New York Times Ridicules Gingrich on Sharia


Pages: 1 2

Organizations like these exercise enormous political power, wo0ing politicians and government officials from both parties, including those involved in counterterrorism and foreign policy. Islamist groups in Europe, Canada and the U.S. are hard at work creating private enclaves where extremist indoctrination and even paramilitary training takes place.

The New York Times article against Gingrich accurately states that “many American-Muslims” oppose Sharia-based governance, but doesn’t mention the many American-Muslims who favor it. Right here in FrontPage, the influential Islamic Center of Cedar Rapids’ advocacy of a global Islamic state and other extremist teachings was exposed. A recent study found that of 100 mosques, only 19% had no texts advocating violent jihad.

The article uses a quote from Mitt Romney saying, “We’re not going to have Shariah law applied in U.S. courts. That’s never going to happen,” but doesn’t mention the study that found 50 cases in 23 states where “Muslim-Americans had their cases decided by Sharia Law against their will” in appellate courts. Nor is it mentioned that Sharia courts have come to Europe.

In its reporting on this issue, the New York Times tries to appear balanced by quoting both sides, but it only establishes the credibility of the experts it agrees with. The other side is seen by readers as having no concrete foundation. Luckily, the Muslim Brotherhood’s own files spell it out for all Americans with a computer to see it.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • WildJew

    Gingrich is one of the few Republican presidential candidates that understands national security implications, the threat from the global and the domestic (stealth and not so stealth) jihad; the jihad against Israel and the West.

    The December 10 Iowa debate / discussion about the Palestinians was instructive.

    Romney: "…by going down and saying the Palestinians are an invented people. That I think was a mistake on the speaker's part. I– I think– you– you– I think the speaker would probably suggest that as well. I– I don't think we want to–

    22:05:35:00 (SPEAKER NEWT GINGRICH: UNINTELLIGIBLE)

    GOVERNOR MITT ROMNEY: Maybe not. I– (LAUGHTER) I think we're very wise to stand with our friends, Israel, and not get out ahead of them….They– Israel does not want us to make it more difficult for them to sit down with the Palestinians.

    Gingrich: This is a propaganda war in which our side refuses to engage. And we refuse to tell the truth when the other side lies. And you're not gonna win the long run if you're afraid to stand firm and stand for the truth."

    Romney: And I'm president of the United States, I will exercise sobriety, care, stability. And make sure that in a setting like this, anything I say that can affect a place with– with rockets going in, with people dying, I don't do anything that would harm that– that ("peace?") process.

    Gingrich: I will tell the truth, even if it's at the risk of causing some confusion sometimes with the timid.

    Senator Rick Santorum: Well, I– I think you have to speak the truth– but you have to do so with prudence. I mean, it's– it's a combination….. And I think Mitt's point was– was the correct one. We need to be working with the Israelis to find out, you know what? Is this a wise thing for us to do, to step forward and to engage this issue? Maybe it is….My guess is, at this point in time, it's not. Not that we shouldn't tell the truth, but we should be talking to our allies. It's their fight.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Gingrich is one of the few Republican presidential candidates that understands national security implications, the threat from the global and the domestic (stealth and not so stealth) jihad; the jihad against Israel and the West.

      Really, then why did he join forces with Obama to support Obama's non-war in Libya, before he did what he does best and later flipped flopped to being against it when he realized it was hurting his presidential aspirations?

      The truth is Gingrich is an incompetent loon when it comes to Islam exactly like all other Republicans in the race as well, and incidentally Romney and Sanatorium didn't disagree with the substance of what Gingrich said about the so-called Palestinians, they just suggested that Gingrich should have sought the approval of Netanyahu first before saying what he said.

      In any event, that fat over the hill amnesty supporting flip flopper doesn't have a prayer in hell of winning as he is toast and dropping like a rock. Hence, what are you going to do WildJew, vote along with your other compatriots for Obama?

      • WildJew

        A good rule of thumb: anything Obama supports, especially in foreign policy, in the Middle East, on Islam, etc., stay away from it! Even if you think Obama might be doing the right thing. When Obama gave the OK to kill bin Laden, I didn't say a thing.

        Like many on the right, Gingrich got sucked-in on the Libya thing, only later realizing Obama could be furthering the jihadist cause in Libya. Gingrich isn't perfect by any means but he was the only one on that stage (at the December 10, 2011 debate) to have the courage to say these people are Arabs (who adopted an identity to destroy Israel) and they are "terrorists."

        Your statement: "Romney and Sanatorium didn't disagree with the substance of what Gingrich said about the so-called Palestinians, they just suggested that Gingrich should have sought the approval of Netanyahu first before saying what he said," is appalling! Shame on you. Gingrich needs no approval from Netanyahu to speak the truth about these killers. What kind of utter rubbish are you talking? You can be sure, thinking Jews in Israel – in the Likud, etc. – were delighted with Gingrich's honest assessment of our mortal enemies. He needs permission from no one to tell the truth; not even Israel's prime minister.

      • Stephen_Brady

        Ah, yes. If we disagree with OYM, we must be leftists.

