<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the UN Is the Problem and the US Should Leave It</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Folino</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-1717554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Folino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 12:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-1717554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just curious, but how can something dated May 25th have happened yet?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious, but how can something dated May 25th have happened yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foolster41</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-713431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolster41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-713431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Errata: (Corrections in bold) 
 
&quot;bending us &lt;b&gt;to&lt;/b&gt; international law&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Errata: (Corrections in bold) </p>
<p>&quot;bending us <b>to</b> international law&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foolster41</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-713424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolster41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-713424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, but being in the system continues to grant a pretend legitimacy. All the UN does is feeds off the generosity of free producing nations and gives to the non-productive ones, money AND power. Who is heading the security council? Despots, communists and Islaofascists who don&#039;t grant the rights the west does. You say, the&#039;ll persecute other free nations. Then they should join us. This is a STRIKE, not working men for better wages, but a strike against bureaucratic thieves in suits who steal OUR rights by bending us international PC law (such as laws against blasphemy), who steal our security and our right tell us we have no right to exist (such as Isreal) or fight back.  
 
 If we remove ourselves, the parasitic UN can no longer feed off the US or the west. They loose legitimacy and fuel and will crash all the sooner.  If others join us, the crash&#039;s velocity will increase.  
 
To the UN, we, as American and free westerns and capitalists should say, as did John Galt did, &quot;Get the hell out our way&quot; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but being in the system continues to grant a pretend legitimacy. All the UN does is feeds off the generosity of free producing nations and gives to the non-productive ones, money AND power. Who is heading the security council? Despots, communists and Islaofascists who don&#039;t grant the rights the west does. You say, the&#039;ll persecute other free nations. Then they should join us. This is a STRIKE, not working men for better wages, but a strike against bureaucratic thieves in suits who steal OUR rights by bending us international PC law (such as laws against blasphemy), who steal our security and our right tell us we have no right to exist (such as Isreal) or fight back.  </p>
<p> If we remove ourselves, the parasitic UN can no longer feed off the US or the west. They loose legitimacy and fuel and will crash all the sooner.  If others join us, the crash&#039;s velocity will increase.  </p>
<p>To the UN, we, as American and free westerns and capitalists should say, as did John Galt did, &quot;Get the hell out our way&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-710583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-710583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I`m astonished by the lack of common sence of the conservative commentators! America have veto in UN security consil, and what`ll do China,Russia,Muslims after America departure? They`l persecute remaining  disageeable countries under the UN flag, and America will have to defend them in the coalition with whom? 
 Conservatives demonstrate the qualities of liberals. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`m astonished by the lack of common sence of the conservative commentators! America have veto in UN security consil, and what`ll do China,Russia,Muslims after America departure? They`l persecute remaining  disageeable countries under the UN flag, and America will have to defend them in the coalition with whom?<br />
 Conservatives demonstrate the qualities of liberals. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-707799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-707799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with the swastika`s place on the picture.But what about the alternative? The tendency of using international forces in conflict is irreversible so there must not be two of international organizations.I see the only way to modernize UN may be by American dictate using their going out. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the swastika`s place on the picture.But what about the alternative? The tendency of using international forces in conflict is irreversible so there must not be two of international organizations.I see the only way to modernize UN may be by American dictate using their going out. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kafirman</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-692508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kafirman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-692508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Horowitz subtly conflates &quot;theocracies&quot; with Islam. But theocracies can be wonderful. Further, Horowitz makes an implied broad appeal to religious neutrality. But like world peace, and however reaffirmed by the SCOTUS, religious neutrality is a fictional construct. There is only atheism, agnosticism, theism, pantheism, finite godism, panentheism and one more (which escapes me). The American system of government has recognition of &quot;Nature and Nature&#039;s God&quot; as the fount of rights. The problem is that Islam does not recognize human rights. Horowitz subtly besmirches theism and the important theisistic notions--like natural law--when he disparages &quot;theocracies.&quot; Mr. Horowitz, Islam and not theocracies are the problem. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horowitz subtly conflates &quot;theocracies&quot; with Islam. But theocracies can be wonderful. Further, Horowitz makes an implied broad appeal to religious neutrality. But like world peace, and however reaffirmed by the SCOTUS, religious neutrality is a fictional construct. There is only atheism, agnosticism, theism, pantheism, finite godism, panentheism and one more (which escapes me). The American system of government has recognition of &quot;Nature and Nature&#039;s God&quot; as the fount of rights. The problem is that Islam does not recognize human rights. Horowitz subtly besmirches theism and the important theisistic notions&#8211;like natural law&#8211;when he disparages &quot;theocracies.&quot; Mr. Horowitz, Islam and not theocracies are the problem. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foolster41</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-690916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolster41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 03:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-690916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I glanced at the article, and it is indeed interesting. It apears though the definitions of both republic and democracy is &quot;by the people, for the people&quot; but republic has closer controls on the goverment, in the case of controls of the goverment to protect rights I&#039;d agree with completely.  
 
