Connecting the Nuclear Dots on Iran


Pages: 1 2

With the IAEA discussing a dramatic new report from its nuclear inspectors in Iran, are some – such as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – exaggerating the imminence of a nuclear-armed Iran? Or is the U.S. government hopelessly misleading us that the threat is manageable through sanctions and tough talk?

A series of extraordinary leaks in the Israeli press last week revealed an internal debate within Israel’s inner security cabinet over the need to launch a pre-emptive strike on Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons sites.

According to these reports, Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Barak favored the strikes; Vice prime minister and strategic affairs minister Moshe “Bogey” Ya’alon reportedly was opposed. The leaks came on the heels of the third test-launch of a Jericho 3 nuclear-capable strategic missile, and what Israel claimed were long-planned air force exercises over Sardinia to simulate an attack on Iran.

According to former CIA case officer turned novelist Chet Nagle, the Jericho 3 test may have been designed by Israel to send quite a different message than the one being played up in the press.

Any Israeli attack on Iran is sure to make of Israel an international pariah, Nagle argues. Plus, the likelihood of success – that is, in destroying or disabling all of Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities so they have nothing to launch on the morning after the attack – is low.

“If you’re going to go to all that trouble and be a pariah, why not take one of those Jericho missiles, and detonate it 300 miles above the surface and deliver an EMP strike on Iran?” Nagel says. “That would stop their clock – if it’s electric – as well as all those centrifuges and everything else. Then the Greens can take over the country and we can go back in and rebuild the grid.”

Nagel was speaking with me and other analysts last week at a briefing organized by EMPact America for Congressional staff. His comments, while purely suggestive in nature, hint at a much larger strategic truth: if Israel is going to attack Iran, they have to make sure they totally disable Iran’s ability to launch a nuclear weapon.

How better to achieve that goal than a nuclear electro-magnetic pulse strike that would take down Iran’s power grid – and with it, even secret nuclear weapons plants Israel might fail to hit otherwise?

EMP or not, Israel was certainly making a show of force in an effort to convince Iran to back off its nuclear plans. On that score, from what we see in public at least, Israel had little success.

According to Iranian press reports cited on Sunday by the Debkafile, top Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) commanders in Iran were shaking their fists.

In one unsigned editorial from the IRGC’s Fars news agency, the Guards threatened to utterly destroy Israel with just four missiles if Israel dared to launch any kind of attack on Iran.

Which brings us to the question, what if Iran already had the bomb?

Former IRGC officer and undercover CIA spy, Reza Kahlili, believes Iran acquired nuclear warheads from a former Soviet republic at the end of the Cold War, and has designed its own nuclear warhead with the help of Ukrainian scientists.

As I reported in my 2005 book, Countdown to Crisis: the Coming Nuclear Showdown with Iran, IRGC commander Gen. Mohsen Rezai traveled to North Korea in January 1993, seeking assistance in arming those warheads. My informant, a top advisor to Gen. Rezai who later defected (and who spoke with me), said the North Koreans agreed to provide that help.

From that day forward, Iran believed it had a nuclear deterrent – not a strike force, but at least a deterrent – and its behavior changed. The IRGC believed they could carry out aggressive acts against the United States, including a terror alliance with Osama Bin Laden and al Qaeda, and the U.S. would never strike back with any consequence, and certainly would not strike the Iranian homeland.

This week’s IAEA report is only the latest in a series of revelations from the UN nuclear watchdog in Vienna that has documented Iran’s long march toward nuclear weapons.

Despite these reports, nuclear skeptics continue to claim that Iran is hopelessly disorganized, incompetent, incapable, and lacking the will to defy the international community and deploy nuclear weapons.

Just three weeks ago, the same nuclear analyst quoted this week by the Washington Post to sound the alarm about the latest IAEA report on Iran’s nuclear weapons progress, David Albright, was telling folks how the Stuxnet virus had crippled Iran’s ability to enrich uranium.

As they say, what a difference a week makes.

Pages: 1 2

  • Ariely

    Part1
    THE WEST IS CLOSE TO GET; ""CHASE MATE""
    1:To Iran's Islamist leaders nuclear power and its weaponization represent security for the regime as well as a means by which Iran's internationalist agenda might be enlarged

    Islamist Iran ideology people should know.
    (All the following points are Iranian leader's declaration and documents, easy to prove and not misleading propaganda)
    *The Final Armageddon war between Iran Islamist and the world will be soon
    *The war result will be the worldwide enforcement of Shia type Islamic mighty caliphate.
    *End of democracy and liberalism
    *Denying human rights and woman equality.
    *Main terror supporter.
    *USA is the big satin.

