CAIR vs. the NYPD Counter-Terrorism Program

Pages: 1 2

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg is standing by the NYPD. Paul Browne, NYPD spokesman, says there are parts of the AP report that are “marked by outright fiction.” He says, “We don’t apologize for it and we’re not deterred by petit jealousies that success made breed.”

Patrick Dunleavy, former Deputy Inspector General of the Criminal Intelligence Division of the New York State Department of Corrections is in a position to know the truth. He worked with the NYPD’s Intelligence Division from 2002 to 2005 and is the author of the forthcoming book, The Fertile Soil of Jihad: Terrorism’s Prison Connection.

In his debate with CAIR attorney Gadeir Abbas, Dunleavy made the point that there was nothing said when Hispanic officers were used to gather information in Hispanic communities to fight Latin American drug cartels. He explains in an editorial that police departments across the U.S. use mapping to identify areas where they should devote more resources to covering. It shouldn’t be surprising that the NYPD’s counter-terrorism efforts would naturally bring them to Muslim areas. Retired NYPD officer John Cutter, who served under David Cohen, said “It’s not profiling. It’s like, after a shooting, do you go 20 blocks away and interview guys or do you go to the neighborhood where it happened?”

Dunleavy also says he never heard of the “Demographic Unit” that the AP report says was in charge of spying on innocent Muslims, and nor has his former colleagues in the NYPD Intelligence Division. The NYPD denies it exists. However, the AP has published an NYPD document about the unit. Even if it does exist, none of the conduct mentioned should be unexpected.

This isn’t the first time that CAIR and its Muslim Brotherhood-tied partners have tried to raise hysteria about a legitimate counter-terrorism program, and it won’t be the last. This is how they remain relevant, solicit donations, pursue their Islamist agenda and hold onto their dwindling amount of supporters.

Pages: 1 2

  • jacob

    How about telling CAIR nd all the others, that if the FBI would have been watching
    the suspicious way of aircraft flying training the al Quaida operatives were
    undergoing wherever (staight and level flying but no take-offs nor landings), and
    would have acted on the report that lady operative of theirs of what that flight
    instructor told her instead of shelving the report, THE 9/11 HORROR WOULDN'T
    HAVE HAPPENED and that WE rather be safe than sorry and if they have nothing
    to hide, they shouldn't fear investigations and that THAT IS THE WAY IT IS, as WE
    are not about to put up with a 9/11 replay under any circumstances
    And not to forget that WE didn't send for them but, if they don't like it, remember
    that good old USA's exit gates are wide open and they don't even have to fear
    the doors hitting their "derrieres" on the way out…

  • StephenD

    Why should there be any explaining to, first, a group like CAIR which has lost all legitimacy for its past activities and second, to anyone at all when it comes to national security issues?
    If there is reason to believe there are terrorists among the members of a Catholic Convent, have at it! It will either vindicate the convent or expose the terrorist. Everyone wins. I'd actually like to agree with CAIR. They are "Victims" here and will continue to be…maybe they should leave. We can be helpful in that regard. We can all pitch in to get them a one way ticket to the Islamic Country of their choice.

  • http://tomaeahmed.onsugar.com/ Pole Shift Cover-Up

    Its such as you learn my thoughts! You seem to grasp a lot about this, like you wrote the guide in it or something. I feel that you just could do with some percent to power the message house a bit, however instead of that, this is wonderful blog. A fantastic read. I’ll certainly be back.