Some of those restrictions on  voting seem not quite so unreasonable. being a citizen and paying taxes are no-brainiers (if any are owed, of course). Though I would disagree with a few, and I do think a few are somewhat unreasonable.  
* 45 seems like quite a bit too old to vote. I can understand wanting to delay so voters gain the knowledge of experience, but this seems much too far. This would mean a person&#039;s life is more than half over before they can vote! It would mean they wouldn&#039;t be able to vote 10 years after being qualified to be president of the US.  
*militaray service:  Serving in the military outside of times of war is not mandatory, so this would be reasonable only if that changed (and I&#039;m not so sure short mandatory time in the military would be a bad thing, though I&#039;m not 100% sure how good it would be either.).  
* I&#039;m not sure why you put not working for goverment on the list. Why would working for a non-partisin post (police officers, administrators, judges) be cause to not vote? Or do you mean people who are in elected offices, or working for them?  
* Owning property is another one I disagree with. Many people rent (i do) and currently cannot afford to own property. Why is it a requirement to vote? 
* Women&#039;s right to vote or cases of that you hint at being &quot;racist&quot; (unless you mean what the liberals label as &quot;racist:&quot; meaning against illegal immigrants) I disagree with. What quality does a woman have that she should not have the right to vote (I assume since you say you get in trouble, you are against this?)?  A simular question about the &quot;racial&quot; policies, assuming it is actually racist, and you don&#039;t mean against illegal immigrants as I said before.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I glanced at the article, and it is indeed interesting. It apears though the definitions of both republic and democracy is &quot;by the people, for the people&quot; but republic has closer controls on the goverment, in the case of controls of the goverment to protect rights I&#039;d agree with completely.  </p>
<p>Some of those restrictions on  voting seem not quite so unreasonable. being a citizen and paying taxes are no-brainiers (if any are owed, of course). Though I would disagree with a few, and I do think a few are somewhat unreasonable.<br />
* 45 seems like quite a bit too old to vote. I can understand wanting to delay so voters gain the knowledge of experience, but this seems much too far. This would mean a person&#039;s life is more than half over before they can vote! It would mean they wouldn&#039;t be able to vote 10 years after being qualified to be president of the US.<br />
*militaray service:  Serving in the military outside of times of war is not mandatory, so this would be reasonable only if that changed (and I&#039;m not so sure short mandatory time in the military would be a bad thing, though I&#039;m not 100% sure how good it would be either.).<br />
* I&#039;m not sure why you put not working for goverment on the list. Why would working for a non-partisin post (police officers, administrators, judges) be cause to not vote? Or do you mean people who are in elected offices, or working for them?<br />
* Owning property is another one I disagree with. Many people rent (i do) and currently cannot afford to own property. Why is it a requirement to vote?<br />
* Women&#039;s right to vote or cases of that you hint at being &quot;racist&quot; (unless you mean what the liberals label as &quot;racist:&quot; meaning against illegal immigrants) I disagree with. What quality does a woman have that she should not have the right to vote (I assume since you say you get in trouble, you are against this?)?  A simular question about the &quot;racial&quot; policies, assuming it is actually racist, and you don&#039;t mean against illegal immigrants as I said before.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John_Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-690807</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John_Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 02:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-690807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gita Lev I agree wholeheartedly with your comments and especially &quot;The Constitution rules and is the greatest document for mankind, since the BIBLE.&quot; 
 
I found a fascinating documentary series on YouTube which really nails the need for America to support Israel. Hope you find it as interesting. 
 
