The Black Hole of Global Warming Spending

Pages: 1 2

In 2011, your federal government will spend $10.6 million a day on climate change. Annual expenditures will be about $4 billion on global warming research—now called climate change–despite the fact that there has been no global warming since 1998, says the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), a British educational think tank.

Billions have been wasted so far, although periods of cooling and warming have occurred naturally throughout history. Fossil fuels—Petroleum, natural gas and coal are the assigned “villains.” Yet, “no conclusive evidence shows that fossil fuels to produce energy have had any significant effect on the earth’s temperature,” GWPF concludes. In December 2010, more than 1,000 international scientists challenged man-made global warming claims made by the United Nations Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

What is inexplicable and inexcusable is the amount of our nation’s money that has been spent on climate change since that UN Panel, composed mainly of research-money-seeking scientists, invented global warming. Al Gore helped dramatize it with dire warnings that terrorized school children, to his mega-million-dollar benefit. Even more confounding is that added U.S. dollars will be poured into continuing research in 2011.

The EPA is doing its part to continue the myth of worldwide disaster. On Jan. 21, the EPA announced it was awarding $25 million to the Health Effects Institute to help the agency study air pollution and climate change. The $25 million is pocket change by Washington standards. It just happens to be the most recent agency outlay. It plans to spend $169 million this whole fiscal year on climate change. But the destructive consequences of the EPA’s actions are its regulations involving greenhouse gases (GHGs) because its rules are many and widespread. They involve everything from power plants to electric generating units and petroleum refineries, to natural gas, oil and coal-fired electric generating units and refineries. Climate change, brought about by greenhouse gases, seems to continue to intrigue our government—from President Obama on down.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) reports on federal spending on research, including budgets for 2011 and how these figures compare with previous years. It shows the stunning fact that all agencies that conduct climate change research expect to have bigger budgets for 2011. AAAS Chapter 15 of its recent report deals specifically with climate change.

At a time when we bear the burden of a $14 trillion debt, and both the Congress and the administration talk of spending restrains, the AAAS reports 13 executive branch departments and agencies will “increase climate research 21 percent to $2.6 billion.”

Pages: 1 2

  • davarino

    Its pretty scary how the left can cook up an emergency like this with the help of our complicit media. Crafty little buggers

  • Jim

    I hope the members of the 112th Congress catch this article. Curbing spending on idiotic nonsence like this will be one of the tools they need to fix the massive hole in the federal budget.

  • BS77

    Just read that New York City has had the most snow since records were kept (1869)….that the midwest is experiencing some of the coldest temperatures on record.
    Global warming is a hoax. Now, global warming has happened but it had NOTHING to do with SUVs or coal burning…..temperature variations are due to volcanic activity and solar fluctuations in radiant output. The last Ice Age had two mile thick ice sheets over Chicago….and they all melted away….there was no SUV or industry anywhere. The recent volcanic explosions at MT Pinotubo, or that volcano in ICeland blasted more gas, smoke, dust and pollution into the atmosphere in a week than all of man's creations in history.

  • Nick Shaw

    I'm with Mr. Trussell and BS77 on this. We don't even have to go back to the Ice Age. How about the Little Ice Age around the 1500s where the winters were colder with more snow leading to greater melt and decreased crop yield. Starvation was rampant. Of course, the increase in snow cover of this and last year are a mere blip on the radar but, who can tell the future? (Well, other than Algore) Riddle me this, what caused the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age when there were no cars or coal burning power plants? Hint: It certainly wasn't man. Like BS77 says, one volcano in Iceland belched out more crap in a month than man has done in 10 years (I'll be conservative) and there's a lot more than one volcano doing the belching.

  • Wesley69

    But EPA’s researchers have found that the tough new rules it plans to impose on industry gas emissions would reduce the global temperature by only 0.006 to 0.0015 degrees Celsius by the year 2100, +24 Vote up Vote down Syrin23 113p · 2 weeks ago
    Go see the thread about the FCC. The same applies here.

  • Wesley69


    “But EPA’s researchers have found that the tough new rules it plans to impose on industry gas emissions would reduce the global temperature by only 0.006 to 0.0015 degrees Celsius by the year 2100,”

    This is an interesting fact, a fact that illustrates the regulations may be directed at something else. Could it be a green industry that puts money into the hands of green supporters and politicians? Or could it be something else?

    The EPA, an UNELECTED bureaucracy is making Radical Environmental policy at the expense of the country's energy needs, and Obama is hell-bent on supporting EPA's moves. “Cap and trade was just one way of skinning the cat."

