THINK PROGRESS WITCH-HUNT

David Horowitz was one of the founders of the New Left in the 1960s and an editor of its largest magazine, Ramparts. He is the author, with Peter Collier, of three best selling dynastic biographies: The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty (1976); The Kennedys: An American Dream (1984); and The Fords: An American Epic (1987). Looking back in anger at their days in the New Left, he and Collier wrote Destructive Generation (1989), a chronicle of their second thoughts about the 60s that has been compared to Whittaker Chambers’ Witness and other classic works documenting a break from totalitarianism. Horowitz examined this subject more closely in Radical Son (1996), a memoir tracing his odyssey from “red-diaper baby” to conservative activist that George Gilder described as “the first great autobiography of his generation.” He is author of the newly published book The Great Betrayal (Regnery 2014), which is a chronicle of the Democrats treachery in the war on terror before 9/11 to the death of Osama bin Laden.


Think Progress — an organization created by George Soros and the Clintons — has joined the Muslim Brotherhood, the Hamas-spinoff CAIR and assorted Marxist groups in issuing a report on “Islamophobia,” which is a smear category designed to silence critics of Islamic terror, Islamic misogyny and Islamic hatred of Jews, gays, Christians, Hindus and other “infidels.” The report claims that seven foundations contributed $42 million to sponsor the leaders of the Islamophobia movement. Robert Spencer and I are prominent among the targeted villains.

Robert has already responded here.  On Monday Frontpage will post a new pamphlet we have written called “Islamophobia: Thought Crime of the Totalitarian Future” which documents the creation of the term “Islamophobia” by the Muslim Brotherhood as a weapon designed to silence its critics.

In the meantime, let me deconstruct one of the numerous lies which this “report” retails, which is the matter of the $42 million. $42 million is the kind of figure that progressive fascists like George Soros give out in a single year to organizations like Think Progress. The $42 million mentioned in the report is the total given by the seven foundations it smears over a decade for many many causes unrelated to criticism of Islamic terror, misogyny and Jew-hatred.

Secondly, ninety-percent of the funding for the David Horowitz Freedom Center comes from 100,000 individual donors — not foundations. The principal funding for Robert Spencer and Jihad Watch comes from the Freedom Center. The Think Progress report is a typical fascistic attempt to silence critics and scare donors from supporting their efforts to inform the American public about the threats we face from the Islamic jihad. Needless to say all Muslims are not jihadists or terrorists or bigots. But too many are. Muslim terrorists have a vested interest in accusing their critics of being anti-Muslim. Think Progress has joined them as enablers. This is a sad day for American liberalism and a troublesome day for America.

 

  • Misfit

    I give my full support to David Horowitz, Robert Spencer and others who keep the truth and struggle alive against George Soros, The Clintons and the rest of the Mob.

    • Joseph

      Let us defend our freedom from Mr. Soros the Socialist/Communist and his cronies the Sharia Laws.

  • effemall

    The reason, perhaps, that there are no comments so far, is that we have all been busy barfing over this latest example from the forces of evil.

  • bangflash

    Why don't you read it for yourself and come up with your own conclusion. I'm more inclined to be persuaded by a thoroughly researched and effectively laid out report than a one page blog post. http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/08/is

    think that you might be wrong.

    • pagegl

      Read it. It's a whitewash of Islam; I'll agree with David on this one.

    • Captain Correct

      so a thoroughly researched report from George Soros and CAIR is what you are interested in? So in other words ? Really? I mean there are so many instances of Islamophobia aren't there? Do you even know any Muslims? I find that the most zealot defenders of the indefensible are predictably liberal morons-who think, feel and believe but don't really know very much.

  • biggovernmentlie

    Wow, Horowitz, you managed to read that >100 page report, conclude it was bogus, and write a response in around two hours. (assuming you started reading as soon as it was released at around 9:30)

    Do you have any sources for your claims about your center's funding or do we simply have to take your word for it?