        Let me get this straight, however. Mitt Romney, your candidate, said that he was a progressive. If you support him, YOU must be the leftist. No one flips like the King of PC Multiculturalism … Gov. Romney … and Gingrich has a record of governing as a conservative.

        Now, I shall be called a moonbat, an unhinged loon, and other colorful metaphors …

        • ObamaYoMoma

          Let me get this straight, however. Mitt Romney, your candidate, said that he was a progressive. If you support him, YOU must be the leftist. No one flips like the King of PC Multiculturalism … Gov. Romney … and Gingrich has a record of governing as a conservative.

          In my book, actions speak louder than words. Indeed, exactly like most conservatives today Mitt was more liberal when he was younger, but as he went through the school of hard knocks known as life like most conservatives today he gradually morphed into becoming more and more conservative, as his actions clearly indicates. Hence, since you are a liberal, then it is understandable why you see Mitt as a turncoat backstabber. However, as a conservative I applaud and salute Mitt's maturation process, as it mirrors the maturation process of most conservatives.

          In addition, while Mitt steadily flipped to more conservative positions as he matured, unlike Newt he never flopped back to liberal positions. Hell, Newt, on the other hand, has flip flopped back and forth between conservative positions and liberal positions back to conservative positions to liberal positions over and over again ad nauseum so many times that examining his excess baggage will literally make you sea sick, and whether or not he is supporting a conservative position or a liberal position depends upon who happens to be buttering his bread on any particular given day. Indeed, Newt is a long established faux conservative. In fact, it was true conservatives that ran Newt out of Congress back in the 90s and those same conservatives still in Congress today are saying they will not support Newt under any circumstances whatsoever.

          In any event, why would anyone support a candidate for president that obviously isn't competent enough to get registered to be on the ballot in his own home state? Not to mention that Newt has been a long time Washington insider for 41 years. In other words, Newt is part of the problem. How can anyone be so mentally incompetent that they could believe a long time Washington insider like Newt could fix Washington. Give me a break, it would be business as usual!

          Nevertheless, Newt is dropping like rock. Hence, he is not even worth wasting time on since he is toast.

          No one flips like the King of PC Multiculturalism ..

          Yeah right….that is hilarious coming from you since you and your unhinged leftwing partner in crime. Chez the Moron Mac, for more than a couple of weeks now have been launching coordinated off topic personal attacks against me and an Internet stalking campaign in an immature and adolescent effort to hound, harass, and intimidate me into admitting that I'm wrong about the PC multicultural error of conflating and morally equating jihad and terrorism together and also because I refuse to admit that the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world are moderates. I'm sorry but I'm not nearly mentally deficient or liberal enough to ever do that. Dude…if anyone is a liberal who can't control his own unhinged moronic emotions, go look in the damn mirror.

          Now, I shall be called a moonbat, an unhinged loon, and other colorful metaphors …

          Like I keep telling you thin skinned crybabies, I have an exceedingly thick skin and can dish it back as good as I get. Hence, if you two thin skinned crybabies don't like my sarcastic in kind responses to you loons' coordinated off topic personal attacks and Internet stalking campaign, then I suggest you try doing something else, because this isn't working out too well for you two overly emotional crybabies.

          • Stephen_Brady

            We're "thin-skinned", and you can dish it back as good as you get? Your last post doesn't seem to indicate that. Indeed, it appears that your head is about to explode.

            By the way … and don't let anyone know … has Mitt flipped to more "conservative positions" or has he flipped to more politically- convenient positions?

            I'm "stalking" you? If you had never responded to one of my posts, in the first place, I never would have talked to you. Stalking. That's funny, man …

          • ObamaYoMoma

            What? You and Chez the Moron Mac are not Internet stalking me and not launching repeated off topic personal attacks against me?

            Yeah right.. http://frontpagemag.com/2011/12/29/frontpages-man

        • ObamaYoMoma

          No one flips like the King of PC Multiculturalism .

          I hate to rain on your PC multicultural parade, but the existence of peaceful and moderate Muslims like the existence of radical Muslims, extremist Muslims, Islamist Muslims, etc., etc., etc. is a false PC multicultural myth. The truth is there is only MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS and MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM.

          Furthermore, mass Muslim immigration to the West with all of its excess baggage is really stealth demographic conquest, which is the most prevalent form of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad employed against the West by the Islamic world today. Indeed, Muslims never ever migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter for the purpose of assimilating and integrating, but instead to eventually subjugate and dominate via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

          Thus, the reason that non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, which relative to violent jihad is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently, is able to occur today throughout the West totally below the radar of scrutiny and completely undetected, unacknowledged, and unopposed is exactly because per the tenets of PC multiculturalism, jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, is always conflated and morally equated with terrorism, which as its name implies is always only violent. Hence, because non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad by definition is non-violent, it isn't construed as being terrorism, and because it isn't construed as being terrorism, it is therefore allowed to take place throughout the West completely unopposed and below the radar of scrutiny.

          Yet you mental incompetents not only disagree with me on the above, which is perfectly fine with me, as I could care less, but you divorced from reality moonbats are also utterly obsessed with coercing me into admitting that I'm wrong like gullible useful idiots. Therefore, why is it so important to you delusional losers that I be forced into admitting that I'm wrong when I'm not?

