Leftist Worship at the Altar of Islamic Jihad


[Editor’s note: Below is a video interview with Jamie Glazov about his new book, Showdown With Evil. The interview was conducted by Canada’s acclaimed talk show host, Christine Williams, at David Horowitz’s Restoration Weekend in Palm Beach, Florida on November 21, 2010.]

To order Showdown With Evil, Click Here.

See also Jamie Glazov on Fox & Friends discussing the New Ground Zero Imam’s Radical Ties:

  • davarino

    Thanks Jamie for continuing the struggle. I know it is a lot of work and can be very frustrating but I want to encourage you to keep it up.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Here’s where I disagree with Jamie on a few issues. He characterizes the problem as radical Islam waging a war against the West, which at the same times insinuates that moderate Islam and moderate Muhammadans are at peace with the West. Yet, this is impossible since there is just one text of Islam and that text is immutable.

    In addition, when he says that there are many brave Muhammadans trying to stand up against the jihad ideology, the truth is those people in reality aren’t true Muhammadans or even so-called moderate Muhammadans, for that matter. In reality they are blasphemers and apostates, as Islam requires total and complete submission to the will of Allah and the freedom of conscience in Islam is not only haaram, i.e. forbidden, it is also punishable under the pain of death.

    Now for obvious reasons Muhammadans living in the West under Western liberal laws and freedoms can get away with speaking out against the jihad ideology, but if those same Muhammadans lived in the Islamic world, on the other hand, and did the same thing they would either be intimidated into silence or outright killed. In other words, again all Muhammadans that speak out against the jihad ideology in the eyes of devout Muhammadans are not Muhammadans but instead blasphemers and apostates that should be executed.

    Another problem that a lot of people are missing the boat on is that the stealth and deceptive non-violent forms of jihad are not only exponentially far more prevalently employed than the violent varieties, they are almost completely ignored altogether. Since for obvious reasons most people and the media especially are entirely transfixed on the violent forms of jihad, at the same time they are also totally oblivious to the many forms of stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad, which in the long run are far more detrimental to our survival as a free society.

    Hence, while we are focused almost exclusively on preventing the next big violent jihadist attack, at the same time we are also enabling demographic conquest to take place completely without any resistance whatsoever, as demographic conquest by far is the most prevalent form of stealth and deceptive non-violent jihad being employed in the world today. Of course, this is all based on the accepted politically correct and false model whereby radical Islam is at war with the West, while moderate Islam and moderate Muhammadans, on the other hand, are at peace.

    However, the reality is there is only one Islam since the texts of Islam is immutable and those so-called moderate Muhammadans speaking out against the jihad ideology that are misconstrued as being so-called moderate Muhammadans, in reality are really blasphemers and apostates in the eyes of all devout Muhammadans that should be executed, as again Islam requires total and complete submission to the will of Allah and the freedom of conscience in Islam is haaram.

    Indeed, the violent forms of jihad are used primarily to make points or to distract our attention away from the stealth and deceptive non-violent forms of jihad, which by far are far more detrimental to our survival as a free society, as the main aim of Islam is to eventually subjugate the world into Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia. In other words, we all live in the darkness (jahiliyya), and it is Islam’s eternal mission to bring us into the light.

    • BUTSeriously

      "there is just one text of Islam and that text is immutable."

      In fact Islam is a non-original replacement theology which gave the world nothing. Not a single law the world accepts comes from the Quran. There is no such thing as Islamic law: name one?

    • ObamaYoMoma

      In fact Islam is a non-original replacement theology which gave the world nothing. Not a single law the world accepts comes from the Quran. There is no such thing as Islamic law: name one?

      Actually, Islamic Sharia Law governs and controls every single aspect of a Muhammadans life down to even the way all Muhammadans must use the bathroom.
      Sharia is also intrinsic to Islam, as you can’t get one without getting the other because the two are inseparable. Sort of like Jihad is also intrinsic to Islam and is also inseparable. Which means that when you import Muhammadans into your country, you also import both Sharia and Jihad. Plus a lot of other excess baggage associated with Sharia as well.

      With respect to Sharia law, why just name one? I can name a whole host of them. For instance, a male’s inheritance is worth twice that of a female’s, or a male’s testimony is worth twice that of a female’s, or a male can marry an unbeliever, while a female marrying an unbeliever is haaram, i.e. forbidden, or to prove rape it takes four male witnesses.

      Moreover, the reason the contemporary world rejects Sharia is because it is so draconian in that it systematically persecutes and often violently oppresses females and unbelievers, it incorporates draconian punishments such as floggings, tortures, stonings, amputations, and beheadings, while at the same time severely restricting the freedom of conscience, the freedom of religion, and the freedom of speech. It also mandates that all Muhammadans wage jihad against unbelievers for the spread of Islam. In addition, it also dictates death for blasphemers and apostates.

