The Accountability Charade

Pages: 1 2

You can’t spell “accountability” without “A,” “C” and “T.” But in Washington, government officials routinely get away with “taking personal responsibility” by mouthing empty words devoid of action. Heads nod in collective agreement that mistakes were made. But heads never roll. The Obama administration has raised this accountability charade to an art form.

At a House Energy Committee hearing on the half-billion-dollar bankrupt Solyndra loan-guarantee disaster, Energy Secretary Steven Chu made a grand pretense of falling on his sword. The neon-green solar energy zealot told lawmakers in prepared testimony that the “final decisions on Solyndra were mine, and I made them with the best interest of the taxpayer in mind.” But again and again, Chu admitted, those decisions were made with serial cluelessness about the political jockeying, dire financial warnings, legal red flags and conflicts of interest that “everybody (else) and their dog” knew about (as GOP Rep. Joe Barton of Texas politely pointed out).

While former Democratic chief inquisitor Henry Waxman praised Chu’s “reputation for integrity” as “unimpeachable,” Chu came across as more Mr. Magoo than Mr. Clean.

Chu said he was “unaware” of the Department of Energy’s own staff predictions two years ago that Solyndra would face a serious cash-flow crisis today.

Chu said he was “unaware” of administration pressure on Solyndra to suppress layoff announcements until after the November 2010 midterm elections. “I don’t know. I just learned about that,” he shirked.

In fact, he used the phrase “I am aware of it now” at least a half-dozen times. If there were a Nobel Prize for Unknowing, Chu would be two-time shoo-in. GOP House Energy Committee Chairman Cliff Stearns summed up:

“We talked about the August 2009 email predicting Solyndra would be out of cash in September 2011. You knew about that, but you didn’t seem to know about that.

The PricewaterhouseCoopers concerns about Solyndra, you didn’t seem real concerned or weren’t aware of it.

The White House emailing your chief of staff regarding their concerns with the PricewaterhouseCoopers report, you didn’t seem to know too much about your chief of staff’s awareness of that.

The request to hold off announcement of the DOE loan, and request by your agency to Solyndra to hold off on announcing layoffs till after the midterm election, you don’t have any recollection of this.

So what I am saying is that through all of this you seem to have an unawareness.”

In short, Chu took full responsibility for everything he wasn’t aware of … until it was too late.

Pages: 1 2

  • SMeloche

    Over and over and over again it happens. Caught stuffing incriminating secret documents into your socks? "whoops!". Caught with thousands of confidential FBI documents of political opponents in your living area covered with your own fingerprints? "I don't recall". Caught with illegal and/or unethical finances? Censured and then praised, then still in office years later. Member of KKK? "I'm better now". Cheating in the White House with interns, lying and rape? "Most respected president ever!"
    Accountability? You couldn't parody real life – it's too unbelievable now!

  • Lfox328

    They learned from the Nixon people – don't lie, develop a missing memory.

    • Rifleman

      And Nixon tlearned the hard way form the kennedys. Physician, heal thyself.

  • leestauf

    The only remaining question that should have been ask of Chu but wasn't was, "Mr. Chu, your own testimony leaves us with a choice between only two possibilities. Those two possibilities are that you have been criminally incompetent in the position you were assigned to, or that you are a liar. Mr. Chu, which is it?".