          By the way, it is very apparent that you don't even know what PC multiculturalism is. If you did, you'd be agreeing with me instead of trying to coerce me into admitting I'm wrong.

          • Stephen_Brady

            First, I do admit that … in some cases … Muslim immigration is "stealth demographic conquest". We have the word of the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood, for that. Not always, but sometimes.

            Second, I suspect that you've never met a Muslim. I've worked with them, and I've taught them. Some of the students worried me, but most people simply wish to live their lives and be left alone. You've created an entire class of people who are participating in a conspiracy, and it's just not so.

            Third, define PC multiculturalsm for me.

            Last, we're trying to coerce you into admitting that you've made a mistake? That's a little paranoid, isn't it?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Not always, but sometimes.

            Not only do you not understand PC multiculturalism, but you are also incredibly blinded by it. Now you can take that as an insult or as an honest observation, I don't care.

            Nevertheless, Muslims never ever migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter to assimilate and integrate, but instead to eventually subjugate and dominate via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

            Second, I suspect that you've never met a Muslim. I've worked with them, and I've taught them.

            Yeah right. Even though like your mentally incompetent cohort in crime you deny being a liberal, it couldn't me more obvious to me that you are a liberal on steroids. In fact, the only loons that ever make absurd comments like, “I suspect that you've never met a Muslim,” are leftwing moonbats that like you are totally blinded by PC multiculturalism. Sorry dude, but the truth is with respect to Islam you are a gullible useful idiot

            Some of the students worried me, but most people simply wish to live their lives and be left alone. You've created an entire class of people who are participating in a conspiracy, and it's just not so.

            With all due disrespect, please refrain from lecturing me on Islam and Muslims when it couldn't be anymore obvious that you are a complete and utter neophyte and then a liberal one on top of that. Nevertheless, despite your complete and utter ignorance of Islam, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty in Islam for EVER MUSLIM ON EARTH to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme.

            Indeed, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called “RADICAL MUSLIMS” to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called “EXTREMIST MUSLIMS” to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, and the sixth and most important pillar of Islam doesn't make it an obligatory duty only for so-called “ISLAMIST MUSLIMS” to fight jihad in the cause of Allah, while at the same time giving an exemption and free pass to so-called “PEACEFUL and MODERATE MUSLIMS” to fight jihad in the cause of Allah. Instead, the sixth and most important pillar of Islam makes it an obligatory duty for ALL MUSLIMS ON EARTH to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme. No exceptions.

            Hence, ALL MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS ON EARTH are jihadists. A small minority of them are violent jihadists, while the vast overwhelming majority of them are non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, and the few that are not jihadists are not Muslims at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of Islam must be executed.

            Thus, those Muslims you naively perceive as being so-called peaceful and moderate Muslims are in reality non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists as opposed to violent jihadists. As non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad relative to violent jihad is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently, and the most prevalent form of non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad employed by the Islamic world against the West today is stealth demographic conquest.

            Hence, because you have been conditioned, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, to believe that jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, is synonymous with terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent, you therefore naively perceive what are really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists as being so-called peaceful and moderate Muslims because they are, of course, non-violent and therefore they can't be terrorists, and then like a gullible useful idiot at the same time you attack me as being some sort of bigoted Islamophobe that is trying to create some sort of anti-Muslim conspiracy.

            –continued below

          • Stephen_Brady

            You know, you're really funny! Have you considered a life in stand-up comedy?

            However, the only reason I continue to respond to you is because you do so with me. If you don't wish to "talk" with me, don't respond. I could easily live my life without you in it.

            The idea that I'm a liberal is absolutely hilarious. After a life of service to my country, and to Jesus Christ, and being the only conservative countless students encountered in their entire university career … after serving my country in the GOP as a conservative on the local and state levels, and in several national campaigns (including Ronaldus Magnus … I have nothing to fear from the likes of you.

            So, rave and rant all you want. You won't have Steve Brady to kick around, anymore. Did you get that? I'm tired of responding to a childish narcisssist, such as yourself.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            The idea that I'm a liberal is absolutely hilarious

            The idea that you are not liberal is absolutely hilarious and utterly absurd, as actions speak louder than words and your actions betray you. Indeed, just like The Center for American Progress attacks anti-Jihadists like me, you also attack me by insinuating that I'm a racist Islamophobe creating some sort of anti-Muslim conspiracies. Dude…you obviously are a true useful idiot Muslim apologist and jihadist sympathizing leftwing loon. You can deny it all you want, but nonetheless read your own posts! Your actions speak louder than words!

            Indeed, don't deny that you are a delusional Leftist when it is irrefutable.

            After a life of service to my country, and to Jesus Christ, and being the only conservative countless students encountered in their entire university career … after serving my country in the GOP as a conservative on the local and state levels, and in several national campaigns (including Ronaldus Magnus) … I have nothing to fear from the likes of you.

