<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anti-Wilders Mob Goes Mad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 04:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchstone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3809904</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touchstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 16:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3809904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;As for the rabid commentators on the video with their bloodthirsty comments, yes indeed I disagree with those&quot;  
 
You disagree with them, but you aren&#039;t alarmed by them. That&#039;s understandable and somewhat excusable, since you&#039;re not Jewish and therefore not the target. But that doesn&#039;t explain why you express so much alarm when Muslims are the target. The double standard that arises from that mismatch suggests to me that you, like the anti-Israel crowd in general, aren&#039;t truly sympathetic to Muslims, but rather antipathetic to Jews. That becomes the message, and ultimately adds to the alarm some Jews feel: it&#039;s not just the bigoted fringe that wants our heads on a stick, but a growing chunk of society, led by the self-righteous activists and idealists. 
 
As for some of the individuals you mention: Bernanke&#039;s defenders (like Fareed Zakaria) would say that he&#039;s actually a hero right now, because his policies are starting to bear fruit, and even the ECB has reversed course and started to adopt his policies, leading to better outcomes. The story may turn out to be that Bernanke helped to remedy the situation that Greenspan presided over. I&#039;m not defending him, I&#039;m just telling you that he&#039;s something of a savior in the eyes of some. Your comments about Bernanke might be in line with many of your earlier ones, in that you&#039;re far too quick to assign blame and guilt and pound the table, demanding the harshest punishment, because you need reality to conform to what many observers perceive is a prejudiced view that routinely pre-determines Jewish culpability. That&#039;s a long way of saying that you think Jews, at least powerful ones, are guilty till proven innocent.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;As for the rabid commentators on the video with their bloodthirsty comments, yes indeed I disagree with those&quot;  </p>
<p>You disagree with them, but you aren&#039;t alarmed by them. That&#039;s understandable and somewhat excusable, since you&#039;re not Jewish and therefore not the target. But that doesn&#039;t explain why you express so much alarm when Muslims are the target. The double standard that arises from that mismatch suggests to me that you, like the anti-Israel crowd in general, aren&#039;t truly sympathetic to Muslims, but rather antipathetic to Jews. That becomes the message, and ultimately adds to the alarm some Jews feel: it&#039;s not just the bigoted fringe that wants our heads on a stick, but a growing chunk of society, led by the self-righteous activists and idealists. </p>
<p>As for some of the individuals you mention: Bernanke&#039;s defenders (like Fareed Zakaria) would say that he&#039;s actually a hero right now, because his policies are starting to bear fruit, and even the ECB has reversed course and started to adopt his policies, leading to better outcomes. The story may turn out to be that Bernanke helped to remedy the situation that Greenspan presided over. I&#039;m not defending him, I&#039;m just telling you that he&#039;s something of a savior in the eyes of some. Your comments about Bernanke might be in line with many of your earlier ones, in that you&#039;re far too quick to assign blame and guilt and pound the table, demanding the harshest punishment, because you need reality to conform to what many observers perceive is a prejudiced view that routinely pre-determines Jewish culpability. That&#039;s a long way of saying that you think Jews, at least powerful ones, are guilty till proven innocent.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3793270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3793270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You ignore the reality in Europe and every other place muslims control.  In most Jews are barely tolerated or allowed to survive. 
 
You refuse to treat any Jew as an individual and putting together a long rant only makes you a bigot in a more boring manner. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You ignore the reality in Europe and every other place muslims control.  In most Jews are barely tolerated or allowed to survive. </p>
<p>You refuse to treat any Jew as an individual and putting together a long rant only makes you a bigot in a more boring manner. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlomotion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3793092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlomotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 21:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3793092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that it is wrong to randomly accuse individual Jews of being &lt;i&gt;category three&lt;/i&gt;, meaning ethnic nationalists, not people who happen to be Jewish, or who benignly observe the religion of Judaism. Unfortunately, since historically the definition of Jew has conflated the three categories, I have to describe them in categories to disambiguate. It is racism to accuse one person of being the animal stereotype of his affiliated group unless he is acting out that part. Some people believe we should never use racial epithets to describe human beings when they are acting out the animal stereotype of their affiliated group. I have mixed feelings about it. I &lt;i&gt;tend&lt;/i&gt; not to. In the second video by the author I linked, the one you linked back to me, the author is clearly using the word &quot;Jew&quot; as an accusation and racial slur. Zeev Tene does as well. I agree with Zeev Tene&#039;s reason for doing it. As for the author in the video, I don&#039;t know. He makes some wild conspiratorial claims, that I do not see substantiated in the video itself. As for the rabid commentators on the video with their bloodthirsty comments, yes indeed I disagree with those, just like I disagree when I read them in the Frontpage comment section, or ubiquitously, nearly &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; comment sections.  
  
In the video I linked, the author was making generalized hate look bad, and making global evil look bad, but he was attributing it to individual and organized, affiliated evil and its participatory defenders. I was moved that Ron Perlman, Benicio del Toro and Malcolm McDowell all agree and participated in the video, and must have gotten to know the producer. The video you linked back to me is less a speech about the human condition and a more sweeping condemnation of Jews as a cartel. I think the second video is quite flawed as it does not distinguish between race, religion, and militant affiliation. I thought Matt Damon&#039;s movie &lt;i&gt;Inside Job,&lt;/i&gt; was a principled investigation of the crimes of a few individuals, really, of a cartel or cabal. I agree that the video you linked back to me, like the videos &lt;i&gt;Innocence of Muslims, 2016: Obama&#039;s America,&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;The Third Jihad&lt;/i&gt; are dog whistle movies, essentially the video equivalent of &lt;i&gt;The Turner Diaries&lt;/i&gt; and film-makers should tread conscientiously.  
  
You said: &lt;i&gt;&quot;people who demonize all Jews as a result of a handful of bankers are committing a wrong of their own and have the potential of becoming an even bigger problem, not only for Jews, than those few bankers themselves.&lt;/i&gt; I agree fully.  
  
However, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s bigotry to note that due to patronage or due to incompetence, the last three Presidents relied like a crutch upon a ready-made team of either financial or foreign policy analysts drawn directly from the seamiest side of PNAC, JINSA, and AIPAC. The past 16 years of Presidents have been marked by increased incinerations of American citizens for thought crimes such as being a Hebrew Identity movement, being a Constitutionalist, wanting to live too far from your neighbors, or heaven forbid, criticizing the increased use of war weapons on Americans. The prior presidency was marked by an institution of the Wolfowitz Doctrine, and a completely hyperbolic resurfacing of nearly every Euclidean surface of American government. That Israel or pro-Israelis have been leading us around by the nose in this matter or selling us the devices is essential to discuss freely.  
  