  • biggovernmentlie

    Wow, Horowitz, you managed to read that >100 page report, conclude it was bogus, and write a response in around two hours. (assuming you started reading as soon as it was released at around 9:30)

  • http://article-v.org Stormkrow

    I'll take the report for what it is: a well researched and documented report that carefully lays out who the bigots of this nation are and who is paying their bills. I'm hopeful that the SPLC has moved your names higher up the list on Hate Watch and that the FBI continues to monitor your absurd behavior for what it is: Hate Speech.

    • StephenD

      Are we to assume you have read the report? If so, can you enlighten us as to how you come by your definitions of "Hate Speech" (just a note: we wouldn't need a law protecting free speech if it was never offensive to some), "Absurd behavior", "Bigot" and what bills these bogymen are paying?

      • http://article-v.org Stormkrow

        http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2011/08/pd

        I think everyone should always and forever keep in mind the name Anders Breivik when discussing Robert Spencer. The 2 shall forever and always be mentioned in the same sentence for Robert has as much blood on his hands as does Mr. Breivik. This is without question.

        I skimmed thru most of it. But here's some highlights:

        "Breivik, for example, cited Robert Spencer, one of the anti-Muslim misinformation scholars we profile in this report, and his blog, Jihad Watch, 162 times in his
        manifesto.
        Spencer’s website, which “tracks the attempts of radical Islam to subvert
        Western culture,” boasts another member of this Islamophobia network in America, David Horowitz, on his Freedom Center website. Pamela Geller, Spencer’s frequent collaborator, and her blog, Atlas Shrugs, was mentioned 12 times.

        "According to our extensive analysis, here are the top seven contributors to promoting Islamophobia in our country:
        • Donors Capital Fund
        • Richard Mellon Scaife foundations
        • Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation
        • Newton D. & Rochelle F. Becker foundations and charitable trust
        • Russell Berrie Foundation
        • Anchorage Charitable Fund and William Rosenwald Family Fund
        • Fairbrook Foundation
        Altogether, these seven charitable groups provided $42.6 million to Islamophobia
        think tanks between 2001 and 2009."

        It's a fairly damning report gien it's scope of detail and analysis and actually not a bad read for knowing who to blame for the mindless deaths in Norway.

        • StephenD

          "…knowing who to blame for the mindless deaths in Norway."
          The sad part is…you're serious.

          I thought it was the fault of Beatles Helter Skelter song.

          To blame anyone other than the perpetrator is ridiculous.

          • http://article-v.org Stormkrow

            Oh, I am completely serious.

            All people everywhere MUST take responsibility for the things that they say true and untrue. By my recollection Mr. Spencer has YET to take ANY responsibility for his causation of hate crimes committed.
            Let's play your game. By your logic then, Hitler's hands are clean. I mean he didn't pull the trigger. Right?

          • Chezwick_mac

            Wrong.

            Hitler advocated violence…and directly ordered his henchmen to commit violence. Spencer has NEVER advocated violence and never ordered anyone to commit violence. The fact that you can't distinguish such a clear-cut moral and practical distinction proves how utterly fatuous and ignorant you are.

        • Chezwick_mac

          By your twisted logic…ANYONE who is critical of ANYTHING bears responsibility for ANY fate that befalls the target of that criticism. Unless you're a total hypocrite, based upon your criticism of Robert Spencer and David Horowitz, you yourself should now assume and accept direct responsibility for any misfortune that may befall them.

          • http://article-v.org Stormkrow

            I don't believe I ever wished any misfortune upon anyone. That is against my nature and religious philosophy.
            But as I said to David and I'll say it here since you want to play this little game then. When can a person waive personal responsibility for Speech that leads to horrible crimes?

            What about Hitler?
            How about Idi Amin?
            Lenin?
            Pinochet?
            What about Bush and Cheney?

          • Chezwick_mac

            Robert Spencer never wished misfortune on anyone. He's never called for violence against anyone. He's never engaged in violence against anyone. Therefore, he can't possibly be held responsible for horrible crimes except in the mind of a delusional leftist trying to silence those with whom he disagrees.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          I think everyone should always and forever keep in mind the name Anders Breivik when discussing Robert Spencer. The 2 shall forever and always be mentioned in the same sentence for Robert has as much blood on his hands as does Mr. Breivik. This is without question.

