Violent Jihadist Video Riles Norway

Pages: 1 2

It was, shall we say, an interesting week in Norway.  On Tuesday, January 17, a video was posted on YouTube that called for Norwegian soldiers to be withdrawn from Afghanistan.  Over images of Norwegian soldiers and of Norway’s prime minister, foreign minister, and crown prince, a text calling for Allah to “destroy them and let it be painful” was read aloud in Arabic, with subtitles in Norwegian.  The video, which concluded with an image of Norway’s flag in flames, urged Muslims to show up for a protest rally on Friday outside the parliament building in Oslo.

The video provoked instant outrage.  On Wednesday, the security police arrested a suspect, but announced that even if the rally organizers proved to be responsible for the video, their permit wouldn’t be withdrawn.  It soon emerged that there were connections between the video and a Facebook group whose members included Arfan Bhatti, one of four men arrested in 2006 for shooting at the Oslo synagogue.  (Bhatti was also suspected by police of plotting to blow up the U.S. and Israeli embassies.)  Another member was Mohyeldeen Mohammed, who at a jihadist rally two years ago threatened Norway with its own 9/11.

And guess who else turned out to be an active member of the Facebook group?  None other than Aisha Shezadi Kausar (20), whom I wrote about a couple of weeks ago – the girl who’s being sent around to schools by the Norwegian literary establishment so she can brainwash kids into thinking the niqab is just dandy.  (Her essay, “You, Me, and Niqab,” has been reprinted in a collection of essays being distributed to students all over the country.)  On Facebook, Kausar clicked “like” on the news of the upcoming rally.

On Thursday, the Communist daily Klassekampen ran a sympathetic interview with Kausar.  When Niqab Girl walked into a café with interviewer Åse Brandvold, the customers emitted audible groans.  Brandvold: “Her garment provokes them….Only the eyes show.  They are radiant.” Kausar: “I want to go over to them and say: Hi, I’m Aisha, and I’m an ordinary person.” Yes, an “ordinary person” who admitted to Brandvold that she planned to take part in the Saturday rally and who, when asked to comment on the video, said: “It’s just a video.” Though Brandvold pressed her (ever so slightly), Niqab Girl refused to condemn the video:  “I’m tired of Muslims always being expected to distance themselves from one another all the time.”

At some point during the week came the stunning announcement by the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) that Islamists represent the major terrorist threat to the country.  Needless to say, this news should not have been stunning to anybody, but (as I describe in a forthcoming e-book) ever since last July 22, when anti-jihadist Anders Behring Breivik bombed a building in Oslo and massacred several dozen teenagers on the island of Utøya, the Norwegian political and cultural elite has done a very effective job of suppressing criticism of Islam on the grounds that the “lesson” of Breivik’s actions is that ethnic Norwegians must stop saying unpleasant things about Islam and embrace their bold, bearded, berobed, and belligerent fellow countrymen as friends and neighbors.

So it was that PST got slammed on a Thursday night TV debate program by Muslim leaders who called for it to stop demonizing their community and pay more attention to the threat of violence by Islam-hating “Christian terrorist” groups in Norway.  (Never mind that, as a terrorism expert bravely pointed out on the show, there are no such groups in Norway.)  On the same broadcast, the head of the aggressive, fast-growing Islam Net, Fahad Qureshi (whose every comment was greeted by a storm of applause from his followers in the studio audience) attacked a politician for having called the perpetrators of the threatening video “vermin”: instead of being dehumanized, Qureshi insisted, the jihadists who’d made that video should be accorded respect and invited to take part in dialogue.

Pages: 1 2

  • Alvaro

    Funny how there were so few in that demonstration. Several hundred mobilized on Facebook. It is obvious that religious leaders told them to stay away. They also stayed away from the pathetically small "counter demonstration" of some 30 people – for the most part Norwegians.

    In february 2011 almost 1.000 Muslim taxi drivers protested against Dagbladet's reprinting of Muhammed caricatures. http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/oslo/article350

    Draw Muhammed and their blood will boil. Lay forward not very subtle death threats towards the royal family, government and troops, and they will not even care.

    • Alexander

      Norwegians are stupid people.

      • Alvaro

        Thanks for that sweeping generalization. IQ has little to do with it. According to "IQ and the Wealth of Nations" there is no difference between Norway and the US. Swedes have higher IQ than both, yet it does not make them immune from a suicidal policy that is far worse than in Norway.

