Put Left-wing Speech Control in the Cross Hairs

Pages: 1 2

Graphic torture and frontal nudity may be shown on screen, but smoking cigars or cigarettes may not. A Churchill museum in London has removed the cigars from wartime Churchill photographs, FDR has had his ubiquitous cigarette holder removed from his photographs, and the cigarettes have been removed from the Beatles’ hands in the famous photo of them crossing Abbey Road.

The list of forbidden words and behaviors due to Leftist activism is quite extensive.

The latest example is the left’s war on any words or imagery that come from the worlds of war or guns.

Already, “crusade” has been removed from Americans’ vocabulary — lest it offend Muslims. Overnight, the left effectively banned the use of a perfectly legitimate word that usually described an admirable preoccupation with doing good — “that newspaper is on an anti-corruption crusade.”

Now, the left has announced that words such as “target” and “cross hairs” are offensive — on the idiotic pretense that such imagery causes people to murder. If I were the CEO of Target stores, I would be concerned — will my company be sued because of its name and logo?

Will the word “war” be next? Perhaps “war on poverty” caused murder. And how about “war on cancer” — only God knows how much killing that caused. Perhaps we should now say “project to eliminate cancer.” But, then again, doesn’t “eliminate” have genocidal overtones?

It was understandable but mistaken for Sarah Palin to take down her map of congressional districts in cross hairs. There was absolutely nothing wrong with that map. Only the totalitarian left argues that it caused the murders in Tucson or anywhere else.

So what’s the answer?

If you love liberty, you must target the left and put its totalitarian tendencies in your cross hairs. We must shoot down political correctness and wage a crusade for truth and liberty. All those ladies and gentlemen who cherish personal and societal freedom must fight like great Indian chiefs, braving secondhand smoke if need be, in affirming a masculinity that has been under relentless attack. And yes, we must even endure the taunts of our foes and, at the appropriate time of the year, wish fellow Americans a “Merry Christmas.”

Then, and only then, will we be able to vanquish lies, defeat the foes of liberty, and once again be able to proudly sing a national anthem that affirms that “the bombs bursting in air gave proof through the night that our flag was still there.”

If we don’t, that line in “The Star-Spangled Banner” will go the way of “Merry Christmas.”

Pages: 1 2

  • SoCalMike

    Dennis Prager gets it.
    There's a foot race among the media and officials to carve out 1st Amendment exceptions for mascots and their privileged friends.

  • Steve Chavez

    NOW ADD THE WORD "ILLEGAL!" Below is a Graduate Student resolution at the University of New Mexico posted in the DAILYLOBO.COM on Feb. 1, 2011. GPSA unanimously passed a resolution to support the elimination of the word “illegal” in reference to people. The El Centro de la Raza presented the resolution at Saturday’s GPSA Council meeting and asked members to endorse the “Drop the I” campaign.
    The misuse of the term is offensive and inaccurate, said Christopher Ramirez, a representative from the Office for Equity and Inclusion. He said the resolution will be proposed to ASUNM.“It is a very de-humanizing word,” he said. “This is racism.

  • LarryLinn

    Last month Dennis Prager wanted MTV to censor rappers. Now he accuses anyone whom disagrees with him of censorship. Deep down, Prager is very shallow.

  • http://www.resonoelusono.com/NaturalBornCitizen.htm Alexander Gofen

    Completely agree with Mr. Prager! The "progressives" imposed the de facto censorship on par with that in the former USSR. However unlike in the USSR, the "progressive" censorship is not backed by the power of the state or KGB. This censorship is based rather on our willing collaboration, on self-censorship! On self-censorship – even if the threat is "only" to lose one's job (yet still not one's freedom or life!)

    So, Mr. Prager, first you yourself stop using the "approved euphemism" like "gay". The terms "homosexual", "pederast" still exist as valid and appropriate words in English.

    It is OK to be begot (whichever it means), because it is OK to reject some entire groups of people exactly for what they are.

    It is OK to be whichever the progressives deem you to be, because as you know, you are "fascist and racist" merely because you are correct…