          So you mean Robert's advocacy for human rights, the freedom of conscience, and the equality of rights for all somehow influenced Breivik to perpetrate terrorism?

          • http://article-v.org Stormkrow

            No clearly the 162 mentions of Mr. Spencer that Breivik called out had nothing to do with Mr. Spencer's alleged "advocacy"? But you're free to cite any references in Breivik's manifesto accordingly: https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explor

            Be careful for whom you wish to carry water for and associate with.

          • Chezwick_mac

            Breivak could have mentioned Robert 1000 times….and that would in NO WAY have implicated Robert in anything…UNLESS one of the quotes actually advocated violence. But none have. Not one. You can't produce a SINGLE quote from Spencer calling for violence against anyone. So it is, your argument has no legitimacy whatsoever.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Really, can you or anyone else for that matter produce just one quote or one link to anything written during Robert Spencer's entire career that is not true about Islam and thus doesn't constitute legitimate criticism. Indeed, are you so mentally incompetent that you are going to arbitrarily accept the words of unhinged loons and useful idiot Muslim apologists who don't have the first clue about Islam without seeing the proof for yourself?

          • http://article-v.org Stormkrow

            I LIVED in the Middle East. I travel there REGULARLY. Everywhere from SA to Kuwait from Iraq to Doha, from Cairo to Lebanon. I have friends who are Muslim. Can you or even Mr. Spencer say that???

            Further you're listening to a man who by all accounts is NOT a scholar of Islam or anything else for that matter. He's simply a bigoted blow hard spouting misinformation and hate on a blog paid for by the right wing Christian/Zionist mafia.
            Here's your link. http://littlegreenfootballs.com/article/32745_Rob
            "Spencer’s partnership with fascist European politicians as well as brought to light the fact that Spencer, on his personal Facebook account joined a group which seeks to reconquer present day Turkey, effectively expel and slaughter 150 Million Muslims and replace them with Christians."

            “I have written on numerous occasions that there is no distinction in the American Muslim community between peaceful Muslims and jihadists. While Americans prefer to imagine that the vast majority of American Muslims are civic-minded patriots who accept wholeheartedly the parameters of American pluralism, this proposition has actually never been proven.”

          • Chezwick_mac

            "…by all accounts…"

            You mean those who disagree with Robert. Actually, his books are very scholarly and meticulously documented using exclusively Islamic sources.

            You lose.

            As for your quote from Robert above, can you factually refute it? Since Muslim apologists insist that "Jihad" is mostly a "personal struggle", then "Jihadist" is a term that logically applies to all believing Muslims. Thus, Robert's quote is characteristically accurate, even to Islamic apologists.

            You lose again.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I LIVED in the Middle East. I travel there REGULARLY. Everywhere from SA to Kuwait from Iraq to Doha, from Cairo to Lebanon.

            Really? With respect to Christians and all other non-Muslim unbelievers living in those countries, do they have equality of rights or are they violently oppressed and systematically persecuted when not outright slaughtered altogether like all Christians and all other non-Muslim unbelievers living in every Muslim majority country in the world?

            Can they build new houses of worship and freely and openly practice their respective religions? I mean if Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by only a tiny minority of extremists, then surely they can freely and openly practice their respective religions. Can they?

            I have friends who are Muslim. Can you or even Mr. Spencer say that???

            You know I can always tell when I'm dealing with a gullible useful idiot, since just like clockwork they all claim to have Muslim friends. You know why, because like loons they all naively assume that Muslims, which are the products of a completely alien civilization, think, act, feel, believe, and desire all the same things as we Westerners do. Nevertheless, I hate to rain on your incredibly gullible parade moonbat, but per the texts and tenets of Islam, Muslims are forbidden from being friends with non-Muslim unbelievers. Hence, let me be the first to congratulate you for making a fool out of yourself.

            Further you're listening to a man who by all accounts is NOT a scholar of Islam or anything else for that matter.

