Does Repealing DADT Restore ROTC?

Pages: 1 2

Now that Congress has lifted its “don’t ask, don’t tell” (DADT) prohibition on open homosexuals serving in the military, elite colleges will once again embrace the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), right?

It would be that simple if the campus opposition to ROTC was as simple as Congress’s policy on gays in the military serving as the sticking point. Alas, academics objected to military courses and campus drill from the World War I-era inception of ROTC. The ostensible reason for the campus war on ROTC has shifted over time. But the underlying reason—an undercurrent of hostility toward the military in academia—is constant. That is why nobody should be surprised if some of the campuses blocking student access to ROTC continue their policy of exclusion.

“I look forward to pursuing discussions with military officials and others to achieve Harvard’s full and formal recognition of ROTC,” explained Harvard President Drew Faust after the repeal of DADT. Similarly, Yale President Richard Levin expressed hope for “a new chapter in the long history of Yale’s support of the U.S. Armed Services.” Even before DADT’s repeal, the dean of students at Columbia asked the university community “to consider whether the right question may no longer be ‘How could we ever formally recognize ROTC on our campus,’ but, instead, ‘How can we not welcome them back?’”

But ROTC wasn’t kicked off Harvard, Yale, and Columbia because of the military’s exclusion of open homosexuals. The Vietnam War served as the pretext for ROTC’s campus banishment. When the Vietnam War ended, ROTC tellingly did not return. Another disqualifying rationale, gays in the military, eventually took its place. Now that the ban on open homosexuals serving in the military has been lifted, it’s no guarantee that academia’s ban on ROTC will be lifted, too.

Who knows if the military’s ageism, handicapism, or sizeism will provide new justifications for ROTC prohibitionists, or if the Department of Defense, weary of past hostility, will even attempt a return to unfriendly campuses?

Some opponents of ROTC are honest enough to admit that the repeal of DADT doesn’t change their minds. Colman McCarthy, a monomaniac on the need for “peace studies” programs, took to the pages of the Washington Post to call for ROTC’s permanent separation from academic life. “It should not be forgotten that schools have legitimate and moral reasons for keeping the military at bay, regardless of the repeal of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell,’” McCarthy wrote last Thursday. “They can stand with those who for reasons of conscience reject military solutions to conflicts.” Lest anyone accuse McCarthy of anti-military bias, he assures: “I admire those who join armies, whether America’s or the Taliban’s.”

The important point conveyed by McCarthy’s column is that animus toward the military is more deeply rooted than the seventeen-year-old DADT policy. Opposition to ROTC is as old as ROTC itself. Early objections focused on the compulsory nature of the program, the lack of rigor of for-credit classes, and the intrusion of the federal government in curricular matters. Between world wars, the Fellowship of Reconciliation’s Committee against Militarism in Education (CME), including such Left luminaries as socialist leader Norman Thomas, churchman John Nevin Sayre, and Nation editor Oswald Garrison Villard, led the fight against ROTC.

Pages: 1 2

  • therealend

    I heard a Reba McIntire song that went something like: maybe I don't have any reason to hate her, I'll think of one later.

  • William Comninel

    Now that DADT (don’t ask, don’t tell) has been modernized to GITMO (gay in the military and out) it is time for the ROTC motto ‘Leadership, Excellence’ to be modernized to ‘Liederkranz, Excrement’.

  • intlctlrdnck

    No, repealing DADT won't change attitudes about the ROTC on campus. The Left will always hate the U.S. military. And when it comes right down to it, all those seemingly reasonable arguments in favor of repealing DADT will be buried under the true intent of the repeal–another tool to target and destroy further the institutions of this country. There's no co-incidence that the commander of the U.S.S. Enterprise just had his career obliterated over videos made some 4 years ago, with more officers set to be on the chopping block because of it. Just like gay marriage opens the door to going after churches.

  • dubrovnov

    Historically in other countires, leftists have often infiltrated and subverted the military. Our leftists hate the military and consider it the enemy. Good! If and when the revolution comes, the left will have few allies (the police forces are also their enemy). Let the universities continue to ban ROTC. That way they cannot subvert it.

  • galloper6

    Yep Dubrovnov.
    Remember during the Spanish Civil War, one side all the cool slogans and political songs, while the other side had all the military training. Guess which side won?

  • Franklin

    "That state which separates it's warriors from it's scholars will have it's thinking done by cowards and fighting done by fools" Thucydides –

  • Eric

    Blueprint for Columbia ROTC

    Beyond Columbia’s military community, ROTC would find a supportive environment on campus. Since 2005, University leaders have consistently cited DADT as the only significant obstacle to the university welcoming ROTC, and DADT is no longer relevant. The ROTC movement has grown within Columbia from students, alumni, and professors supporting the military on campus. The steady trend on campus has been to support the military, as expressed by University leaders such as Trustees chairman and Army veteran Bill Campbell and Columbia College Student Council president and ROTC advocate Learned Foote, multiple Columbia Spectator staff editorials calling for ROTC at Columbia, Columbia’s outreach to recent veterans with robust participation in the Yellow Ribbon program, the unveiling of the Columbia War Memorial, and highly visible commissioning ceremonies on campus. In 2006, Columbia even amended the university non-discrimination policy to add “military status” as a protected category.

    • William Comninel

      Insert 'Bronx Cheer' here.

  • Juan Gamboa

    DOD needs to pull all of its funding from schools that do not want ROTC on campus. Just like NPR, schools that feel that they are private while collecting public funds, can stand on their own then.

  • Speakman

    Dude.. I’m not much into reading, but somehow I managed to get to read through a great deal of articles for your blog. Its amazing how interesting it is actually should visit you usually.

  •,ne scuba certification

    I’ve been surfing online greater than 3 hours today, but I never found any interesting article like yours. It?s lovely worth sufficient for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made just right content material as you probably did, the web will likely be much more helpful than ever before.