Cashing In On Kashmir

Pages: 1 2

It is just one of life’s little ironies. While the United States is setting conditions to restore the suspended $800 million in aid to a poverty-stricken, failing Pakistan, its military-controlled Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) was discovered illegally spending money in Washington to influence American foreign policy regarding the disputed Kashmir region.

The ISI is the agency suspected of harbouring Osama bin Laden for years in a military town in Pakistan until he was killed by American Navy SEAL commandos last May. With relations at an all-time low between the two countries because of the Pakistani military’s suspected involvement in concealing bin Laden, the United States had suspended the aid payment.

After an FBI investigation, two US citizens of Pakistani origin were charged this week in connection with the illegal donations. Syed Fai, 62, and Zaheer Ahmad, 63, are facing up to five years in prison for never having registered as agents of Pakistan’s government, as required by law, in order to legally make such donations. The money, as much as four million dollars, was disbursed through the Kashmiri Administrative Council (KAC) which Fai headed. Fai, who has been arrested, was also head of the Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Muslim Students Association (MSA) between 1984 and 1988. Ahmad resides in Pakistan.

“Mr. Fai is accused of a decades-long scheme with one purpose – to hide Pakistan’s involvement behind his efforts to influence the U.S. government’s position on Kashmir,” said Neil MacBride, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia where Fai lives. “His handlers in Pakistan allegedly funnelled millions through the Kashmir Center to contribute to U.S. elected officials, fund high-profile conferences, and pay for other efforts that promoted the Kashmiri cause to decision-makers in Washington.”

The FBI also said there was no evidence the recipients knew the donations were illegal.

The dispute between India and Pakistan over Kashmir has been called “the longest jihad.” Kashmir is a Muslim-majority state that had a Hindu monarch when the Indian subcontinent was partitioned into India and Pakistan after bloody riots between Hindus and Muslims in 1947 at the end of British colonial rule. When Kashmir’s ruler did not join Pakistan, the new Muslim state sent irregular tribal fighters, who thought they were fighting an anti-Hindu jihad, into Kashmir to annex it by force.

But the invasion only resulted in Kashmir’s ruler seeking military assistance from India, which said it would only help if Kashmir joined India. With the agreement made, Indian forces then drove the jihadis back, but not completely out of Kashmir. The conflict settled into a stalemate that has erupted twice since then into wars between the two states. Pakistan lost both conflicts.

According to United Nations (UN) Resolution 47 that ended the 1947-48 war, a plebiscite was to be held to let the Kashmiri people decide their state’s future. But since Pakistan has refused to withdraw its troops, as stipulated in the UN resolution, from the part of Kashmir it controls, India has used this as an excuse not to hold the plebiscite.

Seeing it could not defeat India and annex Kashmir by conventional warfare, the Pakistani military embarked on a campaign of terrorism in the early 1950s to subvert Indian rule.

“In 1951, the first major, low-grade terrorist initiative by Pakistan was the calibrated destruction of telephone lines, bridges and guesthouses in J & K (Jammu and Kashmir),” writes Sreeram Chaulia in his review of Praveen Swami’s book: India, Pakistan and the Secret Jihad. “…There were striking resemblances between the fundamentalist Islamist beliefs of these pioneers and those of a successor generation of jihadis. Besides sabotage, the early brigades bombed temples and mosques in 1957 to incite Hindu-Muslim violence…”

After a disputed state election in 1989, the insurgency intensified. Local terrorists, supported by Pakistan, joined jihadists trained in camps in Pakistani Kashmir in a guerrilla campaign meant “to bleed India.” Atrocities were committed by both the jihadists and the Indian security forces. The violence hit its peak in 2001 when 4,507 people died, but the insurgency ended in failure.

Since then, security in Kashmir has improved so much that by 2009 terrorist activity had declined 90 percent from 2001. With Israeli help, Indian authorities have refined their counter-terrorism techniques so effectively that 2,400 terrorists were killed between 2005 and 2009. One hundred and thirty of their leaders were also killed or captured, leaving “the terrorists either leaderless, or commanded by men with little experience.”