      Hence, while the contemporary world rejects Sharia, at the same time the Islamic world rejects all contemporary laws because it only adheres and recognizes Sharia. For instance, all democracies and international laws are seen as abominations that must be destroyed. Hence, sovereignty and current international borders, for instance, aren’t recognized by Muhammadans, as Islam divides the world into two spheres, the Dar al Islam (the land of submission), and the Dar al Harb (the land of Jahiliyya, i.e. darkness and ignorance).

      In fact, Muhammadans rejects all contemporary laws because those laws emanate directly from man, while Islamic law, on the other hand, emanates directly from Allah (God), which means that it is divine, perfectly just, and infallible, whereas manmade laws, on the other hand, are fallible and unjust by definition because they emanate directly from mere mortal human beings.

      Indeed, one of the favorite tricks of deception used by Muhammadans to deceive gullible unbelievers, especially on the Left, is to falsely accuse countries such as Israel and the USA of violating international laws, at the same time they reject all international laws. Witness the numbers of delusional Leftists screaming that Israel is in violation of international laws. As a matter of fact, when Muhammadans wage violent jihad, when do they not kill indiscriminately? The answer is never, because they don’t adhere to manmade international laws and to contemporary norms of human rights.

      Nevertheless, the eternal mission of Islam is to rescue unbelievers from the darkness (jahiliyya), to bring them into the light. In other words, the main goal of Islam is to subjugate the world into Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia.

  • greg

    In islam there are no moderates. There are only those waiting their turn to rape, murder, have a gang of children to sodomize. The queeran demands no less. There is no discussion. There is no debate. The queeran commands that they wait until their numbers can win and then they will start their lust for rape, murder and thievery.

  • Stuart Parsons

    Islam is a menace. The proof is to be found in the Quran, Sunnah and Sirah if only people would take the trouble to read them.

    The religion invented by the mad Muhammad is a bigger threat to the well-being of mankind than Fascism, Communism and the Hordes of Ghengis Khan ever were. IT IS FALSE, VILE AND EVIL. IT MUST BE OPPOSED.

  • btilly

    Islam is as evil as its real Allah(god) Satan the Devil quran 3:54. A religion that supports sex with 1 day old babies in 65:4, and a cult that espouses hatred and degradation of all African Blacks as Stupid, ugly,nappy headed slaves for hellfire, slaves for white people. Black men are less than a donkey's penis! Ishaq 243.

  • dawning

    Yomama…That is my disagrement with so many of the folks speaking out about islam. They seem to hesitate when it comes to the fact that THERE IS NO MODERATE islam….Ergadon (sp?) of turkey came out very clearly several months ago and stated.."I don't know what all this talk is about moderate islam there is only one islam there is no moderate islam". And we are begining to see what real islam is, showing up in that country.. There is ONLY strong islam and weak islam…there is NO moderate, kind, considerate, compasionate, thoughtful or usefull islam anywhere on the planet. Never has been never will be.

  • BUTSeriously

    The problem is not Islam. Its the Islamic Regimes created by Briton for 30 barrels of oil. Vast lands were given to one family as their personal, private property. Jordan and Pakistan, fictional regime states were also the result of Briton's corruption to please the Regimes. Briton now calls for serial 2-state demands in the same land – which is genocide, to please the Regimes. Bush's great error was going to the Taliban hills instead of Mecca: it is the regimes which belong in Gitmo.

  • Waldemar

    Jame Glazov – love you and your work but how can you hold he view that you are not against Muslims? That's sheer Doublespeak. If someone VOLUNTARILY embraces an evil ideology he is evil too. I come from same region as you do – I lived under the Brown Liberalism (Nazis) and under the Red one (Bolsheviks). Most Nazis and Bolshis did NOT perpetrate evil acts – one Nazi even saved my life – but by serving the Evil they turned evil, too. I have to admit – I hate the Nazis, the Commies, and the Muslims – they have to be defeated, not persuaded. Conversion of Evil seems to be the dream of the Progressive Right (like Jamie) . As all dreams, it's unreality.

  • marc

    Most of your video was fair and square, however you destroy any argument you have when you state you are helping the brave muslims save themselves and their loved ones from Sharia law… You are obviously very uneducated with Islam if you do not understand that as a Muslim one must strive, struggle, fight and wage political campaigns to install sharia wherever they live in the world… Until you understand that those who do not want the law of Allah just aint Muslim..