The Durban Perversion


Pages: 1 2 3

Literature available at the first Durban conference

 

The United Nations hosted a full-day celebration on September 22nd commemorating the tenth anniversary of one of its greatest embarrassments since its founding: the adoption of the so-called Durban I Declaration and Programme of Action. This Declaration was the final outcome document of the 2001 anti-Semitic, anti-Western hatefest known formally as the UN World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance. It singled out the Palestinians as the victims of alleged Israeli racism. And the Holocaust deniers who were running Durban I refused to include any reference to the twentieth century’s most vile example of racism, genocide and crimes against humanity.

The “Durban III” self-congratulatory anniversary conference resulted in a consensus reaffirmation of the Durban I Declaration and Programme of Action, as well as the Outcome Document of the Durban II Review Conference adopted in 2009 – the conference Iranian President Ahmadinejad opened with an attack on Israel, which he called the most racist country in the world.

Expecting the anti-Israel, anti-Western agenda to continue at the Durban III conference, thirteen nations decided to boycott the conference – New Zealand, Canada, Australia, United Kingdom, Austria, Germany, Italy, France, the Netherlands, Bulgaria, Poland (which is currently heading the European Union), Israel, and the United States. However, that left 180 UN member states that took no such action against this obscene perversion of the concepts of true anti-racism, tolerance and human rights.

Anne Bayefsky, Hudson Institute senior fellow and director of the Touro College Institute on Human Rights & the Holocaust, correctly pointed out that there is a direct link between the UN’s Durban III gathering on September 22nd and the General Assembly address of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas the following day seeking full state recognition and membership in the United Nations.

“It’s clear that this is intended to be a one-two action: You label Israel racist, and then the next day you say you don’t have to negotiate with it,” Bayefsky said. “Durban is not about combating racism, it is about demonizing Jews and the Jewish state.”

Durban III continued the propaganda campaign waged by the Palestinians and their friends in the United Nations to delegitimize Israel. However, at first glance, if one did not know its historical context, the Durban III final statement would seem perfectly benign. Its surface message is that racism and related acts of intolerance and discrimination occur on a daily basis all around the world. It calls for increased action and accelerated implementation of measures to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance.

The authors of the statement made it as plain vanilla as possible in order to attract as many supporters as they could. Iran did not play a visible role in the planning of the conference this time. Its minister of foreign affairs, Ali Akbar Salehi, filled in at the conference for President Ahmadinejad, who saved his vile remarks for a speech he delivered to the UN General Assembly on the same day as Durban III. Ahmadinejad predictably repeated his golden oldies from past UN speeches, including his Zionist conspiracy theories and questioning who was behind 9/11.

But Ahmadinejad knew that Durban III would achieve its sinister objectives by stealth – reaffirming previous anti-racism world conference declarations going back to 1978 that had expressly promoted the Palestinians’ false narrative that they were the victims of Israeli racism and apartheid. This was just a few years after the UN General Assembly had equated Zionism with racism. While that toxic resolution was revoked in 1991, the campaign to delegitimize the right of Jews to have a single state of their own in their own historic homeland continues.

The first World Conference to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination was held in Geneva back in 1978.  In its Declaration and Programmes of Action, this conference concluded that “[A]partheid, the extreme form of institutionalized racism, is a crime against humanity and an affront to the dignity of mankind and is a threat to peace and security in the world.” While it focused attention on the apartheid regime of South Africa, this document specifically linked Israel to that regime and condemned “the insidious propaganda by the Government of Israel and its zionist and other supporters against the United Nations organs and against Governments which had advocated firm action against apartheid.”   One paragraph accused Israel of practicing “diverse forms of racial discrimination against Palestinians affecting all aspects of their daily lives in a manner which prevents their enjoyment of their elementary human rights on a basis of equality.”