Greenspan can be excused his sad incompetence when he says &quot;we cannot ferret out proxies for M5 (we don&#039;t know what the value of money is).&quot; Who could? It&#039;s too abstract and too rapidly expansive to calculate when it&#039;s not based on real work to the less than second derivative. He can &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; be excused for generating the subprime housing credit bubble/ponzi scheme. Ben Bernanke cannot be excused for deliberately posturing that his knowledge is too complicated to quantify, or for lying about the true state of the economy, or for bluntly refusing to answer auditing questions about the bailout. I think he should go to prison. Someone like Jon Corzine, I think should get the death penalty. We have to be able to discuss this effective coup against the American economy, especially where it touches upon oil and banking cartels and restructuring the Middle East according to a Wolfowitz/Wurmser Doctrine. It is definitely panning out to be not in the American interest, but Frontpage is duly dedicated to making sure that the next PNAC committee gets installed as our national advisory board and that we &lt;i&gt;absolutely&lt;/i&gt; go to war with Iran. We also need to be free to discuss that Wolfowitz&#039;s proscription that no aggressive new foreign power should be allowed to rise and challenge American power should not be made to apply domestically to Americans trying to make money, buy homes, or travel.  
  
I did say that the tone of the second video equates with the tone of Frontpage. I do disagree with both instances. I do also think that the subjects raised at Frontpage should be discussed. However, the discussion is not going to work if it is formulated as DHFC vs the crypto-Muslim Communist left or the &quot;threat&quot; of Muslims displacing Jews as the first among equals in an egalitarian society. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that it is wrong to randomly accuse individual Jews of being <i>category three</i>, meaning ethnic nationalists, not people who happen to be Jewish, or who benignly observe the religion of Judaism. Unfortunately, since historically the definition of Jew has conflated the three categories, I have to describe them in categories to disambiguate. It is racism to accuse one person of being the animal stereotype of his affiliated group unless he is acting out that part. Some people believe we should never use racial epithets to describe human beings when they are acting out the animal stereotype of their affiliated group. I have mixed feelings about it. I <i>tend</i> not to. In the second video by the author I linked, the one you linked back to me, the author is clearly using the word &quot;Jew&quot; as an accusation and racial slur. Zeev Tene does as well. I agree with Zeev Tene&#039;s reason for doing it. As for the author in the video, I don&#039;t know. He makes some wild conspiratorial claims, that I do not see substantiated in the video itself. As for the rabid commentators on the video with their bloodthirsty comments, yes indeed I disagree with those, just like I disagree when I read them in the Frontpage comment section, or ubiquitously, nearly <i>all</i> comment sections.  </p>
<p>In the video I linked, the author was making generalized hate look bad, and making global evil look bad, but he was attributing it to individual and organized, affiliated evil and its participatory defenders. I was moved that Ron Perlman, Benicio del Toro and Malcolm McDowell all agree and participated in the video, and must have gotten to know the producer. The video you linked back to me is less a speech about the human condition and a more sweeping condemnation of Jews as a cartel. I think the second video is quite flawed as it does not distinguish between race, religion, and militant affiliation. I thought Matt Damon&#039;s movie <i>Inside Job,</i> was a principled investigation of the crimes of a few individuals, really, of a cartel or cabal. I agree that the video you linked back to me, like the videos <i>Innocence of Muslims, 2016: Obama&#039;s America,</i> and <i>The Third Jihad</i> are dog whistle movies, essentially the video equivalent of <i>The Turner Diaries</i> and film-makers should tread conscientiously.  </p>
<p>You said: <i>&quot;people who demonize all Jews as a result of a handful of bankers are committing a wrong of their own and have the potential of becoming an even bigger problem, not only for Jews, than those few bankers themselves.</i> I agree fully.  </p>
<p>However, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s bigotry to note that due to patronage or due to incompetence, the last three Presidents relied like a crutch upon a ready-made team of either financial or foreign policy analysts drawn directly from the seamiest side of PNAC, JINSA, and AIPAC. The past 16 years of Presidents have been marked by increased incinerations of American citizens for thought crimes such as being a Hebrew Identity movement, being a Constitutionalist, wanting to live too far from your neighbors, or heaven forbid, criticizing the increased use of war weapons on Americans. The prior presidency was marked by an institution of the Wolfowitz Doctrine, and a completely hyperbolic resurfacing of nearly every Euclidean surface of American government. That Israel or pro-Israelis have been leading us around by the nose in this matter or selling us the devices is essential to discuss freely.  </p>
<p>Greenspan can be excused his sad incompetence when he says &quot;we cannot ferret out proxies for M5 (we don&#039;t know what the value of money is).&quot; Who could? It&#039;s too abstract and too rapidly expansive to calculate when it&#039;s not based on real work to the less than second derivative. He can <i>not</i> be excused for generating the subprime housing credit bubble/ponzi scheme. Ben Bernanke cannot be excused for deliberately posturing that his knowledge is too complicated to quantify, or for lying about the true state of the economy, or for bluntly refusing to answer auditing questions about the bailout. I think he should go to prison. Someone like Jon Corzine, I think should get the death penalty. We have to be able to discuss this effective coup against the American economy, especially where it touches upon oil and banking cartels and restructuring the Middle East according to a Wolfowitz/Wurmser Doctrine. It is definitely panning out to be not in the American interest, but Frontpage is duly dedicated to making sure that the next PNAC committee gets installed as our national advisory board and that we <i>absolutely</i> go to war with Iran. We also need to be free to discuss that Wolfowitz&#039;s proscription that no aggressive new foreign power should be allowed to rise and challenge American power should not be made to apply domestically to Americans trying to make money, buy homes, or travel.  </p>
<p>I did say that the tone of the second video equates with the tone of Frontpage. I do disagree with both instances. I do also think that the subjects raised at Frontpage should be discussed. However, the discussion is not going to work if it is formulated as DHFC vs the crypto-Muslim Communist left or the &quot;threat&quot; of Muslims displacing Jews as the first among equals in an egalitarian society. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchstone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3791334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touchstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 16:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3791334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;we are not allowed to talk about Jews.&quot; 
 
Of course you are. But why do so many people think it&#039;s OK to talk about Jews as a collective, each one of us guilty of pure evil and therefore deserving of the harshest punishments? Why is it that you can&#039;t distinguish between reasonable discussion about specific individuals who happen to be Jewish, and the most hateful, rabble-rousing, racist bigotry that condemns not specific people but an entire race? Did you notice the bloodthirsty reactions in the comments section under both videos? The author must be thinking, &quot;mission accomplished&quot;. 
 
Did all you notice was the J-Bomb and not the generalized hate? Do you think the author of that video sounds like he wants to limit his reprisals to a handful of bankers? Does the pitchfork-wielding mob in the comments section sound like they want no more than a principled investigation of the crimes of a few individuals? Or are comments like &quot;I say we kill them all&quot; precisely what the author intended? These videos are dog whistles. It&#039;s &quot;release the hounds&quot; time.  
 
&quot;none of these banking cartel swindlers gave a good god-damn whether their actions might reflect poorly on Jews&quot; 
 
On this point you and I are in agreement. Nevertheless, people who demonize all Jews as a result of a handful of bankers are committing a wrong of their own and have the potential of becoming an even bigger problem, not only for Jews, than those few bankers themselves. 
 
