look down upon the decision-making abilities of the average American, especially in decisions concerning the individual’s personal affairs. We object to “expertise” being taken as a license to make policy outside of the democratic process. We object to corruption and pseudoscience being forced upon us in the guise of the scientific method, as the Left has done with climate change. We object to secularists drawing hasty theological conclusions from scientific theories and then proselytizing about them to our children. And we object to leftists claiming a monopoly on science even as they willfully disregard its findings when it suits them to do so.

To make this false antagonism between the Founders and the Tea Party seem plausible, Maher tries to cast the former as enemies of religion. But the historical record shows that this is really Maher projecting his own anti-religious prejudice onto them. True, the Founders had wildly-varying views on the particulars of theology, but on the biggest, most politically-relevant aspects of religion, they were largely unanimous. Whatever God’s precise nature might be, they all agreed that there was one, that He demanded that human beings treat one another justly, and that religion was an essential ingredient to the survival of a self-governing society.

George Washington:

Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and Morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of Men and Citizens. The mere Politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths, which are the instruments of investigation in Courts of Justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

Benjamin Franklin:

In the beginning of the contest with G. Britain, when we were sensible of danger we had daily prayer in this room for the Divine Protection. — Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have observed frequent instances of a Superintending providence in our favor. To that kind providence we owe this happy opportunity of consulting in peace on the means of establishing our future national felicity. And have we now forgotten that powerful friend? or do we imagine that we no longer need His assistance.

I have lived, Sir, a long time and the longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth — that God governs in the affairs of men. And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without his notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without his aid?




Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://www.frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/calvin-freiburger/bill-maher-rewrites-and-ignores-history-to-pit-the-founding-fathers-against-the-tea-party/

Copyright © 2009 FrontPage Magazine. All rights reserved.