            None of that means you are a conservative. None of it. As a matter of fact, the Republican Party today is far more leftwing than it is rightwing. Indeed, the Republican Party and the Dhimmicrat Party today are virtually indistinguishable and are really just two sides of the same incredibly incompetent leftwing coin. In fact, when I saw how far to the left the Republican Party had drifted at the end of the Bush administration, I registered as an independent because it is too far to the left for me. I didn't leave the Republican Party. It left me. Hence, it no longer gets any of my money or my company's money.

            So, rave and rant all you want. You won't have Steve Brady to kick around, anymore.

            Who is kicking you around and why should anyone want to kick you around? I could care less that you are an unhinged leftwing loon addicted to emoting like your mentally incompetent cohort in crime.

            Did you get that? I'm tired of responding to a childish narcisssist, such as yourself.

            Look moonbat, it is you and your liberal cohort in crime that has been Internet stalking me and launching coordinated off topic personal attacks in an adolescent effort to coerce, harass, and intimidate me into admitting that I'm wrong when I'm not. Indeed, you two mentally deranged incompetents are obsessed with trying to force me to admit that I'm wrong even though it couldn't be anymore obvious that you two thin skinned crybabies are both emoting leftists that are blinded to the hilt by PC multiculturalism.

            In fact, you are so far to the left that just like The Center for American Progress you are apologizing and sympathizing for jihadists like a true useful idiot while attacking anti-jihadist conservatives like me at the same time. Hence, it doesn't matter what you say, as actions speak louder than words.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            In any event and despite your gullibility, your complete and utter ignorance, and the fact that you have been rendered totally blind and oblivious via PC multiculturalism, Muslims never ever migrate to the West or anywhere else for that matter to assimilate and integrate, but instead to eventually subjugate and dominate via the eventual imposition of Sharia for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

            Indeed, in country after country and anywhere and everywhere mass Muslim immigration is occurring in the world today, just like clockwork the vast overwhelming majority of Muslim immigrants flat out refuse to assimilate and integrate and instead form segregated Muslim only enclaves that in time inevitably morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia as fifth columns and in direct contravention to the laws of the states in which they reside.

            In fact, a few years ago the government of France counted 758 Muslim no-go zones ruled by Sharia as fifth columns in France alone, and that same exact phenomenon that is happening in France and all over the world, is also now happening here in the USA as well. As Muslim immigrants are also forming segregated Muslim only enclaves that in time will inevitably also morph into Muslim no-go zones ruled Sharia as fifth columns in the USA as well.

            In any event, I challenge you to point to just one country anywhere in the world where mass Muslim immigration has been occurring for several decades where the vast overwhelming majority of the Muslim immigrants actually assimilated and integrated and then matriculated into becoming contributing and productive citizens. Let me save you some trouble, there is no such place on the planet.

            Third, define PC multiculturalsm for me.

            Multiculturalism and its various corollaries: Political Correctness, Diversity, and Tolerance are all forms of leftwing cultural Communism that is employed throughout the West to destroy what is homogenous and united societies from within in order to make way for the establishment of one world governance under the auspices of Marxism.

            PC multiculturalism conflates and morally equates all civilizations, cultures, and societies together as all being equal and the same, even though obviously all civilizations, cultures, and societies are not equal and the same. For instance, there is no way that backwards, draconian, and barbaric Islamic civilization is equal to Western civilization.

            In addition, PC multiculturalism also conflates and morally equates jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, with terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent. Thus, because non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad is non-violent by definition, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, it isn't construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it is allowed to manifest completely unopposed as is happening today throughout the world with respect to mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

            Indeed, jihad and terrorism are really two separate and mutually exclusive manifestations and two entirely different and very distinct things altogether. Thus conflating and morally equating them together, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, is not only ludicrous but also incredibly self-destructive.

            Indeed, PC multiculturalism is one of the most self-destructive leftwing ideologies ever created, as once it becomes established in societies, like cancer it is virtually impossible to eradicate.

            Last, we're trying to coerce you into admitting that you've made a mistake?

            Look loon…I disagree with people all the time, but I don't go around Internet stalking them and repeatedly launching coordinated off-topic personal attacks against them in order to try to coerce, harass, and intimidate them into admitting that they are wrong. As a matter of fact, I could care less if they are wrong, as I just simply dismiss them as loons as I do you Internet stalking moonbats. Not only that, but I know irrefutably that I'm not wrong.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      But in fact they’re both engaged in jihad, and they’re both seeking to impose the same end state, which is to replace Western civilization with a radical imposition of Shariah,” Gingrich says.

      See what I mean WildJew, Gingrich is incompetent on Islam just like all the other Republican Party candidates, as the existence of a radical version of Sharia as opposed to a moderate version of Sharia is a PC multicultural myth. Of course, there are various schools of Islamic jurisprudence in both Sunni and Shi'a Islam, however, the truth is on approximately 75 percent of all substantial matters, including the obligatory duty for EVERY MUSLIM ON EARTH to fight jihad in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme, all the various schools of Islamic jurisprudence are in full agreement, and on the other 25 percent there are only minor differences that are for the most part irrelevant.

      Thus, your contention that, “Gingrich is one of the few Republican presidential candidates that understands national security implications, the threat from the global and the domestic (stealth and not so stealth) jihad; the jihad against Israel and the West,” is easily proven to be a product of your over active imagination.

