CNN Does Castro’s Bidding — Again

Pages: 1 2

The evidence examined by Venezuelan judge José Moros González in 1980 to declare Posada totally innocent was so overwhelming, authoritative and conclusive that its small wonder Castro’s propaganda apparatus and his auxiliaries in the U.S. media have been so frantic to squash it. Among this evidence was a 200-page report from the Forensic Explosives Laboratory of Britain’s Royal Armament Research & Development Establishment, (ARDE) considered among the most authoritative for investigations of this kind. (This agency helped crack the July 2005 London subway bombings, for instance.)

The investigation into the Cubana Airline’s explosion was commissioned and the report issued, not by “right-wing Cuban-American crackpots” but by the government of Barbados, the nation whence the plane had departed shortly before the explosion. The investigators and authorities from Barbados retrieved bodies, baggage and portions of the plane found at the crash site. The investigation took the British agency two months and was headed by the agency’s top expert, Eric Newton, a 33-year veteran of such investigations.

The findings from the world’s top investigative agency methodically demolished every item of the Castro-CNN version of the crime. Castro, for instance, claims that, at Carriles’ instigation, an explosive device was planted in the rear bathroom of the plane by a Venezuelan named Hernan Ricardo, who boarded the plane on its previous stop in Trinidad and deplaned in Barbados. Carriles’ defense lawyers argued that the explosive device was planted in the baggage compartment of the plane at the instigation of a Castro double-agent named Ricardo Morales Navarette, during a stop in Guyana.

“It would have been impossible for an explosion in the plane’s bathroom to cause the type of damage we found,” concluded the ARDE report. “The explosion definitely came from the baggage compartment.”

Castro claims Carriles’s accomplice used a type of explosive device known as C-4. Defense lawyers maintained Castro’s accomplice used commercial dynamite. The ARDE report found “no traces of any chemical found in C-4 explosives” and instead found traces of nitroglycerine, a component of commercial dynamite.

More interesting still: ARDE investigators offered to raise the entire plane from the sea’s bottom — and were frantically rebuffed by Fidel Castro himself, who knew this would further damage his case against Carriles. (But not with such as CNN.)

Finally, a confession to the plane bombing exists, in the form of deposition in Dade County’s 11th Judicial court dated April, 5 1982 — and it’s from a Castro double-agent named Ricardo Morales Navarette.  Another detail for you, CNN.

“It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy,” quipped Henry Kissinger in 1968, “but to be America’s friend is fatal.” The U.S. vs Luis Posada-Carriles provides perfect proof.

Pages: 1 2

  • Amused

    Mr.Fontova , dont know what your agenda is , but Posada's nothing but a bomber and terroriost , once used by the CIA . "Defender of America " .????…dont make me laugh , he is a hater of Castro more than anything else …still no excuse for blowing up an airliner . He is responsible for other bombings in Havana . Better fact check your "heroes " before you go putting your neck out on the chopping block for this TERRORIST .
    Say what you will about CNN , but to bring up Posada as part of any criticism of CNN , is just ludicrous and irrelevant …..blowing up people in airliners is an act of terrorism , even if the victims are peoiple you don't like .

  • mickBelker

    It would appear that your last commentor, “Amused,” didn’t bother to read your article.

    Hater of Castro? No doubt and with cause, one might add. Don’t you just love these guys? His byline should read “Don’t confuse me with the facts. My mind’s made up.”