<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rhetoric vs. Reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rhetoric-vs-reality</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: crypticguise</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[crypticguise]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just don&#039;t understand why someone like this person is as stupid as he is. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#39;t understand why someone like this person is as stupid as he is. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188871</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 03:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perfect name! it&#039;s so you!  All you need to add so that your identity is totally accurate is &quot;deranged&quot;.  Of course you could add &quot;obtuse&quot;, or &quot;illogical&quot;.  
 
I know I am wasting my time, but  David Horowitz is discussing the ideology of true extremists, whereas these photos are making vile attacks on an elected official, with no basis in reality. Did you hear that rushing sound?  That was my comment going right over your head. Or was it the wind rushing between your ears? Probably both. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perfect name! it&#39;s so you!  All you need to add so that your identity is totally accurate is &quot;deranged&quot;.  Of course you could add &quot;obtuse&quot;, or &quot;illogical&quot;.  </p>
<p>I know I am wasting my time, but  David Horowitz is discussing the ideology of true extremists, whereas these photos are making vile attacks on an elected official, with no basis in reality. Did you hear that rushing sound?  That was my comment going right over your head. Or was it the wind rushing between your ears? Probably both. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188869</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was there and saw it, repeatedly. There were plenty of other signs with varying degrees of implied violence, and some advocating rape, Marxist revolution, and suppressing the free speech of conservatives. 
 
The difference between the crosshairs the idiot left was posturing over and the ones in Madison is that the crosshairs on a map didn&#039;t imply shooting an individual, whereas the ones in Madison clearly did. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was there and saw it, repeatedly. There were plenty of other signs with varying degrees of implied violence, and some advocating rape, Marxist revolution, and suppressing the free speech of conservatives. </p>
<p>The difference between the crosshairs the idiot left was posturing over and the ones in Madison is that the crosshairs on a map didn&#39;t imply shooting an individual, whereas the ones in Madison clearly did. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truebearing</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[truebearing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 02:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Superficial analysis, at best. I noticed you didn&#039;t calculate what $260,000, invested over 45 years, would yield. You aren&#039;t qualified to be making any argument on something you so clearly don&#039;t understand. 
 