    2: Prof Bernard Lewis the West’s #1 expert on Islam warned of the:
    APOCALYPTIC MINDSET OF THE IRANIAN EADERSHIP.
    The apocalyptic time has come.“Ma’adi” the Muslim messiah is already her.
    THE FINAL BATTLE HAS ALREDY BEGUN.
    THE END OF TIME HAS COME-and sooner the better.
    Islamism theocrats cannot be deterred by the arms control strategies that worked with the Soviets.
    __

  • Ariely

    Part2
    THE WEST IS CLOSE TO GET; ""CHASE MATE""
    3: Persians – clever people- (today called Iranians) invented the Chess game.
    The winner of the game has to be a master on advance planning of many moves as well as misleading the opponent.
    Are the Islamist Iranian theocrats the new world champions?
    The problem faced by the world is not with the Iranian people.
    The problem is with the Islamist theocrat regime.

    • Spinoneone

      Unfortunately, as things seem to stand now, lots of Iranian people will die in any effort to topple the Islamist theocratic regime.

  • Steve Chavez

    Israel is forcibly being put in a corner: First Strike or Destruction of itself! With Obama as an enemy of Israel, and yet American Jews still support him although there are many FAKE JEWS, Israel will have to go it alone and will also have to defend itself from Hamas and Hezbollah terrorist attacks including from thousands of Arab Spring "peaceful" demonstrators who will join in the fight since their goal now is to end any peace agreements with Israel.

    Israel does have large drones that can stay up in the air for 24 hours including new air refueling capabilities but can they hide from Iran's anti-aircraft defenses? Will Iran mine the whole Persian Gulf and the Straits of Hormuz thereby shutting off all oil supplies to the world?

    So, what will Saudi Arabia do? Would they attack Iran knowing that Iran's pursuit of a bomb would be used to also blackmail the Saudi's and pretty much do anything they want and takeover who they want? Venezuela also said they would cut off our oil shipments if we attacked Iran. BLACKMAIL?

    In all cases, it doesn't look good but for the future of the world, Iran's nuclear program MUST be taken out NOW! To hell with Russia/KGB Putin, China, and Venezuela. We don't need any of these TERRORIST STATE ENABLERS! Shutting off China would be good for the world since their new found "Middle Class" would again become peasants and they will revolt! That would be a good thing!

    • Freddy

      You're dribbling all over yourself again…

    • Asher

      I am ashamed of the President we have. He has consistently ignored warnings about Iran, and also Islamic Terrorist groups, thrown Israel under the bus, and treated PM Netanyahu like Dirt. From Day one he has been destroying the US defense systems and enabling our natural enemies to attack us and destroy Israeli and Western civilization…Leon Panetta says cuts to the Pentagon budget will invite aggression, without enough man power at Military Installations..We can blame this administration for what is to come in the future. I fully support Israel and wish we could do more to help the IDF and Israel's people. All of this Tyranny is coming to a head one way or another. Israel's courage will come from the Almighty.

  • StephenD

    I really am not a religious person per se, but I know we have NOTHING to fear. Israel will suffer greatly to be sure but it will not be destroyed. I happen to believe the prophecy of the third temple being built and also the 2 prophets that will preach before the end comes.
    I only hope Israel can hang on until there is a real American in the W.H. and America can stand shoulder to shoulder with Israel again. Maybe Iran will have new leaders by then who would rather embrace life and this talk of doom can be put to rest.

  • http://jewishdefense.org AJ Weberman

    The Boy Who Cried Wolfowitz
    If the neo-cons had not made those false claims about Iraq having WMDs and embarking on a program to produce a nuclear device Israel would be in a much better position to take out the Iranian bomb program and assassinate the Hitler of Iran.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      The Boy Who Cried Wolfowitz
      If the neo-cons had not made those false claims about Iraq having WMDs and embarking on a program to produce a nuclear device Israel would be in a much better position to take out the Iranian bomb program and assassinate the Hitler of Iran.

      Actually, there was a lot of false claims made by the Bush administration, but none of them were intentional as the self-hating Left and the Ron Paul blame America first anarcho-kooks both propagandize. In any event, as for as I was concerned, Saddam had to go because he repeatedly violated the terms of the ceasefire agreement he signed in 1991, and if those terms of that agreement weren't enforced, then all future such agreements wouldn't be worth the paper they were signed on.