It&#039;s in 6 parts and titled &quot;America Under Judgment&quot;. Here&#039;s the link for part 1. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncZan8r6BNs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncZan8r6BNs&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Keep up the good work Gita Lev. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gita Lev I agree wholeheartedly with your comments and especially &quot;The Constitution rules and is the greatest document for mankind, since the BIBLE.&quot; </p>
<p>I found a fascinating documentary series on YouTube which really nails the need for America to support Israel. Hope you find it as interesting. </p>
<p>It&#039;s in 6 parts and titled &quot;America Under Judgment&quot;. Here&#039;s the link for part 1.<br />
  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncZan8r6BNs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncZan8r6BNs</a> </p>
<p>Keep up the good work Gita Lev. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hrayspitz</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-688504</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hrayspitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 19:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-688504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Move the UN to Haiti - they need some sort of industry. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Move the UN to Haiti &#8211; they need some sort of industry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gita Lev</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-687545</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gita Lev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-687545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rouge...so right! Fascism is just plain EVIL! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rouge&#8230;so right! Fascism is just plain EVIL! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gita Lev</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-687527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gita Lev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-687527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Kelly.....agreed! UN IS A GREAT FRAUD REPRESENTING THE EVIL INCARNATES desire to seem JUST in the world(nothing more than BARBARIANS in WESTERN STYLE clothing). Long live the GREAT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC...America, G-d Bless her and may she remove herself from the United Nothings...(would that mean BO too????? &lt;goal of this administration is to make the UN the world&#039;s governing body of law&gt;.  The Constitution rules and is the greatest document for mankind, since the BIBLE. Good for the people(not the politicos). The US and Israel are connected for all the right reasons....... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Kelly&#8230;..agreed! UN IS A GREAT FRAUD REPRESENTING THE EVIL INCARNATES desire to seem JUST in the world(nothing more than BARBARIANS in WESTERN STYLE clothing). Long live the GREAT DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC&#8230;America, G-d Bless her and may she remove herself from the United Nothings&#8230;(would that mean BO too????? &lt;goal of this administration is to make the UN the world&#039;s governing body of law&gt;.  The Constitution rules and is the greatest document for mankind, since the BIBLE. Good for the people(not the politicos). The US and Israel are connected for all the right reasons&#8230;&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonny</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-687457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 15:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-687457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN is and for al purposes the tool for international Progressives i.e. Leftists and the majority of Arab states during the cold war were soviet client states supported and armed by Moscow. The PLO was a leftist organization supported by the old USSR. The majority of Muslims went to universities in Russia and now those very Arab countries run the UNGA. Now we ask if the UN is viable and whether we should belong and fund an organization that is basically a stacked deck against everything the US and Israel stand for. Many fear the end of the UN, but history tells us that organizations that bite the hand that feeds them are the ones doomed to extinction. Ask this question of yourself; name one war the UN has stopped? I rest my case.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UN is and for al purposes the tool for international Progressives i.e. Leftists and the majority of Arab states during the cold war were soviet client states supported and armed by Moscow. The PLO was a leftist organization supported by the old USSR. The majority of Muslims went to universities in Russia and now those very Arab countries run the UNGA. Now we ask if the UN is viable and whether we should belong and fund an organization that is basically a stacked deck against everything the US and Israel stand for. Many fear the end of the UN, but history tells us that organizations that bite the hand that feeds them are the ones doomed to extinction. Ask this question of yourself; name one war the UN has stopped? I rest my case.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geoffputerbaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-686987</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffputerbaugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-686987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gee, I was for getting out thirty years ago, and haven&#039;t changed my mind. 
An alliance of democratic states might be worth looking into, as well as that vague concept called The Anglosphere.   
 