&quot;the last three Presidents had Judaized and also Zionized advisory cabinets&quot; 
 
Now you&#039;re back to talking like a bigot. I thought you distinguished between Jews and Zionists, believing that today&#039;s Zionism is the mutant offspring of Herzl&#039;s. But now you&#039;re insinuating that something nefarious must be afoot when, heaven help us, a few more Jewish Americans have risen to prominent positions. You represent the element in society that just won&#039;t hold bosses accountable for squat, when there&#039;s a Jewish underling to blame, and therefore generalize about. Whether it&#039;s Bush or Obama or Clinton, it&#039;s not them but THE JEWS whose feet must be held to the fire, right? When you talk like this, you&#039;re tapping into the ancient, global wellspring of antisemitism. 
 
Another case in point: Greenspan was operating a &quot;scam&quot;? Is it not conceivable that a Jew in charge of the Fed (or in any position of power) might have just messed up? (Especially when things were going so well economically and he was being widely praised for his wisdom.) The answer is no, because for centuries Jews have been widely suspected of harboring evil designs against the non-Jewish population. Therefore, one doesn&#039;t talk about Greenspan&#039;s errors in judgment, but the &quot;scam&quot; he was running, as if every powerful Jew is a carbon copy of Madoff. When your premise is so nakedly prejudiced, you&#039;re really just asking permission to promote hatred of Jews in the guise of skewering one or two. What you describe inocuously as &quot;discussion&quot; is one in which the prejudiced framework of discussion and its predictable conclusions have been determined from the outset. Using one or two Jews as your starting point, you&#039;re really just &quot;discussing&quot; to what extent Jewry has corrupted society, rather than honestly appraising the actions of a few people without regard to their ethnic heritage. Asking you to do so is asking too much when such fevered conclusions are the desired result of the innocent-sounding &quot;discussion&quot; you&#039;d like to conduct. Your accusations suggest that you want the ultimate witch-hunt, not an honest, rational discussion. 
 
Lastly, I detect another possible contradiction arising from your post. On the one hand, you say that society should be openly discussing the ideas about Jews raised in the video. On the other hand, you equate the tone of the video with FrontPage, against which you rail volubly. So what you&#039;re saying unwittingly is that FrontPage is indeed raising topics that should be discussed, but you only want to discuss Jews in such harshly realistic terms, not Muslims. In exposing my double standard, you&#039;ve exposed your own, yet again. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;we are not allowed to talk about Jews.&quot; </p>
<p>Of course you are. But why do so many people think it&#039;s OK to talk about Jews as a collective, each one of us guilty of pure evil and therefore deserving of the harshest punishments? Why is it that you can&#039;t distinguish between reasonable discussion about specific individuals who happen to be Jewish, and the most hateful, rabble-rousing, racist bigotry that condemns not specific people but an entire race? Did you notice the bloodthirsty reactions in the comments section under both videos? The author must be thinking, &quot;mission accomplished&quot;. </p>
<p>Did all you notice was the J-Bomb and not the generalized hate? Do you think the author of that video sounds like he wants to limit his reprisals to a handful of bankers? Does the pitchfork-wielding mob in the comments section sound like they want no more than a principled investigation of the crimes of a few individuals? Or are comments like &quot;I say we kill them all&quot; precisely what the author intended? These videos are dog whistles. It&#039;s &quot;release the hounds&quot; time.  </p>
<p>&quot;none of these banking cartel swindlers gave a good god-damn whether their actions might reflect poorly on Jews&quot; </p>
<p>On this point you and I are in agreement. Nevertheless, people who demonize all Jews as a result of a handful of bankers are committing a wrong of their own and have the potential of becoming an even bigger problem, not only for Jews, than those few bankers themselves. </p>
<p>&quot;the last three Presidents had Judaized and also Zionized advisory cabinets&quot; </p>
<p>Now you&#039;re back to talking like a bigot. I thought you distinguished between Jews and Zionists, believing that today&#039;s Zionism is the mutant offspring of Herzl&#039;s. But now you&#039;re insinuating that something nefarious must be afoot when, heaven help us, a few more Jewish Americans have risen to prominent positions. You represent the element in society that just won&#039;t hold bosses accountable for squat, when there&#039;s a Jewish underling to blame, and therefore generalize about. Whether it&#039;s Bush or Obama or Clinton, it&#039;s not them but THE JEWS whose feet must be held to the fire, right? When you talk like this, you&#039;re tapping into the ancient, global wellspring of antisemitism. </p>
<p>Another case in point: Greenspan was operating a &quot;scam&quot;? Is it not conceivable that a Jew in charge of the Fed (or in any position of power) might have just messed up? (Especially when things were going so well economically and he was being widely praised for his wisdom.) The answer is no, because for centuries Jews have been widely suspected of harboring evil designs against the non-Jewish population. Therefore, one doesn&#039;t talk about Greenspan&#039;s errors in judgment, but the &quot;scam&quot; he was running, as if every powerful Jew is a carbon copy of Madoff. When your premise is so nakedly prejudiced, you&#039;re really just asking permission to promote hatred of Jews in the guise of skewering one or two. What you describe inocuously as &quot;discussion&quot; is one in which the prejudiced framework of discussion and its predictable conclusions have been determined from the outset. Using one or two Jews as your starting point, you&#039;re really just &quot;discussing&quot; to what extent Jewry has corrupted society, rather than honestly appraising the actions of a few people without regard to their ethnic heritage. Asking you to do so is asking too much when such fevered conclusions are the desired result of the innocent-sounding &quot;discussion&quot; you&#039;d like to conduct. Your accusations suggest that you want the ultimate witch-hunt, not an honest, rational discussion. </p>
<p>Lastly, I detect another possible contradiction arising from your post. On the one hand, you say that society should be openly discussing the ideas about Jews raised in the video. On the other hand, you equate the tone of the video with FrontPage, against which you rail volubly. So what you&#039;re saying unwittingly is that FrontPage is indeed raising topics that should be discussed, but you only want to discuss Jews in such harshly realistic terms, not Muslims. In exposing my double standard, you&#039;ve exposed your own, yet again. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlomotion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3786214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlomotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3786214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can definitely say it with a straight face. I had not watched any other videos by that author and knew nothing of him except the content of that one video. So I watched the second video that you linked by him. Yes, he sure drops the J-Bomb a lot. I think your choice is helpful because it moves us to one of the pinnacle examples of the paradigm &quot;we are not allowed to talk about Jews.&quot;       
       
The video you linked is decisively more Louis Farrakhan in script. But the big observation I take from that video is that none of these banking cartel swindlers gave a good god-damn whether their actions might reflect poorly on Jews. You and I can share a camaraderie in the fact that these men consider themselves even more special, even more beyond criticism, and even more outside humanity than you or I.       
       
But is it &lt;i&gt;forbidden&lt;/i&gt; to discuss that these men were functionally acting in the historical tradition of Jewish exchequers driving a war-finance engine for an empire in the tradition of the Exchequer of the Castilian Monarchs? Do we not face a financial crisis on par with those times? Are we not reminded constantly that collapse to the forces of invasive Islam is the consequence? To be carved up also by the Asiatic Hordes? We can&#039;t discuss it?  We cannot discuss that the last three Presidents had Judaized and also Zionized advisory cabinets? We have to blame the collapse of the American empire post-Saddam on Obama and not on &lt;i&gt;Wolfowitz&lt;/i&gt;? Wolfowitz and Greenspan, whose scam came crashing down with the Middle East only half attacked and the housing bubble throwing Americans into destitution? Wolfowitz who tried to appoint his girlfriend to Queen of World Finance after he was named King and both had to step down? Please.       
       
