Newt’s Fortunes

Three distinguished guests recently joined Jamie Glazov’s tv program, The Glazov Gang, to shed light on Gingrich’s chances of rising to the top. The All-Star cast included Conservative political pundit Al Sonja Schmidt, America’s #1 Conservative Comedian Evan Sayet and Political Analyst Austin Dragon. Below are the three segments to the program (parts 2 and 3 dealt with Obama and the Middle East):

Part I, Gingrich Rising:

Part II, Obama’s Destructive Designs on America:

Part 3, Bye-Bye Middle East:

To get the whole story on why the Left sympathizes with enemy death cults, read Jamie Glazov’s book, United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror.

 

  • WildJew

    What do we make of the following:

    Asked by Dan Gilgoff of U.S. News & World Report if his repeated references to "jihad" in a speech at the Heritage Foundation characterized Islam in sinister terms, Mitt Romney surprised Gilgoff with this reply:

    "I didn't refer to Islam at all, or to any other religion for that matter. I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis. Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. If you want my views on Islam, it's quite straightforward. Islam is one of the world's great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker. They want to raise families and have a bright future.

    "There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism. They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term…. It's by no means a branch of Islam. It is instead an entirely different entity. In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam.

    • zsqpwxxeh

      If nothing else, Mitt could certainly replace Napolitano as Homeland Security Chief. A more eloquent piece of politically correct idiocy would be hard to find outside of academia/the Obama Administration.

      Utterly pathetic. Make him choke on it.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        If nothing else, Mitt could certainly replace Napolitano as Homeland Security Chief. A more eloquent piece of politically correct idiocy would be hard to find outside of academia/the Obama Administration.

        Utterly pathetic. Make him choke on it.

        I'm glad you noticed how utterly pathetic Romney's position is on Islam since it is the official position of the Republican Party and indeed all of the other Republican Party candidates for president as well.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Actually, Romney's PC position on Islam, is the exact same official PC position of the Republican Party, Newt Gingrich, and of all the other Republican Party candidates competing for the Republican Party presidential nomination as well. The only difference is Romney uses slightly different terminology, but nevertheless if you pay attention closely, it is the same exact position.

      For instance, the official Republican Party position is that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Romney calls those extremists jihadists, and Gingrich calls those extremists radical Muslims, and both call the version of Islam practiced by extremists radical Islam, which they consider to be a corrupted version of Islam as opposed to the official Religion of Peace™.

      Thus, Romney and Gingrich and in fact all the Republican Party candidates in essence all share the same exact PC multicultural view of Islam, which also happens to be the official Republican Party position.

      In addition, the Republican Party's official position on Islam also happens to be the Dhimmicrat Party's official position as well. Proving at the same time that the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party are really two sides of the same leftwing coin, and never mind the fact that the left is in bed with Islam.

      Indeed, because GWB acted like a Dhimmicrat on steroids by using the 9/11 jihad attacks as a crisis to justify massively increasing the size, scope, and power of the federal government and to justify usurping our formerly heretofore constitutionally protected rights and freedoms at the same time, as soon as the economy eventually slowed down, our federal deficits and federal debt inevitably skyrocketed through the roof out of control.

      Thus, today we are in essence on the fast track to bankruptcy, contemplating massive federal budget cuts, massive tax increases, and implementing severe draconian cuts to our military all to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, and the saddest part of it all is other than a false sense of security created so that mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage could be further increased, in reality we are really more vulnerable to violent jihad attacks on the homeland today than we were even before 9/11, as the Fort Hood Massacre, the Christmas Day Bomber, the Times Square Bomber, and the Arkansas Jihad Attacker all demonstrated. Indeed, each Muslim we import into the country with all their excess baggage incrementally increases the threat of violent jihad attacks on the homeland.

      Anyway, how many Republicans and Dhimmicrats have you heard proposing outlawing Islam and banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage as a solution to our current financial woes? I mean by outlawing Islam and banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, it would make it virtually impossible for violent jihad attacks to occur on the homeland, as zero Muslims living in America would equal zero probability of violent jihad attacks. Indeed, there is a reason that jihad always gets conflated and morally equated with terrorism, even though both are mutually exclusive manifestations and indeed two entirely very different and distinctive manifestations altogether.

