Palestinians Promote Genocide; NYTimes Silent

Pages: 1 2 3

If Palestinian leaders indoctrinate their people to pursue genocide and the New York Times doesn’t report it, is the indoctrination nevertheless of consequence?

In a recent poll of Palestinian opinion – conducted by Stanley Greenberg, leading pollster for the Democratic party, in conjunction with the Palestinian Center for Public Opinion, and sponsored by the Israel Project – 73% agreed with a quote from the Hamas charter on the need to kill all Jews.

Those who get their news on the Arab-Israeli conflict from the Times would likely be surprised and befuddled by this result. Alternatively, they might attribute it to hostility generated by Palestinians living with elements of self-government but, at least in the West Bank, that self-governance significantly short of full independence from Israel. Of course, the latter view makes little sense. Those who embrace it would very probably not expect, for example, that 73% of Tibetans wish to murder all Chinese, or 73% of the people of Darfur desire to kill all Sudanese Arabs; yet these groups live under infinitely more onerous conditions than the Palestinians of the West Bank or Gaza.

In addition, the same poll revealed that only 34% of Palestinians questioned would accept the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel as a permanent solution to the conflict. Presumably, if the “occupation” were the source of Palestinians’ genocidal hostility, they would view attaining an independent state as the arrangement that would assuage that hostility. No doubt the people of Tibet and Darfur, as well as dozens of other populations around the world living under genuine occupation, would be delighted to be offered independence. Rather, 66% of Palestinians said that a two-state arrangement might be a starting point but that the Palestinian goal should be the annihilation of Israel.

In fact, Palestinian dedication to Israel’s destruction, and indeed to the annihilation of the Jews, would be of little surprise to anyone who has bothered to follow the agenda set by Palestinian leaders since Israel’s creation. Insistence on its destruction pre-dated Israel’s presence in the West Bank and Gaza, and calls for killing of all Jews is not only part of the Hamas charter. It has, for example, been a fixture of Palestinian Authority indoctrination – at times in cooperation with Hamas – virtually since creation of the Palestinian Authority in 1994 and subsequent PA control over a large network of media, mosques and schools.

Yet, as central as the promotion of genocide is to Palestinian indoctrination, evasion of the issue is no less central to Times misrepresentation of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. If there is any allusion to it in the Times, it is almost invariably to minimize its significance and even to ridicule Israeli concern about it.

Emblematic is a story by Times reporter William Orme published in October, 2000, shortly after Yasir Arafat had rejected Israeli concessions offered at Camp David, had likewise dismissed President Clinton’s additional proposed concessions, had offered no counter-proposals, and instead had launched his terror war against Israel. On October 13, the day after the lynching of two Israeli reservists in Ramallah, the official Palestinian Authority television station broadcast a sermon by Sheik Ahmad Halabaya in which the sheik declared:

“Whether Likud or Labor, Jews are Jews… They are the terrorists. They are the ones who must be butchered and killed, as Allah the almighty said: Fight them; Allah will torture them at your hands, and will humiliate them… Have no mercy on the Jews, no matter where they are, in any country. Fight them, wherever you are. Wherever you meet them, kill them. Whereverr you are, kill those Jews and those Americans who are like them…”

Halabaya, in this official Palestinian Authority broadcast, also asserted that all of Israel properly belongs to the Arabs.

Orme, in his Times article published eleven days later, notes Israeli complaints of the PA’s using its official media for incitement, and his tone is clearly dismissive of Israel’s position. He writes at one point, “Israelis cite as one egregious example a televised sermon that defended the killing of two soldiers. ‘Whether Likud or Labor, Jews are Jews,’ proclaimed Sheik Ahmad Abu Halabaya in a live broadcast from a Gaza City mosque the day after the killings.” That is all Orme says of the sermon; nothing about Halabaya’s exhortations to butcher Jews wherever one finds them, nothing about his assertions that all of Israel belongs to the Arabs, nothing about his invoking of Allah as calling for the torture and murder of the Jews.

Orme’s intent was obviously to make the Israeli complaints look unfounded and ridiculous.

