Obama, Sarkozy’s Contempt for Netanyahu Exposed


Pages: 1 2

A little more than a year later, on the eve of Netanyahu’s visit to Washington to address a joint session of Congress, Obama tried to upstage him by proposing that Israel, without receiving any meaningful concession in return, offer to start negotiations based on Israel’s shrinking back to the indefensible pre-1967 lines with some unspecified minor mutual land swaps. Once again, Netanyahu would not play along with Obama’s shenanigans. During a joint news conference, Netanyahu was the grown-up in the room and delivered a candid, strongly worded rebuke to Obama’s demand for Israeli concessions that left Obama squirming:

This is something that we want to have accomplished.  Israel wants peace.  I want peace.  What we all want is a peace that will be genuine, that will hold, that will endure.  And I think that the — we both agree that a peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle Eastern reality, and that the only peace that will endure is one that is based on reality, on unshakeable facts.

I think for there to be peace, the Palestinians will have to accept some basic realities.  The first is that while Israel is prepared to make generous compromises for peace, it cannot go back to the 1967 lines — because these lines are indefensible…Remember that, before 1967, Israel was all of nine miles wide.  It was half the width of the Washington Beltway.  And these were not the boundaries of peace; they were the boundaries of repeated wars, because the attack on Israel was so attractive.

After pointing out that Palestinian President Abbas was making negotiations more difficult by announcing his intention to form a unity government with Hamas, which he called the “Palestinian version of al Qaeda,” Netanyahu discussed the Palestinians’ insistence on the right of return of millions of Palestinian refugees to pre-1967 Israel. “Now, 63 years later, the Palestinians come to us and they say to Israel, accept the grandchildren, really, and the great grandchildren of these refugees, thereby wiping out Israel’s future as a Jewish state,” said Netanyahu. “I think it’s time to tell the Palestinians forthrightly it’s not going to happen.”

Obama and Sarkozy do not like dealing with uncomfortable truths when it comes to defining what it will really take to reach a genuine, secure peace between Israel and the Palestinians. Sarkozy calls Netanyahu a “liar” for telling the truth, and Obama complains that he has to listen to the unvarnished truth from Netanyahu “every day.”

But, as the saying goes, know the truth and the truth shall set you free. Here are four fundamental and undeniable truths for Obama and Sarkozy to consider:

  • The truth about the risks for peace Israel has already taken to no avail, as jihadist terrorists launch waves of rockets from Gaza aimed at killing innocent Israeli civilians including children.
  • The truth about Hamas, with whom the more “moderate” Abbas wants to form a unity government.
  • The truth about the Palestinians’ denial of Israel’s basic right to exist as the only Jewish state in the world – a policy of rejectionism that led directly to the Palestinians’ present stateless condition and which their leaders continue to propound today.
  • The truth about the Palestinians’ insistence on the “right of return,” which is intended to destroy the Jewish character of whatever remains of Israel after reaching agreement with the Palestinians on borders. On this point, Obama should face the truth that his demand that Israel essentially return to the pre-1967 lines, while not simultaneously insisting to the Palestinians that they take the “right of return” of millions of Palestinian refugees to pre-1967 Israel off the table for good, is self-contradictory at best.

As Prime Minister Netanyahu told the UN General Assembly in his September 23rd speech, “I hope that the light of truth will shine, if only for a few minutes.” Whether or not they “cannot stand” Netanyahu, it’s time for Obama, Sarkozy and other world leaders to stop whitewashing the truth.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • SHmuelHaLevi

    One has to feel sorry for the US choice for president.
    His family life could not have been worse. A white mother that appeared in very explicit pictures and a yet to be determined father. The door kicker has arguably been born somewhere in the planet. His two purported maternal grandparents raised him? Both hard core communists.
    You ever seen a chip on a shoulder bigger than that? Then, if that was not enough, he was trained by some of the most virulent enemies of the US and of course Jews.
    Then he goes and meets with none other than Sarko, the present occupant of darlin' Carla, also a photogenic lass. He is there when not chewing on frogs legs and sucking snail shells.
    What can anyone possibly expect of such duo?

  • Ezra

    I hope my Jewish brother and sister wakeup, these leaders are not good people.

    • Sallie G. Schaffer

      You are so right. Why did they vote for obama? Didn't the Jewish people know about R. Wright and the rest of his story? I don't understand them.

