The Mullahs’ Denial

Frank Crimi is a San Diego-based writer and author of the book Raining Frogs and Heart Attacks. You can read more of Frank's work at his blog,www.politicallyunbalanced.com.


Pages: 1 2

When Israel alleged that high grade weaponry seized from a cargo ship off its coast was of Iranian origin, it elicit a quick denial from the Islamic Republic. It was but the latest in a series of denials issued by Iran over its involvement in a wide range of subterfuge — refutations that can’t disguise its growing menace.

The weapons were discovered on the cargo ship Victoria, a German-owned and French-operated vessel. The ship had departed from the Syrian port of Latakia, stopping briefly in the Turkish port of Mercin, before sailing toward Egypt where it was seized by IDF forces 200 miles off the Israeli Mediterranean coast. The weapons were believed to be destined for Gaza for use by Hamas and other terrorist groups.

Although Egypt and Turkey were not believed to be involved in the smuggling operation, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was confident where blame should be assigned: “The only certain thing is the source of the weaponry was Iran, and there was a Syrian relay station as well. This is the main axis that provides the forces of terror in Lebanon and Gaza.”

The weapons, the manuals of which were in Farsi, included land-to-sea missiles, mortars and rockets. According to Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak, the armaments were ones that Gaza militants do not currently possess: “We suspect, or think, that among the weaponry are the beginnings of an advanced system that could affect our freedom of operations along the Gaza coast.”

The allegations were quickly dismissed by Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman, Ramin Mehmanparast, who warned: “Don’t trust Israeli media news. There is no such thing. We do not confirm it in any way.” The denial fits the usual pattern of Iranian deception.

The international community has long-accused Iran of trying to acquire nuclear weapons, while Iran has consistently and strenuously denied the charges. On February 27, new allegations by the IAEA charged that Iran “is developing a nuclear payload for its missile program,” but Iran offered another excuse.

According to the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Ali Asghar Soltanieh, Iran’s nuclear program was not only peaceful in nature but compliant as well: “The important point is that the full detailed report regarding all our nuclear activities shows full supervision by the IAEA and no deviation to prohibited ends.”

Then, in early March — amidst reports that Iran was training, arming and funding Taliban and al Qaeda insurgents — NATO forces in Afghanistan discovered a large weapons cache that British foreign secretary William Hague said “no doubt… came from Iran.”

Ramin Mehmanparast was again trotted out to assuage concerns by laying blame at the feet of a hostile media. He yawned, “Releasing fabricated news about Iran’s arming of extremist groups in Afghanistan or other countries has become a boring repeated issue.”

Iran has also been hiding internal trouble with its resurgent Green Movement, which has seen the arrest of its two most important opposition leaders–Mirhossein Mousavi and Mehdi Karoubi. Yet Iranian officials have been unable to admit opposition protests have even taken place.

Specifically, Iranian opposition websites, including Sahmnews, said at least 79 people were arrested at a demonstration on March 15. Yet, Tehran prosecutor Abbas Jafari Dolatabadi told the Fars news agency: “A limited number of people, influenced by anti-revolutionary groups, were intending to do something. Yet no specific incident happened in Tehran.”

Pages: 1 2

  • Aram

    "Syria, Iraq and Lebanon – who had asked for a no fly-zone. " Syria together with Algeria had voted against the measure of so called no-fly zone better check it out! Whoever write this is so ignorant!

  • alanmirs

    In 1888, Sir Henry Drummond Wolff, the British Plenipotentiary Minister to Tehran, presented a War Office map to the Iranian King Nasser al-Din Shah Qajar, in which the islands were presented as Iranian territory.

    In his 1892 book Persia and the Persian Question, George Nathaniel Curzon, the Viceroy and Governor-General of India recognized the islands as belonging to Iran, but a decade later in 1902 the British occupied the islands as a buffer against the growing Soviet influence in Southern Iran.

  • alanmirs

    Being afraid of the growing Soviet influence in the Southern regions of Iran, the British forces occupied three Iranian islands, named Abu Mousa, Lesser Tunb and Greater Tunb in the year 1902.

    Iran and Britain fought over the islands for decades until 1968, when the Britons pulled their troops out from the Indian Ocean and Persian Gulf as a reconciliatory stance.

    Then, in 1971, as the colonial protectorate of Ras al-Khaimeh and Sharjah, Iran signed an agreement with Sharjah with the arbitration of British government to take responsibility for the islands’ security while recognizing the sovereignty of Bahrain and the UAE.
    The problem is US foreign policies including the allies "leave us kids alone" this is not the new world

    • Heywood Floyd

      Soviet influence in southern Iran in 1902?

  • alanmirs

    The problem is US foreign policies including the allies "leave us kids alone" this is not the new world

    For centauries through out the history the natives lived together dominated by majority rule in harmony, and they respected each others heritage, related to one another, through intercourse, association, socializing, and being part of it as one family which are joint tenant, with Jews, Moslems, Christians, all alike
    Any foreign domination, and or meddling to our affaires by the west or Israel today cause tribulations for the entire world, you cannot go back to the colonial ages as Empires exist no more and Influence today comes from friendship stop misleading us become our friends and let us have our prosperity back

    • MixMChess

      "For centauries through out the history the natives lived together dominated by majority rule in harmony, and they respected each others heritage, related to one another, through intercourse, association, socializing, and being part of it as one family which are joint tenant, with Jews, Moslems, Christians, all alike "

      What? Since the 6th century, when the Muslim armies from the Arabian peninsula invaded Jewish and Christian lands there has been nothing but strife. Christians, Jews, Zoroastrians and Buddhists were subject to persecution by Muslims for centuries.

  • http://www.facebook.com/al-kidya Kim

    Will the Obamanation continue to believe the lies that emanate from Iran?

  • UCSPanther

    I wonder that for all Iran's regime stands to gain from these uprising, they may be also putting themselves in the same position the French Monarchy did when they supported the American Revolution in the 1700s.

  • http://www.fxexchangerate.com/ fxgeorges

    The neocons have a long tradition of fabricating evidence. If this is the best they can come up with, I'd say this dubious paper serves rather as proof of the contrary.