In June, 2001, New York’s two Senators at the time, Charles Schumer and Hillary Clinton, sent a letter to President Bush lauding his efforts to achieve an Israeli-Palestinian cease-fire but noting that, “Unless the Palestinians take unequivocal steps to stop the rhetoric of hate emanating from official Palestinian Authority (PA) statements, media organizations and textbooks in Palestinian schools, any peace agreement will have little meaning… For nearly ten years, while Mr. Arafat and the Palestinian leadership were speaking the language of peace with Israel and the West, they were continuing their calls for the destruction of Israel to the Palestinian people and the Arab world.”

The Senators included in their letter illustrations of Palestinian incitement and hate-mongering. Among them were a statement from a PA minister, made a few months before the outbreak of hostilities, that Oslo was merely a first step toward Israel’s destruction; an article in an official PA newspaper calling for the killing of Jews wherever they are found; and citations from Palestinian school texts declaring that “there is no alternative to destroying Israel” and proposing that the Jews had been brought to “our land” in order to be annihilated. But the New York Times could still not bring itself to cover the issue of genocidal Palestinian incitement, or of Palestinian incitement more broadly.

The same is true now. The PA declares Israel illegitimate. It denies any historical connection between Jews and the land and insists Jews are simply usurpers in Palestinian lands. It teaches Palestinian children they must dedicate themselves to Israel’s destruction. It lauds murderers of Jews as models whom Palestinian children should aspire to emulate. It promotes the murder of all Jews. Often, PA president Mahmoud Abbas participates directly in this incitement.

And the indoctrination has consequences. As a generation of young Palestinians has grown up knowing only the PA’s education curriculum, and PA media and mosque incitement has shaped broader Palestinian opinion for almost two decades, the indoctrination has rendered the possibility of genuine peace only more remote. The recent poll cited above illustrates this inevitable reality.

(All of which was, in fact, predictable. In the context of Jordan’s having renounced any claims to the West Bank in the late 1980’s, Yitzhak Rabin began promoting the idea of a UN-overseen election in the territories for leaders from within the territories who would then negotiate a peace with Israel. He continued to do so through the months immediately following his becoming prime minister in 1992. Rabin recognized that such leaders would almost certainly be much more amenable to genuine peace than Arafat and those around him in Fatah and the PLO. But while there was significant interest in the proposal among Palestinians in the territories, potential candidates were intimidated by PLO threats. In addition, foreign leaders, and many within Rabin’s own Labor Party, insisted he deal only with Arafat as a “peace partner”; and Rabin ultimately accepted the disastrous Oslo path.)

But if Palestinian incitement to Jew-hatred and genocide has consequences, so, too, does the Times’ consistent failure to cover that incitement. It distorts Times readers’ understanding of the nature of the Palestinian-Israeli, and broader Arab-Israeli, conflict. In addition, as the Times remains in some respects America’s newspaper of record whose stances are regurgitated by myriad other news outlets, it inculcates belief in those distortions in a much wider audience.

But apparently that’s the Times’ intention. The explanation for its failure to cover Palestinian incitement to Jew-hatred and genocide is unwillingness to publish truths that undermine its editorial bias. That bias is, essentially, that genuine peace can be achieved by sufficient Israeli territorial concessions, and that Israel’s making those concessions does not entail exposing the Jewish state to unacceptable threats. This is the line pursued in Times editorials, in the articles of the paper’s op-ed writers, and even in news stories.

For example, in an August 7, 2011, editorial entitled “Palestinians and the U.N.,” the paper expresses “sympathy for [Palestinian] yearning and… frustration. For years, they have been promised a negotiated solution… and they are still empty-handed.” The editorial calls on the United States and “its partners” to “put a map on the table, with a timeline for concluding negotiations,” supports that map being based “on pre-1967 borders with mutually agreed land swaps,” (in fact, there were no pre-1967 borders, only armistice lines, and the Times itself has corrected this error on multiple occasions in the past but apparently still cannot resist repeating it for its rhetorical value) and ridicules Prime Minister Netanyahu and others who characterize those lines as “indefensible.”