      Thus, with zero probability of violent jihad attacks on the homeland, we could roll back the extremely invasive Patriot Act, the humongous and incredibly incompetent Department of Homeland Security, the very intrusive TSA, and the gargantuan and extremely inept National Intelligence Directorate that altogether constitute a police state, and use the money currently being wasted to fund those massive federal boondoggles instead to get our financial house back in order. Sad to say, I haven't heard one Republican or one Dhimmicrat politician making such a proposal.

      Indeed, what other immigrant group cost America hundreds of billions of dollars on an annual basis just to accommodate? The answer is other than Muslims none of them. Yet, the Republicans, Dhimmicrats, and the news media altogether miraculously at the same time are conveniently overlooking this reality, at the same time we are literally on the fast-track to bankruptcy. Give me a break, this can't be happening by accident. It can only be happening by design.

      Hence, one can only assume that both the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party are really two sides of the same leftwing coin, and never mind the fact that the left is in bed with Islam. Of course, the left also conveniently controls the news media, which includes, by the way, Fox News, and to a very large extent the news media controls the debates in this country.

      http://www.hermes-press.com/bush_kiss.jpg http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y205/Biggerfoot/http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/bowone.jpg http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/bowing to%2…..

    • ObamaYoMoma

      What do we make of the following:

      Asked by Dan Gilgoff of U.S. News & World Report if his repeated references to "jihad" in a speech at the Heritage Foundation characterized Islam in sinister terms, Mitt Romney surprised Gilgoff with this reply:

      "I didn't refer to Islam at all, or to any other religion for that matter. I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis. Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. If you want my views on Islam, it's quite straightforward. Islam is one of the world's great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker. They want to raise families and have a bright future.

      "There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism. They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term…. It's by no means a branch of Islam. It is instead an entirely different entity. In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam.

      Anyway, since this is the second time I've seen you posting this exact same cut and paste that tries to falsely depict Romney as somehow being more liberal relative to the Republican Party and his fellow Republican Party candidates with respect to Islam, I have to ask what's up? Why are you trying to intentionally mislead your fellow conservatives?

  • Stephen_Brady

    I've not heard a single word on this board, by the Romney supporters, why over $100,000 of Massachussett taxpayer's money was spent to purchase Romney's computers and harddrives, before he lleft office. The harddrives were subsequently wiped.

    http://news.nationalpost.com/2011/12/06/romney-pa

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Romney supporters are waiting for Newt to fully explain his acceptance of almost $2 million dollars from Freddie Mac on the eve of the financial meltdown. As soon as Newt demonstrates that he wasn't being paid off to remain silent, the Romney supporters will gladly provide an explanation for you, although Romney has already repeatedly explained it in the debates ad nauseum. In addition, all the debates are available online in case you are anxious and don't want to wait.

      • Maxie

        Keep digging. The finacial meltdown was the "October Surprise" engineered by a notorious currency trader to assure the Bamster's election. Insiders who keep their financial stethoscopes on the Market knew something was brewing and went short. Newt was likely in that mix thru his advisors as were other pols. It's too much to hope for that the "authorities" will dig into this fiasco. Too many people in high places made too much money for that to happen. But, hey, maybe John Corzine knows something?

      • Stephen_Brady

        This was what I talked about, last week. What your post represents is a misdirection Unable to adequately respond to the charge against Romney, what you have done is to change the subject.

        Romney has addressed his massive chnageover from a liberal Republican to a conservative Republican, but he has never addressed the use of public funds to purchase computers from the governor's office, and wipe their harddrives. Aren't you at least curious to know what was on them?

        Newt Gingrich has repeatedly talked aout his tenure as an advisor to Fannie Mae and freddie Mac, in which he also served as an historian. He also frankly states that the organization did not accept his advice … an assertion never refuted by any poffical, past or present, of the organizations.

        I've seen all of the debates, and never heard Mr. Romney explain what, if anything, he was hiding at the end of his term as Governor of Massachussetts. I rather think that if he gave a plausible explanation, I would believe him, though that still leaves the issue of the use of public funds.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Romney has addressed his massive chnageover from a liberal Republican to a conservative Republican, but he has never addressed the use of public funds to purchase computers from the governor's office, and wipe their harddrives. Aren't you at least curious to know what was on them?

          Yes he has over and over again ad nauseum. Like I said dude, go watch the videos of the 2008 debates and the 2012 debates on line.

          Newt Gingrich has repeatedly talked aout his tenure as an advisor to Fannie Mae and freddie Mac, in which he also served as an historian. He also frankly states that the organization did not accept his advice … an assertion never refuted by any poffical, past or present, of the organizations.

