Rabbi Reuben J. Poupko vs. David Solway on the Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs

Pages: 1 2

Editor’s note: In our Dec. 5, 2011 issue, we publish David Solway’s article, “These Shoes Were Made for Walking,” which criticized Canada’s “Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs” for surrendering to the Islamist agenda. Rabbi Reuben J. Poupko, of the Beth Israel Beth Aaron Congregation in Montreal, Quebec, takes issue with Solway’s arguments in the letter below. Solway’s response to Rabbi Poupka follows.

In Defense of the Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs
By Rabbi Reuben J. Poupko

I was shocked to read David Solway’s misleading criticism of the Center for Israel and Jewish Affairs, the advocacy arm of the organized Canadian Jewish community (“These Shoes Were Made for Walking”, Frontpage Magazine, Dec. 5, 2011).

The dearth of David Solway’s insight into Jewish advocacy in Canada is best displayed by his ad hominem attacks against the Center’s Vice-President in Quebec, Luciano Del Negro. Indeed, Solway’s slanderous accusations are based on the ravings of a convicted terrorist killer, Rhéal Mathieu, published on the notoriously anti-Semitic website Vigile.

I have known Luciano Del Negro for many years and can personally attest to his unwavering commitment to the defense of Israel. In fact, his passion and courage were demonstrated as we dodged Hezbollah’s katyusha rockets together in northern Israel during the Second Lebanon War in the summer of 2006.

Ironically, David Solway’s accusation that the Center and its predecessor organizations indulge in “sha shtill” advocacy are all the more ridiculous when you consider that the Parti Québécois felt compelled to dissociate itself from the hateful website after our advocacy staff had publicly denounced the virulent anti-Semitism promoted by Vigile.

It is equally ironic that David Solway would attempt to trash our community’s advocacy organization with one of its most resounding successes. A year ago, Mr. Del Negro and his public affairs director David Ouellette brought widespread media attention to the anti-Israel boycott of Montreal shoe store Le Marcheur, which had preceded the picketing of Naot by a couple of months.

As a result, a wave of public indignation at the BDS campaign and support for the embattled businesses ensued, leading to an unprecedented and massive rejection of the demonization of Israel. Paradoxically, at the very moment when Quebec declared war on the anti-Israel movement, David Solway wrote on this website that “Montreal join[ed] the war on Israel”.

Yves Archambault and Ginette Auger, owners of Le Marcheur, were recently honored by the Canadian Institute for Jewish Research (CIJR) at its conference on the delegitimation of Israel, co-sponsored by the Center, and featuring Daniel Pipes as keynote speaker. On that occasion, Mr. Archambault expressed his gratitude to the Quebec-Israel Committee (QIC, a predecessor organization of the Center led by Mr. Del Negro) for its support in mobilizing grassroots “buycott” activities which helped the targeted businesses stand firm against the boycotters.

In fact, this anti-Israel campaign became such a cause célèbre that both the Parliament of Quebec and the Montreal City Council condemned the boycott campaign and reiterated their firm support for the Quebec-Israel Cooperation Agreement. In the aftermath of the intense media criticism and political and public denunciations, the ranks of the boycotters dwindled to a mere handful. The figurehead of the anti-Israel movement, radical leftwing politician Amir Khadir, would later concede defeat and publicly blame QIC as the “great saboteur” of the BDS movement in Quebec. As well, pollsters would note a sharp drop in Khadir’s popularity (11% to 5%) which they attributed directly to his reckless anti-Israel agitation.

Meanwhile, the few remaining boycotters stopped picketing Le Marcheur and shifted their full attention to the Jewish-owned Naot boutique. QIC continued to mobilize grassroots support for Naot and provide support to Daniel Laprès. However, it soon became clear that the boycott had become the butt of jokes in Quebec and passers-by either mocked or ignored the picketers, their numbers rarely exceeding more than 5 people. It was then that QIC and most of its non-Jewish allies (who had been there since day 1) formed the consensus opinion that the boycott campaign had failed miserably and that their continued presence had become irrelevant.

Successful advocacy is measured by the achievement of clearly defined goals. In this case, not only was this specific boycott action defeated and discredited, but a new consensus was achieved in Quebec rendering the BDS campaign as a whole absolutely toxic.

Naturally, the Centre does not pretend to have a monopoly on best advocacy practices and will continue to welcome constructive criticism. Also, the Center cherishes its cooperation with other pro-Israel organizations such as CIJR and my own congregation, where I recently hosted, with the assistance of the Center’s David Ouellette, two pre-eminent Canadian critics of Islamism, David Harris and Salim Mansur.