    • Anamah

      Ezra you are so right… I really can not understand how people who I though were normal and intelligent like him. I found this guy so unbearable, so dangerous, so malefic and poisonous… from the first time I heard him I became allergic to. It is so clear he lie all the time to impose his agenda. We have an incompetent build in a bad narcissistic human being. He hate America soul and spirit as he hate Israel and Jews. But worst we have a high percentage of brainwashed people and a Media decisively dishonest . Little by little America became socialist not knowing it, as predicted by Khrushchev. Tragic perspective going straight to a sad destiny for this unique, one time the most and inspirational country in the world. I cry for you America.

  • anonymous

    The wierd thing is how Netanyahu denies he was humiliated and defends Obama

  • Dispozadaburka

    Now we can see through the smokescreen of the Anti-Christ. (Obama)

    New World Order needs a new world religion.

    Islam.

    Pure Luciferian Doctrine coming to fruition.

  • jacob

    I WILL NOT SHORTEN ANYTHING AND I WILL RATHER DELETE THE WHOLE
    COMMENT, AS I JUST DID…

    THANKS FOR NOTHING, ANYWAY

    • ObamaYoMoma

      You are supposed to setup an account at intensedebate.com, which would allow your post to not only be exponentially longer, but also allow you to edit and delete them.

  • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

    Joe, I imagined you feverishly banging away, ape-like on your keyboard as you sweated in your wifebeater, McDonalds milkshake cups crushed in heaps beside your chair, when the obvious became known: that the leaders know Benjamin Netanyahu to be a duplicitous, lying, and annoying dirtbag. I imagined you screaming to the desktop, trying to flip it and weave it into a negative print, making Israel shine and the world look black. This article is truly disappointing. I’m going to the zoo.

    • Joseph Klein

      The zoo is a good place for you to go and stay with your friends. They will provide you with the intellectual challenge your are craving.

      • Cynic

        You should realise that the downside to flipside is that his comments are flippant.

      • Beth

        "They will provide you with the intellectual challenge your are craving"

        (lmao)

    • Jacob

      Good contribution. Well thought-out arguments.

    • Boston

      Well, go to the zoo. You'll probably find Obama there along with the Frog President of France.

    • Steeloak

      I always wondered where you escaped from.

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        ZOO-HATER!

    • zionista

      all that jealousy of the Jews is really getting to you huh flippy – you aren't fit to shine Bibi's shoes!

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        That’s always an interesting canard; to accuse people of jealousy for criticizing the eternal anus of humanity. As if one could be jealous of arrogance, mendacity, and kleptomania.

    • Sallie G. Schaffer

      You are an ape, your home is the zoo. Why do you read D. Horowitz's column every day. You really are sick every way.

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        It’s like checking a carcinogenic mole for shape changes.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    This is a president who has gone out of his way to visit Muslim countries in the same region as Israel, but has yet to visit Israel itself since taking office. Obama had no trouble bowing to the Saudi king, while insulting the Israeli prime minister at every turn.

    Hmm…speaking of kissing Saudi Princes, does anyone recall the following:

    http://foodforthethinkers.files.wordpress.com/201

    As Bush, Colin Power, and Condi “appeaser” Rice all eagerly sold out Israel every chance they got as well. Indeed, in 2006 when Israel had a perfect opportunity to hand Iran and Syria a major strategic defeat by obliterating their Hezbo proxy in Lebanon once and for all, the USA under Bush and Rice effectively tied the Israelis hands. So today the Hezbos are several times better armed and with much better weapons in anticipation of the next inevitable hot jihad with Israel, and the Hezbos also thanks to those incompetent losers effectively rule Lebanon today, while Bush and Rice also continued to fund Lebanon's military to the tune of $100 million annually. Indeed, this is just the tip of the iceberg, as I could go into far more Bush betrayals of Israel during his very disgraceful two terms of office.

    Not to mention that all of them are also responsible for the two biggest strategic blunders ever in US history in Iraq and Afghanistan, and because Bush elected to double the size, scope, and power of the federal government and usurp our heretofore constitutionally protected rights and freedoms like Dhimmicrats on steroids in response to 9/11, instead of outlawing Islam and banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP, our federal deficits and national debt are exploding through the roof today, at the same time other than creating a false sense of security so that they could continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage, the homeland today is actually more vulnerable to jihad attacks than it was prior to 9/11 simply due to the fact that we have more Muslim jihadists, both violent and non-violent, living in America as a fifth column today. Indeed, had Bush outlawed Islam and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration instead, all of those Americans killed in the Fort Hood Massacre and the Arkansas jihad attack would still be alive and well today.

    Also, if Bush hadn't incompetently bogged us down in pursuit of two silly and asinine nation-building missions in Afghanistan and Iraq that couldn't have been more fantasy based and counterproductive, Iran's nuclear weapons program and Pakistan's nuclear weapons arsenal and nuclear weapons program could both already be obliterated today.