        Lack of IQ is not the problem – an excess of leftists hellbent on destroying society with their jihadist allies is the problem.

        • BunnyOlesen

          oh for god's sake, he didn't say they had a low IQ, he said they were stupid people. Stupid is as stupid does, and their behaviour is culturally suicidal. And yes, I live in Sweden, the government here is the same.

      • Ros

        Alexander,if the Norwegians are a stupid people the there's a lot of them about-just look how islam has gained strength in the last few years alone.It has only been able to do that by apathy,fawning apology time and time again for one imaginary "insult "against islam and it's followers and it's "oh poor me"atitude.We are all guilty of this and so we arestupid too aren't we?

        • wsk

          Education and IQ have nothing to do with intelligence. And, yes we are stupid people to put up with this Islamic nonsense.

        • cjk

          As of my writing Alvaro above got a plus 21, was 22 until I thumbs down it myself. YES IT IS CALLED STUPIDITY! That is the best and obvious description regardless of whatever IQ mumbo-jumbo or whatever else.
          BOTTOM LINE: STUPIDITY!!!!!!!

      • pennswoods

        Norway has one of the highest standards of living in the world. They are also among the best educated people on earth. They unfortunately suffer from a self hatred and cultural disease that has infected most of Europe today which I call "naivevititus". This left wing welfare state self hatred combined with a massive Islamic immigration invasion is always terminal.

        • johnnywoods

          Intelligence should not be confused with wisdom and common sense.

        • BunnyOlesen

          They won't have one of the highest standards of living in the world for very long if they keep important welfare parasites.

          I live in Sweden, land of 50% income tax and 25% taxes on purchase items, and the PM here just SERIOUSLY suggested raising the retirement age to 75 !!!! And all these P.C. liberal left wing sickening articles coming out with things like "Oh yeah I can't wait to work till I'm 75, that's great" of course coming from bright eyed 23 year olds with all the stamina on earth.

          I say come back when you're 50 or 55 and tell me you look forward to working yourself into the grave, while surrounded by muslim immigrants from Somalia and Afghanistan who don't work, hate us, commit horrible and violent crimes against our youth, and the reason you will NEVER retire is because of that.

          Average life expectancy here is 71 !!

  • David M

    Norway is a case study for the unholy alliance between Islam and the Left. It must be a mental disorder or stupidity of a nation to be Europe's most anti-Semitic and raise so many Stalinists and Maoists, as politicians, activists, journalists, writers, etc., to represent this tiny coward and sick nation. The Norwegian ambassador to Israel has openly endorsed Palestinian terrorism against Israeli citizens and The junior partner in the Norwegian government, the Socialist Left Party  (Sosialistisk Venstreparti), has openly supported Hamas and is for the bombing of Israel.

  • Mickey Oberman

    Norway is one of the western world's most antisemitic countries.
    Now they are reaping what they have sown.
    And it will, unoubtedly, get much worse.

    • Me in Canada Eh

      A consequence of coddling anti-semitism will be the loss of their own culture, since Islam's main policy is to dominate and subjugate every other nation until all are under an international Islamic caliphate.

  • khan

    OK The west will not object if a lady goes naked but when they choose to wear what they want (including Niqab/Viel) all there speeches about freedom/Liberty etc go down under and a systematic campaign of hatred ,abuses,racism starts by those very people who are very vocal about the suppression of Women…is it not suppression to stop someone from what they want to choose afterall they are not asking others to wear it they want to live they own code of dress…Let the common sense prevail.

    • claspur

      You forget that people don't know what's under a burqa/niqab-wearing islamist?

      Why don't you exercise some 'common sense' yourself, and read more about
      what Shar'ia Law entails?
      Women under Shar'ia don't have any choice about what they are told to wear, among many other things.

      • ros

        Spot on claspur

    • Me in Canada Eh

      Under sharia law, if a woman accuses someone of raping her, she must have five witnesses to convict the perpetrator, and one of the witnesses must be the rapist himself.

      When a woman does come forth with a claim of rape, she is often accused of adultery, which is an actual crime under Islamic law. If found guilty, she is buried in the ground up to her waist and large rocks are thrown at her head until she dies.