You seem to be enthralled with parasites. Might I suggest studying  bedbugs or mosquitos? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superficial analysis, at best. I noticed you didn&#39;t calculate what $260,000, invested over 45 years, would yield. You aren&#39;t qualified to be making any argument on something you so clearly don&#39;t understand. </p>
<p>You seem to be enthralled with parasites. Might I suggest studying  bedbugs or mosquitos? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david Owens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Social Security IS a Ponzi Scheme!.  There are no accounts for individual beneficiaries, they are paid out of the money taken in each year thru SS taxes.  No different than Bernie Madoff.  You have obviously not studied the history or current operation of Soc Sec. How can there be a &quot;Profit&quot; on a system where the govt spends all of the money taken in on other projects and pays current beneficiaries out of the current tax payers????  Bill Clinton&#039;s budget &quot;surplus&quot; was only possible by not accounting for the fact that Soc Security was not actually paying into the accounts for those who deserved it. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Security IS a Ponzi Scheme!.  There are no accounts for individual beneficiaries, they are paid out of the money taken in each year thru SS taxes.  No different than Bernie Madoff.  You have obviously not studied the history or current operation of Soc Sec. How can there be a &quot;Profit&quot; on a system where the govt spends all of the money taken in on other projects and pays current beneficiaries out of the current tax payers????  Bill Clinton&#39;s budget &quot;surplus&quot; was only possible by not accounting for the fact that Soc Security was not actually paying into the accounts for those who deserved it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebonystone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ebonystone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 23:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s the math, Mr. Pain: your calculation leaves out the interest that deposits bring when invested. Paying ca. $6,000/yr into just a tax-free bank account at 4% brings one&#039;s total after 45 years to ca. %725,000, not the $260,000 you claim. Adding to that the equivalent amount that your employer pays on your behalf brings one to a total of $1,450,000, which is -- I do believe, let me make sure now, yes, yes it is -- over a million, just as Michael claimed. And that&#039;s just putting it into an insured savings account. Nothing fancy, no stocks, no bonds, no mutual funds.  
A retiree after such a program, could start drawing just the interest, and get $58,000/yr -- which I believe, is more than any SS payments -- and still have the nearly million-and-a-half to leave to his heirs. 
Note also that with SS, if you and your spouse both die shortly before reaching retirement age, or any time after retirement, your heirs get nothing. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#39;s the math, Mr. Pain: your calculation leaves out the interest that deposits bring when invested. Paying ca. $6,000/yr into just a tax-free bank account at 4% brings one&#39;s total after 45 years to ca. %725,000, not the $260,000 you claim. Adding to that the equivalent amount that your employer pays on your behalf brings one to a total of $1,450,000, which is &#8212; I do believe, let me make sure now, yes, yes it is &#8212; over a million, just as Michael claimed. And that&#39;s just putting it into an insured savings account. Nothing fancy, no stocks, no bonds, no mutual funds.<br />
A retiree after such a program, could start drawing just the interest, and get $58,000/yr &#8212; which I believe, is more than any SS payments &#8212; and still have the nearly million-and-a-half to leave to his heirs.<br />
Note also that with SS, if you and your spouse both die shortly before reaching retirement age, or any time after retirement, your heirs get nothing. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188116</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once the neo-cons destroy all the jobs in America, and push all wealth up to the top, you&#039;re probably RIGHT, but for all the WRONG REASONS!!  Do you think BUSH solved the immigration &#039;problem&#039;?  ANSWER HONESTLY ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once the neo-cons destroy all the jobs in America, and push all wealth up to the top, you&#39;re probably RIGHT, but for all the WRONG REASONS!!  Do you think BUSH solved the immigration &#39;problem&#39;?  ANSWER HONESTLY </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we have here in this Youtube clip is a clear case of what David Horowitz doesn&#039;t like:   Hypocrisy and the use of hate speech.   How could anyone who believes in responsible political discourse use faulty innuendo and inflammatory language like that in Wisconsin.  OH, THAT&#039;S RIGHT, DAVID DOES.   A quick look at the David Horowitz archives shows this:  &quot;Noam Chomsky&#039;s Love Affair with Nazis (5/15/06); &quot;The Totalitarians Among Us&quot; (11/2/09); &quot;Serious Fascists in America&quot; (10/1/09).   That&#039;s just a sampling.  What&#039;s really funny is that ON THE SAME PAGE OF FPM, WHERE HOROWITZ IS WHINING ABOUT EXTREME LANGUAGE, ONE FINDS RICH TRZUPEK&#039;S ARTICLE ON &quot;UNIONS FASCISTS IN WISCONSIN.&quot;  Consider Horowitz DEMOLISHED.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we have here in this Youtube clip is a clear case of what David Horowitz doesn&#39;t like:   Hypocrisy and the use of hate speech.   How could anyone who believes in responsible political discourse use faulty innuendo and inflammatory language like that in Wisconsin.  OH, THAT&#39;S RIGHT, DAVID DOES.   A quick look at the David Horowitz archives shows this:  &quot;Noam Chomsky&#39;s Love Affair with Nazis (5/15/06); &quot;The Totalitarians Among Us&quot; (11/2/09); &quot;Serious Fascists in America&quot; (10/1/09).   That&#39;s just a sampling.  What&#39;s really funny is that ON THE SAME PAGE OF FPM, WHERE HOROWITZ IS WHINING ABOUT EXTREME LANGUAGE, ONE FINDS RICH TRZUPEK&#39;S ARTICLE ON &quot;UNIONS FASCISTS IN WISCONSIN.&quot;  Consider Horowitz DEMOLISHED.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188102</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, that&#039;s just plain stupid.  Almost as amazingly stupid as Glenn Beck trying to sum up the ENTIRE EGYPTIAN UPRISING by pointing out that &#039;Days of Rage&#039; was also used a half century ago in a different country for a different purpose.  Guess that means that Beck supports random torture, especially that of Khalid Said who was kicked to death by Mubarak&#039;s secret police.  Truly, Glenn Beck did too much LDS in the 60s.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, that&#39;s just plain stupid.  Almost as amazingly stupid as Glenn Beck trying to sum up the ENTIRE EGYPTIAN UPRISING by pointing out that &#39;Days of Rage&#39; was also used a half century ago in a different country for a different purpose.  Guess that means that Beck supports random torture, especially that of Khalid Said who was kicked to death by Mubarak&#39;s secret police.  Truly, Glenn Beck did too much LDS in the 60s&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188098</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fred Dawes = Standard b**lshi* racism.  Nothing more.  Go to sleep, Fred.  Or better yet, hang yourself from the noose you made for the monkeys.... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Dawes = Standard b**lshi* racism.  Nothing more.  Go to sleep, Fred.  Or better yet, hang yourself from the noose you made for the monkeys&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scum</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188096</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 21:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha Ha, yes indeed.  Social Security, hands down, is one of the most brilliant, and most successful, of all government programs.  The end of SS means the end of America.  Watch and Learn.  Remember the hatchet man Bob Dole, who tried to transform himself into a viable presidential candidate (LOL LOL).  When Dole ran his campaing against SS, he got a little call from his &#039;mom&#039;, who said, &#039;Bobby dear, exactly what do you think I live on?  Give it a break!&#039;  God bless her for putting some sense in the executioner... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha, yes indeed.  Social Security, hands down, is one of the most brilliant, and most successful, of all government programs.  The end of SS means the end of America.  Watch and Learn.  Remember the hatchet man Bob Dole, who tried to transform himself into a viable presidential candidate (LOL LOL).  When Dole ran his campaing against SS, he got a little call from his &#39;mom&#39;, who said, &#39;Bobby dear, exactly what do you think I live on?  Give it a break!&#39;  God bless her for putting some sense in the executioner&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim_C</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-188041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim_C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 19:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-188041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a full on assault on a huge union--of course it&#039;s going to be controversial. Silly, fact-free speculation about &quot;scary&quot; 60s associations who literally haven&#039;t been relevant for 40 years is not needed. I&#039;m surprised you didn&#039;t mention &quot;Soros,&quot; that&#039;s always sure sign of a paranoid dingbat. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s a full on assault on a huge union&#8211;of course it&#39;s going to be controversial. Silly, fact-free speculation about &quot;scary&quot; 60s associations who literally haven&#39;t been relevant for 40 years is not needed. I&#39;m surprised you didn&#39;t mention &quot;Soros,&quot; that&#39;s always sure sign of a paranoid dingbat. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martel64</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-187117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martel64]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-187117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This being Wisconsin, this Bernardine Dohrn native territory - Bill from Michigan. Don&#039;t be surprised if the Rosenbergs of the &#039;60s - that escaped justice ,of course - are totally involved in this, and even got the whole thing going. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This being Wisconsin, this Bernardine Dohrn native territory &#8211; Bill from Michigan. Don&#39;t be surprised if the Rosenbergs of the &#39;60s &#8211; that escaped justice ,of course &#8211; are totally involved in this, and even got the whole thing going. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-187071</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 13:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-187071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you admit that the government is paying for social security wth debt (original point of this thread is made). 
Here is a link to a Forbes article that mentions the $600 bil (although this was widely reported and should be consiered common knoweledge) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/22/ben-bernanke-wrong-quantitative-easing-leadership-managing-rein.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/22/ben-bernanke-wro...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
I trade currences for a living, it is my job to know what is going on with the dollar and other major currencies. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you admit that the government is paying for social security wth debt (original point of this thread is made).<br />
Here is a link to a Forbes article that mentions the $600 bil (although this was widely reported and should be consiered common knoweledge) <a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/22/ben-bernanke-wrong-quantitative-easing-leadership-managing-rein.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/22/ben-bernanke-wro" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/22/ben-bernanke-wro</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>I trade currences for a living, it is my job to know what is going on with the dollar and other major currencies. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas paine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-186886</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-186886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the fed is increasing the money supply because they think that inflation is so low that it is hurting business, and they are trying to raise it 
 