Another important point about the video that you linked is that the rhetoric, the cadence, the logic, the direction of blame is IDENTICAL to the thrust and tone of &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; of Frontpage&#039;s articles. If you take out the word &quot;Jewish&quot; and replace it with &quot;Islamic,&quot; if you harp on &quot;Shalom&quot; and &quot;Israel&quot; instead of &quot;Hussein&quot; as a middle name, if you blame collapse on a &lt;i&gt;Muslim-Leftist&lt;/i&gt; cabal instead of a Jewish-Likudnik cabal, &lt;i&gt;there is no difference&lt;/i&gt;. You have conceded that the DHFC are uber-Nazis in the service of a Zionized Diaspora.       
       
All of this world fact is indeed unfortunate, but to me it leads to no conclusion that genocide, deportation, or mass disenfranchisement is justifiable. It does not color my impression of people who happen to be Jewish or people who benignly follow the religion of Judaism. It only affects, enhances really, my dislike for the third category of Jews, the militant separatists who never see fit to separate themselves very far from the slop trough. It is ironic that they hate Elijah Muhammad so much when they resemble him in every way. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can definitely say it with a straight face. I had not watched any other videos by that author and knew nothing of him except the content of that one video. So I watched the second video that you linked by him. Yes, he sure drops the J-Bomb a lot. I think your choice is helpful because it moves us to one of the pinnacle examples of the paradigm &quot;we are not allowed to talk about Jews.&quot;       </p>
<p>The video you linked is decisively more Louis Farrakhan in script. But the big observation I take from that video is that none of these banking cartel swindlers gave a good god-damn whether their actions might reflect poorly on Jews. You and I can share a camaraderie in the fact that these men consider themselves even more special, even more beyond criticism, and even more outside humanity than you or I.       </p>
<p>But is it <i>forbidden</i> to discuss that these men were functionally acting in the historical tradition of Jewish exchequers driving a war-finance engine for an empire in the tradition of the Exchequer of the Castilian Monarchs? Do we not face a financial crisis on par with those times? Are we not reminded constantly that collapse to the forces of invasive Islam is the consequence? To be carved up also by the Asiatic Hordes? We can&#039;t discuss it?  We cannot discuss that the last three Presidents had Judaized and also Zionized advisory cabinets? We have to blame the collapse of the American empire post-Saddam on Obama and not on <i>Wolfowitz</i>? Wolfowitz and Greenspan, whose scam came crashing down with the Middle East only half attacked and the housing bubble throwing Americans into destitution? Wolfowitz who tried to appoint his girlfriend to Queen of World Finance after he was named King and both had to step down? Please.       </p>
<p>Another important point about the video that you linked is that the rhetoric, the cadence, the logic, the direction of blame is IDENTICAL to the thrust and tone of <i>all</i> of Frontpage&#039;s articles. If you take out the word &quot;Jewish&quot; and replace it with &quot;Islamic,&quot; if you harp on &quot;Shalom&quot; and &quot;Israel&quot; instead of &quot;Hussein&quot; as a middle name, if you blame collapse on a <i>Muslim-Leftist</i> cabal instead of a Jewish-Likudnik cabal, <i>there is no difference</i>. You have conceded that the DHFC are uber-Nazis in the service of a Zionized Diaspora.       </p>
<p>All of this world fact is indeed unfortunate, but to me it leads to no conclusion that genocide, deportation, or mass disenfranchisement is justifiable. It does not color my impression of people who happen to be Jewish or people who benignly follow the religion of Judaism. It only affects, enhances really, my dislike for the third category of Jews, the militant separatists who never see fit to separate themselves very far from the slop trough. It is ironic that they hate Elijah Muhammad so much when they resemble him in every way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchstone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3785683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touchstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3785683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;To you they are these gargantuan gorgons of bitter ridicule, something from deep in the psyche of Zionist culture where men are cuckolded by women and try to rise above them as cold calculators and moral experts.&quot; 
 
That&#039;s one of the most imperceptive, misinformed thoughts you&#039;ve expressed on this site (and you&#039;ve probably written tens of thousands). 
 
In an effort to save you the trouble of crafting yet another completely off-the-mark waste of a paragraph, let me just say that I don&#039;t &quot;hate&quot; schoolgirls, and I can&#039;t believe I have to spell this out for you. I concede that I sometimes lean on the cliche of young girls being catty and occasionally employ this stereotype as a way of diminishing an opponent, when I think it&#039;s appropriate, as it certainly is in your case. But I realize it&#039;s just a stereotype, and I don&#039;t have to be bashed over the head with a pointless lecture about the cosmic potential of young females. Next time I&#039;ll try to be more imaginative and compare you to something that won&#039;t prompt a needless valentine to schoolgirls. But getting back to what set this in motion: Is your unwarranted digression a sign that you really can&#039;t grasp the notion that your attacks on Spencer are trivial, shallow and juvenile? That&#039;s the whole bloody point! 
 
&quot;you seek to rob from me my genuine like for all human beings which includes, of course, people who happen to be Jewish&quot; 
 
Please say that again with a straight face, after watching the following video, made by the same uber-Nazi you linked to: 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQibFxp-b0k&amp;feature=plcp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQibFxp-b0k&amp;fe...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
At approximately 2:25, he laments that &quot;the treasury of the United States will forever be in the hands of the Jews&quot;. 
 
At about 5:08, he says, &quot;the fix is in, and the fix has a Jewish seal on it&quot;.  
 
This b*stard wouldn&#039;t have been just an ordinary Nazi. He would have wanted Himmler&#039;s job. This is the hate-oozing fiend you promote. Did you not want me to discover what this man truly believes?  
 