          Nobody believes that crap dude. What…..a $2 million dollar historian. Give me a break! Nobody in their right mind is gullible enough to swallow that lame garbage. He was paid off to remain silent, just like hundreds of other lobbyist and Washington insiders that were also bought and paid off, as Freddie Mac had been paying off everyone to keep silent for years. Everyone in Washington and their brothers knew about it. You must have just fallen off the turnip truck.

          I've seen all of the debates, and never heard Mr. Romney explain what, if anything, he was hiding at the end of his term as Governor of Massachussetts. I rather think that if he gave a plausible explanation, I would believe him, though that still leaves the issue of the use of public funds.

          Pay attention next time. Old regurgitated charges and old news. In fact, all the objections are old regurgitated charges and old news that has been repeatedly addressed over and over and over again ad nauseum. No one is really concerned about the regurgitated charges are Romney's logical explanations. They just don't want to vote for a Mormon. However, they can't openly say that they don't want to vote for a Mormon, because they will reveal at the same time that they are bigots. Thus, instead they just play stupid and simply regurgitate the same old tired and warn out charges over and over and over again ad nauseum, as if they have never been addressed before. Not to mention also that all of those same regurgitated objections came up in 2008 as well, as none of them are new, and they were also all addressed in 2008 as well. Hence, you haven't been paying attention there bud. Either that or you also don't want to vote for a Mormon.

          As for as Romney's transformation from liberal Republican to more conservative, it is the same transformation that happened for Reagan and millions of other conservatives as well, as most people get smarter and wiser as they gain experience through the school of hard knocks known as life.

          Of course, the Left doesn't see it the same way. Instead, they see it as betrayals, flip flops, and being stabbed in the back. Indeed, as long as Romney flipped to more conservative positions and at the same time betrayed liberals, then if you are a conservative, what's the gripe? You should be proud!

          In addition, unlike Gingrich, Romney never flopped back to more liberal positions when being bought and paid. Indeed, the reason Gingrich conceded a debate to John Kerry on Global Warming and then later video taped a PSA with of all people Nancy Pelosi urging Congress to act on Global Warming, is because he was being paid, exactly like he was being paid to keep his mouth shut with respect to Freddie Mac. Indeed, everybody and their brothers knows that Freddie Mac had been buying off everyone in Washington for years.

          Not to mention, that there is also an awful lot of noise but no names yet emanating from the halls of Congress. Apparently, there are a lot of Congressman behind the scenes not very happy about Newt's rise in the polls that was engineered by Fox News and that are threatening to come forward to explain why they will not support Newt even if he wins the nomination. I'm also hearing that many Congressmen are claiming that if Newt wins the nomination that it will be absolutely impossible for Republicans to win back the Senate.

          In fact, just about every Congressman that previously worked for Newt or worked with him at one time, are totally against him, as they all say that the house was a Zoo when he was the Speaker. Not to mention that I'm hearing a lot of noise that Newt was an expert at stealing credit for himself for everyone else's accomplishments. In addition, I've been hearing for years now that Newt is a big ideas guy, but was a total disaster when it came to implementing his big ideas, and everyone claims that Newt is one of the most arrogant human beings on the planet when off camera.

          As a matter of fact, I've been reading hints about pent up anger against Newt for years stemming from the time when he was Speaker of the House, and it is very widespread. Apparently, there are many Republicans that were very glad to see him go, as he must have burnt down a lot of Republican Party bridges during his time as speaker, which is now threatening to come back to haunt him and bite him on the a$$. Indeed, that has been puzzling me and peaking my curiosity for years.

          Indeed, Newt can't and won't win. Obama and his cronies are praying Newt becomes the Republican Party nominee, and if he does, Obama's reelection will be a cakewalk. Not to mention that independents despise Newt as well.

          • Stephen_Brady

            Another novella? Have you ever considered consolodating and copyrighting your work. I'm sure that there's someone out there who would want to read it. I don't have the time for this.

            Let's leave at this: You want Romney to win and I want Gingrich to win. Simple, isn't it?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            You want Romney to win and I want Gingrich to win. Simple, isn't it?

            The problem is all the Republican Party candidates are blind and incompetent with respect to Islam thanks to PC multiculturalism. Thus, if the race comes down to Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney as it appears to be doing, there is no way I can support Newt Gingrich simply because he supports amnesty. Indeed, if amnesty is ever passed in any form in this country, I will never ever vote for another Republican for the rest of my life. Nevertheless, it really doesn't matter all that much anyway, as the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party are really two sides of the same leftwing coin.