Nowhere in the editorial is there any reference to the obstacles to peace presented by Palestinian leaders’ refusal to accept Israel’s legitimacy within any borders and their persistent  incitement to the state’s destruction. Of course, the editorial is silent on the Palestinian promotion of the extermination of Jews.

The same basic biases were recently repeated in another Times editorial on September 11, entitled “Palestinian Statehood.” In this piece, the editors indict the United States, Israel and Europe for failing to offer Abbas enough to dissuade him from seeking recognition of a Palestinian state at the UN. Standing truth on its head – ignoring that it has been Abbas who has consistently refused to negotiate, except briefly near the end of Israel’s ten-month construction freeze in the West Bank, and has instead waited for the Obama administration to deliver Israeli concessions as a condition for negotiations – The Times editors, in their ascription of fault, assert, “We put the greater onus on Mr. Netanyahu, who has used any excuse to thwart peace efforts.”

Pages: 1 2 3


    TOILET PAPER IS EXPENSIVE, WE USED OUR CRIMINAL COMMUNIST PARER LIKE TOILET PAPER ?rip it put string thru hole and hang on the nail, next to toilet enviroment friendly.

    • Flowerknife_us

      Using it for toilet paper still leaves one at risk of something fowl rubbing off.

  • Asher

    I predict the New York Times will fall because they are actually supporting Terrorism. Some Newspapers and Media outlets have contributed whole heartedly to Jihad too.

  • StephenD

    “And the indoctrination has consequences. As a generation of young Palestinians has grown up knowing only the PA’s education curriculum, and PA media and mosque incitement has shaped broader Palestinian opinion for almost two decades, the indoctrination has rendered the possibility of genuine peace only more remote.”
    Yet and still the US provides aid to this pretense of a people seeking peace.
    The world is willfully blind to Israel and will pay the price. I look forward in hope. I still expect to see the 3rd Temple built and that would mean the Dome is gone. This tells me that though all hell may break, Israel will triumph…Thank G_d!!

    • Dawn

      It will happen, the Bible in Revelation predicts a third temple being built. As a taxpaying American citizen I am sick and tired of my tax money being funneled to Palestinian terrorism.

  • Ben

    leftist journalists and writers where always tolerant to brutality of the next totalitarian ideology: in Soviet Russia they where best friends of terrorist V CH K ( KGB`s predecessor) and understood "class-hate".Today they are tolerant to planning genocide and ethnic cleansing of Jews as the inevitable excess of "liberation movement".
    There aren`t an inhuman actions that won1t be justificated by leftist media.

  • Linda Rivera

    Arafat and his cruel PLO were REWARDED for their satanic atrocities and mass murders of Lebanon's Christians. Arafat and his PLO were introduced to Israel as their "peace" partners and provided with mega money, land and weapons. Arafat and his PLO terrorists did EXACTLY as was expected of them: they severely persecuted the Arab Christians of Judea, Samaria and Gaza and waged ruthless jihad against Israel's Jews.

    Every person responsible for bringing into Israel and empowering, financing and military training global terrorist, Arafat, and the PLO/PA Muslim terrorists have an all-consuming hate for both Jews and Christians.

  • Linda Rivera

    In a recent poll of Palestinian opinion – 73% agreed with a quote from the Hamas charter on the need to kill all Jews.

    This religion-inspired murderous hate for Jews is well known by ruling elites. The elites know that Muslims can't wait to perpetrate a Second Holocaust of Jews. UN/US/EU/UK and other nations' leaders are guilty of wickedly seeking a Second Holocaust via an illegitimate Muslim terror state implant that will reduce little Israel at mid-section to 9 miles wide INDEFENSIBLE, Auschwitz borders.

    Not one inch of Jewish Holy Land to genocidal monsters!

  • dr Dave

    The Times' news department is run by Jewess Jill Abramson. For the love of God man, how can you expect this Harvard educated Jew to be favorable to Israel. The antithesis is guaranteed to be true lest she and all the Jews running theJew York Times be accused of consiring to run the world. The NT Times' co-conspirator paper in Israel is Haaretz. Their job, discredit Israel at every twist & turn, try with every editorial to depose Netanyahu and get The Queenn of Surrender, ,TZIPI Livni, in power. To them she's a great example of a "brilliant" & "strong" Jewess. To the Usraeli voter they are glad she's long gone as she is mostly responsible for Israel's security decline. Ultimately Abramson & her Jewish counterparts at the NY Times would prefer to see Israel destroyed than be embarrassed as being Jews who support a strong Israel. They are spineless as they haven't the guts to buck the trend of overwhelming far-Left Jew hate from non-Jewish & self-loathing Jewish elitists & "intellectuals" who dominate their industry.