Just stop paying money to support thugs and their &quot;ambassadors.&quot;  Move the thing to the Central African Republic; they probably need the income. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, I was for getting out thirty years ago, and haven&#039;t changed my mind.<br />
An alliance of democratic states might be worth looking into, as well as that vague concept called The Anglosphere.   </p>
<p>Just stop paying money to support thugs and their &quot;ambassadors.&quot;  Move the thing to the Central African Republic; they probably need the income. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rogue operator</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-686079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rogue operator]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 11:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-686079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The graphic is really interesting.  I can&#039;t shake idea that the UN is an international fascist organization (Fascism does not equal racism, by the way). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The graphic is really interesting.  I can&#039;t shake idea that the UN is an international fascist organization (Fascism does not equal racism, by the way). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John_Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-685508</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John_Kelly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 09:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-685508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The United Nations is the &#8220;United Nothing&#8221; and if the facts are examined it is easily identified as the greatest fraud in all history with an underlying purpose to destroy the United States. 
 
This festering snake pit and den of hypocrisy costs the American tax payer almost one trillion dollars per year.  
 
To highlight the absolute incompetence, let&#8217;s just look at one simple case of the U.N.&#8217;s involvement in mishandling global affairs, the Middle East crisis. 
 
On May 16th 1967 &#8211; Cairo Radio (Egypt) announced &quot;The existence of Israel has continued too long. The battle has come in which we shall destroy Israel.&quot; 
 
On May 19th 1967 Cairo Radio said &quot;This is our chance Arabs to deal Israel a mortal blow of annihilation.&quot; 
 
On May 27th 1967 Egypt&#039;s President Gamel Abdul Nasser said &quot;Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel.&quot; 
 
On June 1st 1967 Iraq&#039;s leader said &quot;We are resolved, determined and united to achieve our clear aim of wiping Israel off the map.&quot; 
 
On June 3rd 1967 Cairo Radio hailed the impending Muslim Holy War. 
 
On June 5th 1967, Israel with just 3 million people went to war against 80 million Arabs. 
 
The battle lasted just 6 days and was a resounding victory for Israel. 
TIME MAGAZINE called it ISRAELS MIRACLE WAR 
 
In the six day war Israel took back: 
&#8226; JERUSALEM, 
&#8226; The WEST BANK (or Judea &amp; Samaria) 
&#8226; The GOLAN HEIGHTS a strategic mountain range that separates Israel &amp; Syria. 
&#8226; The GAZA STRIP. 
&#8226; And THE SINAI PENINSULAR. 
 
Then the United Nations got involved and said &#8220;give the land back&#8221;, as per U N Security Council Resolution 242. 
 
If America applied the same logic we would have given Alaska to Japan in a &#8220;land for peace&#8221; deal when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.  
 
The United Nations the great 39 story tower of wisdom located In New York, better described by former UN Ambassador Dore Gold as the tower of babble. 
 
The United Nations is the same lame duck organization which turned a blind eye and did nothing in 1994 while 800,000 innocent civilians were massacred in the tiny African nation of Rwanda. 
 
The United Nations who stood back and did nothing from 1974 to 1979 while 2 million Cambodians were slaughtered by an insane leader named Pol Pot. 
 
The United Nations stood back and did nothing from 1975 to 1999 while tens of thousands were slaughtered by radical Muslims in East Timor, just off the North Coast of Australia. 
 
The United Nations who want to replace the American Constitution with the United Nations Charter. In case you have never read the U.N. Charter it starts with the words &#8220;We the People of the United Nations&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;.hmmmm sounds familiar! 
 
The United Nations who have an agenda to bring World peace through a one world government but is giving us a world in pieces, they told Israel, Give the land back. 
 
If America applied the same logic as United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, we would have given Alaska to Japan in a &#8220;land for peace&#8221; deal when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.  
 
If America applied the same logic as United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, we would have given Manhattan Island to Osama Bin Laden in a &#8220;land for peace&#8221; deal after the attacks of 911. 
 
President Obama is now expecting Israel to go back to the 1967 lines. 
 
 THE UNITED NATIONS IS THE UNITED NOTHING.  
 