    Indeed, Bush should have instituted a policy of containment to stop the expansion of Islam in response to 9/11. Instead, like an unhinged moronic loon on steroids he declared a “war on terror,” and never mind the fact that terrorism and jihad are mutually exclusive and two entirely different manifestations altogether, as terrorism, which as its name implies always employs violence, is a product of Western civilization only, while jihad, on the other hand, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, in stark contrast to terrorism can employ both violent and non-violent means and is a product of Islamic civilization only. Hence, Bush like a mentally incompetent loon effectively declared war on a manifestation of Western civilization only.

    Now the above diatribe is not to say that I support the Obama administration, because I most certainly don't, as the Obama administration is just the Bush administration on steroids. The truth is that both the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party have become virtually indistinguishable today as they are both incredibly incompetent and inept. Yet, we wonder why this country is in the sad shape it is in today.

    Indeed, any president that isn't incompetent would not only automatically support Israel 100 percent since the jihad being waged against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel is just an extension of the greater global jihad at large being waged against all non-Muslim unbelievers around the world, but also insist at the same time that Israel abandon the so-called peace process ASAP since it is being used as a ploy to weaken Israel and dupe gullible useful idiots.

    • Herman Caintonette

      Sane people don't believe such rot. One cannot defend "Israel" on the merits.

      • Steeloak

        Any sane person can easily defend Israel on the merits. It is defending Hamas, Hezbullah, and the PLO that requires insanity to believe their rot.

    • Beth

      "had Bush outlawed Islam and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration instead, all of those Americans killed in the Fort Hood Massacre and the Arkansas jihad attack would still be alive and well today"

      Absolutely!

      Well said ObamaYoMoma! all of it.

  • intrcptr2

    OK, all; the first person to respond to flipsh*t gets banned, yes?

    We all realize he responds merely for the attention, rather like the petulant little boy in school who just will not shut up. Now is the time to simply ignore him…

    • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

      That’s you.

      • Herman Caintonette

        Does the free-speech crusader David Horowitz impose viewpoint-based bans? If that is the case, it can and will be used against him when he whines about his view being discriminated against.

        The First Amendment is not for declarations that kittens are cute. It must protect the speech you loathe, or it is meaningless. Ask David Goldberger, of Skokie fame.

        • Steeloak

          I agree with you 100% about the First Amendment, that's why they allow trolls like you, Flip, Jim_C, and the rest here at FPM.
          Like the paid village drunkards in ancient Greece, your postings are on public display here as a lesson to all.

        • tkellybal

          You have the right to speak freely. You have no right to someone else's microphone. There is no 1st amendment issue here.

          • Herman Caintonette

            So, why is Team Horrowitz whining always uncontrollably about the unfairness of the MSM?

          • Steeloak

            Um…Because it's true. But you dissemble, neither Horowitz nor his bloggers have ever called for censorship. The major thrust of what Horowitz does is to fight against those who would stifle free speech.

        • fiddler

          From whence then do we get "hate speech"?

    • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

      Plus, you are in school and you use two computers to post.

    • ziontruth

      "OK, all; the first person to respond to flipsh*t gets banned, yes?"

      I'd prefer Flipscum got banned. Him and the other anti-Zionists whose defecations now stink these comments sections up for lack of adequate sanitation services.

      • Herman Caintonette

        Justice Stewart responds:

        "Censorship reflects a society's lack of confidence in itself. It is a hallmark of an authoritarian regime. Long ago those who wrote our First Amendment charted a different course. They believed a society can be truly strong only when it is truly free. In the realm of expression they put their faith, for better or for worse, in the enlightened choice of the people, free from the interference of a policeman's intrusive thumb or a judge's heavy hand."

        Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463, 498 (1966) (Stewart, J., dissenting).

        Winston Churchill’s observations regarding Adolf Hitler applies with equal force to you:

        "You see these dictators on their pedestals, surrounded by the bayonets of their soldiers and the truncheons of their police. On all sides they are guarded by masses of armed men, cannons, aeroplanes, fortifications, and the like — they boast and vaunt themselves before the world, but in their hearts there is unspoken fear: They are afraid of words and thoughts! Words spoken abroad, thoughts stirring at home — all the more powerful because forbidden. These terrify them. A little mouse of thought appears in the room, and even the mightiest potentates are thrown into panic.

        Winston S. Churchill (BBC Radio broadcast to London and America, Oct. 16, 1938), reprinted at Randolph S. Churchill, Into Battle 58-59 (Hesperides Press 2006).

