Three Democrat Women for Dependency


Pages: 1 2

The Democrats have announced that Massachusetts Senate Candidate Elizabeth Warren and Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke will be on hand at the Democratic National Convention to hype the alleged Republican “War on Women” and promote “Julia,” the cartoon character that touts the numerous boons Democrats supposedly provide women. The Dems’ showcasing of these three women highlights what’s at stake in November if Obama wins––even more expansion of government power that will further entangle women and men alike in dependency and servitude.

Fluke, you remember, appeared before some Congressmen last February and claimed that birth control cost $3000, arguing that making women bear this fiscal burden is a sexist crime against humanity as well as an assault on “women’s health.” Leave aside the creepiness of treating pregnancy as a disease. Given the numerous clinics that offer free birth control, Fluke’s claims were patently absurd. And making a student at a prestigious law school a spokesman for those women without Fluke’s options, opportunities, and resources was even more ridiculous. It revealed once again the hypocrisy of affluent feminists who advance their own careers by exploiting the misery of poor and working-class women. By every standard of well being––health, leisure, education, disposable income, or economic opportunity––the average middle class American woman today, let alone a college graduate heading for a lucrative law career, enjoys a better life than most of the men who ever existed. And the problems of poor and working-class women have less to do with their sex, and more to do with the lack of economic opportunity exacerbated by progressive policies that enable big government interference rather than creating the conditions for economic growth.

Then there’s Elizabeth Warren, or “Fauxcahontas” as she came to be called after she was exposed as having exploited an alleged 1/32 Cherokee heritage in order to get a leg up in her academic career by passing herself off as a “woman of color.”  The spectacle of a blonde, blue-eyed Harvard Law professor getting special consideration because of a tenuous connection to a “protected group” was equally revealing of progressive hypocrisy. Once again, intrusive government policies designed to benefit those presumably victimized by past discrimination are more often the vehicles of careerist advancement for a white woman more privileged than most white males.

But even worse are Warren’s economic views. Don’t forget, she was the source of Obama’s now infamous “you didn’t build that” put-down of entrepreneurs and business builders. Last September Warren said, “You built a factory out there? Good for you. But I want to be clear. You moved your goods to market on the roads the rest of us paid for. You hired workers the rest of us paid to educate. You were safe in your factory because of police-forces and fire-forces that the rest of us paid for. You didn’t have to worry that marauding bands would come and seize everything at your factory — and hire someone to protect against this — because of the work the rest of us did.” So factory-builders pay nothing for roads, public colleges, firemen, and police? In fact, they pay much, much more than their fair share of these public resources, because their tax payments have to make up for all the freeloaders––nearly half of taxpayers––who pay nothing. Like Obama, Warren wants to demonize the “makers” in order to justify appropriating more of their wealth to finance government programs that buy political support from the “takers.” It’s about power, the power of government agencies, government bureaucrats, and elite government “experts” to manage and control our lives and further their own careers––all financed by revenues expropriated from those who actually do create wealth and jobs.

Pages: 1 2

  • Dave

    these three "women are truly odious, vile and despicable!!!!

  • scotsirish

    …………..what we are witnessing is mass whorage to the government. It is not a pretty sight and it applies to all genders. It. is. called. Communism. and it is disgusting and evil.

  • Schlomotion

    What a torte of silliness! A man saying Republicans are more feminist than Democrats.

    To make such an argument, I would imagine, takes a certain degree of calculated knavishness. You have to believe that if you are persuasive enough to the half-witted women that are your target audience they will switch their votes from Democrat to Republican. If you are knavish enough, you realize that this will not happen, so you are merely settling for having a snicker at the perceived dishonesty and wrongheadedness of the fine Senatorial candidate you are derisively attacking.

    What is the purpose of bellyaching that a woman is an octoroon Indian, or not a Halachic Native American? Is the substance of that observation as quantitative in intellectual mass as the purported vast quantity of Republican feminism? This is identical to Mr. Thornton wabbing up a ball of nothing in his hand and winding up a menacing pitch, throwing air and watching desperately for a flinch.

    • flowerknife_us

      Are you aspiring to be one of their Toy Boys? Where you get to pay for the entertainment and the getting rid of the evidence?

      Abortion is just one of those pretty words used in place of murder.

    • NAHALKIDES

      The purpose of "bellyaching" as you put it, is to point out that besides the intrinsic evil of race and gender-based privileges, it's even worse when the beneficiary is not entitled to a preference even under such a debased standard. Warren is a less-than-mediocre intellect who was awarded a spot on the Harvard Faculty in preference of better candidates (let's fact it – there HAD to be better-qualified candidates!) because she falsely claimed to be Cherokee. She and her ilk are always carping about "white skin privilege", and now she hypocritically takes advantage of a program designed to "help" those who, unlike herself, don't have that white skin.

    • poppakap

      Slomo's doing a bang-up job showing the world why even DailyKos won't pay him for content.