            Indeed, we are literally spending hundreds of billions of dollars annually today to fund the massive and useless Department of Homeland Security, to enforce the invasive Patriot Act, to fund the extremely intrusive TSA, and to fund the totally dysfunctional and immense National Intelligence Directorate all to protect the homeland from violent jihad attacks and at the same time going bankrupt in the process. Meanwhile, how many Republicans and Dhimmicrat have you heard calling for outlawing Islam and banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage as a way of getting our financial house back in order by rolling back all of the above aforementioned federal boondoggles? Not one.

            Another question I have is how many other immigrant groups cost hundreds of billions of dollars annually just to accommodate? Indeed, how many Republicans and Dhimmicrats are pointing out or complaining about how many billions of dollars it cost just to accommodate mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage? Like I said, the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat today are really two sides of the same leftwing coin, and never mind the fact that the Left is in bed with Islam.

            In any event, if Newt wins the Republican Party nomination, it will in effect hand over Obama's re-election to him on a silver platter, as there is no way that old has-been can defeat Obama, not with all of that excess baggage. Plus all the same conservatives that didn't vote for McCain in 2008 like me because he supported amnesty, will also not vote for Newt in 2012.

          • Stephen_Brady

            Once again, you want Romney to win, and I want Gingrich to win. We have little to discuss.

  • WilliamJamesWard

    So we may be damned to the lesser of evils and it seems a fight to be the least
    evil candidate to all those who want to save America but do not believe the
    same old same old party lines. Who can we trust, what can we do but accept
    and America destroyed by leftists and RHINO'S who talk with forked tongues.
    I think fighting with a no compromise attitude on Constitutional principles and
    defeating moral turpitude in the political class is overwhelmingly necessary.
    Getting America better must start with eliminating Obama from government and
    the rest of his criminal gang……………………………………..William

  • BS77

    Read Ann Coulter's column about Newt G this week. It's pretty interesting…and funny.

    • mlcblog

      Hard to follow her. She was all gung ho for Christie, the definite liberal, just because of his hard stance and entertaining ways with NJ schoolteachers.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    I notice the Romney supporters here – so vocal before – have fallen eerily silent. Thanks for digging up that quote.

    There is a lot of cognitive dissonance regarding Islam in our culture, but the quote above is one of the most tortured pieces of logic I've ever read.

    Yeah right…there is a lot of cognitive dissonance with you as well, as Romney's position on Islam is the same exact official position of the Republican Party and the same exact position as all the other Republican Party candidates too.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    What did someone write about you here the other day, Skippy?…something about your habitual use of a "broad brush".

    Actually, anyone saying I use a “broad brush” obviously suffers from severe cognitive dissonance exactly like you, Moonbat.

    Please document where Bachman, Gingrich or Santorum have ever taken the "SAME EXACT POSITION" as Romney above…you know, saying Jihad is an "entirely different entity" than Islam?

    Yeah right, why don't you document where they haven't taken the same exact position on Islam as Romney. Indeed, simply watch the Republican Party debates, as they are all readily available online free. Not to mention that Romney's position hasn't evolved one iota since he ran in 2008, and never mind the fact that apparently unlike you, I always make it a point to know all their respective positions with respect to Islam. Hence, if you are too lazy to do your own leg work, don't blame me or expect me to do it for you. In fact, because all the candidates for the Republican Party presidential nomination all share the same exact position when it comes to Islam, I would have to hold my nose and compromise my principles just to vote for one of them.

    You know, we're ALL human. We ALL get it wrong occasionally. A normal, rational man periodically fess's up and admits as much. But not you, Skip. You are constitutionally incapable of introspection, of self-criticism, of ever admitting you are wrong.

    With all due disrespect, you have never ever proven me wrong. Ever! Thus, I have nothing to admit to or apologize for because there is nothing to admit to. Nevertheless, you are just emoting again since you are angry as usual because I like to torment you whenever I see that you are wrong, which is nearly all the time. Indeed, I've always been a leader and an executive and you don't gain a lot of respect by being human and making a habit out of putting your foot in your mouth. Hence, if I'm not absolutely sure I'm correct about something, unlike you I keep my mouth shut, always have, always will.