            You mean according to Muslims and their useful idiot apologists Spencer isn't a scholar. However, Spencer is not only a scholar on Islam who has written numerous critically acclaimed and best selling books on the subject, but he is also a recognized authority in Islamic jurisprudence. Indeed, the only people claiming Spencer is NOT a scholar are taqiyya spewing Muslim stealth and deceptive jihadists and the gullible useful idiots whose ignorance’s they are exploiting.

            He's simply a bigoted blow hard spouting misinformation and hate on a blog paid for by the right wing Christian/Zionist mafia.

            You know it is only unhinged leftwing loons like you that resort to making stupid assertions they can't possibly backup. The reality is you are nothing but a mentally incompetent moonbat.

            And as for as your Charles Johnson's crap goes, stick it up where the sun doesn't shine, he is a mentally handicapped moron just like you.

        • waterwillows

          WOW………you just might be getting it after all.

          Now…..what do you think happens when millions of muslims read the Koran? Instead of 'tracking'….. the Koran does much worse….IT INCITES.

        • Rather Dan

          Then who’s to blame for the 17,000 fatal jihadi attacks since 9-11. Answer me that, goofy.

        • effemall

          Thank you for the list, Stormkrow.. Now I know to whom to send my donations. Islamophobia, however, is a misnomer in many of our cases. Many of us who have contempt for this primitive bundle of antisocial, political rules calling itself a religion are not afraid of it (phobia is fear) We despise it as we despise AIDS and Cancer. I am disappointed in Mr. Spencer for making excuses where none are needed. He and all those like him are doing America a great service by exposing the duplicity and evil of Islam and of its advance men who have been infiltrating our culture in their societal jihad. The youngster who went on a killing spree in Norway may very well have been awakened by those who expose Islam but he certainly got everything confused. He obviously has a few loose marbles but he wouldn’t have needed inspiration from writers – he could see Norway go to hell right in front of him. Had he blown up a mosque or two in which mullahs preached the destruction of the non-muslim world then one could say that he got the message and that would not be surprising because a violent push back by non-muslims around the world will be seen more and more. It is inevitable because Muslims are programmed and can't stop pushing.

        • astra

          Islam is against gays. I know they beat me up for my boyfriens. I don't care what your report says.

    • Wiley

      And I guess this means J. D. Salinger should be in prison because Mark David Chapman was carrying a copy of Catcher in the Rye when he shot John Lennon. Up yours, Stormkrow.

  • zsqpwxxeh

    If you're not getting flak, you're not over the target.
    If you're not getting constantly attacked by leftists, you're not a threat to their plans.
    Questions? Ask Palin, Sarah.

  • Chezwick_mac

    “Islamophobia: Thought Crime of the Totalitarian Future”

    Perfect title.

  • waterwillows

    Talk about having a wooden brain. Just because people are able to recoginse right and wrong and just because they have enough sense to know what evil is…….Does Not Mean That They Are Mentally Deranaged!

    What is this 'phobia' crap? It sounds to me that the people who promoted the phobia crap are themselves mentally ill. If not, then they must be some of the stupidist people on earth.

  • Jim_C

    Fun stuff! You know David's gonna get a lot of mileage out of this!

  • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

    ” ‘Islamophobia,’ which is a smear category designed to silence critics of Islamic terror, Islamic misogyny and Islamic hatred of Jews, gays, Christians, Hindus and other ‘infidels.’ ”

    That is a powerful rhetorical construction. If it were done like this:

    “Anti-Semitism,” which is a smear category designed to silence critics of Zionist expansionism, Zionist passive aggression and Zionist hatred of Muslims, Black professors, Christians, Armenians and other “nationalists.”

    People would harumph. Alan Dershowitz would come out swinging like Woody Allen in blue and white boxer shorts.

    • http://vnnforum.com DeShawn

      Flipside nailed it once again.