        Censorship is the opening argument of the tyrant. Goebbels claimed that it is "the absolute right of the state to supervise the formation of public opinion," Foreign News: Consecrated Press, Time, Oct. 16, 1933, and Lenin thought that to give the weapon of freedom of the press to one’s opponent is to "ease the enemy’s cause." Vladimir I. Lenin, Pravda (1912). “The jaws of power are always open to devour, and her arm is always stretched out, if possible, to destroy the freedom of thinking, speaking, and writing.” John Adams, A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law (1765). From Tienanmen Square to FrontPageMag, the fangs of power are perpetually bared.

        • Joseph Klein

          Excellent quotes on free speech and the dangers of censorship. Just another reason to support Israel, the only real democracy in the Middle East where free speech is truly protected.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            Unless you say something like “boycott Israel.”

          • zionista

            then you'd better boycott most of your electronics since most of them are invented in Isreali tech companies – you loser!

        • ziontruth

          My standard is the Torah, not the American Constitution or British Common Law, so those quotes carry no import with me. The Torah says enemies both within and without are to be fought, not to be given a podium.

          • Herman Caintonette

            You mean, like the Islamic concept of jihad? LOL!

          • ziontruth

            Jihad is offensive while the Jewish concept of waging war is defensive (the difference between imperialism, which Islam is, and nationalism, which Judaism is). However, perhaps it's better for you to think the Jewish concept is equivalent to the Islamic one. If your attitude regarding Islam and jihad is anything to go by, that means you'll be scrambling to appease us.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            Just say no to Jewish Sharia.

    • stern

      And Herman Can'tsayanythingniceaboutanyoneunlesshe'saNazi scumbag, is second on the list.

    • macdaddy31

      Theirs is a campaign to try and weaken legitimate argument by throwing anything they can in front of it, regardless of the merits, and to attempt to sway weak-minded people to their side. Our politicians like to tell us that the people's wisdom is solid, but my feeling is that if any argument is preached in repetition, many will be brain-washed to accept it no matter how illogical or morally bankrupt.

  • StephenD

    “it’s time for Obama, Sarkozy and other world leaders to stop whitewashing the truth.
    I wouldn’t hold my breath.
    The truth has a way of outlasting lies. Eventually the world will see that hurling bombs at children and calling it “resistance” just doesn’t cut it. I only hope it is sooner rather than later.
    Viva Israel!

  • ze-ev ben jehudah

    those,sneaky,statements of these two,so-called,world leaders says
    everything about themselves and nothing about Netanyahu.
    If Israel takes the necessary steps to disable the nuclear threat of Iran
    and will be the victor of that batlle then he will gets laurels -nobel prices
    and will be the worlds hero.The rest of the world is waching,with faces the
    other side. And Barack Hussein obama and Zarkozy ?? well it's not worth
    polluting this comment,so I wont say it out loud but I'm thinking….Oh boy.

  • Steve Chavez

    FAKE JEWS, the vocal minority who speak for practicing Jews, will support Obama's War on Israel and justify all terrorist actions as a "an Israeli over-reaction and problem." "FAKE JEWS?" Aren't Rev. Wright, Rev. Jackson, and Rev. Sharpton FAKES REV'S?

    FAKE JEWS and Real Jews will still support Obama and the Democrats who are at WAR WITH ISRAEL!

    WAKE UP JEWS as you are more hated than Muslims, and their terrorist enablers, right now! Voting, funding, or supporting any Democrat will be the downfall and destruction of ISRAEL who now is being put in a corner by OBAMA, and other EU leaders, and will have to attack Iran on its own for their own survival. AND WHO WILL OBAMA BLAME?

  • Cynic

    Seems that the person who commented in a Czech paper which I referred to way back in the comments couldn’t have been more right about some to those posting here.

    Way to go America.
    Those Israelis who survive the trashing of Israel will have lots of schadenfreude to keep them warm in America’s Muslim winter.

  • tkellybal

    Israel, and Netanyahu's, motivation is simple: Survival.
    Arab, and Obama's, motivation is also simple: Hate.

  • mrbean

    Obama is a clandestine Muslim anti-semite shooled by his mentor the anti semite Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Nicholas Sarkozy is classic European anti-semite and a useful idiot of Islam. In 2002, the then Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy initiated the creation of a "French Council of the Muslim Faith" (Conseil Français du Culte Musulman – CFCM), though wide criticism claimed this would only encourage communitarianism. The CFCM is informally recognized by the national government and it is a private nonprofit association so it pays no taxes. It is headed by the rector of the Paris Mosque, Dalil Boubakeur who is an enemy of Israel and suspected of support terrorists. And you are surprised?

  • guest

    As a Muslim President, he bows to our enemies, and attacks Americas friends.