    In the tens of thousands of stupefyingly redundant words you've posted on these pages over the months, I challenge you to produce a SINGLE occasion when you've ever written something to an interlocutor such as…"I could be wrong"…"perhaps you're right"…"I'll have to give that more thought"

    Yeah right…now you are going to revert back to your instinctive liberalism by emoting like a loon. Par for the course. You can't stick to issues, because you can't for the life of you control your own emotions. Moreover moonbat, I hate to rain on your emotive parade again, but I generally keep my trap shut unless I'm absolutely positive I'm correct. One would think that you'd have figured that out by now, but apparently you are controlled by your emotions a little more than I originally first thought.

    You can't Skippy, because it's not in your nature. You're too brittle, too prideful, too adolescent, and apparently too fragile for introspection….so you wrap yourself around the arrogance and ignorance of your blind certitudes.

    You are correct Moonbat, it's not in my “brittle” nature to admit I'm wrong when I'm not wrong, and if you don't like it, then go fly a kite. I'm just not impulsive and controlled by emotions the same way you are. Indeed, I'm a very different breed of animal and I'm wired very differently than you. You are an instinctive liberal and I'm an instinctive conservative. Get over it.

    But hey, I could be wrong here.

    You usually always are.

  • Maxie

    You raise a good point. For the Left it is an impossibility to admit error of ANY degree. In the mind of the Left they can't be wrong because they judge themselves by their always good intentions; never their poor outcomes. In the same way they judge conservatives by their (Imputed) evil/bad motives and that's wher it stops for them. Horowitz put it more succinctly somewhere in his writings (The Politics of Bad Faith?).
    It's worth remembering if you're prone to duel with the trolls who show up here.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    SKIPPY: "Thus, with zero probability of violent jihad attacks on the homeland…"

    My God??? Zero probability? What was Fort Hood? What was the attack on the Armed Forces recruitment station in Arkansas? What was the attack at the Jewish Center in Seattle? What was the van attack on pedestrians in North Carolina? What was the Times Square bomber?

    Skippy, your digging a hole too deep to dig out of.

    Okay MOONBAT, with Islam outlawed and mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage banned and reversed, then please explain how it is you figure that those violent jihad attacks you referenced above could be possible with zero jihadists living in America? See what I mean about letting your emotions control your actions. Damn, you must be addicted to putting your foot in you mouth!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    SKIPPY: "Yeah right, why don't you document where they haven't taken the same exact position on Islam as Romney."

    Sorry MOONBAT, I'm not your poodle. Why should I do your leg work for you, especially when you should already know each candidate's specific positions already?

    You see Skip, just like before…you make an assertion that someone has said something….and then, when asked to document it, you try to get out of it by demanding your interlocutor prove a negative…prove that someone DIDN'T say something. That's called evasion Skippy. I big, important executive like you should understand as much..

    MOONBAT, let's be frank, the only reason you want me to document what is already common knowledge is because you hope I waste my time on your nonsense. It's a very familiar game that you and your fellow liberal friends love to play. Not to mention, where and when did I make assertions that someone has said something? Moreover, I wouldn't exactly call you an interlocutor, more like a moonbat instead, and actually its called not playing your silly and asinine emotional games.

    But it's the rest of the post that I find remarkable…you are explicitly telling everyone here that you are incapable of error…that in all yourhundreds of comments here, you've never, ever been wrong about anything.

    I figured you'd find it remarkable since you are wired to emote, to be impulsive, and to be wrong far more than you are right. Please excuse me if I'm not wired the same way you are to be impulsively stupid. Moreover, I never said I was incapable of making errors, but I generally keep any errors to myself until after I confirm if I'm correct. Indeed, I've trained myself to never make a statement on any issue unless I'm absolutely sure I'm correct and can defend my position. On other matters, I never ask questions unless I already know the answer. Like I said, I'm hardwired completely differently from you liberals. In fact, it's something my old daddy instilled in me starting at a very young age. Don't assume everyone is as mentally handicapped and undisciplined as you, because I assure you not everyone is. Indeed, there are a lot of people like me. I know because I've hired a ton of them.

    Wow! How does it feel to be omniscient? Do you genuflect every time you walk by a mirror?

    Surreal.

    Uhm…other than you, who emoted by alleging that I'm omniscient. I certainly never claimed it. The only thing I said is I'm hardwired very differently than you, thank God.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    1) Skippy's unambiguous assertion (the man's own words)…

    "Romney's position on Islam is the same exact official position of the Republican Party and the SAME EXACT position as ALL the other Republican Party candidates too."