      • tyke

        Yeah, why should we allow the Jews a barren country with no oil,barely the size of Wales, it's Zionist expansion gone mad. We should be helping the Arab Muslims take over Sudan, Somalia and Nigeria at the moment, they need our help to wipe out the Nuba people. When will people realise that arab muslims are the rightful owners of all the land in the world,

    • http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm Infidel 4 Ever

      'Reactionary,' which is a smear category designed to silence critics of Socialist terror, nationalist Socialist fascism and Socialist patronizing of Blacks and Latinos, hatred of Jews, gays, Christians, Hindus and other 'workers'

      Those who can, do.
      Those who can't, teach,
      Those who can't do or teach become parasitical Socialists.

    • ehudolmert

      awesome! lets call these guys (DH and his ilk) out for what they are: well-funded hypocrites. no other way to look at it.

    • esperantominoria

      Flipside,

      You confuse a people(the Jews) with an set of ideas (Islam).Of course it is wrong to smear the Jews.
      But if you say negative things about Islam(an ideology) that are true then it is ok,ad you can also do the same for other set of ideas like capitalism,communism,etc.

      Do you see my point?Read here how to tell if a Muslim is a true Moderate,one of U:
      http://www.antisharia.com/2011/05/07/how-to-tell-

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        You are alleging that hatred of Muslims is Odium Abominationis while hatred of Jews is Odium Inimicitiae. I am saying no, criticism is NOT hatred and that as far as most people are concerned, Jews and Muslims are interchangeable and their petty squabbles are equally petty, their hatreds of each other equally abominable, and their militant identities equally optional and/or loathsome.

    • Walrus

      Quick we have a job for Flipside in Mombai. How do 7 million civillians who are surrounded by more than 500 million bloodthirsty, possessed people expand? And why should that be fearful? Don't you have to show an IQ card to get in here?

  • http://righthereontheleftcoast.blogspot.com/ Ralph Vaughan

    CAIR continues its infiltration of government at all levels because good people are punished when they speak their minds.

  • effemall

    Flipside & DeShawn, the dance team with different agendas who can swing together when they're playing "Kill the Jews but call them Zionists and that will decriminalize it because the Palestinian lies have been accepted."

    • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

      In order for that to be true, 1) criticizing Jews would make them die. 2) the book The Jewish State, Theodor Herzl, Ze’ev Jabotinsky, Bernard Baruch, etc would be figments of my imagination.

  • Andy Gill

    The appearance of these reports suggests desperation. The Islamofascists are losing ground and they know it.

  • Dispozadaburka

    New World Order needs a New World Religion
    to control mass populations by a few.
    One ideology of Islam for all.
    Chelsea should look great in a burka.

    • Tin Soldier

      The 'New World Order' was invented by muslims to distract atheists from what is REALLY going on!

  • Craig

    Here in England, on Poppy day this year, which commemorates all the dead in the first and second world war, there was a protest by muslims, during the 2 mins silence in which they burned the Union Jack flag and wished death on British soldiers. They were protected by the police and none were arrested, can you imagine if English people burnt effigies of Mohammed on Ramadan?

    • sherlock holmes

      well, UK is gone…it’s a hopeless case…I understood this simple, obvious fact years before you guys were even aware of existence of something called Islam, years before 9/11….when I saw the reaction of UK people to the death of Diana, a former British Royal with a Muslim boyfriend, then & there I understood that UK people are corrupted to their core. don’t worry, only a few more years before that tiny island becomes sharia compliant…& to tell you the truth bluntly, all this gives me a sort of sadistic pleasure…this broad daylight rape of UK..b’coz we can never forget what britishers did in India while they were lording over here, and how, during those hundreds of years, they always supported muslims against Hindus, right upto India’s partition & creation of pakistan in 1947 .

      • tekow

        it is elementary my dear watson, sherlock holmes is jealous because he never got a white anglican pussy.

      • Indioviejo

        So the chickens are coming home to roost, sort of. Still it is sad to see a great culture declining so fast before our very eyes, willfully destroying their values. The rest of Europe is in the same boat. Several centuries of outright self-hatred for the judeo-Christian civilization which brought them to the dance, is irrational self destruction. Are we next?