      Now forgive me if I stopped reading the remainder of the article at this point, as the writer of this garbage is by far the most incompetent writer on FPM's stable of writers. Indeed, he isn't qualified to write for a junior high school newspaper let alone FPM.

  • StephenD

    WildJew is absolutely right! Gingrich, even with his many personal follies and political foibles, has proven thus far to be out in front of this issue. This issue, apart only from the economic abyss facing us (something that a domestic energy program can prove to be a life line for us), is probably the single most important one of our day. He identified it and called it like it is. As I've stated before, the TRUTH is still our most formidable weapon. Let them scramble to try and refute it but we (our elected reps, all) should be willing to put it out there ALWAYS. Never mind dancing around the edges. IF you follow the teachings of a Pedophile Trade Route Bandit and consider him the best example of what a human man should be, I'm going to say so and let YOU try to defend such beliefs.

    • Kevin Stroup

      Gingrich is indeed smart. But he still insist on a GOVERNMENT solution to nearly all problems he encounters. That is not what a true conservative does. What conservative candidate has suggested gutting the hell out of our bloated government? NONE.

  • John_Kelly

    The only REAL function the New York Times still serves:

    When rolled up tightly it still makes a good "fly swatter."

    • tagalog

      It's also pretty decent as a table protector in absorbing nitro solvent when I put it down and clean my guns over it.

    • johnnywoods

      It also serves well as bird cage liner.

      • SpiritOf1683

        If you were a budgie, would you want that in your cage?

    • tanstaafl

      You can start fires in your wood stove or fireplace with it….

  • ze-ev ben jehudah

    My wish for 2012. The world would be a much safer place if there were a 1000
    Gingriches in every Westeren country and not just only one in America.
    Mr Gingrich for the next president of the U.S.A.

  • John_Kelly

    How tragic that a once respected newspaper like the New York Times is so totally inept at searching out the TRUTH of Islam's Hidden Agenda.

    Perhaps they don't realize that the Islamic approach to Jihad is very similar to a game of chess where there are many different players with the same goal……to destroy the opponent.

    Today we have the aggressive militant form of Jihad such as Al Qaeda but we also have the silky tongued exponents of Jihad such as Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf,

    While the Western World is so intently focused on the militant Jihadists it is the slippery snakes oozing with colloquial eloquence who are proving to be the most destructive as they destroy America from within.

    I salute Newt Gingrich and any elected officials such as Allen West who have the vision and courage to stand up and identify Islam as the greatest threat to world peace.

    • Kevin Stroup

      You assume they are blind to Sharia. Perhaps they really want it. Leftist are totalitarian at heart, look who they sympathize with.

    • fiddler

      I guess those at NYT feel that enough people haven't died yet. I remember the hand-wringing of the Left after 9-11 when they were agast over seeing uhhhh American flags pasted on Fire Engines. "Too Nationalistic" they crowed.

  • 1minuteman

    maybe the N.Y. Times should check out the family that just got wiped out in the name of allah in texas by the good muslim dressed as santa clause. i believe 7 dead because his daughter was dating a non believer.

    • tagalog

      An honor killing by a Muslim dressed as Santa Claus? What was that all about, adding insult to injury?

      • intrcptr2

        https://www.google.com/#sclient=psy-ab&hl=en&…

        Seems that the media are playing it off as "financial distress". I can accept that there was that involved, but the report at JihadWatch seems to go a little deeper…

        I think I'm going to put it up on Facebook.

  • mikeb

    Hitler had his Mein Kampf and a track record in plain view. Islam has Sharia and the Hadith and its track record in plain view. The same fools are blind to both.

  • oldtimer

    Gingrich's popularity went down right after he stated the truth about the Palestinians. Now he is being blasted again, for stating the truth about sharia. At least he has the guts to state and stand up for what he believes in. It shows how much power the media has. Look what they did to Herman Cain as soon as he got popular. How soon we forget, but didn't Bill Clinton have a mistress when he ran for president. Didn't hurt him. Even if Cain did have a mistress, he didn't use taxpayers money to support her, he was in the private sector at that time, Clinton was Governor.

    • Zena

      Gingrich's popularity went up after having the guts to speak truth about the pretend palestinians. It went down when he started acting like a fool and bashing capitalism, amongst other things.

  • Marty

    Happily, the times is losing readership. Hopefully, it will cease publication in the near future. Delusional fools such as kristoff and Friedman can then go into comfortable retirement secure in the knowledge that they have done substantial damage to the cause of freedom and western civilization.

  • crackerjack

    And where exactly have US lawmakers as yet adopted Sharia or even attempted ? Perhaps Newt could present us with a few examples to vindicate his overexitedness.

    • gerald

      Been to dearborn Mich. latley? it takes all of a minute to do a goggle search to see how much sharia is beeing accepted into our court cases and laws, you really should research a subject before questioning someone that is quite fimiliar with it.

    • joy52

      Because it is fought wherever proponents bring it up. We are not sitting back until it is too late.