    Notice the words I've capitalized…"SAME EXACT"…and "ALL Republican candidates".

    Here we go again, more emoting and playing stupid liberal games as usual, which is the type of brain damage everyone must endure whenever they point out he is wrong, which unfortunately is far more often than not. Indeed, you also always incessantly accuse everyone that demonstrates that you are wrong of being guilty of exactly what it is you are incapable of doing.

    Nevertheless, you conveniently and VERY deliberately left out the very next sentence MOONBAT:

    “The only difference is Romney uses slightly different terminology, but nevertheless if you pay attention closely, it is the same exact position.”

    Nice. Good job, MOONBAT. I'm really impressed. What…it wasn't unambiguous enough for you?

    The reality…

    Rick Santorum has NEVER separated Jihad as an "entirely different entity" from Islam, the way Romney did in his quote.

    Michelle Bachman has NEVER separated Jihad as an "entirely different entity" from Islam, the way Romney did in his quote.

    And – AS FAR AS I KNOW – Newt Gingrich has never separated Jihad as "an entirely different entity" than Islam, the way Romney did in his quote.

    Here we go again, from my post here's what I actually said:

    “For instance, the official Republican Party position is that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Romney calls those extremists jihadists, and Gingrich calls those extremists radical Muslims, and both call the version of Islam practiced by extremists radical Islam, which they consider to be a corrupted version of Islam as opposed to the official Religion of Peace™.”

    Why don't you stop emoting and playing silly and asinine liberal games by deliberately misquoting me out of context or by alleging that I said certain things I never said? It's getting to me very boring and its more than just a little brain damaging as well.

    Since Skippy insisted that the position of "ALL" the Republican candidates on Islam is the "EXACT SAME" as Romney, ergo, we can logically deduce that Skippy is actually wrong.

    Really? Can you please explain how?

    That's right folks! The important "leader and executive" who "keeps his mouth shut" unless he is "absolutely sure" he is always right…..is proven wrong.

    Really? Where, when, and how? Whatever it is you are smoking, you need to send me some of that bad stuff.

    Will he acknowledge it? Don't count on it folks. That would take a level of maturity and humility that he simply doesn't possess.

    Again, why should I admit to something I'm not guilty of? Indeed, again you sure in the hell like to put your foot in your mouth don't you? Damn MOONBAT…you sure are a glutton for punishment, Hell, my knuckles are getting raw just from pounding on you.

    Of course, you are not going to admit that you are wrong again as always. Indeed, we'll be holding our breath waiting. I'm sure you are full of humility.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    SKIPPY NOW: "Not to mention, where and when did I make assertions that someone has said something?"

    SKIPPY BEFORE: "Romney's position on Islam is the same exact official position of the Republican Party and the same exact position as all the other Republican Party candidates too."

    LOGICAL EXTRAPOLATION: The other candidates have enunciated their policy on Islam, and it is the EXACT SAME as Romney.

    OK Skip?

    Uhm…Okay. But let me ask you, why are you again intentionally quoting me out of context and at the same time deliberately leaving out the very next sentence which clarifies:

    “The only difference is Romney uses slightly different terminology, but nevertheless if you pay attention closely, it is the same exact position.”

    And you're wrong, I've proven you wrong…neither Gingrich, Bachman, or Santorum have separated Jihad as a "separate entity" To Islam….and yet, you can't admit it, because you think emotionally and not logically. Your opinions and analysis are hostage to your fragile ego…and when you make a mistake, which you clearly have, you can't admit it.

    I'm wrong and you have proven me wrong? With all due disrespect, the only thing you proved is that you are exceedingly mentally handicapped. Here is what I actually said you MOONBAT:

    “For instance, the official Republican Party position is that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Romney calls those extremists jihadists, and Gingrich calls those extremists radical Muslims, and both call the version of Islam practiced by extremists radical Islam, which they consider to be a corrupted version of Islam as opposed to the official Religion of Peace™.”

    Nah…I'm not wrong and what's more, you have never ever come close to ever proving me wrong! However, you have given me a lot of brain damage attempting to though. Again, I can't admit it because I'm sorry but I'm not guilty of being wrong period. You are though! Thus, I will be holding out for your admission that you were wrong again like always. Indeed, we know you are full of humility.

    Indeed, your opinions and analysis are hostage to your fragile ego…and when you make a mistake, which you clearly have, you can't admit it. Isn't that right MOONBAT? Yes indeed!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    SKIPPY: "Nevertheless, you conveniently and VERY deliberately left out the very next sentence…"

    RESPONSE: Where Skippy? I was responding to your statement under the lead comment of WildJew. You posted it 4 hours ago. There was no next sentence. Me thinks you're a little confused.