    • http://www.resonoelusono.com/NaturalBornCitizen.htm Alexander Gofen

      Alas, what I cannot imagine is exactly the English people burning effigies of Mohammed…

      Burn korans, shred korans, display the cartoons of their pedophile Mohammed if you still have a wish to survive…
      http://www.resonoelusono.com/Islam/
      http://www.resonoelusono.com/Imminent.htm

  • WilliamJamesWard

    The Clintons, talk about enemies of America and just think how high in elected
    office these traitors have risen. One third of Americans are leftists, completely
    indoctrinated with hate America talking points and subvert everythin American
    they can. The next two thirds, well one is wraped around a sports program and
    bottle of beer and may come up for a look around now and then. The remainder
    of Americans are trying to live patriotic lives while being subverted by the leftist
    agenda, which is to make life unliveable for Americans. The Clintons like all
    of the left are more brazen in their open complicity with Islamis/leftist subversion.
    Open traitors know there is no government that will prosecute their treason, Obam
    makes sure of that, our government is home of all subversives……………William

    • tekow

      and only one of the Americans is a redneck zionist.. can you figure that one out..

  • voted against carter

    ' TAQIYYA '
    Do your own research about it if you don't know what this means.

    Islam IS EVIL. PERIOD.

    Islam strives for world domination.

    The Quran commands Muslims to exercise jihad.

    The Quran commands Muslims to establish shariah law.

    The Quran commands Muslims to impose Islam on the entire world.

    Islam is NOT a religion, it IS a totalitarian ideology.

    Islam wants to dominate all aspects of life, from the cradle to the grave.

    Shariah law is a law that controls every detail of life in a Islamic society.

    From civic- and family law to criminal law.

    It determines how one should eat, dress and even use the toilet.

    Oppression of women is good, drinking alcohol is bad.

    The core of the Quran is the call to jihad.

    Jihad means a lot of things and is Arabic for battle.

    Islam means submission, there cannot be any mistake about its goal.

    Islam and freedom, Islam and democracy are not compatible.

    They are opposite values.

    Mohamed's "wife" was six years old.

    That makes Mohamed a PEDOPHILE!!!

    And you want to base a "Religion" on this a z z -holes rantings?

    Are you INSANE?

    • tekow

      wow you seem to have an inside knowledge of it.. are you a muslim?

  • Bob Webster

    Amen!

  • GadsdenGurl

    Of course Clinton and Soros would side with misogynists who think it's OK to cut your wife's head off for looking at a man.

  • http://fawstin.blogspot.com/ Bosch_Fawstin

    I spell "Islamophobia" islamophoNia, and here's why… http://bit.ly/ojqJcP

  • guest

    Conservatives crying "witch hunt", what an upside down world they inhabit. I've never seen a group work so hard or spend so much money to paint themselves as victims. Horowitz is at his most shrill here, tossing about "totalitarian" and "fascist" like little rhetorical hand grenades. The attempt to equate concern over the rise of anti-Muslim sentiment, organizations and actions as "totalitarian mind control" is clumsy but will no doubt be effective given the quality of people they are attempting to provoke.

  • tekow

    "Conservatives crying "witch hunt", what an upside down world they inhabit. I've never seen a group work so hard or spend so much money to paint themselves as victims."

    I would not call them conservatives, rather they are right wing Zionists. If you are a perpetrator it takes quite a bit of effort to guise yourself as the victim.

    "Horowitz is at his most shrill here, tossing about "totalitarian" and "fascist" like little rhetorical hand grenades."

    It is not just rhetoric. It is a tactic actually fascists employ to preempt a rational discourse in the debate and force the opponent to a defensive posture. Horowitz does not know sh*t about Islam or middle east history. He is just a right wing Zionist, that is all.

    " The attempt to equate concern over the rise of anti-Muslim sentiment, organizations and actions as "totalitarian mind control" is clumsy but will no doubt be effective given the quality of people they are attempting to provoke."