    The french? They were forced to fight in WWII in Canada. Useless.

  • mrbean

    Hmmmm….the picture….that clutching embrace…. maybe they are both swishy too?

  • Moishe Pupick

    W., 11/09/11 common era

    Surprise! Barack Husein Obama (a.k.a. Barry Sotero) can't stand Bibi. What do all of you Jewish suckers who voted so enthusiastically for him think now? Will you vote for him in a year, if in the meantime, he says good things about Woody Allen movies,
    publicly states that he likes bagels and lox, and wants to create even more federal
    red tape?

    Not to worry. B.H.O. didn't create the heavens and the earth.

  • Ironboomer

    I challenge Sarkozy to a duel!

    • SpiritOf1683

      By the looks of him, an ant would win in a duel against Sarkozy.

  • Ghostwriter

    By now,Obama will have just kissed his Jewish support goodbye.

    • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

      He wised up. He knows you have to promise that Israel is sacrosanct and then kick them in the rear end later.

  • A.R Momen

    I think that this true and spontaneous gesture shows how thick is the Zionist blood which the Israeli governed media tries to insert into the decision makers' bodies allover the globe .You know that your fiscal capitals can buy the attitudes of politicians , but the hearts of nationals can't accept your arrogance and stealth influence.Don't you want to read what do the majority of American people(and not your purchased senates) want ?Do you want to strangle the presidents' throats ?These are elected persons representing their peoples ,can't you understand?They are not moronic loons nor inepts ,but it's time to give your octopus lobby its real size ,to squeeze it to its natural volume rather than keeping terrorized by its- powerful -arms .

  • Ghostwriter

    Wonderful,Mr. Momen. Where did you get your information from,"Mein Kampf?"

    • Herman Caintonette

      No, reality.

      • Ghostwriter

        That's rich,coming from a Jew-hating fiend such as yourself,HC.

  • BLJ

    I see Comrade O is still batting .000 in the class department. He is not only a disgrace as POTUS but also as a human being.

  • myohmy

    Is this the kind of foreign diplomacy leader we need? Obama? This is one of the most embarrassing mistakes ever made by a US president on foreign diplomacy. I told you Obama wasn't ready for prime time. Had no experience. Obama and Sarkozy, who kisses mslim ass daily in France might as well have told Ahmedinejad they don't mind if he attacks Israel whenever he wants to. Both Sarkozy and Obama just called Netanyahu a pest, a liar, a big trouble maker…. persona non grata. This president is a national disgrace and embarrassment. Clearly Israel is on it's own and can expect no help from Obama. If muslims attack Israel or get into an all out war with Israel do you think the USA won't get attacked by them too? Obama just made things a lot more dangerous not only for Israel but for America too. If an EMP goes off over America store shelves will be empty in one week. ATM's won't work… gas pumps won't work… nothing computerized will work… Computerized weapons won't work….. Think about it.

  • Arius

    I wonder, could it be that the Big O and Sarko agreed to leave the mic on? We should consider the possibility.

  • shihab

    these are right leaders …happy to hear that the world leaders realized the cruel face of israeli leaders who kills innocents people of Palestine

  • Joe Munzer

    Oh, sure, American Jews whine and shriek about BHO's anti-Israel bias. In the end, however, he will get 80+ percent of the Jewish vote (as he did in 2008), since American Jews' hatred of America trumps their love for Israel. Just sayin'.

  • http://google.se Doodles

    Somebody necessarily lend a hand to make severely posts I might state. That is the first time I frequented your web page and thus far? I amazed with the analysis you made to create this actual put up incredible. Magnificent process!

  • Herman Caintonette

    IOW, for the day that the parasite finally kills off its host.

  • alan g

    I wouldn’t blame the “parasite” for leaving after it realizes that the head of its host is infected with inoperable brain cancer. The only cure is removing the head completely.

  • ziontruth

    He blames the Jews (or their State… same thing today, in effect) for America's decline. But he is not a Jew-hater, no, certainly not.

    Neo-Nazi scum.

  • Cynic

    I suppose you are aware of a comment in a Czech paper in March or April of this year?

    “It will be far easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to a depraved electorate willing to have such a man for their president.”

    Rather representative of those Liberal Jews, what?

  • Herman Caintonette

    By all means, leave … and don't let the door hit ya where the good Lord`split ya…

  • fiddler

    All I needed was to hear Reverend Wright's rants (followed by his attempts at talking around them) and that was enough for me. The alternative for Dems was another Alinsky-ite, Hillary Clinton.

    When is Saul Alinsky's birthday? We ought to wear black arm bands and mourn the day he was born.