Along with the hard jihad of conventional and irregular warfare, the Pakistani government has also been engaged in a soft jihad to conquer Kashmir. In the soft jihad, Pakistan’s strategy is to force India through international pressure to hold the long-delayed plebiscite mentioned in UN Resolution 47. By forcing a plebiscite, the Pakistani military believes Kashmir’s Muslim-majority electorate will vote to join Pakistan.

Pages: 1 2

  • Larry

    It does explain some, but by no means all, the USA's stupidity on dealing with a jihadist state as a close friend and ally.

    • nexium vs prilosec

      A few stand up people may be there trying to do what is best for America but are and
      will continue to be overwhelmed by the good old boys. The sad thing is that our leaders' egos have been seduced by oil money.

  • bob

    Some truth all the while blowing smoke up your backside, Osama was dead several times long before Obama's announcement { If he even ever existed } there is no left and right politically in the US they all work for the same people; It is a straw man argument, if they can instill an ounce of fear in most of the people, they can get them to give up rights and liberty in exchange for safety.

  • StephenD

    Lay down with dogs you're bound to get fleas.

  • mrbean

    Bill Clinton was worse. It has been thorughly documented the myriad ways in which Clinton's 1992 and 1996 campaigns were the beneficiaries of " illegal contributions" from individuals and organizations associated with the People's Republic of China, in particular the PRC military/intelligence. These included "a massive cascade of illegally laundered foreign funds" dropped off in bags at the whitehouse and injected into key states in the general election of 1992. China's biggest arms smugglers had a White House meetings with Clinton at which they were illegally solicited for enormous secret campaign donations. The People's Liberation Army [or PLA] partner sat next to Clinton at a Democratic National Committee fund-raiser and contributed hundresd of thousands of dollars in illegal campaign funds to the Democrats through the Whitehouse; and "the officers of an American defense contractor LORAL in business with China's missile builders suddenly became the No. 1 contributors" to the president's reelection campaign in 1995-1996. Clinton is and was a traitor.

  • Geddy

    Obama is worse than the worst of Clintoon and Carter together. America is finished. Over. Done. Our corruption is through to the very core, (the corrupt judges are now in the supreme court). There is no recovery. I am ashamed of my service in the military that sufficed in only helping liars like kennedy, kerry and reid in office becoming billionaires.

  • Jim

    The whole place here is a little like Quartzite Arizona. Corruption here there and every where.
    Geddy should now consider the next step.

  • Amused

    " The FBI also said there was no evidence the recipients knew the donations were illegal "

    LOL……gee !! where'd they get that idea ??? OF COURSE they didn't think it was illegal , it's bloody S.O.P., here in the USA .

  • Amused

    And of course , according to Mr. Geddy above ….it's only Democrats that are crooked , this could never happen with the LILY-WHITE-Republicans ……..right Mr. Geddy ?
    Boy you are one deluded /brainwashed dude !!

  • Amused

    Oh , and BTW Geddy , most of those Supreme Court Justices were appointed by Bush . In addition , those "horrible losses of Liberty " , you are whining [ lying ]about …….yup Republicans again …TSA , Homeland Security ,and the Patriot Act .

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Washington being the pit of dishonesty and criminal activity within a patronage
    bureaucracy is hopeless and beyond reform while the character of our
    politicians remains amoral, ethically void and continuously selfserving. A few
    stand up people may be there trying to do what is best for America but are and
    will continue to be overwhelmed by the good old boys. American voters are to
    blame for this situation and unless and until America wakes up and changes
    who it gives authority to our government will remain a noose around our collective

  • Dispozovdaburka

    Why not give the 800 mil to India?
    Why not give unlimited aid to Israel?
    How about "exclusively" supporting REAL allies?
    Why not question "human rights violations of the Saudi's?"
    And Pakistan
    and Afganistan.
    and actually –
    ALL Muslim countries.
    Hillary will find her Pakistani" crush" to be nothing more than someone
    she can pay to patronize her sympathic, pathetic, female ego.
    The sad thing is that our leaders' egos have been seduced by oil money.
    But on an optimistic note…
    Since Israel has recently discovered oil within their legal borders…

    How about the US "EXCLUSIVELY" buying oil in the Middle East from our real ally in the Middle East, Israel?