    Yeah, it is a clumsy but nonetheless arguably a profitable vocation to exploit free speech to in order to deny the same right and protection to another group. Look at how all the other posters parrot: islam is not a religion, it is an ideology bent on world domination.. all muslims are killers or cowards.. al qaida is the true face of islam not the rest of the 1.5 billion.. the rest are either cowards or liars… the only good muslim is the dead muslim.. blah blah blah.. just the ramblings of a shrill right wing zionist.

    • WilliamJamesWard

      "all muslims are killers or cowards" you got that right, Islam is incompatible
      with free people, whereas their depredations to non muslims are horrid.
      Muslims should not have been let into America and the day will come when
      they will be sent away. Leftists in their attempt to destroy America are behind
      this plague, for people that hate pork they know how to act like swine. As an
      apologist for this rot in human form you would do well to return to Iran, that
      is unless you are there now with all of the Mullah trash……………..William

    • Indioviejo

      But then what about the historical evidence, written by Muslims on the conquest and colonization of Andalusia, or the conquest of Byzantium, and its colonization which lasts to this day. And don't forget the Armenian genocide, or the more recently conducted genocide in Darfur-too much even for George Clooney- and blessed by Carter, Clinton, Bush and Obama above all. If this offends you them you may call me a right wing zionist, an oxymoron, buy who cares about thruth, right?

  • kafir4life

    Question…..If the "thought police" were to take over, how would they answer the following question?
    Isn't islam that gutter cult that was invented by the pedophilic maniac mohamat who enjoyed sex with then later a meal of his favorite pig (or mama as she'd been called by moe) which later caused him intestinal distress and the diarrhea that was used to write the most holy guide of terror, the koran which is the word of the moon god allah as shat directly from mohamats anal orfice?

    I'm pretty sure the answer is "yes".

  • Steve Chavez

    The Muslims student groups are very civil and that's why DAVID HOROWITZ NEEDS SECURITY THE MINUTE HE STEPS ON "FREE SPEECH ZONES/UNIVERSITIES!"

    Their screaming HATRED of David, who uses their own Muslims words and actions against them, is his only weapon. HOW CAN THEY DENY THEIR OWN WORDS? He shows films with their own actions but they hate to be exposed by the TRUE LIGHT!

    HERE IN ALBUQUERQUE, at our University of New Mexico two years ago, there was a "Muslim Understanding Day" so I wrote a note and gave it to the leader. "Are there 'American Understanding Days' at Arab Universities? I don't need to 'understand' you, I just need to tolerate you." I walked away and two male students ran to me and one had a T-shirt that said "Hamas 175" which I didn't ask what that was about. We argued but they walked away when I kept bringing up facts.

    Last year, there was a protest in support of Hamas, many of the same students were there including the leader of the protest who was a partner to Joseph Massad, the radical Columbia professor, who did his undergrad at UNM. The Muslim Student A. has meetings and there are many outsiders running the show. When this Massad friend saw me coming into the meeting, he broke it up immediately! The students were left there standing and wondering what had just happened. WHAT WAS THE MEETING ABOUT THAT THEY WERE AFRAID OF ME HEARING IT?

    • WilliamJamesWard

      That they were all here illegally, planning a bombing or assassination, who knows
      what evil transpires within these criminal groups……………………..William

  • http://haque.alphacor.net Sameul Haque

    Who let the dogs out?

    Woof Woof !!!

    Sameul Haque

  • http://freethoughtnation.com Acharya S

    Leftwingers and Muslim apologists are weeping and wailing about some $42 million supposedly spent on "Islamophobia" – i.e., education about Islam's history and doctrines. Meanwhile, the Saudis ALONE have spent $87 BILLION over the past couple of decades pushing their women-enslaving cult on the world.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabi

    This fact cannot be pushed enough – we needs scores of articles exposing all the money spent on Islamization globally.

  • angel

    David,

    You said:
    "Needless to say all Muslims are not jihadists or terrorists or bigots. But too many are." And many more remain silent. This is just as bad.

    Remember the words of Dietrich Bonhoeffer:

    "Silence in the face of evil is itself evil: God will not hold us guiltless. Not to speak is to speak. Not to act is to act."

    It can not stand and I do hold them guilty because of their silence. Silence in the face of evil.