      Women cannot divorce their husbands in Islamic countries. Women have no custodial rights of their own biological children. If there is a divorce, the man arranges it and he gets everything.

    • Guest

      I guess you approve of the court challenge presented by a female Muslim in Florida not terribly long ago. She was ordered to remove her "Muslim Kit" for a photo of her driver's license and refused. The court forced her to comply, thankfully. I see no problem with her MUSLIM GEAR (if its Halloween). But covering one's face is not a RIGHT in societies. Consider the security issues at banks, airports and other institutions that rely upon cameras to help ensure the public safety. These MUSLIMS have no regard for the safety of the population they live amongst.

  • Ros

    Khan-if your ladies want to have the freedom to wear what they want(and so they should)does that also stand that they can choose which religion to follow even if it's not islam?

  • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

    Poor Oslo. All they do is provide a house in which to sign an accord, and for the rest of eternity they have to suffer the slings and arrows of gay Zionists throwing a magnifying glass on every last muslim Youtube video and setting up an international alert every time someone grows a beard.

    • zena

      You want to be gay and can’t. You envy Jews. Your angry words are a poor cover. Your conscious tries to make sense of your thoughts, not the other way around. Learn something real for a change. Intelligence with messed up thinking is worse than stupid.

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        You’re right. I keep putting this coaster on my head, and not only does it jam my gaydar, it makes me wish for bald spot.

        • Advocatus

          You have awesome intellectual powers, Flippy. Well done, old chap.

    • FriendofGaryCooper

      If dhimmitude is good, go live in Norway; grow a beard and get an Allah bump on your head. Or better yet, go live there and don't do any of that; and if you're still alive in a month or two, write an honest letter about your experience.

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        Ooooooh. Dangerous, dangerous Norway.

        • FriendofGaryCooper

          Well, I know you'll smile when they're slapping you; and spitting on you,
          when you pay JIZYA.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            Right. Hey, you know, God never made good on the threat to make me beg for my mortal soul back on 12/31/99 either.

          • BunnyOlesen

            So, you obviously don't live here in Scandinavia, so who cares what you think? You read a few articles & think you know whats going on in the world? Get real, go yap to some of your ridiculous drooling left wing suicidal retard friends.

    • Ted G

      Point missed Check
      Deflection Check
      Redirect to disarm opposition arguments Check
      MB troll Big check

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        Well it had to have been said in humor. Who envies Jews?

        • Advocatus

          Any chance you might relocate to a cave in Afghanistan? You'd fit right well in.

    • Ghostwriter

      I'd say you're an idiot,Flipside,but that would be insulting to the perfectly decent idiots out there. I'll just say,you're a creep.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    At some point during the week came the stunning announcement by the Norwegian Police Security Service (PST) that Islamists represent the major terrorist threat to the country. 

    What specifically constitutes Islamists? Are they that tiny minority of extremists that are trying to hijack the Religion of Peace™? Thus, as long as a Muslim isn't violent, even if they are living in Norway for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme and like the vast overwhelming majority of Muslim immigrants are flat out refusing to assimilate and integrate, they are nonetheless considered to be so-called moderate and peaceful Muslims by virtue of the fact that they are non-violent. Indeed, if it isn't construed as being violent, then it isn't construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it isn't opposed, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism which conflates jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, with terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent.

    The truth nonetheless is that per the sixth and most important pillar of Islam, every Muslim on Earth is a jihadists, either a violent jihadists or otherwise a non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists, and the few that aren't jihadists are not Muslims at all, but instead blasphemous apostates that per the dictates of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM must be executed.

    Anders Behring Breivik bombed a building in Oslo and massacred several dozen teenagers on the island of Utøya,

    Now Breivik's attack was a legitimate terrorist attack as opposed to a violent jihad attack since it wasn't perpetrated in the cause of Allah, it wasn't perpetrated by a Muslim, it indiscriminately targeted civilians, and it was a violent attack. While, on the other hand, jihad can be both violent and non-violent and the non-violent variety of jihad relative to the violent variety of jihad is employed against the West by the Islamic world astronomically far more prevalently, is always only in the cause of Allah, and is always perpetrated by Muslims against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme.

