The Consequences of Islamic Imperialism in Scandinavia

David Horowitz was one of the founders of the New Left in the 1960s and an editor of its largest magazine,Ramparts. He is the author, with Peter Collier, of three best selling dynastic biographies: The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty (1976); The Kennedys: An American Dream (1984); and The Fords: An American Epic (1987). Looking back in anger at their days in the New Left, he and Collier wrote Destructive Generation (1989), a chronicle of their second thoughts about the 60s that has been compared to Whittaker Chambers’ Witness and other classic works documenting a break from totalitarianism. Horowitz examined this subject more closely in Radical Son (1996), a memoir tracing his odyssey from “red-diaper baby” to conservative activist that George Gilder described as “the first great autobiography of his generation.”

Twitter: @horowitz39
Facebook: David Horowitz


Here’s a commentary by the inimitable Pat Condell on the consequences of multiculturalism in Scandinavia.

 

 

  • Sound&Fury

    Europeans bring to mind the abused wife who thinks that if she somehow manages not to cross her husband, her won't abuse her any more. What they fail to realize is that you don't get along with an abuser by tolerating him.

    • Fred Dawes

      Abuse wife or husband always kill the abuser. that has always been behind the ideals of Multiculturalism, it is always been about death of people and the death of many races. and that ideal called multiculturalism came out of the KGB In 1955 and was used here in 1957.

      • trickyblain

        What about when Jefferson sired a child with his slave? Seems pretty multicultural to me…that was before 1957, right?

        • HalleysFifth

          Unproven. I'm sure you want to believe this, but the proof does not exist.

        • TxAngie

          seriously dude – do some research.

          • RightStuff

            I have done the research TxAngie, and it is unproven. Liberal tripe.

  • Angel

    I really don't understand this anymore. What is wrong with these people. Why are they so willing to turn their country over to a bunch of criminals. The behavior is inexplicable to me. The only way this makes any sense is if these guys in power are a bunch of global communist, you know the, one world order UN sponsored kind, letting the Muslims do the heavy lifting in destroying the country. But no one there is objecting to this? What the hell is wrong with you guys?

    • Morty62

      There's a lot of latent guilt in Europe that stems from the colonial period and the Holocaust and also a steady erosion of faith in your culture that has been systematically undermined by neo-Marxist cultural theory. Native Europeans feel they must take the abuse as a form of cultural self-flagellation. Plus, there is Bat Ye'or's contention that a deal was struck in the 70's that put in motion a Euro-Arab axis of power to act as a bulwark against American hegemony.

      • ebonystone

        The idea was that the growing European economy would need immigrants to fill all the new jobs and to contribute to the extensive government welfare plans, since the native population was not growing. This was a lie from the start, as is shown by the very high European unemployment rates; the new jobs never appeared. But the Moslem immigrants continue to pour in, unstopped, and instead of working and paying taxes and paying into the welfare schemes, they soak up a disproportionate amount of welfare themselves. The Moslems are the human equivalent of cowbirds.

  • Bandidass

    Yes, the raping issue is bad, and it's correct – 9 out of 10 are asylum seekers. They are jailed and/or escorted by police on a plain back to where they came from. These rapists are mostly Somalians – christians and muslims. On the other hand, 9 out ot 10 rapes done by Norwegian are not reported to the police. Maybe a fair share of that is that the domesticated women won't stand up for their superior right as women.

    • Mary

      I haven't heard of a single instance of Christian men raping women lately. Your post is not logical nor true

      • Bandidass

        Here are some numbers. It's 'only' two thirds. http://www.aftenposten.no/english/local/article19

        • traeh

          I just went to the link you posted, and the 2/3 number says nothing whatsoever about Christians. So you are lying or you can't read.

  • 080

    For years now we have been watching Islamic terrorists blow up things in Western Europe. Inevitably social democrats of all countries have folded like cheap beach chairs. Perhaps Brevik took the idea from the Islamists. If the Social Democrats could be made to fold in one direction by blowing up people then blowing up Social Democrats might make them fold in another desired direction. Of course, all this is fascism whether of the Islamic variety or the Norwegian variety.

  • b dalton

    am trying to share these articles but am being denied you might want to check into this please

  • Bandidass

    One might benefit when discussing Europe, to read Stein Rokkan's work. This link is based on it and added some points, but I recommend to look up Stein Rokkan's Conceptual Map of Europe. http://www.transcend.org/galtung/papers/Building%

  • Bandidass

    Here is another great paper on the model http://hsr-trans.zhsf.uni-koeln.de/hsrretro/docs/

  • http://vnnforum.com DeShawn

    What do you folks gotta say about THIS? Try for once not just calling names…address some facts. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_LjvSIBKVc

    • UCSPanther

      That is propaganda by the two-bit Ku Klux Klanner turned race hustler David Duke. Nice try, and epic fail.