America needs to get out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of America. 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The United Nations is the &ldquo;United Nothing&rdquo; and if the facts are examined it is easily identified as the greatest fraud in all history with an underlying purpose to destroy the United States. </p>
<p>This festering snake pit and den of hypocrisy costs the American tax payer almost one trillion dollars per year.  </p>
<p>To highlight the absolute incompetence, let&rsquo;s just look at one simple case of the U.N.&rsquo;s involvement in mishandling global affairs, the Middle East crisis. </p>
<p>On May 16th 1967 &ndash; Cairo Radio (Egypt) announced &quot;The existence of Israel has continued too long. The battle has come in which we shall destroy Israel.&quot; </p>
<p>On May 19th 1967 Cairo Radio said &quot;This is our chance Arabs to deal Israel a mortal blow of annihilation.&quot; </p>
<p>On May 27th 1967 Egypt&#039;s President Gamel Abdul Nasser said &quot;Our basic objective will be the destruction of Israel.&quot; </p>
<p>On June 1st 1967 Iraq&#039;s leader said &quot;We are resolved, determined and united to achieve our clear aim of wiping Israel off the map.&quot; </p>
<p>On June 3rd 1967 Cairo Radio hailed the impending Muslim Holy War. </p>
<p>On June 5th 1967, Israel with just 3 million people went to war against 80 million Arabs. </p>
<p>The battle lasted just 6 days and was a resounding victory for Israel.<br />
TIME MAGAZINE called it ISRAELS MIRACLE WAR </p>
<p>In the six day war Israel took back:<br />
&bull; JERUSALEM,<br />
&bull; The WEST BANK (or Judea &amp; Samaria)<br />
&bull; The GOLAN HEIGHTS a strategic mountain range that separates Israel &amp; Syria.<br />
&bull; The GAZA STRIP.<br />
&bull; And THE SINAI PENINSULAR. </p>
<p>Then the United Nations got involved and said &ldquo;give the land back&rdquo;, as per U N Security Council Resolution 242. </p>
<p>If America applied the same logic we would have given Alaska to Japan in a &ldquo;land for peace&rdquo; deal when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.  </p>
<p>The United Nations the great 39 story tower of wisdom located In New York, better described by former UN Ambassador Dore Gold as the tower of babble. </p>
<p>The United Nations is the same lame duck organization which turned a blind eye and did nothing in 1994 while 800,000 innocent civilians were massacred in the tiny African nation of Rwanda. </p>
<p>The United Nations who stood back and did nothing from 1974 to 1979 while 2 million Cambodians were slaughtered by an insane leader named Pol Pot. </p>
<p>The United Nations stood back and did nothing from 1975 to 1999 while tens of thousands were slaughtered by radical Muslims in East Timor, just off the North Coast of Australia. </p>
<p>The United Nations who want to replace the American Constitution with the United Nations Charter. In case you have never read the U.N. Charter it starts with the words &ldquo;We the People of the United Nations&rdquo;&hellip;&hellip;.hmmmm sounds familiar! </p>
<p>The United Nations who have an agenda to bring World peace through a one world government but is giving us a world in pieces, they told Israel, Give the land back. </p>
<p>If America applied the same logic as United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, we would have given Alaska to Japan in a &ldquo;land for peace&rdquo; deal when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor.  </p>
<p>If America applied the same logic as United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, we would have given Manhattan Island to Osama Bin Laden in a &ldquo;land for peace&rdquo; deal after the attacks of 911. </p>
<p>President Obama is now expecting Israel to go back to the 1967 lines. </p>
<p> THE UNITED NATIONS IS THE UNITED NOTHING.  </p>
<p>America needs to get out of the United Nations and get the United Nations out of America. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-/#comment-684527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 06:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-684527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The final destruction of the British and French empires, and the absolute entrenchment of the USA in its newly acquired positon of No.1 Power. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The final destruction of the British and French empires, and the absolute entrenchment of the USA in its newly acquired positon of No.1 Power. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BS77</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-684232</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BS77]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-684232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The UN should move to a  more appropriate location---perhaps Zimbabwe or Sudan....perhaps North Korea or Iran....somewhere it belongs. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UN should move to a  more appropriate location&#8212;perhaps Zimbabwe or Sudan&#8230;.perhaps North Korea or Iran&#8230;.somewhere it belongs. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supreme_Galooty</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-684033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Supreme_Galooty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-684033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry. I intentionally did not answer your question, the answer seeming so obvious. Being home-schooled it is entirely reasonable that there might be holes in what you have learned, or you learned it and forgot it. At least you escaped the significant harm that is done to folks ensnared by the public &quot;educational&quot; establishment. Go here for a discussion of democracy vs republic: &lt;a href=&quot;http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspec...&lt;/a&gt;  
 