    Indeed, the most prevalent form of jihad employed by the Islamic world today against the West is mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest. However, because jihad is always conflated with terrorism, which is always violent, because non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad by design isn't violent, it isn't construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it isn't resisted or opposed, thanks again to PC multiculturalism.

    (Never mind that, as a terrorism expert bravely pointed out on the show, there are no such groups in Norway.) 

    Any so-called terrorist expert that morally equates jihad with terrorism isn't an expert, but a PC multicultural blinded buffoon instead. As jihad and terrorism are two mutually exclusive, very separate, and entirely different manifestations altogether.

    Jihad is a product of the Islamic world only and terrorism is a product of the un-Islamic world only. As jihad is always only holy fighting in the cause of Allah, can be both violent and non-violent, and is always waged or perpetrated by Muslims, while terrorism, on the other hand, can be for any number of various political causes, is always only violent, and is never perpetrated by Muslims.

    Not to mention that it is also non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad that makes violent jihad possible. Indeed, without non-violent stealth and deceptive jihad, such as mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, violent jihad in the West would be completely impossible.

    –continued below

    • Alvaro

      "Now Breivik's attack was a legitimate terrorist attack as opposed to a violent jihad attack since it wasn't perpetrated in the cause of Allah, it wasn't perpetrated by a Muslim, it indiscriminately targeted civilians, and it was a violent attack."

      Here is a picture of the AUF leader Eskil Pedersen (who bravely ran away with the ferry while Breivik used the teenagers for target practice) together with the minister of foreign affairs Jonas Gahr Støre, the day before the massacre:
      http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-JHPM16p260g/TjBChn1mznI

      Not only has Eskil Pedersen called for a boycott of Israel. He also wanted to invite the leader of Hamas to Norway.

      He and those teenagers may have thought it was comfortable to sit in Norway and de facto endorse terrorism, but I'll bet it wasn't as fun being at the receiving end.

      • ObamaYoMoma

        He and those teenagers may have thought it was comfortable to sit in Norway and de facto endorse terrorism, but I'll bet it wasn't as fun being at the receiving end.

        Actually, they are useful idiot loons if they thought were endorsing terrorism. As terrorism in the Islamic world is a capital offense, since it is un-Islamic and blasphemous. Islam only sanctions jihad, as opposed to terrorism, as jihad, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and can be both violent and non-violent as opposed to terrorism, which can only be violent, is an obligatory duty incumbent upon all MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS on earth. Without exception.

        Indeed, jihad is a manifestation of Islamic civilization only, while terrorism, on the other hand, is an un-Islamic manifestation only. Hence, if they believe that Hamas is a terrorist organization that only targets Jews then they are sadly mistaken. As Hamas is a jihadist organization that targets all non-Muslim unbelievers in the world. It may be prioritizing the Jewish unbelievers in Israel for the present time and for the purpose of conquest, but if it ever manages to obliterate the Jewish unbelievers in Israel, it would soon target other non-Muslim unbelievers as well.

        Indeed, Breivik's victims were the victims of an actual terrorist attack as opposed to being the victims of a violent jihad attack as the Jewish unbelievers in Israel. As the attack wasn't in the cause of Allah to make Islam supreme and was perpetrated by a non-Muslim unbeliever. In other words, it was a de facto terrorist attack as opposed to a violent jihad attack in the cause of Allah.

    • Western Canadian

      ****
      “Indeed, if it isn’t construed as being violent, then it isn’t construed as being terrorism, and if it isn’t construed as being terrorism, then it isn’t opposed, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism which conflates jihad, which can be both violent and non-violent, with terrorism, which as its name implies can only be violent. ”
      ****
      Look skippy, this is one of the most assinine loads of drivel created by any drug addled loon, while your habit of conflating your sickening rants with scholarship is no longer even slightly amusing. You are ignorant, quite dim, and offensive to the max with your pathetic ravings. You sound like the jihadis who try to pretend that jihad is an internal struggle, rather than a slaughter for fun and profit (pardon the misuse of the word profit).

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Abid Q. Raja, is also a Muslim – one who’s made clear his own Islamist sympathies but who, in the current bizarre atmosphere, comes off, in comparison with the likes of Qureshi, as a moderate, a patriot, a stalwart champion of the royal house and of Norwegian democracy.