    Okay MOONBAT, what's this:

    Actually, Romney's PC position on Islam, is the exact same official PC position of the Republican Party, Newt Gingrich, and of all the other Republican Party candidates competing for the Republican Party presidential nomination as well. The only difference is Romney uses slightly different terminology, but nevertheless if you pay attention closely, it is the same exact position.

    For instance, the official Republican Party position is that Islam is a Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists. Romney calls those extremists jihadists, and Gingrich calls those extremists radical Muslims, and both call the version of Islam practiced by extremists radical Islam, which they consider to be a corrupted version of Islam as opposed to the official Religion of Peace™.

    Like I said, whatever it you are smoking, you need to send be some of that bad stuff. Man…it must be good high dollar stuff. Come on, don't hog it all for yourself.

    SKIPPY: “The only difference is Romney uses slightly different terminology, but nevertheless if you pay attention closely, it is the same exact position.”

    RESPONSE: Skippy, you've always been a stickler for doctrinal purity. Romney has made a statement consciously separating Jihad from Islam, specifically calling them "separate entities". This is a doctrinal innovation that has NEVER been uttered by the other candidates. That makes you WRONG.

    I'm sorry to have been so hard on you, but your ego is so inflated ("leader", "executive"), that you periodically need a good slapping down. It's for your own good Skippy.

    Here is what Romney said as copy and pasted from Wild Jew's copy and paste post:

    "I didn't refer to Islam at all, or to any other religion for that matter. I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis. Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. If you want my views on Islam, it's quite straightforward. Islam is one of the world's great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker. They want to raise families and have a bright future.

    "There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism. They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term…. It's by no means a branch of Islam. It is instead an entirely different entity. In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam.

    Apparently, you have the reading comprehension of a 3 year old. Which also is one of the reasons why you are more than just a few cards short of a full deck.

    Nevertheless, as I previously already said, with the exception of terminology, Romney's position is identical to the Republican Party's official position and also all the other Republican Party candidates in the race as well. He just uses different terminology that says the same thing. In fact, if you disagree with me, then by all means please explain how it is you figure that Romney's position is somehow different.

    As a matter of fact, instead of using the terms radical Islam or extremist Islam as opposed to the Religion of Peace™ or Islam, Romney prefers to use the word jihadism instead, and instead of using the terms radical Muslims or extremist Muslims or Islamist Muslims, all of them, by the way, including moderate Muslims and radical and extremist Islam as well, are all false PC multicultural myths in any event, Romney prefers to use the term jihadists instead. Which is actually more accurate than the PC terms radical or extremist or Islamist Muslims, or also the term terrorist as well, as terrorism in the Islamic world is a blasphemous capital offense since terrorism is a product of Western civilization only and therefore un-Islamic.

    PS – Your excessive use of the words "thus" and "hence" is making you a laughing stock. You may think you're some kind of scholarly sage, but for the rest of us, your writing-style is actually very sophomoric and unimaginative….hardly the stuff of an "executive".

    Just trying to help, Skippy. Someday, you'll thank me.

    Okay….back to emoting again. Indeed, you are so damn predictable. Therefore, instead of putting your mouth where your money is and admitting that you are wrong again as always, you are instead trying to distract attention away from your stupidity by attacking my writing style. MOONBAT, you are not only more than a just little unhinged and mentally handicapped at the same time, but you are also one of the biggest hypocrites on the planet.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    I ask again, where is the next sentence you are supposed to have posted? I quoted you from the comment directly below my response to Wild Jew's initial comment. Your statement ends with:

    SKIPPY: "Yeah right…there is a lot of cognitive dissonance with you as well, as Romney's position on Islam is the same exact official position of the Republican Party and the same exact position as all the other Republican Party candidates too."

    Read my above response to your absurd emotive insanity.

    That's it! No other sentence Skippy. Me thinks you're having a nervous breakdown.

    Me thinks you fried your brain on hard drugs.

    But I addressed what you claim is your next sentence this way:

    You've always been a stickler for doctrinal purity. Romney has made a statement consciously separating Jihad from Islam, specifically calling them "separate entities". This is a doctrinal innovation that has NEVER been uttered by the other candidates. That makes you WRONG.