This declaration, written in 1978, decried “the cruel tragedy which befell the Palestinian people 30 years ago and which the (sic) continue to endure– manifested in their being prevented from exercising their right to self-determination on the soil of their homeland, in the dispersal of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians, the prevention of their return to their homes…”

The second World Conference to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination, also held in Geneva, took place in August 1983 and repeated the same rhetoric. It called for “the cessation of all the practices of racial discrimination to which the Palestinians and other inhabitants of the Arab territories occupied by Israel are subjected.”

In 1997, the UN General Assembly called for a World Conference against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance, to take place no later than 2001.

Pages: 1 2 3

  • kafir4life

    I have a question about Obama's mentor, Armond Imalittleteapot. Is he one of those moon-god worshippers and pedophile (mohamat) imitators? Read that terror guide, the koran, that was shat from the anal orfice of said pedophile following a nite of rowdy sex with, then later a meal of his favorite pig, or "mom" as he used to call it?
    He one of them?

    allahu snackbar

  • Linda Rivera

    The most EVIL racists are ALLOWED to perpetrate horrifying atrocities and genocide.

    Who do Arab Muslims hate the most? Blacks or Jews? Or do they equally hate Blacks and Jews? Considering the cruel atrocities, kidnappings and genocide of Black innocents in Libya by the U.S. backed Libya rebels, Muslims must NEVER be given one inch of Jewish land. NEVER.

    STOP THE GENOCIDE!

    The Obama-supported rebels left in charge are now conducting a “large
    scale cleaning in the areas under their control with the extermination
    of all blacks in the capital”, according to The Independent.

    Ruthless genocide of blacks in Libya by US/France/NATO backed Al-Qaeda linked rebels has been going on for months. US/NATO who waged war for months for the Al-Qaeda linked rebels-who murder our troops in Iraq-are RESPONSIBLE for stopping the genocide.

    US/NATO are also responsible for
    rescuing the many terrified blacks kidnapped by the rebels, including the
    kidnapped black children who have been horrendously abused by the
    black-hater Muslim rebels.

    Blacks must have human rights!

    STOP THE GENOCIDE!

    • Indioviejo

      It is a pattern of Arab racism compounded by a Koranic mandate for slavery, which is still practiced today in All Muslim countries. Just remember the ongoing genocide in Sudan.

  • maturin20

    Racism is much better kept quiet and secret where few people can hear it.

  • AntiSharia

    We should have sent a CIA drone to the first Durban conference and blown it off the face of the earth with a hell fire missile. We would have taken out a lot of garbage if we had.

  • Marty

    I once delivered a paper at a professional conference explaining how the un is worse than useless and actually is controlled by a cabal of evil and despicable sociopaths who make life miserable for their own people and are uniformly anti-semitic. It wasn't particularly well received, but the "progress" of the un continues to increase the accuracy of the paper's conclusions. It is time for any democracy with a backbone to leave this racist and genocidal organization and join a real outfit that actually contributes to human advancement and individual rights.

    • Raymond in DC

      Agree. The charter members of that new democratic organization are found in the 14 countries (out of 193) that elected to boycott Durban III: Canada, Israel, US, Italy, Czech Republic, Australia, New Zealand, Poland, Germany, Austria, UK, and a few more.

  • StephenD

    Let them talk. All they really do is expose their warped world view. It becomes a pleasure to go against such loud mouths as Imadinnerjacket when they speak. Anyone associated with this (Durban I, II, & III) IS guilty by association. They're making it easier to castigate them by advocating the withdrawal of aid, isolation, etc. I'm all for them having their little Soirée impressing each other with the amount of venom they can spew toward Israel not realizing that the balance of the world sees them for what they are; barbarians all.

  • DissolvetheUN

    Why wasn't the iranian fascist arrested as soon as it set foot in the USA? There must be a thousand charges of racist incitement and aggression against civilisation that he could be tried for, and be put away for a long time.

    Nowadays we shouldn't wait for *itler reicarnations to kill 60 million people before they are snuffed out.

  • mrbean
  • Ghostwriter

    mrbean,has anyone ever told you what a lowlife you are?

  • maturin20

    Really?