      • Fred Dawes

        That is right and the KKK Was owned by the FBI From 1935 to its end. oh yes what about the black KKK? AND THE BROWN KKK Called La Raza( the race )?

        • scum

          The FBI owned the KKK? Which planet are you from Fred? But David Duke is race hustler, like most of the authors on FPM.

    • Fred Dawes

      One of the reason why so many died in Norway was the ideals of multiculturalism that is why the rAT SHOT So many of the children of the ruling class and all ideals of multiculturalism will only become a war of races and the end game is depopulation of all nation states and the death of billions that is what one world is all about, its not only the Jews its you who can't see facts in front of your face.

      • scum

        And so it continues: The FPM whitewash. Please everyone, send your hard earned dollars to THE BREIVIK DEFENSE FUND at FPM, c/o David Horowitz

  • http://vnnforum.com DeShawn

    You folks obviously got a problem with Muslims, fine. So why do you ignore the people PUSHING for Muslim immigration?

    • UCSPanther

      Looks like someone is trying to play vulture here. You neo-nazi freaks were doing the same thing with the Tuscon rampage.

    • SpiritOf1683

      And you've got a problem with Jews, who invented medicines and vaccines which keep antisemitic loons like you alive.

  • Amused

    Condel's right on the money ,as usual . Bye bye Sweden .

  • http://www.fxexchangerate.com/currency-converter-widget.html converterwidget

    They started taking showers for starters.

  • Fred Dawes

    The consequences of islamic imperialism is mass Wars death of all white Europeans the death of many cultural ideals and the nazi win the war in black and brown face.
    The facts are islam has been at war with the european lands for 1500 years that is the real historical facts;

    And faces facts the ideals of islam are totally worthless and the proof of this fact is millions of islamic people have come to the west and no sane white european would make any islamic country home.

  • esperantominoria

    In the Muslim literature they whitewash their Islamic history.In the West people admit the good and the bad.Muslims receive an idealized history.For example that the Ottoman Empire was GREAT for Christians.Muslims are deceived by their own "intellectuals"
    http://www.antisharia.com/2011/03/26/the-myth-of-
    http://www.antisharia.com/2011/07/24/roxelanafrom

    Plus the Myth of the Tolrance of Muslim Spain
    http://www.antisharia.com/2011/03/04/the-myth-of-

    • trickyblain

      Funny thing is, our very own far-right "conservatives" want the same kind of history taught in out schools.

      This website's EIC has had a long campaign to make it so; slavery was great for black Americans!

      (good thing that only a few can look at and listen to him without laughing)

    • scum

      Of course, you yourself forget to mention what happened in Spain during and following the Reconquista: Moors were kicked out of the country. Ferdinand implemented his own brand of the Inquisition. Jews were burned at the stake. Libraries destroyed. Laws tightened. And so it goes: One ideological blind spot engenders another. You people crack me up. LOL

  • GKC

    We don't want a troll to have the last word, now, do we?

    • scum

      Have at it.

  • LindaRivera

    It is frighteningly clear that Sweden's leaders intensely HATE their own people and are working closely with Islam to totally destroy the Free World country of Sweden and bring about Muslim conquest. Where can frightened Swedes flee to? Certainly not any other European country or Britain.

    In India, Israel, Europe and the UK, there are many no-go Muslim areas where it is too dangerous for non-Muslims to enter. In some areas of Europe, the hate for non-Muslims is so fierce, that ambulances require a police escort to enter a Muslim area.

    Europe and the UK have been deliberately inundated by their leaders with a massive Muslim invasion. The goal of Islam and European/UK leaders is obvious: Muslim conquest of Europe and the UK via massive Muslim immigration.

    Centuries ago, brave Europeans – Leaders-LOYAL to their own people and countries – REAL MEN – fought desperate, bloody battles against cruel Muslim invaders. In our alarming and tragic time period, ruthless Western leaders WELCOME Muslim conquest of their countries. The future suffering of non-Muslims will be beyond bearing.

    • Abelard

      You missed ONE thing: the Socialist leaders of Europe and elsewhere want not to become Muslims but to coerce "their" countries (of course by rights the TRAITORS shouldn't think of themselves as parts of those countries!!!) into Communism all over again – and they're using the Muslims as their allies for now. The plan is, once they've achieved their "perfect Marxism" (which will never happen – all they'll get is Communist dictatorships as was under Stáljin, Mao et al!!!), they'll then persecute the Muslims. They don't realise what kind of a ride upon a tiger they've gone out for…

    • scum

      Yea, it's all a conspiracy!!! LOL

    • TitoWilliams

      You mean the ones where we invaded the holy land and massacred, raped and brutalised Muslim communities. The ones where we killed surrendering men and we lined up and shot innocent civillians for being different in skin pigmentation. You have this incredibly fascist idea that Muslims are some sort of vile monsters. You, i'm sorry to say, that you are a bigot. You don't seem to understand that through colonialism and imperial land-grabbing. Through enforced racism and institutionalised discrimination other cultures and ways of life have been supresssed. The day, a european man is the victim of racism, I

      • LindaRivera

        My brothers and sisters are all skin colors, all races.
        My Hindu brothers and sisters tell of 80 million Hindus murdered by Muslims.
        Their blood cries out from the ground to God.