    • jacob

      Looking at what our Republican representatives and senators, plus those
      TEA PARTY we sent to Congress have been doing so far, I wouldn't doubt
      one of the Muslim congresspeople proposing the adoption of SHARIA and
      our Congress parasites to accept it

  • Neils60

    Gingrich sees what's on the horizon for us, the U.S. Remember, out of all the Republican candidates running for President, he's the only historian among that group.

  • Dispozadaburka

    NWO needs a NW RELIGION.

  • montlasky

    If the world at large does not believe that Islam is determined to overthrow the "infidels" world wide assisted by left wing editors including The New York times and others, then we might as well start wearing burkes now! What will it take to wake the world up? The Red Crescent flying over the White House?????

    • WilliamJamesWard

      Look what is inside the White House and see the true grievance, if Obama
      is not a wake up call, we are doomed…………………..William

    • jacob

      No need to have the Red Crescent flying over the White House….

      Down to the nitty-gritty, what do we have actually there but a born Muslim ????

  • Arnie

    The media has been totally infiltrated by the socialist and liberal mind-set that Michael Savage refers to as a form of mental illness. This mind-set is a result of Communist infiltration through the "long-march" into the wests' institutions as the communist Gramsci espoused. The Times and the rest of the Media-Academia-Financial-Government complex is totally infiltrated. They have found Islam as an effective tool to weaken or destroy the Judeo-Christian worldview since a direct head-on assault against Protestant capitalism would never work. When one understands this bigger picture, it all comes into focus what is going on and how Islam fits into the scheme of the globalists. Somehow in their warped view of reality, they believe (the Progressives, the Globalists, the Communist Internationale) can eventually control or tame islam and make us all one big happy family. It is a suicidal mistake and the west has bought into it hook, line and sinker. Gramsci was correct in his assessment and strategy. The only question, can we wake up in time to see what is going on?

  • The concerned

    Most of the westeners have no idea about Islam. They take it as a std. religion like all others, but unfortunately it is not. All any one can do is to read the Quran, and hadit, and the rest, and find out exactly what this supposedly religiopn is all about. It is true that a lot of moslems are good people and car about their family and contry, but for most parts they are the one's that do not follow the teaching of Quran, and they are considered as non-belivers like any other non-belivers, and by the strict rulls of sharia they can be eliminated. Jihad mean war in arabic, and that is how islam spread in the worled by the force of the sword.

  • leonidas

    Islam(=submission) is a totalitarian social and political ideology ,disguised as a religion, that aims with Jihad or stealth jihad to conquer the world and impose Sharia islamic law.
    Sharia(=way) law imposes women inferiority to males,death to apostates from islam and women for adultery , banning of dogs,pigs,bikinis,and imposition of Burkas, so men will not be tempted and women will keep their chastity.Also it imposes mandatory 5 prayers per day in the Mosque(=prostrate)where the infidels are cursed 5 times in each prayer.
    Prophet Muhammad was according to the Hadith(=tradition) a mass murderer,plunderer,rapist and pedophile as wife Aisha was 9 years old.He deserves no reverence but contempt and ridicule.
    The Koran (=recitation) is a distorted copy of the old Testament that is full of contradictions,inaccuracies,repetitions and states that Jews,Christians and Infidels must be killed, if they refuse to convert to Islam or spared death, if they pay tax to Muslims(=faithful) and that women are inferior to males and will ALL go to Hell!
    We need Newt Gingrich to implement a program of containment and defeat of Islam
    the way the Communist Soviet Union was contained till it collapsed in 1989

  • tramky

    The cases in the United States that were decided using Sha'ria law or rules are very worrisome. But MOST worrisome are the judges or magistrates who let that occur. On what possible grounds would Sha'ria be used in America, for anything? EVERY judicial official who permits anything other than the rules of American jurisprudence to apply to ANY case should be removed from the bench.

  • BS77

    New York Times…..impervious to reality……strains to maintain its strong leftist-liberal bias. What a pathetic editorial staff.

  • gerald
  • vlparker

    It's nice to know that there are so many experts on Islam out there looking out for us. They just want to take over the world and establish one global Islamic caliphate but the experts assure us there is nothing to worry about. Thank Allah.

  • BS77

    Check out AtlasShrugs.com Pam Geller

  • Marty Kay Zee

    Equal enforcement of our well-functioning body of secular criminal law and justice system has served us well so far. We've defeated the Mafia, right-wing religious terrorism and we're still working on the futile drug prohibition fantasy. What I'm really afraid of is paranoid people. I once knew one who was once right.

    • Western Canadian

      What colour is the sky on the world where you dwell?? I would suspect anything but blue….

    • jacob

      What you referred to had nothing absolutely to do with the sickness infecting
      most of our "leaders" , academia and pseudointellectuals :
      What has to do with is the accursed "POLITICAL CORRECTNESS" which will
      end up burying us all..
      Pray show me the" PARANOIA" on fighting against the dirty wart Muslims are
      carrying against us, both by commission and by ommission….
      And as to the drugs, would it be up to me, cocaine, heroine, etc,. would be
      govmt. provided at $100 a kilo.
      Let all addicts sniff it, drink it, eat it…
      Just take a one way ticket trip and free us of their presence….
      Dead dog, end of rabies……

  • Marty Kay Zee

    You see, folks? That's the kind of ad hominum attacks we have learned to expect from you Christians. A Canadian one in this case, no less. May I hear from a Muslim or a Jew as to what a seriously bad person I am? Come on, pile on…

  • http://www.healthydogtreats.com.au dogvault

    When reading these articles as an observer, it is hard to know if we are talking about extremism, religion, or terrorism.