    So we know where Obama stands. But why???

    “Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket…even regardless of what I say about whether coal is good or bad, because I’m capping greenhouse gasses, coal power plants, natural gas…you name it…whatever the plants were, whatever the industry was, they would have to retro-fit their operations.
    That will cost money…they will pass that money on to the consumers.” With these statements, why do this at this time? We are talking higher prices for energy, food. We are talking about a loss of jobs? We are talking about stalling or ending the economic recovery??? Why??? Why would Obama jeopardize his own chances of reelection? This is where it gets dicey.

    Radicals know if they cripple the energy industry upon which industry depends, they can take down the economy and create a crisis of unbelievable proportions. Could it be the Cloward-Piven Strategy in action?

    Republicans MUST education all citizens showing what is at stake. Only with massive citizen opposition can there be any hope for stopping this administration's destructive course of action. Republicans must investigate, develop legislation to stop or delay these measures from going into effect. They will need the help of Democrats interested in this country and not their party to pull it off. The regulations can also be tied up in the courts as well.

    The Republicans MUST put the President and his administration on the spot and have them DEFEND their harmful actions and the EPA MUST BE PUT IN ITS PLACE.

  • ApolloSpeaks


  • USMCSniper

    The claim that 2010 is the second warmest year on record is delusional, irrelevant and disingenuous. Warmist (warm is cold) explanations for extreme events are as useless as saying ‘Wet days cause rain.’” It is useful to keep in mind that U.S. agencies such as NASA and NOAA have been issuing similar politically correct and meteorologically incorrect “global warming” claims for years. Consider weather events just since the beginning of the year. For the first time since 1945, the maximum daytime temperature in North Korea has remained below zero for nearly a month. In neighboring China, the snowfall in northwest China was accompanied by extreme cold and a snowfall that flattened or damaged 100,000 homes. All around the world there have been similar reports, including sunny Italy that set new cold records, -48.3 degrees on January 19. In the United States, Minnesota shattered its cold records on January 21 reaching an astonishing -46 degrees. In Florida, eight new record lows were set by January 17 and there was snow in every State of the lower 48. And spring will not debut until March 21!

  • Nick Shaw

    It's interesting (as in the Chinese "may you live in interesting times") that the unrest in Egypt now consuming all the news organs may cause problems at the Suez, through which a heck of a lot of oil passes. It may also spread to other oil producing countries. Conjecture yes, but, not inconceivable. What effect is this going to have on the price of oil and, of course, gasoline. Oops! It already has! The price is going up! All we need to top the cake is an active hurricane season (not caused by Gore Bull warming you dolts) starting in a few months. Thank you progressives / liberals / environmentalists. I forsee a time when we yearn for the days of Jimmy with gas on alternating days and really expensive for the time. It will be much, much worse than that soon. You know, if we had have started drilling on the first day we heard the phrase "drill here, drill now" this wouldn't be the problem it will become. Again, thanks jerkwads, for crashing our economy but, that's what you wanted all along, wasn't it?

  • pse12

    So a debunked think tank with less than one hundred members becomes an authority on this subject. You need to look at who the data is coming from. If you believe the likes of the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF), and think that British chancellor Lord Lawson should be a voice of reason, I for one am really worried.

    Comments like: You know, if we had have started drilling on the first day we heard the phrase "drill here, drill now" this wouldn't be the problem it will become, are amazing in their lack of knowledge. Even if we add our oil to the world pool, it will have little effect. Maybe a few dollars per barrel. World oil prices are world oil prices, adding the limited amount we can from the US would do little to change that. We are still subject to global issues. The only way forward is to get off oil. If we don't buy it, we are not subject to the problems it brings.

    We need to think rationally about this issue, not take sides. It is a problem for all of us and we all need a solution. There is some type of middle ground.

    • Nick Shaw

      Frankly, I'm stunned by your amazement. If the US had it's own supply of oil and natural gas (and there's more than enough to last quite a while according to recent studies) there would be no Jimmy Time, exemplified by long lines on alternate days. Further, if the US were not on the customer list of OPEC, the price of oil would crash. This is a proven fact as of just last year when US oil consumption dropped during the height of the recession (though I don't agree the recession is over or has reached it's height, I'm just using published report as an example) The price of a barrel of oil also contains the royalty paid to the country it comes from, as such, home pumped oil could easily be much cheaper than on the world market (if the US government doesn't tax it up to world prices that is) One merely has to research the price of a gallon of gas in Saudi Arabia or Venezuela. Lastly, we are not going to get off oil tomorrow, despite the pontifications of The One.

