Reporters Without Credibility

Bruce Bawer is a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center and the author of “While Europe Slept” and “Surrender.” His book "The Victims' Revolution: The Rise of Identity Studies and the Closing of the Liberal Mind" is just out from Broadside / Harper Collins.


Pages: 1 2

Founded in 1985, Reporters Sans Frontières (RSF), also known as Reporters Without Borders, professes to be motivated by a profound devotion to freedom of expression.  The organization has apparently done good work on behalf of journalists in countries like Cuba and China, where press freedom simply doesn’t exist.  But RSF also issues an annual Press Freedom Index – the latest was released just the other day – in which it purports to rank countries according to the degree of freedom their journalists enjoy.  Let’s just say that the list doesn’t represent RSF at its finest.

As someone who frequently slams the New York Times, I’m glad to be able to say that Times reporter Andrew Rosenthal, writing about RSF’s new list last week, summoned precisely the right word to describe it: “ridiculous.” As Rosenthal put it: “Like US News & World Report with colleges, they freshen the list each year based on new developments, and – again like US News – they sometimes end up with a pecking-order that doesn’t quite mesh with reality.”

For example, on the new list, the United States comes in at #47, falling from #20 last year, purportedly because police officers have beaten and arrested journalists reporting on the Occupy Wall Street movement.  One suspects that at least some of those whom RSF counts as mistreated journalists are bloggers who were taking active, and violent, part in them.  Be that as it may, it turns out that Hungary was given a better ranking this year than the U.S., even though its news media are under government control.  Rosenthal issues a challenge to RSF: “Can you find me a journalist who thinks he’d have a freer hand in Hungary than in the United States? I don’t think so.”

But it’s not just Hungary’s position relative to the U.S. that is ludicrous.  To judge by RSF’s rankings, you’d think some of the most troubling recent assaults by Western governments on the freedom of expression never took place at all.

Take one of two countries tied for tenth place – Canada, where a few years back both Mark Steyn and Ezra Levant were hauled before Human Rights Commissions for writing critically about Islam.  Although the Ontario Human Rights Commission declared that the offending article by Steyn – which had appeared in the new magazine Macleans – was beyond its jurisdiction, it condemned the article anyway, rendering, in effect, a guilty verdict without a trial on a matter that it acknowledged was none of its business.

Steyn’s article appeared in 2006, and his cases before the Ontario and Canadian Human Rights Commissions were wound up in 2008; so were two cases against Levant before the Alberta Human Rights Commission.  But there’s no indication that anything has changed in Canada to render critics of Islam less vulnerable to government harassment in 2011 than Steyn and Levant were in 2008.  In any event, it’s worth noting that Canada’s Press Freedom ranking in 2008 was #13, while the U.S. was tied with several other countries for 36th place.

Tied with Canada at #10 this year is Denmark, where author and journalist Lars Hedegaard has been put on trial for criticizing Islam in a conversation held in his own home.  Hedegaard – who is the founder and director of Denmark’s Free Press Society as well as of the International Free Press Society – was found not guilty of racism in 2011, but the case was retried, and later in the year he was found guilty and fined 5,000 kroner ($884).  It was an outrageous travesty of Western justice and a chilling betrayal of the freedom of expression for which Hedegaard’s own organization stands – and which the RSF, too, purportedly exists to defend.  But does RSF even know about the case?  From 2010 to 2011, Denmark actually went up a slot on its Press Freedom list, from #11 to #10.

At #5 on RSF’s new list is Austria.  Elizabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, anyone?  In February 2011, an Austrian court convicted her of “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion” – guess which one? – and fined her up to €480; in December, Austria’s Supreme Court affirmed the verdict.  Despite this scandalous precedent, Austria’s new RSF ranking, too, represents a step up from 2010, when it was at #7.

Pages: 1 2

  • Jim

    RSF seem to be just part of the bunch. It's a ho hum event what ever they say as they are not independent and serve only to kid those who want to be kidded.

  • Robert Laity

    Many Journalists are purposely ignoring the fact that Obama is NOT a Natural Born American/ That is a disgrace. We have freedom of the Press but they dont do their jobs.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ JasonPappas

    The exemption given Islam is ludicrous. Every religion is a philosophy–a view about life and what is right or wrong. Islam, in particular, is inherently a political philosophy–founded by a military commander. Punishing the criticism of Islam is suppressing debate about a political creed. If some political creeds are except from critical assessment what is left of free speech?

    I always said Marx’s biggest mistake was to omit four words from the end of the Communist Manifesto–”And God wills it.” Had he done so, all criticism of communism would have been banned by law for “insensitivity” to a religion. Thank God he was an atheist and claimed his rant was “scientific” socialism! It was fair game for criticism.

    Let's lift the taboo against critical assessment of Islam. Our culture is founded on the idea that every proposition can be critically examined–every idea can be judged.

  • http://libertyandculture.blogspot.com/ JasonPappas

    The special treatment for Islam is absurd. Every religion is a philosophy–a view about life and what is right or wrong. Islam, in particular, is inherently a political philosophy–founded by a military commander. Punishing the criticism of Islam is suppressing debate about a political creed. If some political creeds are except from critical assessment what is left of free speech? Europe is in trouble … deep trouble.

  • Dispozadaburka

    Harvard University is having Fareed Zakaria give the commencement speech this year.
    The author of The Post-American World. As Fareed describes "the rise of the rest"

    • mrbean

      CNN host Fareed Zakaria has openly bashed Americans as "selfish" for complaining about increased taxes. Zakaria told Americans to cut down on their consumption and give more to their government. Typical Haaawwrvard leftist elitest with his anti-American snobbery. " Ooooohhh… Yaaassss … those Americaaans are soooo provinicial and need our guidance and control."

  • Joba

    What about Austria ranking #5 with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff's case and the weekly NEWS? According to RSF, free speech is one way, for journalist only

  • Eric G

    Wonder how the RSF would rate Germany from 1933-1945? Based on precedent, I am supposing the RSF would say the Reichstagsbrandverordnung (Reichstag Fire Decree), signed by von Hindenburg in 1933, was protecting anti-Semitic Aryans from mean-spirited criticism.

  • PETER

    Many Muslims blogging on this site and others have been careful not to denigrate Christians and Jews. But they do lie repedetly about Islam, Shuria and the Koran. I believe there is a school or seminar for Muslims for the specific purpose of blogging here and in a few other places I frequent. The disinformation seems obvious to me, though often very well written.

  • bootspur

    Ahhh, I wouldn't get too worked up over that flap, it sounds like RSF gets a pocket hard-on anytime a little (small 'd') democracy happens and they aren't privy to all the facts. I suspect they take the opportunity to share their displeasure by basically giving the U.S. an honorary "F" in small 'd' democracy. I'd call it a poke in the eye it's the equivalence of "sticking out the tongue."

  • Indioviejo

    RSF is an organization with very little credibility. Although it is celebrated among leftist everywhere who are criminally inclined to curtail other people's freedom, specially if you say differently to their set norm, they condemn real freedom of speech. It is basically a tool of the Quite Orwellian leftist. Proud descendants of Walter Duranty and Herbert Mathews. And the beat goes on…

  • Ghostwriter

    I agree with the above article. I think it's just a publicity stunt,trying to get attention for themselves. I think RWB knows the truth but wants to attack America just the same.