      Anyway, the invasion of Iraq and the ouster of Saddam weren't the problem. The problem was the subsequent fantasy based nation-building missions in Afghanistan and Iraq, which couldn't have been more counterproductive or misguided, as winning the hearts and minds of Muslims who are obligated by Islam to hate our unbeliever guts no matter what and establishing Western-style democracy in the Islamic world are absolutely impossible.

      Thus, instead of pursuing two silly fantasy based nation-building missions in Afghanistan and Iraq that were incredibly misguided, exceedingly counterproductive, and preordained to fail even before they were ever implemented, we should have instead obliterated the ruling Mullahs of Iran and destroyed their nuclear weapons program, and also subsequently confiscated the nuclear weapons arsenal of Pakistan and destroyed its nuclear weapons program as well. In fact, we could easily have accomplished both objectives for a small fraction of the price we paid in Afghanistan and Iraq for absolutely nothing.

      • KH

        And if the CIA had minded their own business in 1953 instead of forcing the Shah on a sovereign nation we probably never would have had the 444 days of hostages nor the hostilities we get to enjoy today with Iran. Neocons are constantly sticking their noses where they don’t belong. Supported OBL in Russia. Result? 3000 dead in New York. Supported Saddam in the Iraq-Iran war. Cost thousands of lives to kick him out later. The same things have been said every time a country has gotten the bomb. The North Korean midget keeps threatening but he knows it would be assured annihilation. Such gnashing of teeth when Pakistan and India got the bomb. We endured 60 years of the Cold War and Russia with the bomb in a much more threatening capacity.

        • ObamaYoMoma

          In other words, it is always America's fault no matter what in your extremely deluded and mentally handicapped mind.

          So according to you, Obama's American bashing Rev. Wright, and your mentally deficient self-hating idol, Ron Paul, the 9/11 jihad attacks were not really jihad attacks for the purpose of making Islam supreme, per the sixth and most important pillar of Islam. What they were instead was America's chickens coming home to roost, and never mind the fact that Mossadegh, who had betrayed the Shah and attempted to usurp his power, was a secular apostate from Islam, meaning that had he still been alive in 1979 when the ruling Mullah regime ruthlessly seized power thanks to that self-hating mentally incompetent loon Jimmy Carter pulling the Persian rug out from under the terminally ill Shah, he would have been among the first apostates executed by the new ruling Mullah regime.

          Not to mention also that the 9/11 jihadists were all Sunnis, which are the eternal mortal enemies of the Shiites of Iran. You know…there is a reason us normal people call that self-hating/blame America first moron Ron Paul and his unhinged moronic acolytes, kooks. It's because you loons are all mentally handicapped kooks!

          By the way, moonbat, the Shah relative to the ruling Mullahs and virtually all other Middle East dictators, was a benevolent ruler, as he gave females and non-Muslims equality. He also ended the feudal system of agriculture by confiscating the land held by the Islamic waqfs and redistributing it to the people.

          Indeed, the Shah is not the devil the Left makes him out to be. He was another Kemal Ataturk trying to lift up his country from 7th century Islamic barbarism to 20th century modernism. However, since everything he was doing at the time was considered un-Islamic, the clerics and their followers naturally were waging jihad against the Shah and his government.

          So yes the Shah and his SAVAK were ruthless, but ruthless only in self-defense, as the clerics and their followers were trying to kill the Shah and destroy his government. However, with respect to the vast overwhelming majority of Iranians who weren't trying to kill him and destroy his government, the Shah was a very benevolent ruler.

          As for as your other unhinged self-hating screed goes, it's too idiotic, moronic, and absurd for me to waste time commenting. Have a nice day kook and if you know what is good for you, don't lose your day job.

    • Adam

      Wow, that would have been fun! We could have done what the Liberals and Progressives wanted and not gone to Iraq so we would now have a Nuclear capable Iran and Iraq… Brilliant observation, AJ.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Any Israeli attack on Iran is sure to make of Israel an international pariah, Nagle argues. Plus, the likelihood of success – that is, in destroying or disabling all of Iran’s nuclear weapons capabilities so they have nothing to launch on the morning after the attack – is low.

    Uhm…don't look now but Israel is already an international pariah the last time I checked. Indeed, there isn't anything that Israel could do to make it a bigger international pariah, even if it decided to use tactical nukes, which, by the way, given the enormous stakes involved, I would fully support.