    The vast overwhelming majority of MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS on earth today are non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists as opposed to violent jihadists, and most non-violent stealth and deceptive jihadists believe that violent jihad is counterproductive and harmful because it invites wars against Muslims and attracts unwanted scrutiny, attention, and focus on Islam. In fact, it could possibly lead to the discovery by the West of the stealth global jihad which is being prosecuted primarily via mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest.

    Indeed, the existence of so-called moderate Muslims, extremist Muslims, radical Muslims, and Islamist Muslims, exactly like the existence of moderate Islam, extremist Islam, and radical Islam are all false PC multicultural myths. As there is only MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX MUSLIMS and MAINSTREAM ORTHODOX ISLAM.

    supports the Taliban and prefers sharia to democracy.

    Well if she didn't support Sharia as opposed to democracy, that would make her a blasphemous apostate, which is a capital offense under Islam.

    She doesn’t call for violence….

    Again, if isn't violent, then per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, it isn't construed as being terrorism, and if it isn't construed as being terrorism, then it isn't opposed, and never mind the fact that jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, can be both violent and non-violent and is something else entirely different from terrorism altogether.

    Congratulations Bruce, the title of this article is a vast improvement. I'm impressed.

    • Western Canadian

      ****
      “and never mind the fact that jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, can be both violent and non-violent and is something else entirely different from terrorism altogether. ”
      *****
      Only in your pitiable and ignorant fantasy world. And I trust he will be most impressed with your being impressed. NOT.

      • BunnyOlesen

        Wow stop being such a heatbag, you're burnt. I don't know why some queeb would try to act like he has any knowledge of anything that is happening in the rest of the 'real world'. Go eat a donut, we all know it's your favorite treat, newf.

        Of course Canada is the land of the lame ass P.C. free speech squashing frogs, so maybe you're a muslim anyway.

  • pennswoods

    I have no sympathy for the Norwegians or the rest of Scandinavia in regards to their growing Muslim populations. Only 40 years ago they lived in peaceful, properous, and happy homogeneous societies. For some unknown reason in the 1970's their elite became obsessed with inviting the 3rd world, especially Muslims, into their countries with small populations and imagined they would create more diverse and happy welfare states. Now they face ethnic and cultural suicide while their leaders atcually welcome that day when the indigenous peoples of Scandinavia are minorities in their own homelands.

    • Thomas

      And with serial underfunding of health care, they are culling the herd, killing off the sick and elderly in order to feed and house the state's new choice of breeding stock. Very sick and an outrageous abuse of human rights, all hushed by state-controlled media.

  • cjk

    In this situation with this type of individual you in fact have given the most intelligent reply.
    No sarcasm, I am ABSOLUTELY serious.
    Just think about it.

  • No Dhimmi tool

    Needless to say, the Norwegians need to throw ALL of these demented imbeciles out of their country. What NERVE they have! But, that's Islam – you can be the most depraved, vile, illiterate and violent thug on the planet, but if you're a Muslim, well, the world exists for YOU.

    Such arrogant, conceited SAVAGES. And this niqab girl is a deranged lunatic who should be locked up with the rest of them.

  • Amused

    Norway is at a crossroad …submit or fight .

  • Amused

    Flipside , you're an anti-semite and a fool .

    • Ghostwriter

      No disagreement here.

  • Brujo Blanco

    Norway may not come to understand what position they are in until the real violence starts. At some point the Muslims will engage in violence. They have never failed to do so elsewhere. When Muslims reach a point of power they will move to take over with violence.

  • Ellman

    Norway was never an imperialist power that ruled overy any country in the Mideast or Northern Africa. One can understand the resentment of Algerians over the atrocities commited by the French imperialists and the subsequent guilt felt by French progressives for the damage done to Algeria. Great Britain also has much to regret from its imperiallism. But why would Norway subject itself to the same self-flagellation that is evident with France and England? Is it possible they are ruled by self-righteous progressives trying to increase their electoral base to insure victorious election results? After all, there are politicians in America who also want to expand their political base with more 'underserved' and 'victimized' minorities.

  • Amused

    Politicians are just that , and they are the same everywhere -self perpetuation takes precedence above all else .Oh there will be "outrage
    ' in Norway …..but little else .

  • http://www.newzoid.com David Moss

    Jews believe in Moses. Christians believe in Moses and Christ. Moslems believe in Moses, Christ and Mohammed. Is there really such a difference between us??