Obama’s Left Turn

Pages: 1 2

Two months ago, Washington was abuzz with speculation that Barack Obama was going to follow Bill Clinton’s re-election strategy and move to the center, forsaking his liberal agenda that cost him control of the House in 2010. Now, it is evident that he has decided to come down hard left and wage his re-election fight from his liberal bunker, firing shots at Republican cuts in Medicare, pushing tax increases on the rich and attributing the gas price increase to speculators.

Very possibly the decision to tack to the left was not entirely voluntary. With the Republicans constantly confronting him with budget cuts and spending reductions, Obama cannot portray himself as a centrist. Every day, he is on the defensive against proposals for Republican attempts to rein in federal outlays. Amid a background of repeated confrontations, he cannot move to the middle. Indeed, there is no middle. His budget compromises with House Speaker Boehner are not middle ground, they are partial surrenders, grudging acceptances of budget cuts he would never otherwise allow.

In the Clinton days, there were — and I suspect still are — two camps in the Democratic White House. There were those who advocated a fundamental repositioning in the center of our politics and those who wanted to battle along ideological lines, using economic populism and class antagonisms to bolster their chances of victory.

The problem with a leftist strategy is that the vote share a Democrat can attract with it has a very low ceiling — in the low 40s. Economic populism just doesn’t play that well outside of the Democratic left.

The key to this electoral model is, of course, turnout. Obama made it work and bring him a majority in 2008 by adding the votes of new, younger voters, increasing the African-American and Latino turnout, and playing on the unique economic panic of the times.

But, absent a big increase in liberal turnout, the appeal of class warfare and populist rhetoric is sharply limited.

Pages: 1 2

  • USAdecline

    College age voters must be somewhat disenchanted by now. Poor job prospects and college loans to pay. Forced to return home to live with parents. Many have parents who have lost good paying jobs and cannot find similar salaries in new jobs. If this group is idiotic enough to support the socialist again, then American education is truly third rate.

  • Jim_C

    "We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace–business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

    "They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

    "Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me–and I welcome their hatred."

    You think that kind of rhetoric is only going to ring true to the democratic base? Good luck with that.

  • StephenD

    "The key to this electoral model is…turnout. Obama made it work…by adding the votes of new, younger voters, increasing the African-American and Latino turnout, and playing on the unique economic panic of the times.But, absent a big increase in liberal turnout, the appeal of class warfare and populist rhetoric is sharply limited."So the answer for them is…to have another economic panic or similar catastrophe on which to galvanize support for his agenda. Remember, the means never really matters at all. The end result is what matters to them. "Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead." I have no doubt that those that are able and want to help him are capable of manufacturing a crisis for him to rally his troops around. Gas/Food prices, M.E. unrest, unemployment…you name it and they’ll find a way to work it to their advantage.