It is extremely disappointing that someone as concerned about the demonization of Israel and the Jewish people as David Solway would resort to outrageously unfounded accusations to tarnish the reputation of an organization that proudly and effectively defends the interests of Canadian Jews everyday.

Rabbi Reuben J. Poupko serves at the Beth Israel Beth Aaron Congregation in Montreal, Quebec.

David Solway responds:

Rabbi Poupko’s attack on my FrontPage article, These Shoes Were Made for Walking, is welcome because it provides me with the opportunity to rebut the many errors, discrepancies and apparent falsehoods that serve to diminish his assumption of authority. I will bullet a number of these below. Readers, of course, can arrive at their own conclusions as to whose account is the more reliable, the Rabbi’s or this writer’s. They may also wish to peruse the article to which the Rabbi takes such vehement exception, but which his rejoinder has materially failed to address.

* According to Daniel Laprès, coordinator of Les Amis Québécois d’Israël (Quebec Friends of Israel), and to numerous other witnesses, Rabbi Poupko was never seen on St. Denis Street confronting the anti-Jewish picketers, members of a group styling itself as Palestinian and Jewish Unity (PAJU). Whether conspicuous by his absence in front of both Le Marcheur and Naot shoe stores, or so discreet as to be unobservable, he is not in the best position to dismiss the threat posed by the boycotters.

* It is worth noting that Luciano Del Negro, vice-president of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA), never filed suit against Rhéal Mathieu or the Tribune libre de Vigile for defamation. One wonders why. The fact that the Vigile is toxically anti-Israel does not in itself alter the details adduced by Del Negro’s old friend. This would require an evidentiary refutation showing that Mathieu was lying.

* It seems likely that the proprietor of Le Marcheur Yves Archambault’s acknowledgment of the Comité Québec-Israël  (CQI), the CIJA’s predecessor, was an act of pro forma politesse.  It was remarked by many of those on the scene that Del Negro arrived at the event honoring M. Archambault and his partner Ginette Auger only just before M. Archambault’s discourse and left immediately afterward, conduct that many consider smacks of opportunism.

* Note, too, the learned Rabbi does not mention the fact that M. Archambault underlined the beneficial role of precisely those organizations, such as Amis Québécois d’Israël and Amitiés Québec-Israël, which Poupko and his associates tend to downplay. It is reasonably obvious that such voluntary groups are frowned upon by the officially recognized institutions, since the former seem to be both more dedicated and more effective than the latter. Additionally, as I wrote in These Shoes Were Made for Walking, “the resistance put forward by outfits like CIJA against the activities of truly committed advocacy groups is standard practice among many of the official representatives of the Jewish community. It is the result of a turf war for power, prestige, exclusive rights, jealously hoarded prerogatives and emoluments.”

Pages: 1 2

  • StephenD

    So what is the Rabbi running for office? Sounds like a typical politician. Show up for a photo op and claim victory due to his support but ignore the ramifications when it isn't in the spot light.
    With friends like this….

  • mrbean

    Canada is fertile ground for anti-Semitism, report says
    July 11, 2011

    TORONTO (JTA) — Canada is fertile ground for anti-Semitism, especially on university campuses, a parliamentary committee has concluded. After two years of hearings, the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism in a report released last week called on the federal government to do more to fight anti-Semitism in Canada, which it said is rising, due partly to increased hostility toward Israel. Over 10 days of hearings between November 2009 and February 2010, the coalition's 22 members, consisting of lawmakers from all federal parties, heard from 74 witnesses, including federal and provincial politicians, diplomats, university administrators, academics, chiefs of police, journalists and other interested individuals.

  • Ben

    Anti-Israel Jews often declare their high moral standards that demand "Israel`s criticism". But we see more and more Jewish organizations of pseudo-friends of Israel as the J Street who hide their activity.Their shyness tells everything about moral standards.

  • Brassard25

    Poupko doesn't seem to know what he's talking about. I've already been to the anti-boycott protest and I saw from my own eyes that the PAJU is still threatening Israeli shops on the St-Denis street. By claiming that they are not threatening anyone by their action, it looks like Poupko and his friend from the CIJA David Ouellette have no clue about what's going on on the ground. By the way, David Ouellette and Del Negro from the CIJA have done no action against the PAJU. The main reason why they left the shoes shop Le Marcheur is because they have found a better target, not because David Ouellette was there. In fact, he was smoking with his friend Patrick a few meters away from the group Les Amis Québécois d'Israël who were protesting against the PAJU. He was absolutely useless and his presence was only to be updated about the situation. It appears that Mr. Ouellette, by writing this article under the name of "Rabbi Poupko", wants to protect his job and his salary by taking advantage of other people's actions against the Israeli boycott.