    IT seems that often islamic extremism is directly connected with terrorism, and therefore the link, phone tapping and all anti terror measures should be used to keep US citizens safe. The real trick seems to be not stepping on any amendment laws in keeping the peace.

    • ziontruth

      We're talking about a movement that is partly a religion and partly an imperialist political ideology little different from Nazism or Marxism. As for "extremism," with Islam it just means people taking its political ideology seriously. And terrorism is one of the means—but by no means the only one—of carrying out the political goal of installing Islamic law worldwide.

      "The real trick seems to be not stepping on any amendment laws in keeping the peace."

      Tell the Muslims their freedom of religion will be honored just so long as they jettison the political tenets of Islam. That way, it will neither be seen as an attack on religious freedom, nor will it leave room for anything but a clear choice: Practice a religion of "Live and let live" like all the others or face mass deportation for being proponents of an imperialist ideology.

  • tanstaafl

    New title for the "Gray Lady" – Dhimmi Times!

  • WilliamJamesWard

    The New York Times is director central for the overthrow of American freedom
    and liberty, they are in the service of Communist/Socialist/Islamist totalitarianism.
    While Americans have been enjoying the entertainment sideshows and sports
    mania, sexual immorality, hedonism as a national mainstay it does not occur
    to the majority that our enemies foreign and domestic have been behind all
    of the inducement to the degeneracy. To think that Christians are continuously
    under attack, that God must be removed from our public life, our children
    have no respect for us and we wonder why. There are some Americans left
    that will be overcomers, hopefully it is the coming year we will see change.
    The New York Times is the enemy within……………………….William

  • Dobermite

    Gingrich is right and he's the only candidate who can articulate this problem clearly and concisely so everyone understands it, and who has the courage to do so despite falling out of favor with the liberal intelligentsia. Its too bad the GOP establishment set out to destroy him the moment he became a threat to Romney, and have largely succeeded.

    Incidentally, Romney will be a disaster on this issue, mark my words. To take this on requires guts and conviction and all of the things Mitt Romney lacks, and Romney is a man who lives to gain the approval of the NY Times and Washington Post et al.

  • Papadakis

    “they and their writings are the infrastructure from which Breivik emerged. This rhetoric is not cost-free.”

    Unbelievable. Throwing around statements like that designed to lead the audience into an inference and yet if one reverses it, it is exactly what critics of Islam say about the Quran and the promotion of jihad within mosques – that they then fall all over themselves to characterize as anti-Muslim bigotry while actively denying the plain facts that support such assertions. This NYT writer is blatant. It's not a matter of intellectual disagreement or contention of fact. It is the fact-free rhetoric of political allegiance. Fact obviously has nothing to do with it.

    The NYT and the masses of journalists that take their cues from their stances will be on the very wrong side of history here. Their stance on Islam is worse than that of the historical conservatives that opposed the civil rights movement. To what degree that proves to be an understatement we will found out. They are Islam's U.S. version of the Soviet "Pravda".

  • Don Don

    No need to get verbose about Islame. We all know that is is an evil ideology. Even if you were half wrong in description you would be all right.
    We all know that the New York times is 99% of the time on the wrong side of right and thats why they are losing readership. (hopefully Keller in the process)

    Just keep the info flowing.

  • stevefraser

    And you thought modern liberalism wasn't a mental illness!

  • Flowerknife_us

    The American People have been lied to so much about this subject that to actually hear the truth rings false. The NYT must be very proud.

    The true measure of the NYT demise as of late is that Newt actually said what he said and is still in the race. A pet project, decades in the making, exposed nationally for the lie it has been.

    Newt needs to return to the subject most Americans know in their Heart what is really true.
    Let the Historian hold a class never heard on a Collage Campus. Statistics show that the College age provide low voter turnout.Go for the numbers.

  • PAthena

    The New York Times has a long history of unreliability and supporting enemies of the U.S. See their old correspondent Duranty.

  • Marti

    Newt and Rep. Allen West also the representative who spoke in front of Congress about Grover Norquist are the only people who have told the truth about Islam.
    Our politicians are a bunch of dhimmis.
    I am sick of the thugocracy of the Muslims.
    Wake up America, we are being had by our own government!!!

  • Asher

    For Those of us on this website who are smart enough to see through deception, Our last 3 years of Obama have been Islamic Muslim Taqiyya. Obama got elected on Hope and Change, but in his mind and the Islamic world it was all about duping the enemy, The Great Satan, The United States…Look at the Government policies, open borders, Healthcare bill destruction, OWS using George Soros, Useful Idiots, Suing Sheriffs for enforcing the border laws, spending us into oblivion, (abandoning Israel, to Islam is the LIttle Satan,) and of course Obama's connections to radicals and many Islamic haters of the west. The goals were to bring us down another way besides Bombing us and they are succeeding through infilatration of our policitcal system, libel lawfare, and Islamic politicians and Judges.