    Of course, should Israel attack Iran's nuclear weapons facilities all it could do is temporarily set back Iran's quest for nuclear weapons, as the only county in the world that could actually destroy Iran's quest for nuclear weapons would be the USA. As regime change will be required to end Iran's quest for nuclear weapons once and for all, and by regime change let me make it clear that I'm not advocating a boots on the ground occupation as in Afghanistan and Iraq. Instead, I'm advocating obliterating the current ruling Mullah regime and destroying the nuclear weapons facilities, and then exiting the country ASAP as soon as that mission has been accomplished, at the same time deliberately leaving behind our death and destruction to fester and to serve as deterrence. I could care less what eventually emerges to replace the Mullahocracy, as in the case of Iran, nothing could be any worse.

    Many people point to the grave national security threat that a nuclear armed Iran would be for Israel to insinuate that if the USA acted against Iran that it would be acting on the behalf of the so-called Israeli parasites, but the truth is a nuclear armed Iran would present a tremendously grave national security threat for the USA and indeed the entire West as well, as it just so happens that Israel's national security interest happens to coincide with the USA and the West's national security interest.

    And yet, in a recent talk to intelligence community retirees and other guests, the Director of National Intelligence, Lt. Gen. James Clapper​, said his fingerprints were “all over” the 2007 NIE and that he stood by it one hundred percent.

    As a matter of fact, Lt. Gen. James Clapper wouldn't hold the prominent job he holds today in the Obama administration if he wasn't completely incompetent. Likewise for Obama's counter-terrorism chief, John Brennan, who believes that jihad is a personal inner struggle only.

    Anyway, as I have said on here repeatedly ad nauseum, when the Bush administration like a Dhimmicrat administration on steroids elected to double the size, scope and power of the federal government via the creation of the massive Department of Homeland Security and the immense National Intelligence Directorate, while at same time usurping American's heretofore constitutionally protected rights and freedoms, instead of using common sense and outlawing Islam and banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP, it was the biggest federal boondoggle ever in Us history.

    Likewise, when the Bush administration declared a so-called “War on Terror,” which is a manifestation of Western civilization only and not a manifestation of Islamic civilization at all, and then proceeded to pursue two extremely idiotic fantasy based nation-building missions that couldn't have been more counterproductive and misguided, instead of following in the footsteps of former president Harry S Truman and instituting a strategy of containing the expansion of Islam the same way Truman had done with respect to Communism, those two fantasy based, extremely counterproductive, and very misguided nation-building missions in Afghanistan and Iraq, although too many Wilsonian RINOs and neo-con Republicans blinded by PC multiculturalism still refuse to admit it, inevitably turned into the two biggest strategic blunders ever in US history, as the Republican Party during the Bush administration became virtually indistinguishable from the Dhimmicrat Party.

    • Adam

      "at the same time deliberately leaving behind our death and destruction to fester and to serve as deterrence."

      Not sure if was an oversight, but we are talking about people who strap bombs to themselves and self detonate. No one really wants to say it because on it's face it seems harsh, but the only solution is full scale war, and let the dogs off the leash this time. Take the ROE's and throw them in the circular file and let them have everything we got. It will take decades to accomplish but until they realize that we are not to be messed with, and that we can be as morbid and vicious as them if not more so, they will just ride it out and wait for their next chance. The problem is systemic and needs to be taken out at the root.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Actually, the correct solution is to institute a policy similar to the Truman Doctrine, which instituted a policy of containing the spread of Communism, except this time it must be containing the spread of Islam.

        Hence, the first step would be to outlaw Islam and ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP. The next phase would be the elimination of the most imminent threats, i.e., Iran's ruling Mullah regime and their nuclear weapons program must be obliterated and Pakistan's nuclear weapons arsenal and nuclear weapons program must be confiscated or destroyed. Then once the first two steps have been accomplished, we should next seize and occupy the Mideast oilfields and confiscate the immense unearned oil wealth of the Saudis and the Gulf State Emirs, otherwise those resources will be used to finance and fund jihad against the West perpetually. The final step is to completely isolate the Islamic world from the West.

        With respect to the final step, since the Islamic world is completely incapable of producing anything on its own other than jihad, murder, oppression, and lots and lots of misery, without the West the Islamic world will quickly devolve into abject crushing poverty, where we should let them live in their own Islamic paradises for a few miserable generations until the ideology of Islam inevitably becomes discredited in due time.

        Anyway, such a solution is far less disruptive and destructive than a full scale war and will accomplish the same exact thing as well.