but you admitted that most of the money for social security comes from actual revenues and borrowing, so I suppose we made some progress 
 
do you have a link documenting this 600 billion figure? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the fed is increasing the money supply because they think that inflation is so low that it is hurting business, and they are trying to raise it </p>
<p>but you admitted that most of the money for social security comes from actual revenues and borrowing, so I suppose we made some progress </p>
<p>do you have a link documenting this 600 billion figure? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-186876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-186876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government collects taxes &amp; sells debt to investors precicely because the government knows that inflation is very destructive so the more taxes they collect &amp; the more suckers they can get to buy our debt, the less money they have to print - of course that is preferable to printing money.  Currently, the government can&#039;t raise taxes enough, &amp; foreigners are buying less &amp; less of our debt, so the Fed is now monetizing our debt - ie, printing money to buy our debt - 600billion at the last announcement &amp; much more to come.  Nice try, but that dog don&#039;t hunt. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The government collects taxes &amp; sells debt to investors precicely because the government knows that inflation is very destructive so the more taxes they collect &amp; the more suckers they can get to buy our debt, the less money they have to print &#8211; of course that is preferable to printing money.  Currently, the government can&#39;t raise taxes enough, &amp; foreigners are buying less &amp; less of our debt, so the Fed is now monetizing our debt &#8211; ie, printing money to buy our debt &#8211; 600billion at the last announcement &amp; much more to come.  Nice try, but that dog don&#39;t hunt. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas paine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-186810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-186810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if that were true, why would the government bother to collect taxes and borrow money from china and japan? if all the government has to do is &quot;print money&quot;, why is there a national debt? 
 
your little fairy tale doesn&#039;t make any sense. try again ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if that were true, why would the government bother to collect taxes and borrow money from china and japan? if all the government has to do is &quot;print money&quot;, why is there a national debt? </p>
<p>your little fairy tale doesn&#39;t make any sense. try again </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas paine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-186811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-186811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if that were true, why would the government bother to collect taxes and borrow money from china and japan? if all the government has to do is &quot;print money&quot;, why is there a national debt? 
 
your little fairy tale doesn&#039;t make any sense. try again ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if that were true, why would the government bother to collect taxes and borrow money from china and japan? if all the government has to do is &quot;print money&quot;, why is there a national debt? </p>
<p>your little fairy tale doesn&#39;t make any sense. try again </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas paine</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/rhetoric-vs-reality/comment-page-1/#comment-186813</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[thomas paine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=85297#comment-186813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if that were true, why would the government bother to collect taxes and borrow money from china and japan? if all the government has to do is &quot;print money&quot;, why is there a national debt? 
 
your little fairy tale doesn&#039;t make any sense. try again ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if that were true, why would the government bother to collect taxes and borrow money from china and japan? if all the government has to do is &quot;print money&quot;, why is there a national debt? </p>
<p>your little fairy tale doesn&#39;t make any sense. try again </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 719/756 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 05:28:46 by W3 Total Cache -->