Bracing for Durban III

Pages: 1 2

Yet another anti-Israel hate-fest is brewing today at the United Nations (UN) in New York City. Durban III is the informal name given to the latest UN-sponsored “anti-racism” conference, which will take place on the opening day of the General Assembly. More importantly and not unintentionally, this event, known for its hate-based, anti-Semitic and anti-Israel bashing in its two previous incarnations, Durban I and Durban II, is coinciding with the Palestinian Authority’s bid for statehood and membership at the world body.

Anne Bayefsky, a human rights lawyer described as “the principal organizer” of an anti-Durban III conference taking place on the same day in New York, says the Durban anti-racism initiative and the Palestinian statehood bid go “hand-in-hand.” She called them the “one-two” punch at the UN of those who want to delegitimize Israel.

“It is, therefore, imperative to point out that Durban and UDI (unilateral declaration of independence) are part and parcel of the rejection of the Jewish state; the racists are masquerading as anti-racists; and the organization that is supposed to protect human rights is run by those who oppose human rights,” said Bayefsky.

Durban I took place ten years ago under UN auspices in Durban, South Africa, from which the conference got its name. Its actual title was the World Conference Against Racism, but it ironically turned into an appalling display of anti-Israeli and anti-Semitic hatred. In the draft text prepared for the conference, for example, Zionism was compared to racism. Such blatant intolerance resulted not only in Israel withdrawing its delegation but also in the discrediting of the conference’s admirable, proclaimed goals of combating racism and discrimination worldwide.

“A sizeable number of Durban I conference participants openly championed Hitler’s destruction of European Jewry, and sought to modernize and extend his lethal anti-Semitism to Israel,” wrote Benjamin Weinthal of Durban I in the Jerusalem Post.

This “lethal anti-Semitism” was also on full display outside the conference, and sometimes violently so. At a separate NGO forum in Durban, attended by about 3,000 NGOs, a document was adopted that described Israel as a “racist, apartheid state” and stated that Israel was guilty of “racist crimes.” An Arab Lawyers’ Union booklet distributed in Durban contained anti-Semitic cartoons, whose offensiveness caused UN High Commissioner Mary Robinson to identify with the Jews.

Outside the forum, “out–of-control NGO mobs” staged several anti-Semitic incidents. One forced the closing of the Durban Jewish Community Center, where Jewish NGOs were meeting, and another saw the Jewish NGOs’ press conference disrupted.

“[The mobs] required Jewish representatives from all over the world to flee the final session with a police escort because their safety could not be guaranteed if they remained,” wrote Bayefsky.

Durban II wasn’t much better. Considering that Muammer Gaddafi’s Libya was the chair of the conference’s planning committee and communist Cuba was the deputy chair, this is not surprising. Officially called the Durban Review Conference, it took place in Geneva in 2009. The conference’s ostensible purpose was to review the Durban Declaration and Programme of Action (DDPA), adopted at Durban I. The DDPA is a watered-down version of the Durban I draft text that caused so much controversy.

Durban II also turned into the expected anti-Israeli hate-fest, but was notable for two things. The first was the appearance at this “human rights” conference of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who in the past had denied the Jewish Holocaust and called for Israel’s destruction. Ahmadinejad gave what French officials called a “hate speech,” in which he said the Israeli government was “totally racist.”

The other notable event at Durban II was the boycotts. Canada was the first of nine countries that decided to stay away altogether from the Geneva follow-up to Durban I. The United States also did not send a delegation. In defending his government’s decision not to attend, Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, leader of his country’s Conservative Party, said the conference would only “scapegoat the Jewish people.” A Conservative government minister later said the fact that Libya and Iran were on the Durban II organizing committee “was all we needed to know.”

Pages: 1 2

  • StephenD

    "… their opponents should shift the focus to the participants’, especially the OIC states’, human rights records, pointing out the rampant racism in Muslim countries. A logical starting point would be the 300,000 black Africans killed in Darfur, and the 500,000 black Africans still enslaved in Mauritania."What MUST be mentioned is the "Palestinians" insistence that when/if they are a recognized State they will not allow any Jews within its borders…while the balance of the world seeks to HELP them even while they maintain this blatant Racism?!?

  • JoC
  • UCSPanther

    The Durban "Pro-Palestine" rally should cut the BS and openly invite skinheads and Ku Klux Klanners (In full klan regalia) to their rallies.

    Then the world can see them for who they really are…

    • mrbean

      Yassah, dun tell meh about Yakub and dem blue-eyed devils, dah whitey mans like Minsta Farrakan dun telled youse. Yassah, Cake wawk fah meh. Call meh dah honkey cracka.

      • Ghostwriter

        Still stuck in the 19th century aren't we,mrbean?

  • Amused

    Are you attending mrbean ? I'm sure you'll be a hit with your lingual talents

  • Ronald W. Carnine

    Our president should be informed (re-informed) that we the American voter are watching this hate fest and we will let our voices be heard at the ballot box. If you haven't already done so I would urge you to read "The Questions Never Asked About Palestine" in the Sept.22 issue of American Thinker. It is an eye opener. Its time we tell the Arabs in the Middle East and OIC to take a long walk off a short pier. Israel isn't old enough nor big enough to have done all the things they have been accused of.

  • aspacia