      On the other hand, he does an admirable job of reminding us why only 20% of the US populace is willing to self-identify as leftist.

  • guest

    Their fraud insults me more than their big government advocacy. They are borderline criminals.

    Elizabeth Warren created her political career as an economical populist and led a campaign against banks and free market entrepreneurs. We later found out she made a lot of money on flipping houses and speculative home loans. The reforms she promoted like Dodd Frank and the Volker rule, ended up putting more money into the hands of the the same people who corrupted federal oversight and less into small community banks. It turned out Barney Frank's boyfriends and Chris Dodd's criminal friends were the only ones with the teams of lawyers to keep up. Heck, they probably wrote it.

    Fluke deliberately transferred to a Catholic University to promote her big government agenda and fake civil rights oppression and bait people on their outrage. She cannot show her true agenda, which consists of forcing employers to pay for employee sex changes in an 1% growth 9% unemployment economy.

    • PDK

      Lieawatha Warren got her start claiming she was 1/32 Cherokee. This got her placeses with both Hravard and Penn State I believe it was. With Harvard she pulls in about 370,000 dollars /year for teaching 1 class twice a week.
      BTW, she stole recipes she "contributed" to the Pow Wow Chow cookbook in 1985. She is a fraud.

  • StephenD

    Look at the bright side. The Obama folks want to Highlight these dimwits as a good thing!?! LOL With friends like these on Obmam's side, Romney should have a cake walk into the Oval Office.

  • clarespark

    For a run down on the "third wave" of feminism and its leftist, incoherent politics, see http://clarespark.com/2012/01/07/feminism-and-its…. "Feminism and its publicists". It was the first wave of feminism that fought for woman suffrage that deserves the name of feminism. The later movements were sharply oblivious to women's needs and "anti-imperialist" as their first priority.

  • cynthia curran

    Well, in the south west most people on welfare are Hispanic and Obama wants to make certain illegal Hispanics which will be deferred get welfare. Ca, Az, Tx, Nm higher Hispanic usage. Both AZ and, NM have higher white poverty less of a gap between whites and Hispanics. California and Texas have more upper-middle class whites so there is a greater gap between welfare usage of Hispanics and whites.

  • http://twitter.com/Jcdavidson37 @Jcdavidson37

    The really true Democratic women are folks like Janet Napalitno & Elena Kagan. They are the linebackers of the Dems feminist team.

  • Steve Chavez

    And on the same stage as the rapist, adulterer, stalker BILL CLINTON?

    Since Biden is crashing Tampa, I would hope Juanita Broadderick, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers,a and of course, Monica Lewinsky will crash the Democrat Convention during BILL CLINTON'S SPEECH.

    I wonder what their view of Sharia Law is and the real "War on Women?"

  • White Hunter

    One wonders what Fluke's reply would be if someone asked her the obvious question: Why should the taxpayers, rather than the men with whom she evidently fornicates, pay for her contraceptives?

    • kafir4life

      She's a lesbian. Birth control is of no use to her. It's all a liberal con.

      And what of the poor college boys? They don't get taxpayer financed dinners and drinks for the effort of trying get the women to use their taxpayer financed birth control. Where's the fairness? Where's the outrage!!??

      • flowerknife_us

        Apparently you and who knows how many other Pizzas and Beers lost out to a 3,000$ a Year Toy budget.

    • BS77

      Good question….way over her head. she's too stupid to grasp how pathetic she really is…

  • Ghostwriter

    As someone who writes fiction,the Obama campaign's "Julia" seems to be as flat as a piece of paper. There are no real traits that define her as a character,much less a human being. She's not really relatable in ANY meaningful way. They really messed up when they created "Julia."

  • WilliamJamesWard

    The Democratic convention will be a grand farce and if you need and emetic or just
    want to give a class on mental instability by the results of generational drug use,
    tune in or go to it. There will be a great collection of leeches, wannabe exhibitionists,
    bottom feeding political scum and pure anti-American frauds that have taken over
    a once proud political party. Now the Democrats are Marxist, Leninist, Socialist, Islamist,
    social deviants looking to rape the tax payers and abuse our citizens, stay away, far
    far away…………………………………..William

  • Eva

    Who the hell is out of their mind to want to fornicate with Fluke? The name suits her: she is a fluke of nature, a toxic socialist foaming at the mouth. We all need to get hazard pay just for having to deal with these degenerate libs.

  • Carwashia Johnson

    These girls should have their birth control not only paid for with taxes but FORCED on them. We must stop breeding idiots. At least Clintoon only took oral favors so his rape victims were never in danger of any spillage. I must say though that I have sick fantasies of Kagan, Napolitano, Hillary, Fluke and a few other of these democrat "babes" in see through teddies. Oh, help I am gonna vomit.

  • ebonystone

    What a pair! Fauxcahontas and Fuxalotofus.