I don&#039;t seek to &quot;rob&quot; you of your &quot;genuine like for all human beings&quot;. How could I? That would be like robbing an empty vault. (Just read your own words instead of pretending that I&#039;ve been putting them in your mouth.) If I seek to &quot;rob&quot; you of anything, it&#039;s your delusion that you&#039;re on a righteous crusade, and now I see that&#039;s either a more deeply held delusion than I realized, or it&#039;s just one grand deception. Clearly, you&#039;re sympathetic to evildoers of a magnitude I wasn&#039;t even aware of. Previously I thought you were somewhat prejudiced, enough to be rude and insulting on a daily basis, but simply in denial about it. Now I see I was giving you way too much credit. The man whose video you linked to could have written Mein Kampf. What the hell are you up to? Would a list of your associates include anyone with a swastika tattooed on his forehead? The question is warranted, given the odiousness of the propagandist you just endorsed, if only indirectly. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;To you they are these gargantuan gorgons of bitter ridicule, something from deep in the psyche of Zionist culture where men are cuckolded by women and try to rise above them as cold calculators and moral experts.&quot; </p>
<p>That&#039;s one of the most imperceptive, misinformed thoughts you&#039;ve expressed on this site (and you&#039;ve probably written tens of thousands). </p>
<p>In an effort to save you the trouble of crafting yet another completely off-the-mark waste of a paragraph, let me just say that I don&#039;t &quot;hate&quot; schoolgirls, and I can&#039;t believe I have to spell this out for you. I concede that I sometimes lean on the cliche of young girls being catty and occasionally employ this stereotype as a way of diminishing an opponent, when I think it&#039;s appropriate, as it certainly is in your case. But I realize it&#039;s just a stereotype, and I don&#039;t have to be bashed over the head with a pointless lecture about the cosmic potential of young females. Next time I&#039;ll try to be more imaginative and compare you to something that won&#039;t prompt a needless valentine to schoolgirls. But getting back to what set this in motion: Is your unwarranted digression a sign that you really can&#039;t grasp the notion that your attacks on Spencer are trivial, shallow and juvenile? That&#039;s the whole bloody point! </p>
<p>&quot;you seek to rob from me my genuine like for all human beings which includes, of course, people who happen to be Jewish&quot; </p>
<p>Please say that again with a straight face, after watching the following video, made by the same uber-Nazi you linked to:<br />
  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQibFxp-b0k&amp;feature=plcp" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQibFxp-b0k&#038;fe" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQibFxp-b0k&#038;fe</a>&#8230; </p>
<p>At approximately 2:25, he laments that &quot;the treasury of the United States will forever be in the hands of the Jews&quot;. </p>
<p>At about 5:08, he says, &quot;the fix is in, and the fix has a Jewish seal on it&quot;.  </p>
<p>This b*stard wouldn&#039;t have been just an ordinary Nazi. He would have wanted Himmler&#039;s job. This is the hate-oozing fiend you promote. Did you not want me to discover what this man truly believes?  </p>
<p>I don&#039;t seek to &quot;rob&quot; you of your &quot;genuine like for all human beings&quot;. How could I? That would be like robbing an empty vault. (Just read your own words instead of pretending that I&#039;ve been putting them in your mouth.) If I seek to &quot;rob&quot; you of anything, it&#039;s your delusion that you&#039;re on a righteous crusade, and now I see that&#039;s either a more deeply held delusion than I realized, or it&#039;s just one grand deception. Clearly, you&#039;re sympathetic to evildoers of a magnitude I wasn&#039;t even aware of. Previously I thought you were somewhat prejudiced, enough to be rude and insulting on a daily basis, but simply in denial about it. Now I see I was giving you way too much credit. The man whose video you linked to could have written Mein Kampf. What the hell are you up to? Would a list of your associates include anyone with a swastika tattooed on his forehead? The question is warranted, given the odiousness of the propagandist you just endorsed, if only indirectly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3785452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3785452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And here you are, surely you aren&#039;t claiming to be part of any mainstream? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And here you are, surely you aren&#039;t claiming to be part of any mainstream? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3785448</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3785448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait until the election results come in and Chicago hasn&#039;t stolen enough votes to rob us our White House. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until the election results come in and Chicago hasn&#039;t stolen enough votes to rob us our White House. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3785435</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 02:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3785435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those muslim friendly trolls that don&#039;t fear reaching and stretching! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those muslim friendly trolls that don&#039;t fear reaching and stretching! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3784939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3784939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a-freaking-MEN. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a-freaking-MEN. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3784888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mary Sue]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 01:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3784888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wow that must be some kind of record ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow that must be some kind of record </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3784146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eva]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 00:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3784146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t you love it that we have the Second Amendment to protect us from these muscular youths with tattoo&#039;s? My wish for them is that after enough Muslims are permitted to settle in Denmark/Norway, etc., these youths are beheaded and their sisters are raped by the militant Islamic mob. Maybe, just maybe...  this will make them pause and think that they are playing with fire.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#039;t you love it that we have the Second Amendment to protect us from these muscular youths with tattoo&#039;s? My wish for them is that after enough Muslims are permitted to settle in Denmark/Norway, etc., these youths are beheaded and their sisters are raped by the militant Islamic mob. Maybe, just maybe&#8230;  this will make them pause and think that they are playing with fire.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlomotion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3783415</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlomotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3783415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am definitely not baffled by the rhetorical trope of the &lt;i&gt;growing trend.&lt;/i&gt; Nor am I baffled that you seek to rob from me my genuine like for all human beings which includes, of course, people who happen to be Jewish but does exclude people who choose ethnic nationalism over universal brotherhood. I can&#039;t bend myself to like a Khallid Muhammad any more than an Irv Rubin. The fact that that kind of &quot;Jewishness&quot; is &lt;i&gt;optional&lt;/i&gt; makes it all the less acceptable when it is beaten so hard into others with not only vicious collective-pride but with the primate deception of group moral rationalization. It really is not only impossible but inappropriate to distinguish it from the Muslim kind which I equally disdain but which I withhold from the gnashing and hungry morons that crave it in the name of equal time.  
  
I am not jealous of Mr. Spencer&#039;s purported superiority at getting attention. Again, I am disgusted and publicly disdainful of his poor choice to pose as a man of religion and exert his highly fragile form of demagoguery over people with the intent of making his community angry only to ridicule them. Let us not forget the modus operandi of DHFC: first the group insult using the full page ad, then the appearance at the institution financed by the insulted audience, then and only then, the calm cool and collected form of academic tilting and sneering. Finally, the angry outbursts, and then the opportunistic photographs of the event portraying Horowitz, Geller, Spencer &amp; Co. as the victims of the mob, when in reality they were parasites of the mob, crowdsurfers.  
  
You should really get over your intense hatred of schoolgirls. I don&#039;t get it. They are pretty, they are bright, and who doesn&#039;t like braided pigtails? Schoolgirls never hurt me. To you they are these gargantuan gorgons of bitter ridicule, something from deep in the psyche of Zionist culture where men are cuckolded by women and try to rise above them as cold calculators and moral experts. Poor schoolgirls. If I may name drop some more, I know another schoolgirl who was always excluded for being brainy and Jewish, and went on to write excellent youth fiction to rival William Gibson. I just don&#039;t understand your visceral hatred of the schoolgirl. They are the counterpart to schoolboys.  
  
&lt;b&gt;&quot;in the next you trot out the old standby of antisemites everywhere: liken Israelis to Nazis&lt;/b&gt;  
  
I am finally reading The Wandering Who by Gilad Atzmon. He does the same therein based on his firsthand experience in the IDF. I have to tell you, I am cheering while reading this book. Such a humanist. Such a philosophically sound and plain speaker is Gilad Atzmon. His writing about politics and personal experience and of his leaving the tiny and bitter family of ethnic nationalists for the wider and more welcoming family of joyful and meritocratic musicians is such a heartlifter. I understand why Alan Dershowitz doesn&#039;t want him to be given the time of day or allowed to breathe air. Atzmon is a &lt;i&gt;moser&lt;/i&gt; who speaks freely about the &lt;i&gt;sayanim&lt;/i&gt;. He is also a fellow man of the most excellent order.  
  