    Yeah right…Romney never even used the word jihad you MOONBAT. What he did was substitute the term jihadism for the terms radical or extremist Islam, which as the Republican Party and all Republican Party candidates believe as well is separate and distinct from mainstream orthodox Islam. Hence, if Romney is guilty of anything, he is guilty of inventing a new PC multicultural term that is nevertheless just as false as the terms radical or extremist Islam. Thus, (and I know you hate that word) Romney's position with respect to Islam and with the exception of terminology as I already noted as well is 100 percent identical to the official Republican Party position and indeed all Republican Party candidates running for the Republican Party nominee today.

    So come on Skip….admit it, Romney's position isn't the EXACT SAME as the other candidates.

    Take your meds. You've blown a fuse. Indeed, I'm tempted to call the white coats to have them slip your straightjacket back on for the rest of the weekend.

    Now, just curious, when are you going to be humble and admit that you were wrong again as always MOONBAT? Come on….don't be a hypocrite, put your money where your mouth is.

    You know, you mentioned your Dad in a different comment. I'm sure he was a great guy. But my Dad taught me to be a man and admit it when I was wrong.

    I'm glad you said that because I will be waiting patiently for your humble apology and admission of stupidity.

    Come on Skip….be a man…for once.

    In the interest of your dad, MOONBAT, please don't be a hypocrite and please follow through with your admission of stupidity and also your humble apology. Then to make amends, please send me some of that high dollar stuff you are hogging all for yourself.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Do us all a great big favor MOONBAT. Blow your brains out!

  • joe

    dont even waste your time…. this person is a sick individual….

  • ObamaYoMoma
  • joe

    he takes everything too personal… and just rants the same points over and over like its his duty & virtue…..never seeing the consequentialist perspective whatsoever… he also never questions the assumptions that support his position.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Romney's comments in these clips are laudable. They don't in any way change the reality of the quote Wild Jew unearthed, that Jihadism is "a separate entity" from Islam

    So when Romney explains in his own words that jihadism is radical Islam, which is the exact same position as his fellow Republican Party candidates, his position is somehow different from the other Republican Party candidates? Give me a break! All I said is that with the exception of terminology, Romney's position on Islam is identical to the other Republican Party candidates, and it is, unlike the cut and paste that Wild Jew was spamming the site with repeatedly in an attempt to mislead and dupe less than astute conservatives about Romney's position on Islam.

    Not to mention that this is Romney's second presidential campaign. If Romney's position on Islam had been the same way Wild Jew's cut and paste tried to misrepresent it, he would have been pilloried off the debate floor by the other Republican Party candidates and hounded out of the race altogether by the news media a long, long time ago. Hell, even that anarcho-kook Ron Paul would have launched attacks against Romney.

    Indeed, the other candidates would be flooding the airways with campaign commercials attacking Romney for his absurd position on Islam since in 2008. Where are the missing campaign commercials, the missing clips of the other Republican Party candidates ganging up and attacking him in the debates, and the missing news reports showing the attacks? Why wasn't Romney laughed out of the race in 2008 and why isn't he ridiculed like that loon Ron Paul today? Are the other Republican Party candidates and the news media too mentally incompetent to take advantage of Romney's gargantuan weakness? Apparently, they are not as intelligent and erudite as you pretend to be!

    Nevertheless, exactly like a liberal you are excessively emotive and at the same time incredibly delusional as well. Therefore Moonbat, put your money where your mouth is and apologize for your stupid idiocy, and then do us all a great big favor and blow your unhinged brains out.

  • joe

    false … i think you maybe over analyzing…

  • ObamaYoMoma

    So instead, You are literally contort reality.

    MOONBAT, you couldn't be more emotive and delusional at the same time. Therefore, with all due disrespect, you couldn't recognize reality even if it jumped on your lap and humped you.

    Now, with respect to the rest of your childish emoting, shove it up where the sun doesn't shine, because I can assure you your garbage won't be read by me. Still waiting for you to prove you aren't a hypocrite by admitting though you were wrong again as always.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Hypocrite!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Hey MOONBAT, you never explained how you figure all of the violent jihad attacks you cited above could be possible with zero Muslims living in the USA?

    Indeed, I'll be waiting for your public admission that you were wrong again as always.

  • joe

    LOL i went through the exact same CRAP on a related topic ….want some good entertainment….check out the FPM archive dated November 21, 2011 Panetta to Israel: Don't Touch Iran 19th comment with 24 replies….you'll get a good laugh!