A few requirements for voting might be: Citizen, property owner, age over 25, age over 45, prior military service, not currently working for any governmental agency, currently paying taxes, etc. I&#039;m sure there are others that would not be deemed racist. As for allowing women to vote, THAT is a completely different subject, and one which earns me the most incredible opprobrium if I am so foolish as to express my opinion. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry. I intentionally did not answer your question, the answer seeming so obvious. Being home-schooled it is entirely reasonable that there might be holes in what you have learned, or you learned it and forgot it. At least you escaped the significant harm that is done to folks ensnared by the public &quot;educational&quot; establishment. Go here for a discussion of democracy vs republic: <a href="http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspec" rel="nofollow">http://lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspec</a>&#8230;  </p>
<p>A few requirements for voting might be: Citizen, property owner, age over 25, age over 45, prior military service, not currently working for any governmental agency, currently paying taxes, etc. I&#039;m sure there are others that would not be deemed racist. As for allowing women to vote, THAT is a completely different subject, and one which earns me the most incredible opprobrium if I am so foolish as to express my opinion. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kivi</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-683906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kivi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 05:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-683906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US out of the UN.  UN out of the US. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US out of the UN.  UN out of the US. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foolster41</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2011/david-horowitz/why-the-un-is-the-problem-and-the-us-should-leave-it/comment-page-1/#comment-683300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foolster41]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2011 03:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=99090#comment-683300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You didn&#039;t answer my question. 
 
From your answer, and your apparent dislike for communists and union leaders, I don&#039;t doubt your intentions are good (we have a common target of dislike, perhaps even hatred). I actually had the benefit of home schooling for most of my life (since 1st grade),  and so avoided much of the communist indoctrination in public schools (Thank God!).  
 
Yes, communists too claim the will of the &quot;people&quot; but the truth is,it is not real democracy, but democracy with restrictions on the people. The people have their self-interest and are forced to be generous at the point of a gun. They take the right of production and spread it around, giving to those who &quot;need&quot; instead of those who earn it. It is not the people who rule, but the corrupt communist ruling government.  
 
You talk about a test for the right to vote, and this seems somewhat troubling to me, and a tad hypocritical. Wouldn&#039;t having a test for the right to vote infact be taking away freedom? Who would administer this test? The government ruling party?  
 
I&#039;m not sure how you equate democracy with a higharchy (&quot;betters&quot; being above), as you seem to imply (why else would, as  you claim &quot;betters&quot; be enamored with democracy?). In a democratic system everyone gets one equal vote. There are no betters, so this seems on the face the opposite of what you&#039;re saying.  
 
I feel like I&#039;m missing something, and so I&#039;d like to hear you clarify what you&#039;re saying. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You didn&#039;t answer my question. </p>
<p>From your answer, and your apparent dislike for communists and union leaders, I don&#039;t doubt your intentions are good (we have a common target of dislike, perhaps even hatred). I actually had the benefit of home schooling for most of my life (since 1st grade),  and so avoided much of the communist indoctrination in public schools (Thank God!).  </p>
<p>Yes, communists too claim the will of the &quot;people&quot; but the truth is,it is not real democracy, but democracy with restrictions on the people. The people have their self-interest and are forced to be generous at the point of a gun. They take the right of production and spread it around, giving to those who &quot;need&quot; instead of those who earn it. It is not the people who rule, but the corrupt communist ruling government.  </p>
<p>You talk about a test for the right to vote, and this seems somewhat troubling to me, and a tad hypocritical. Wouldn&#039;t having a test for the right to vote infact be taking away freedom? Who would administer this test? The government ruling party?  </p>
<p>I&#039;m not sure how you equate democracy with a higharchy (&quot;betters&quot; being above), as you seem to imply (why else would, as  you claim &quot;betters&quot; be enamored with democracy?). In a democratic system everyone gets one equal vote. There are no betters, so this seems on the face the opposite of what you&#039;re saying.  </p>
<p>I feel like I&#039;m missing something, and so I&#039;d like to hear you clarify what you&#039;re saying. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 701/731 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 05:44:10 by W3 Total Cache -->