Compared to Mr. Spencer, I can&#039;t agree, as you claim, that Spencer is getting a better reputation. I think he is the typical subject of this video:  
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkPsvMWu4OM&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkPsvMWu4OM&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am definitely not baffled by the rhetorical trope of the <i>growing trend.</i> Nor am I baffled that you seek to rob from me my genuine like for all human beings which includes, of course, people who happen to be Jewish but does exclude people who choose ethnic nationalism over universal brotherhood. I can&#039;t bend myself to like a Khallid Muhammad any more than an Irv Rubin. The fact that that kind of &quot;Jewishness&quot; is <i>optional</i> makes it all the less acceptable when it is beaten so hard into others with not only vicious collective-pride but with the primate deception of group moral rationalization. It really is not only impossible but inappropriate to distinguish it from the Muslim kind which I equally disdain but which I withhold from the gnashing and hungry morons that crave it in the name of equal time.  </p>
<p>I am not jealous of Mr. Spencer&#039;s purported superiority at getting attention. Again, I am disgusted and publicly disdainful of his poor choice to pose as a man of religion and exert his highly fragile form of demagoguery over people with the intent of making his community angry only to ridicule them. Let us not forget the modus operandi of DHFC: first the group insult using the full page ad, then the appearance at the institution financed by the insulted audience, then and only then, the calm cool and collected form of academic tilting and sneering. Finally, the angry outbursts, and then the opportunistic photographs of the event portraying Horowitz, Geller, Spencer &amp; Co. as the victims of the mob, when in reality they were parasites of the mob, crowdsurfers.  </p>
<p>You should really get over your intense hatred of schoolgirls. I don&#039;t get it. They are pretty, they are bright, and who doesn&#039;t like braided pigtails? Schoolgirls never hurt me. To you they are these gargantuan gorgons of bitter ridicule, something from deep in the psyche of Zionist culture where men are cuckolded by women and try to rise above them as cold calculators and moral experts. Poor schoolgirls. If I may name drop some more, I know another schoolgirl who was always excluded for being brainy and Jewish, and went on to write excellent youth fiction to rival William Gibson. I just don&#039;t understand your visceral hatred of the schoolgirl. They are the counterpart to schoolboys.  </p>
<p><b>&quot;in the next you trot out the old standby of antisemites everywhere: liken Israelis to Nazis</b>  </p>
<p>I am finally reading The Wandering Who by Gilad Atzmon. He does the same therein based on his firsthand experience in the IDF. I have to tell you, I am cheering while reading this book. Such a humanist. Such a philosophically sound and plain speaker is Gilad Atzmon. His writing about politics and personal experience and of his leaving the tiny and bitter family of ethnic nationalists for the wider and more welcoming family of joyful and meritocratic musicians is such a heartlifter. I understand why Alan Dershowitz doesn&#039;t want him to be given the time of day or allowed to breathe air. Atzmon is a <i>moser</i> who speaks freely about the <i>sayanim</i>. He is also a fellow man of the most excellent order.  </p>
<p>Compared to Mr. Spencer, I can&#039;t agree, as you claim, that Spencer is getting a better reputation. I think he is the typical subject of this video:<br />
  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkPsvMWu4OM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkPsvMWu4OM</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchstone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3782589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touchstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3782589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;ve made plenty of comments disparaging of Jews in general, and Israel in general, not just the fringe you claim to focus on. You&#039;ve slandered Judaism in terms much stronger than anything you&#039;ve used to criticize Islam, and you&#039;ve done the latter only when you&#039;ve been pressured to spread the criticism around. What&#039;s truly &quot;wild&quot; and &quot;amazing&quot; is how unaware you are of your own prejudice, how deep your denial is, how undisciplined you are with your slanders, and how baffled you must be at the ever-growing number of people here who seem to agree that you have a beef with Jews. Reminding people how &quot;nice&quot; you think most Jews are is what all insincere Israel-bashers say when they get defensive.  
 
As for the &quot;comedy&quot; I unintentionally provided you: I was simply reporting what I was reading. If you&#039;re not jealous of Spencer&#039;s superior ability to attract attention, then you certainly SOUND like it. That&#039;s really the point. I wasn&#039;t trying to read your mind so much as I was trying to let you know how schoolgirlish your petty attacks on him sound. Criticizing the guy&#039;s physical appearance and hotel room habits? That&#039;s perfectly in keeping with small-minded, envious spite; not exactly the stuff of scholarly disquisitions on brain-machine interfaces. (Which reminds me: bragging, whether in the form of name-dropping or ostentatious displays of erudition, is the other go-to defense mechanism you use, when hyperbole won&#039;t suffice.)  
 
&quot;a hairybeary midget&quot; -- I rest my case. That tripe could have appeared on any catty teenage girl&#039;s twitter feed. 
 
&quot;the volatile piece of real estate they currently run concentration camps on&quot; 
 
In one breath you insist you&#039;re not an antisemite, and in the next you trot out the old standby of antisemites everywhere: liken Israelis to Nazis, even though the comparison has no merit. It&#039;s meant to sting and demonize, not reflect the truth. Yes, let&#039;s all pretend that Hamas is a perfectly friendly social club, not linked in any way to genocidal mullahs, and Israelis should just leave them to their own peaceful pursuits. Why be the slightest bit concerned about their activities? And let&#039;s also pretend that Israelis, like Nazis, are running &quot;camps&quot; where they&#039;re performing gruesome medical experiments on Arab children and making innocent people stand interminably at roll call and gassing them when they collapse from exhaustion. (Have you heard about the luxury shopping in the &quot;camp&quot; called Gaza, by the way?) 
 