  • Nicole Allio

    I used to be a fan of Rabbi Poupko but I couldn't have imagined that one day he would write an article on the demonstrations taking place on St-Denis Street. He has not seen personally what is happening on the street and relies on erroneous interpretations of the situation. Has Rabbi Poupko been hired to defend CIJA's questionable reputation as Jewish agencies' budgets and performances are being reviewed by CJA? It is both offensive and laughable for those of us who are actively fighting anti-Semitic actions where they take place – on the streets – to see David Ouellette described as a good strategist. His reading of the political climate in Quebec is 100% wrong – and it does not take long to understand that his recommendations are detrimental to the well being of the Quebec Jewish community. I hope Rabbi Poupko gets back to his knitting, commenting on what he knows – and not tarnishing his name trying to save his friends' tarnished reputations.

  • Brassard25

    Actually, I'm part of Les Amis Québécois d'Israël and I've already been three times to the anti-PAJU protest on the St-Denis street. I saw David Ouellette smoking cigarettes with his friend Patrick. He was only there as an observer and he never really participated. When Rabbi Poupko claims that David Ouellette and his organisation CIJA are the ones who successfully defeated the PAJU on the St-Denis street, it is absolutely wrong. Today, the PAJU is still protesting in front of Jewish shops and they are still a threat to many merchants. What is Mr Ouellette doing against them? Nothing. They are bashing the only people who are actually protesting (Les Amis Québécois d'Israël) and they wrongly claim that the PAJU is not threatening people anymore. I really doubt that they are aware of what's going on on the ground. I think that David Ouellette wants to protect his job, his salary and his reputation, nothing more. By doing so, he harms the Israli cause and he works agains the interests of the Jewish community. Some people are doing is job with more efficiency and they aren't paid for that. They are spending their own free time to protest against the PAJU and to support the merchants who are victim of the BDS campaign.

  • guest

    The 'official ' Jewish orgs (with the exception of B'nai Brith under Frank Diament) are basically doing what needs to be done to 'look good' , keep their 'reputations' up, and stay 'relevant'. Sadly, this lip service falls short of what reality calls for.

  • http://www.amitiesquebec-israel.org/ JMGelinas

    Rabbi Poupko's article is really unfortunate and irresponsible. It is wrong and unrealistic to claim that the PAJU's boycott campaign against Israeli products on St-Denis' street is over. The battle is, to the contrary, far from being a done thing, and claiming “victory” as does rabbi Poupko (or those who might have pen the article for him) is not only a lie, but it is also a call for delivering the targeted Israeli store to the hands of the racist thugs who harass it since almost a year.

  • Georgette

    I am outraged that Rabbi Poupko could write such comments! It is obvious he does not have his facts straight. David Solway is right. M Del Negro has not rebuked the accusations from M Mathieu because they are true. CIJA takes the credit for «solving» the «buycot» on St Denis street. It is still going on! I invite anyone to come on Saturdays from 13:00 to 15:00 in from of Naot and you will see the Paju with their Palestien flags and hateful propaganda stopping buyers from entering the shop! M Kadir incited and led a mob to parade in from of the store this summer. He is more popular than ever. So Rabbi Poupko do your homework and get your facts right!

  • http://www.amitiesquebec-israel.org/ JMGelinas

    Also : what the Rabbi Poupko says is totally inaccurate. As a piece of evidence that confirms that PAJU's harassment is far away from being a solved problem, one may want to read what Madame Ginette Dubé wrote us about her recent visit to the Naot store on December 17, 2011: « I was there this afternoon and there many PAJU thugs who were standing right in front of the Naot store. They occupied all the public space and loudly shout hateful anti-Israel songs. » Defending Israel needs mobilization of people in the streets every time it is needed and face the enemy. We must not fear those thugs and we should make them to understand that we won't give up the fight and that they don’t scare us at all.

  • henery25

    I prefer to visit the blogs that are raising some serious issues and this is the best post i ever read. I want to know more about this topic and hope to get some thrilling posts soon. Thanks for it

  • aspacia

    MKULTRA BRAINCHIPMAN go away, no one bothers with your childish rants. What a f!@k fool

  • aspacia

    Regardless of what Israel does, what land she cedes, what humanitarian aid she gives, Muslims will always attack her and attempt to murder all infidels, especially Jews.