  • KKKK

    to all readers, i agree with this assesment of the FALSEtinian question. they are indocriated from childhood to view Israel as illegalment and "occuiped Palestine," rather than an independent sovergian state. this is reinfroced in mosques and meida throughout the life of a FALSEtinian. by contrast, terrorism aganist Israeli civilians is protrayed as heroic "resistance to the occuipers" and even streets are named after martyrs. Israel failes to see this, and thinks that "peace" can be achieved by negotations.

  • alphakilosingh

    It is simple.
    If Muslims want to enact a genocide, it is perfectly in order, because it carries religious sanction.
    If others either pre-empt or retaliate, it is foul, because it does not carry religious sanction.
    NYT being a religious paper, is with supporting those who are following their religion.
    Simple. Is it not?

  • DanKelso

    Opposing Arab colonialism and Muslim theocracy, oppression of women and non-Muslims, and supporting the free and democratic state of Israel are progressive positions.

  • DanKelso

    Kenneth Levin is totally right and the NY Times hasn't said one word about this.
    Abbas honors mastermind of Munich Olympics massacre.
    July 7, 2010
    PA TV honors Sbarro pizza shop terrorists.
    Itamar Marcus and Nan Jacques Zilberdik.
    Sept. 4, 2011

    PA TV host sends "best wishes" to "our glorious" prisoner
    who transported suicide bomberto attack that killed 15, including 7 children.
    These are the sadists that the left supports.

  • DanKelso
    Abbas honors terrorist Dalal Mughrabi, killer of 37
    This week Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas once again honored the memory of the terrorist Dalal Mughrabi – this time by sponsoring a ceremony celebrating the 50th anniversary of her birth. Mughrabi led the worst terror attack in Israel's history in 1978, when she and other terrorists hijacked a bus and killed 37 civilians. Present at the ceremony were Palestinian dignitaries and a children's marching band. Earlier this year, Abbas sponsored a computer center named after Mughrabi.
    The PA further glorified Mughrabi on the date of her birth when the Governor of Ramallah announced the naming of the "Dalal Mughrabi Square".

  • DanKelso

    You notice Thomas Friedman thinks Abbas is a moderate.
    If this a moderate, then Ted Bundy was a moderate.
    Abbas financed the Munich Massacre.

    Abbas honoring the terrorist Ayyash for all his massacres against Jews in the mid 90s.
    Fogel Baby-Stabber ‘Proud of What I Did’
    Hakim Awad and Amjad Awad happy about Fogel massacre.

    PA glorifies Eilat massacre.
    August 24, 2001

  • DanKelso
    PA TV: Western Wall area to be turned into Arab housing neighborhood.
    Palestinian Authority TV:
    Western Wall area to be turned into Arab housing neighborhood -Jewish presence in Jerusalem will be erased from history.
    Aug. 17, 2011

  • DanKelso

    Hamas and the PLO derive their legitimacy by killing Israeli secretaries and high schoolers.

    The Palestinians have raised an entire generation to believe that the highest aspiration in life is to kill Jews. The Palestinians are engaged in an unremitting campaign of targetted murder of women and children. When the Palestinians massacre Israeli school children on buses, and babies in baby carriages, they celebrate. They have raised an entire generation to believe that the the ! highest cultural and religious value is the massacre of Jews. Through the Arabs hate, an entire generation has lost the capacity for humanity.

  • DanKelso

    Kenneth Levin wrote, In a recent poll of Palestinian opinion – 73% agreed with a quote from the Hamas charter on the need to kill all Jews.

    We should remember, No less than 84% of the Palestinians supported the Mercaz Harav yeshiva massacre in 08 in Jerusalem.