&quot;to prolong the inevitable condemnation of an evildoer by the public&quot; -- Inevitable? Is that what your crystal ball tells you? As long as Islamic radicalism threatens to increase, not decrease, the more likely it is that experts who warn about it will be respected and valued by the public, rather than vilified. When Muslims murder an American ambassador, it&#039;s the reputation of Islam that takes a hit, whereas that of &quot;evildoers&quot; like Spencer can only get better.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#039;ve made plenty of comments disparaging of Jews in general, and Israel in general, not just the fringe you claim to focus on. You&#039;ve slandered Judaism in terms much stronger than anything you&#039;ve used to criticize Islam, and you&#039;ve done the latter only when you&#039;ve been pressured to spread the criticism around. What&#039;s truly &quot;wild&quot; and &quot;amazing&quot; is how unaware you are of your own prejudice, how deep your denial is, how undisciplined you are with your slanders, and how baffled you must be at the ever-growing number of people here who seem to agree that you have a beef with Jews. Reminding people how &quot;nice&quot; you think most Jews are is what all insincere Israel-bashers say when they get defensive.  </p>
<p>As for the &quot;comedy&quot; I unintentionally provided you: I was simply reporting what I was reading. If you&#039;re not jealous of Spencer&#039;s superior ability to attract attention, then you certainly SOUND like it. That&#039;s really the point. I wasn&#039;t trying to read your mind so much as I was trying to let you know how schoolgirlish your petty attacks on him sound. Criticizing the guy&#039;s physical appearance and hotel room habits? That&#039;s perfectly in keeping with small-minded, envious spite; not exactly the stuff of scholarly disquisitions on brain-machine interfaces. (Which reminds me: bragging, whether in the form of name-dropping or ostentatious displays of erudition, is the other go-to defense mechanism you use, when hyperbole won&#039;t suffice.)  </p>
<p>&quot;a hairybeary midget&quot; &#8212; I rest my case. That tripe could have appeared on any catty teenage girl&#039;s twitter feed. </p>
<p>&quot;the volatile piece of real estate they currently run concentration camps on&quot; </p>
<p>In one breath you insist you&#039;re not an antisemite, and in the next you trot out the old standby of antisemites everywhere: liken Israelis to Nazis, even though the comparison has no merit. It&#039;s meant to sting and demonize, not reflect the truth. Yes, let&#039;s all pretend that Hamas is a perfectly friendly social club, not linked in any way to genocidal mullahs, and Israelis should just leave them to their own peaceful pursuits. Why be the slightest bit concerned about their activities? And let&#039;s also pretend that Israelis, like Nazis, are running &quot;camps&quot; where they&#039;re performing gruesome medical experiments on Arab children and making innocent people stand interminably at roll call and gassing them when they collapse from exhaustion. (Have you heard about the luxury shopping in the &quot;camp&quot; called Gaza, by the way?) </p>
<p>&quot;to prolong the inevitable condemnation of an evildoer by the public&quot; &#8212; Inevitable? Is that what your crystal ball tells you? As long as Islamic radicalism threatens to increase, not decrease, the more likely it is that experts who warn about it will be respected and valued by the public, rather than vilified. When Muslims murder an American ambassador, it&#039;s the reputation of Islam that takes a hit, whereas that of &quot;evildoers&quot; like Spencer can only get better.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlomotion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3781880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlomotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 18:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3781880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I disagree. Really, it just looks like Zionists are a radical fringe that relies on being &quot;oppressed&quot; and Islamists are the eternal fuel for that radical fringe. So infrequently can radical fringe groups tolerate one another. As we enjoy this post-Zionist era unfolding, an era of acceptance and the concomitant fear of assimilation and loss of specialness, the lunatic fringe feels obligated to rail against the center. Not the Left, mind you, but the &lt;i&gt;center&lt;/i&gt; of America because we just don&#039;t have the fear of Muslims that Spencer and Geller can hope to squeeze out of Christian Fundamentalists or immigrant wannabe superpatriots. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. Really, it just looks like Zionists are a radical fringe that relies on being &quot;oppressed&quot; and Islamists are the eternal fuel for that radical fringe. So infrequently can radical fringe groups tolerate one another. As we enjoy this post-Zionist era unfolding, an era of acceptance and the concomitant fear of assimilation and loss of specialness, the lunatic fringe feels obligated to rail against the center. Not the Left, mind you, but the <i>center</i> of America because we just don&#039;t have the fear of Muslims that Spencer and Geller can hope to squeeze out of Christian Fundamentalists or immigrant wannabe superpatriots. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlomotion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3781824</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlomotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3781824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It really is wild to watch you try to lump Jews who randomly happen to be born Jewish, Jews who benignly observe the Jewish religion, and fanatical nationalist gangster Crip Jews who are merely a xenophobic criminal affiliation all into the same category. I am not &lt;i&gt;anti-Jewish&lt;/i&gt; by a longshot, unless you mean anti-Category Three Jews who think that everyone who is a Jew is an obligatory lifetime member in the ethnic nationalist and internationalist special person club. You know, the Jews who issue real and professional fatwas against people who break ranks with the collective? I admit readily that I am anti-&lt;i&gt;those type of Jews&lt;/i&gt;. They don&#039;t like America as anything but a chuck wagon, and have no real intention of  all moving to the volatile piece of real estate they currently run concentration camps on. I am justified in disliking that particular subgroup that you try to cover over with the other two groups of nice people.    
   
It was a good piece of comedy, you claiming that I am jealous of Robert Spencer in a hotel room, when in fact anybody can rent a hotel room for around $90 bucks a night and sit in front of his laptop over wi-fi and claim he is on an important business meeting with Sun News Canada. Oh, that is funny!   
   
Now Spencer beat me on a test and stole my girlfriend? Oh, the jokes just don&#039;t stop. A hairybeary midget stole my girlfriend? Hey, I&#039;ll tell you though, a classmate did beat me on a test once, as you say. She wrote a good treatise on brain-machine interfaces after she got her PhD. Really approachable and ambitious material. I don&#039;t think I can ever be spiteful of intelligence. I can definitely be critical of an evil man who poses as a pastor and has a roadshow of hatred though. It&#039;s amazing to me that you defend this guy. The lengths to which people go to prolong the inevitable condemnation of an evildoer by the public so that he can score a few more points for selective morality and landgrabbers is really stunning. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is wild to watch you try to lump Jews who randomly happen to be born Jewish, Jews who benignly observe the Jewish religion, and fanatical nationalist gangster Crip Jews who are merely a xenophobic criminal affiliation all into the same category. I am not <i>anti-Jewish</i> by a longshot, unless you mean anti-Category Three Jews who think that everyone who is a Jew is an obligatory lifetime member in the ethnic nationalist and internationalist special person club. You know, the Jews who issue real and professional fatwas against people who break ranks with the collective? I admit readily that I am anti-<i>those type of Jews</i>. They don&#039;t like America as anything but a chuck wagon, and have no real intention of  all moving to the volatile piece of real estate they currently run concentration camps on. I am justified in disliking that particular subgroup that you try to cover over with the other two groups of nice people.    </p>
<p>It was a good piece of comedy, you claiming that I am jealous of Robert Spencer in a hotel room, when in fact anybody can rent a hotel room for around $90 bucks a night and sit in front of his laptop over wi-fi and claim he is on an important business meeting with Sun News Canada. Oh, that is funny!   </p>
<p>Now Spencer beat me on a test and stole my girlfriend? Oh, the jokes just don&#039;t stop. A hairybeary midget stole my girlfriend? Hey, I&#039;ll tell you though, a classmate did beat me on a test once, as you say. She wrote a good treatise on brain-machine interfaces after she got her PhD. Really approachable and ambitious material. I don&#039;t think I can ever be spiteful of intelligence. I can definitely be critical of an evil man who poses as a pastor and has a roadshow of hatred though. It&#039;s amazing to me that you defend this guy. The lengths to which people go to prolong the inevitable condemnation of an evildoer by the public so that he can score a few more points for selective morality and landgrabbers is really stunning. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iftikhar Ahmad</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3781787</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iftikhar Ahmad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3781787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do Muslims come to Europe, one wonders....and why do we allow them to? Did someone ask your opinion before letting Muslims come to Europe as you say?  I think you have very little say in the matter, and perhaps that&#039;s why you&#039;re so angry.  Cultural diversity, open borders and an end to blatant racism is the only answer. England is big enough for 70 million or more. To be honest, I would be prefer to live in a Britain of immigrants than intolerant bigots.  
 