  • WildJew

    Like you barring anything unforeseen, I will feel compelled to vote for Mitt Romney if he is the nominee. Obama is an unmitigated disaster. It looks more and more likely Romney will be the nominee, the way the Republican Establishment, Coulter, Krauthammer, pro-Romney PACs, etc., are going all-out to destroy Gingrich. On Islam, I am afraid Romney will prove to be another disappointment. I came across this a little while back:

    Asked by Dan Gilgoff of U.S. News & World Report if his repeated references to "jihad" in a speech at the Heritage Foundation characterized Islam in sinister terms, Mitt Romney surprised Gilgoff with this reply:

    I didn't refer to Islam at all, or to any other religion for that matter. I spoke about three major threats America faces on a long term basis. Jihadism is one of them, and that is not Islam. If you want my views on Islam, it's quite straightforward. Islam is one of the world's great religions and the great majority of people in Islam want peace for themselves and peace with their maker. They want to raise families and have a bright future.

    There is, however, a movement in the world known as jihadism. They call themselves jihadists and I use the same term…. It's by no means a branch of Islam. It is instead an entirely different entity. In no way do I suggest it is a part of Islam.

  • tagalog

    Jihadism is not a part of Islam? Huh? I need some help on that one; some explanation of how that happens to be true. If it's not part of Islam, what is it part of? I thought Muslims say that jihad is an essential part of Islam. Does any other religion, or system of thought for that matter, have a conception of jihad?

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Jihad is the sixth and most important pillar of Islam.

  • johnnywoods

    The clowns at NYT hope that when the Islamopigs take over they will eat them last but they seem to have forgotten the concept of "the useful idiots".

  • jacob

    Sorry….

    Unbelievable as it may sound, 90% New Yorkers swear over the piece of wet
    used toilet paper the New York Times is, than on the Bible…..

  • ObamaYoMoma

    He whines like a paranoid adolescent that we've "coordinated a campaign" to harass him…and then turns around and accuses YOU AND I of being "crybabies". It's a textbook case of projection….part of his God-complex.

    I don't accuse you moonbats of being crybabies. Go read your own posts, it couldn't be anymore readily apparent that you two losers are thin skinned crybabies. Nevertheless, like I keep telling you two losers, I have a very thick skin and I can dish it out as good as I get.

    Thus, if you thin skinned losers continue Internet stalking me and launching coordinated off topic personal attacks against me, then I will keep responding to your off topic personal attacks sarcastically and it isn't my fault that you two thin skinned mentally deranged losers are crybabies. I can't help that.

  • Stephen_Brady

    Chez, it may be that he is an adolescent. High intelliegence, with a lack of understanding in how to use it, effectively. However, his notion that he is "thick-skinned" and that we aren't is belied by almost every post he makes to us.

    ——————————————————————

    Thanks for the New Year's wishes and the same to you and yours.. My son has a few months left in his deployment, and his only fear is that Obama will negotiate his sector into a "ceasefire zone" with the Taliban!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Yep…but two of his coordinated off topic personal attacks from another thread which you said didn't exist are in that thread because I posted them when you said I couldn't. Oops!

  • ObamaYoMoma

    You know Skippy, your facility for language and your way with words are awe-inspiring.I think a twelve year old could have composed that sterling retort.

    Like I said if you two thin skinned crybabies can't take my in kind sarcastic responses to your off topic personal attacks, then don't make them. It's not rocket science.

    And yet, you responded by calling him a "gullible, useful idiot.

    Just curious…why are you always responding for Stephen? Why can't you let him respond for himself.

    And the reason I called him a useful idiot is because he is one. Indeed, in order to apologize for Islam and sympathize with Muslims he naively and ignorantly believes are peaceful and moderate but are really non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, he claimed that like a bigoted Islamophobe I am trying to drum up some sort of anti-Muslim conspiracy. In other words, he is so oblivious of Islam and blinded by PC multiculturalism at the same time, that he is even going out of his way to do their bidding for them. If that doesn't constitute being a useful idiot then nothing does.

    And why did you lash out at him so emotively and unprovoked?

    That's not emoting or lashing out like you are famous for doing; that's telling the truth. I always stick to the issues with respect to you unhinged liberals, because I know I can't possibly lose a debate to you moonbats. What is emoting is off topic personal attacks because you are too mentally incompetent to argue on the merits of the issues.

    Because his opinion was at variance to your own, and your God-complex kicked in.

    No, his opinion was utterly ridiculous. I mean he is obviously a complete and utter neophyte on the subject, and definitely way out of his league. I shouldn't even be wasting my time with someone like him or you, for that matter, because both you losers' knowledge of the issue is extremely limited and very rudimentary at best. Plus on top of it you two liberals are totally blinded by PC multiculturalism. So I told the truth and it is not my fault that you moonbats can't accept the truth.

    Therapy, Skippy. Seek it. Let it be your New Year's resolution.

    Excuse me, but I'm not the one resorting to Internet stalking and launching coordinated off topic personal attacks. That would be you two mentally deranged delusional moonbats.