      • Nick Shaw

        Drilling here and now, at least gives us breathing room and the money to switch to natural gas then, later, to hydrogen. See, I'm not a one trick pony as you assume. I just think wind and solar and biofuels, though the first 2 might have limited appeal in special circumstances (like producing hydrogen perhaps?), are the dumbest things to rely on. If they weren't, why is it they need backup generators burning fossil fuel when the wind don't blow or the sun don't shine? There is no middle ground with these boondoggles!

        • Richard71999

          Hydrogen will not happen.. its not grown on trees.. mined, or refined.. its made with electricty.. it uses 4 energy to make 3 hydrogen energy.. better to use the electricty directly.. source to make electricty?

  • BS77

    Now the global warming whiners are going to tell us they were wrong…it's global COOLING that we must deal with…..or some other nonsense. Most of the forces involved in making Earth's weather are beyond man's ability to control or alter…..volcanoes, sea currents, and the sun itself. The Sun fluctuates in the amount of energy and heat it radiates ; these cycles have been going on for hundreds of millions of years. Now some nut job leftist professor is going to tell us we can control these immense forces with bicycles and tofu.

  • USMCSniper

    Another waste of money is trying too combat AIDS and poverty in Africa: Look at the results in Liberia in spite 100's of millions of dollars.

    • Nick Shaw

      Amen Sniper. A world tax on carbon is really just redistribution of weath with a gurantee. 'Til now these countries and their tin pot dictators depended on the largess and charity of countries willing to work for their money. Pushing for a tax will shower them with money just like welfare payments to the projects in Detroit. I know this is unkind to a great many decent people caught in infortunate circumstances but, at some point they have to take a stand and throw off the yoke of oppression themselves. Sending money and even humanitarian aid,year after year, simply strengthens the oppressors and creates a welfare culture. I could live with aid with strings attached but, the clowns in Washington are too afraid of how this makes them look to the world.

  • abraham83

    Obliquely in reference to the EPA concentration and support of "alternate" energy, it is of some note as an unintended (but dire) consequence of Obama's war on petroleum that Marathon Oil has split off its drilling operation into a seperate subsidiary that they appear to be negotiating to sell to China. This may be a result of their stock falling due to the uncertainty of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and the bleak future for oil under this Democratic administration. Marathon faces a big stock hit unless they drop their stagnant oil exploration operation, and it just so happens that China is waiting in the wings to pick it up.

    In affect, Obama is forcing America to sell off its oil assets and/or move them to more favorable areas of the world. In this case, the US will be pushed into selling off more of its critical infrastructural assets to our "free trading" partner, and erstwhile enemy: China. The US is not only being pushed into backruptcy by our liberal/left politicians, but they are opening up the nation to further penetration and dismemberment by an enemy nation.

  • Rich Engard

    I like this hold much, this is the obstacle where i can inform smth from me, a cut of upward of this is what i like.

  • Michael

    Note they don't want to spend more money on what is really needed- millions more measuring sites. Satellites results aren't meaningful unless the result is compared to. e.g they measure 8km of the atmosphere in 1 degree by 1 degree segments- what is it really measuring. Most of the globe is undercovered.
    Remote sensing needs local proofing and they can't remotely measure precipitation (rain, snow…) one of the big holes in weather/climate description.

  • Five Star Escorts Delhi

    We are a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community. Your web site offered us with helpful info to work on. You have performed a formidable activity and our whole group shall be grateful to you.

  • Independent Delhi Escorts

    You realize therefore considerably when it comes to this subject, produced me for my part believe it from a lot of varied angles. Its like women and men aren’t involved unless it is one thing to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs great. All the time deal with it up!

  • Escort Service in Delhi

    Welcome to India’s finest V.I.P. dating, modelling, dinner dates and companionship site.We providing all types of services realates to male and female models.

  • sonam

    great information thanks for telling us..

    Sweet Delhi Escorts

  • tom3341
  • tom3341
  • Gurgaon Escorts

    Gurgaon Escorts:-Very inspirational and interesting blog….

  • Escort in Pune

    Escort in Pune I will possibly be again to go through more, many thanks for your information.

  • Pune Escorts Service

    Pune Escorts Service I hope you will continue to keep in submitting new posts & thanks for sharing your great experience among us.

  • WDP

    A good website is The right climate stuff