I love immigration. The more people of diverse culture the better. The sooner we water down the racists who look down upon anyone with non white skin the better. What goes around comes around.......any one remember colonisation ,.....immigration is pay back time!This debate is not about mass immigration. It&#039;s all about maintaining a white majority ,Britain. With so much suffering going on around the world, these people are more concerned about 15 century tribalism than helping humanity.  
IA ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do Muslims come to Europe, one wonders&#8230;.and why do we allow them to? Did someone ask your opinion before letting Muslims come to Europe as you say?  I think you have very little say in the matter, and perhaps that&#039;s why you&#039;re so angry.  Cultural diversity, open borders and an end to blatant racism is the only answer. England is big enough for 70 million or more. To be honest, I would be prefer to live in a Britain of immigrants than intolerant bigots.  </p>
<p>I love immigration. The more people of diverse culture the better. The sooner we water down the racists who look down upon anyone with non white skin the better. What goes around comes around&#8230;&#8230;.any one remember colonisation ,&#8230;..immigration is pay back time!This debate is not about mass immigration. It&#039;s all about maintaining a white majority ,Britain. With so much suffering going on around the world, these people are more concerned about 15 century tribalism than helping humanity.<br />
IA </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchstone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3781363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touchstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3781363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to add that few things could be more corrosive to society than what a radical element in Islam has been trying to do, albeit with more success in Europe than America. That radical element, exemplified by Choudhary in the UK, openly (or clandestinely) seeks to overthrow the existing order and replace it with its own preferred medieval one. The problem that&#039;s getting more serious in some European cities today could be America&#039;s problem farther down the road. It would be worse for society if no-one was talking about it, as you would prefer. At least Spencer and Geller have drawn some attention to it, whether or not they&#039;re guilty of alarmism.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add that few things could be more corrosive to society than what a radical element in Islam has been trying to do, albeit with more success in Europe than America. That radical element, exemplified by Choudhary in the UK, openly (or clandestinely) seeks to overthrow the existing order and replace it with its own preferred medieval one. The problem that&#039;s getting more serious in some European cities today could be America&#039;s problem farther down the road. It would be worse for society if no-one was talking about it, as you would prefer. At least Spencer and Geller have drawn some attention to it, whether or not they&#039;re guilty of alarmism.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Touchstone</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3781251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Touchstone]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 16:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3781251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;to tease them to a frenzy with sticks&quot; -- Like what you try to do every single day to people who support Israel? It&#039;s OK for you to speak your mind, but not Spencer? You, but not Geller? You&#039;re not in a credible position to complain. You&#039;re not more righteous than Spencer (far from it), you&#039;re just much less successful at getting your message out. 
 
&quot;Mr. Spencer and Ms. Geller are the kind of acid that degrades a civilization&quot; -- If you (and the UN) had your way, nobody would be allowed to criticize Islam or defend Israel. That&#039;s really the &quot;crime&quot; that Geller and Spencer are &quot;getting away with&quot;. What&#039;s an &quot;acid&quot; to a zealot like yourself is good medicine to others. The fascist effort to silence political opponents by any means necessary -- a wicked practice you defend regularly -- is a far more corrosive acid than speaking uncomfortable truths and issuing warnings that certain elements would rather not be spoken and issued. 
 
&quot;pumping that kind of bile into the American social fabric&quot; -- You&#039;re the one trying hard to pump bile in the form of daily anti-Jewish provocations, slanders, and celebrations of amorality and anarchy. But like I said, your reach is tiny. Quantitatively, you&#039;re not doing much damage. Qualitatively, you&#039;re far coarser a wrongdoer than those you condemn. If you could, you would pump your own bile until it buried your enemies, along with millions of others you hate. 
 
&quot;Let&#039;s not make Robert Spencer out to be Americanism incarnate&quot; -- Who&#039;s doing that? Hyperbole is your go-to rhetorical ploy. Defending someone&#039;s right to speak isn&#039;t the same as putting that someone on a pedestal.  
 
The slings and arrows you direct at Spencer (like what he does in his hotel room) sound petty and envious and make you look very small indeed. The more trivial and spiteful your attacks on him, the more he doesn&#039;t seem to be doing anything particularly egregious, and the more you look like a jealous, disgruntled git. Your attacks on him are commensurate with a rival classmate who bested your performance on an exam or stole your girlfriend, not with the witch-burning monster played by Vincent Price. The irony is that you&#039;re actually diminishing the magnitude of Spencer&#039;s alleged wickedness by attacking him in such a petty, spiteful way.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;to tease them to a frenzy with sticks&quot; &#8212; Like what you try to do every single day to people who support Israel? It&#039;s OK for you to speak your mind, but not Spencer? You, but not Geller? You&#039;re not in a credible position to complain. You&#039;re not more righteous than Spencer (far from it), you&#039;re just much less successful at getting your message out. </p>
<p>&quot;Mr. Spencer and Ms. Geller are the kind of acid that degrades a civilization&quot; &#8212; If you (and the UN) had your way, nobody would be allowed to criticize Islam or defend Israel. That&#039;s really the &quot;crime&quot; that Geller and Spencer are &quot;getting away with&quot;. What&#039;s an &quot;acid&quot; to a zealot like yourself is good medicine to others. The fascist effort to silence political opponents by any means necessary &#8212; a wicked practice you defend regularly &#8212; is a far more corrosive acid than speaking uncomfortable truths and issuing warnings that certain elements would rather not be spoken and issued. </p>
<p>&quot;pumping that kind of bile into the American social fabric&quot; &#8212; You&#039;re the one trying hard to pump bile in the form of daily anti-Jewish provocations, slanders, and celebrations of amorality and anarchy. But like I said, your reach is tiny. Quantitatively, you&#039;re not doing much damage. Qualitatively, you&#039;re far coarser a wrongdoer than those you condemn. If you could, you would pump your own bile until it buried your enemies, along with millions of others you hate. </p>
<p>&quot;Let&#039;s not make Robert Spencer out to be Americanism incarnate&quot; &#8212; Who&#039;s doing that? Hyperbole is your go-to rhetorical ploy. Defending someone&#039;s right to speak isn&#039;t the same as putting that someone on a pedestal.  </p>
<p>The slings and arrows you direct at Spencer (like what he does in his hotel room) sound petty and envious and make you look very small indeed. The more trivial and spiteful your attacks on him, the more he doesn&#039;t seem to be doing anything particularly egregious, and the more you look like a jealous, disgruntled git. Your attacks on him are commensurate with a rival classmate who bested your performance on an exam or stole your girlfriend, not with the witch-burning monster played by Vincent Price. The irony is that you&#039;re actually diminishing the magnitude of Spencer&#039;s alleged wickedness by attacking him in such a petty, spiteful way.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiel</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/bruce-bawer/anti-wilders-mob-goes-mad/comment-page-1/#comment-3781021</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kiel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 15:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=163028#comment-3781021</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sweden has a dubious record, all right. WW II did harm the Swedes reputation, and the post-war period with the hapless Oluf Palme and his &#8220;folkhem&#8221; (democratic socialism Swedish style) followed up. Up to date the political correctness plays its tune full-blown.             ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweden has a dubious record, all right. WW II did harm the Swedes reputation, and the post-war period with the hapless Oluf Palme and his &ldquo;folkhem&rdquo; (democratic socialism Swedish style) followed up. Up to date the political correctness plays its tune full-blown.             </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 798/850 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 23:04:21 by W3 Total Cache -->