        • Adam

          I do like the idea of isolating them from the rest of us, problem is, what do you do with the Islamists that are not in the Middle East? Interment camps will play right into their hands. In a way everything you describe is exactly what they want us to do. Islamists have used our media against, so far that is their best weapon on us. Now in order to do what you suggest, certain Constitutional rights will need to be violated other wise we are no better than them. Full on boots on the ground is the only way to go in this case. Just hope we have the stomach for it.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I do like the idea of isolating them from the rest of us, problem is, what do you do with the Islamists that are not in the Middle East?

            As I said, you ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration from the West with all of its excess baggage ASAP, as zero Muslims living in the West translates into not only zero jihad attacks, but also the savings of hundreds of billions of dollars currently being wasted in various and useless security measures that do nothing more than create a false sense of security, while usurping at the same time our heretofore constitutionally protected rights to privacy and freedom. Indeed, zero Muslims living in the West equals zero jihad attacks. Again, the key words here being ban and reverse, especially the keyword reverse and not to just the Middle East, but indeed the entire Islamic world.

            Interment camps will play right into their hands.

            Damn…who is suggesting interment camps?

            In a way everything you describe is exactly what they want us to do.

            Really? They want us to outlaw Islam and then ban and reverse mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage?

            Islamists have used our media against

            When you say Islamists, it implies that there are Muslims that aren't Islamists. In other words, it is a PC multicultural loaded term and when you use such PC multicultural loaded terms such as Islamist, all it does is reenforce false PC multicultural myths and fantasies.

            Now in order to do what you suggest, certain Constitutional rights will need to be violated other wise we are no better than them.

            Not really, as Islam is not a faith-based religion. Instead, it is a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that requires of all adherents total, complete, and unconditional submission to the will of Allah. Indeed, the word Islam in Arabic means submission and the word Muslim in Arabic means one who submits.

            In fact, adherents of faith-based religions are perfectly free to question and even challenge the texts and tenets of their respective religions and to even freely leave their respective religions or convert to another religion altogether if they so desire, but because the freedom of conscience in Islam is forbidden, those same actions in Islam, blasphemy in the first case and apostasy in the second, are both capital offenses.

            Indeed, what faith-based religions punish blasphemy and apostasy under the pain of death similar to Islam? The answer, of course, is none of them do and only Islam does, proving irrefutably that Islam is not a faith-based religion and is therefore not protected under the establishment clause of the first amendment.

            As a matter of fact, although Islam masquerades as being a religion to dupe the societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of demographic conquest to make Islam supreme, the truth is Islam is not a faith-based religion at all, but instead a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology, and as such Islam is far closer to other totalitarian ideologies such as Communism than it is to being a religion. As just like Communism, Islam seeks world domination, and the end result of Islam just like Communism, is totalitarianism and lots and lots of misery.

            Full on boots on the ground is the only way to go in this case. Just hope we have the stomach for it.

            Good luck with that, as PC multiculturalism pervades our Western societies today. So, of course, there is no stomach or will for it, especially when there are much less disruptive and destructive solutions to contain the spread of Islam. Not to mention also, that unless you kill every Muslim in the world, which is in excess of 1.6 billion Muslims, a full out boots on the ground war as you insist would be a major bloody fiasco of astronomical proportions. Plus, who is going to recruit and pay for the mammoth sized military that would be required for decades as you say to pursue such a debacle, especially when the USA and Europe are teetering on the brink of financial collapse today?

          • Adam

            "Damn…who is suggesting interment camps? "

            Have you noticed our illegal immigration problems? How do we expel all the radicals currently residing in this country based on only the cultism they practice? I don't see many returning voluntarily, especially the ones here intent on doing us harm. While things heat up, that may create more Tariq Mehanna types. This needs tobe taken into consideration. This will involve keeping a watchful eye, and unfortunately some are in fact US citizens who do have fundemental protected rights. Some were even born here, and if we attempt to get them to denounce Islam it will be paitnted as a new age Inquisition. These are just some factors that will need to be considered in order to keep the peace here in the US. As far as Europe, they are on their own with this one. Too many of those countries have done far more enabling than even we have.

            So ultimatly if we can't stomach a traditional war over seas, fought with honor, the things that would be needed domesticaly will be far worse in the eyes of the PC'ers.

          • Adam

            "When you say Islamists, it implies that there are Muslims that aren't Islamists."

            Well if I implied that, I apologize. I do understand that not all Muslims are active in the Jihad, but I acknowledge that the central teachings of Islam is violence and domination.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            I do understand that not all Muslims are active in the Jihad, but I acknowledge that the central teachings of Islam is violence and domination.