  • LindaRivera

    Countries that REFUSE to protect their own people, are countries that face total destruction and conquest. The end of civilization. G-D help non-Muslims!

    Sweden is being destroyed. A low intensity civil war has alr.flv http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JyH-MesET7w

    Caption underneath the video:
    The Swedish social system is collapsing under the pressures from the hundreds of thousands of Muslim immigrants that have flooded the country. Immigrant crime and rape are epidemic. Social services are reduced and slipping away as asylum seekers get preference over Swedes.

    • scum

      Linda's at it again, folks!!!

  • sdfs
  • guest

    The editors of FPM must get turned on by that graphic at the top, they sure use it often enough. Eww… I'm just waiting for it to turn up on a FPM t-shirt!

    • scum

      Half their crap is photo-shopped. Horowitz makes no claim to objectivity or fairness at all. One example: the Code Pink 'photo' that putatively showed activists with a banner saying 'We support the murder of U.S. Soldiers.'

  • Paul of Alexandria

    Nope. the U.S. is, as far as I know, the only country that gives its citizens the right to carry arms and defend themselves in case of attack.

  • traeh

    In core Islamic texts, Muhammad allows his soldiers to rape captive women:

    From Sahih Muslim, a canonical hadith collection:
    Book 008, Number 3371:

    Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger [Muhammad] (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born.

    Notice that Muhammad did not say, "do not rape your captive women." He merely says it does not matter if his soldiers withdraw before ejaculation, because souls destined by Allah to be born will be born regardless.

    From Sahih al-Bukhari, the most canonical hadith collection:
    Volume 5, Book 59, Number 459:

    Narrated Ibn Muhairiz:
    I entered the Mosque and saw Abu Said Al-Khudri and sat beside him and asked him about Al-Azl (i.e. coitus interruptus). Abu Said said, "We went out with Allah's Apostle for the Ghazwa [battle at which Muhammad was present] of Banu Al-Mustaliq and we received captives from among the Arab captives and we desired women and celibacy became hard on us and we loved to do coitus interruptus. So when we intended to do coitus interruptus, we said, 'How can we do coitus interruptus before asking Allah's Apostle [Muhammad] who is present among us?" We asked (him) about it and he said, 'It is better for you not to do so, for if any soul (till the Day of Resurrection) is predestined to exist, it will exist."

    Again notice that, in answer to his soldiers' queries Muhammad doesn't say "You must not force your captives to have intercourse with you." He says only that coitus interruptus, withdrawing prior to ejaculation, is pointless, because souls predestined to exist will exist regardless.

    Again in Sahih al-Bukhari:
    Volume 7, Book 62, Number 137:

    Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri:
    We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Apostle [Muhammad] about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection."

    Thus Muhammad does not forbid his men to rape their captives, but merely says that it's better not to do coitus interruptus. His men were to keep going till coitus was complete.
    ——————————————

    The heading of Chapter 29 of Sahih Muslim, a canonical hadith collection, is

    "IT IS PERMISSIBLE TO HAVE SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A CAPTIVE WOMAN AFTER SHE IS PURIFIED (OF MENSES OR DELIVERY). IN CASE SHE HAS A HUSBAND, HER MARRIAGE IS ABROGATED AFTER SHE BECOMES CAPTIVE"

    The hadiths in Chapter 29 say that after a victory for the Muslims at the Battle of Hanain, and in response to the fact that Muhammad's soldiers "seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women," Muhammad produced Qur'an 4:24's statement about slave girls/captive women,

    And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess…

    Get it? Muhammad's Allah is telling his soldiers, "go ahead, boys, you can rape the captives, married or not."

  • Jhon of Indonesia

    Your taqiyya does not work here, what the news reported is "Nine out of ten cases do not make it to prosecution, most of them because police do not believe the evidence is sufficient to reach a conviction", where the heck the accusation about Norwegians are the perpetrators comes from? you are lying through your teeth, LIAR! No wonder you call yourself bandit ass!

  • traeh

    Yes, and that second link of yours speaks of a Pakistani rapist who said his religion gives him the right to do what he wants with the woman he raped. Now the vast majority of Pakistanis are Muslim.