A Muslim Apostate’s Defense of the West

Pages: 1 2

After taking us on his enthusiastic spin around New York, Warraq leaps back in history to discover why the West has been so successful.  The Greeks bequeathed us critical thinking, the concept of citizenship, and the separation of politics from religion; Rome developed law; Christianity taught compassion and forgiveness.

There were other important factors.  While Islamic educational institutions were “governed by religious law” and thus limited in what they could explore and teach, European universities “were independent institutions” and could thus “engage in relatively unfettered research into a multitude of subjects and cultivate a rational approach to studying the world.” Reason was crucial: if “[m]edieval Christian philosophers believed that the rational faculties not only came from God, but represented the likeness of God in man,” in Islam “[t]he idea that human reason could be a source of law or ethics was considered blasphemous.”

Warraq also highlights the importance to the rise of Western civilization of such things as literacy, the recognition of the importance of the freedom to criticize, Spinoza’s introduction of Biblical criticism, and the introduction of the newspaper.  (“Newspapers,” he notes, “did not appear in the Islamic world until the nineteenth century.”)  In addition, he very effectively takes on the argument that the West won its prosperity at the expense of “exploited” non-Western peoples, the romantic myth that “Native Americans and other primitive cultures lived in harmony with nature before the white man’s arrival,” and the uninformed notion that Western civilization is uniquely violent and other cultures uniquely spiritual.

In the same way, he shows that – contemporary leftist rhetoric to the contrary –  neither racism nor imperialism is distinctively Western.  He reminds us of the now politically incorrect fact that if West African natives had not sold their black brothers and sisters to Europeans and Americans, there would have been little or no Atlantic slave trade.  He notes that during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, North African Muslims made slaves of a million or so white Europeans and Americans.  And he stresses that while human bondage still exists in the non-Western world, its abolition on moral grounds “was very much a Western initiative.”

Warraq points up one substantial irony that should receive a great deal more attention – namely, that many of the same people who consider Western imperialism an unmitigated evil hold up Arab imperialism, which crushed “many ancient, advanced civilizations” without mercy, “as something admirable and a justifiable source of Muslim pride.” In a wonderful passage, he observes that

Muslims despise any coreligionists who accept what they regard as alien Western values, yet fail to consider that they themselves could justifiably be seen as “traitors” to the culture of their ancestors.  Muslims in present-day India are descendants of Hindus; in Iran, of Zoroastrians; in Syria, of Christians.  A vast number of Muslims throughout the world have been persuaded to accept a religion that originated thousands of miles away and to bow toward Arabia five times a day – a vivid symbol of cultural imperialism.  Before they can read or write their national language, they are taught to recite a book in a language they do not understand.  These Muslims learn more about the history of a people remote from them geographically and ethnically than about their own countries before the advent of Islam.

Indeed, as Warraq so pithily puts it, “[t]he Arabs turned out to be the most successful imperialists of all time, since so many of those conquered by Arabs came to believe they were thereby saved and that their whole prior cultural heritage was worthless.”

What Warraq has produced here is a wide-ranging, illuminating, and powerful case for the superiority of Western civilization to all others.  His purpose, to be sure, is not to encourage self-congratulation on the part of those of us who happen to be the heirs of this civilization.  We are not its creators, after all, but its beneficiaries – and should also be its fierce and uncompromising protectors.  That’s Warraq’s point: to underscore what an incomparable treasure we have in the edifice of culture and values that our ancestors built, generation by generation and century by century, and that we owe it to them, and to our posterity, to preserve in the face of every assault against it – whether from without or from within – so that we may be able to pass it on as it was passed on to us.

If I had written this piece a few weeks ago, I would have urged readers to buy copies of Warraq’s book as Christmas or Hanukkah gifts for the intelligent young people in their lives.  In a time when students in the West are, all too often, being taught to despise their own civilization and to exalt others – the more primitive, brutal, and alien, it sometimes seems, the better – this book can provide a desperately needed corrective.  So, okay, don’t buy it for Christmas – but buy it for their birthdays, their graduations, their confirmations or bar mitzvahs.  Whatever.  Just buy it, and talk to them about it.  The next generation needs to know the things that are in this book.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ JasonPappas

    Every now and then someone who chooses to be an American tells us natives how much we fail to appreciate and celebrate about our great nation. There are some immigrants who not only assimilate but seize the core greatness of our culture.

    Warraq helps us remember our humanist tradition going back to classical civilization. He did that in passing when he warned us about Islam in “Why I am not a Muslim” and he does that explicitly in his new book “The West is the Best”.

    He reminds me of another immigrant who did the same in the 1930s, 40s, and 50s. Ayn Rand warned us about communism in the 30s. In the 1950s she almost singlehandedly revived the concept of individual rights. Both left and right were hostile to the notion. Academia laughed at the notion of natural rights. But we forget that conservatives, such as the founder of American conservatism, Russell Kirk, view the notion of rights as a French bastardization and dangerous abstraction. Rand went back to Jefferson and revived the moral concept of individual rights–not privileges or permissions or utilitarian rules–but inalienable rights just as the founding fathers understood them.

    Sometimes we need people to sound a load bell warning us that we are slowly losing what make us great. Let’s continue to be a beacon and welcome those who don’t take our greatness for granted.

  • hammar

    The world is at war but the media will not acknowledge the facts
    because that wouldn't be politically correct news, it would be
    Jewish-Christian hear say.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      Not only the media, but also our federal government and both political parties as well. They are all lying to us, at the same time that they are absurdly claiming victory in Iraq, while also claiming that we are winning in Afghanistan.

      Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Muslims are allowed to immigrate to America on a weekly basis at the same time that thousands of violently oppressed Christian refugees trying to flee the Islamic world are flat out denied refugee status, and never mind the fact that mass Muslim immigration to the West with all of its excess baggage like clockwork has turned into an unmitigated disaster everywhere it has occurred

      There is something obviously awfully terribly wrong.

  • Ghostwriter

    Thanks for the book,Mr. Warraq.

  • tanstaafl

    "Why I am not a Muslim." is a classic.

  • Asher

    Strong hearts, Courage, and minds that will not be brainwashed will win against Evil and Tyranny! Truth is on our Side!