            Actually, you are incorrect. The sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty in Islam for EVERY MUSLIM to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. Indeed, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty for only so-called radicals to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty for only so-called extremists to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, while at the same time giving an exemption and free pass to so-called moderates to fight jihad in the cause of Allah. Instead, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty for ALL MUSLIMS to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. No exceptions.

            Hence, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS are jihadists. A few of them are violent jihadists, while most of them are non-violent jihadists, and the few that aren't jihadists aren't Muslims at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of Islam should be executed.

    • Asher

      We know Israel will have to stand alone at some point, not without support from the American people, but from the U.S. government and other anti-semetic nations…Jerusalem will eventually prevail…God will not allow his Holy Chosen City to be destroyed forever, but there will be battles and wars first, we are in Birth Pains, Man will turn against his brother, and Nation against Nation before everything comes to a final climax.

  • 080

    I remember reading in one of Yossef Bodansky's early books that Iran had the bomb. That was years ago.

  • gazza

    The US should remove all Neo-cons (mostly Jews who support Middle East wars defending Israel), and these people.

    $$$
    Head of US Treasury, Timothy Geithner, (JEW)
    Head of US Federal Reserve, Ben Bernanke (JEW)
    Head of International Monetary Fund, Christine Lagarde (JEW)
    Head of World Bank, Robert B. Zoellick (JEW)
    Goldman Sachs head (Wall Street’s largest bank), Marcus Goldman (JEW)
    National Economic Council Director, Gene Sperling (JEW).

    POLITICS
    United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Dianne Feinstein (JEW)
    Deputy Secretary of State, Jim Steinberg (JEW)
    Supreme Court of the United States (9 total) Stephen G. Breyer, Elena Kagan. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, (3 JEWS) – can overturn laws and executive actions it deems unlawful or unconstitutional
    Chief Performance Officer of the United States (responsible for federal budget and government reform), Jeffery Zients (JEW)
    Senior advisor to the President, David Plouffe (JEW)
    Speaker of House of Representatives – John Boehner (JEW)
    Senate leader – Joe Biden (JEW)

    MEDIA (Control the media – control people’s minds) – tip of the iceberg…
    Wikipedia boss – Jimmy Wales (JEW)
    Google founders – Sergy Brin (JEW)
    Facebook founder – Mark Zuckerberg (JEW)
    Pornographic Talk show host – Howard Stern (JEW)
    Disney owner – Michael Eisner (JEW)
    Pornography boss – Steve Hirsch (JEW) owns 80% US porn industry
    MTV and Viacom owner – Sumner Redstone (JEW)
    Porn actor – Ron Jeremy (JEW)
    Anti-Christian apologists – Sam Harris, Christopher Hitchens (JEWS)
    Time Warner CEO – Gerald Levin (JEW)
    Washington Post –
    New York Times –

    Jew$ are 2% OF THE US POPULATION but control ALL KEY AREAS of US politics/media/banking

    This must be racist because blacks outnumber JEW$ by 7 to 1 but there are no black names in the above lists. There are also no Chinese, Japanese, Mexican, Indian, or Arab names. Mmmmm…

    Could the above list of JEWI$H names have anything to do with the USA spending billions on supporting Israel and fighting in the Middle East?

    Could the above list of JEWI$H names have anything to do with the FED and US bankruptcy?

    I have given ENORMOUS proof, but people on this forum STILL CAN’T SEE who is ruining America.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      In other words, according to you the US should just submit to Islam and pay the Jizya and except its dhimmitude.

  • Amused

    hey gazza , the Jews are not just runnng the US , they're running THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD MAN !
    But since they're not slaughtering christians , slaughtering Hindus , suicide bombing , killing innocents , crashing airplanes into civilian buildings , blowing up schools , burning churches , cutting people's heads off , honor killing women , blowing up buses and subways , launching missles into other countries , slaughtering school children ,murdering Budhists in Thailand , and just more or less wreaking havoc , bloodshed and misery wherever they hgappen to live , we'll CONCENTRATE ON DOING SOIMETHING ABOUT PEOPLE LIKE YOU ,AND THE REST OF YOUR MUSLIM CULT >

  • http://www.genussallee.at Hannes L.

    Don't let the iranian clericals have nukes!!!!! the western world must do all that they cannot get mwd.
    Feinkost kaufen über den Feinkostversand

  • Asher

    Want to find a way to totally immobilize the US Super Power, shoot up a Missile from a Sub or ship, and cause the Loss of Technology! Evil is ruling us!