<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Decision: The Best Possible Result for 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2014 10:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: SuperRoadrunner</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3307847</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SuperRoadrunner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3307847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lousy decision by SCOTUS can be rectified by an amendment to the Constitution that in the future would close the door to any attempts by the feds to abridge personal liberties by way of taxation. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lousy decision by SCOTUS can be rectified by an amendment to the Constitution that in the future would close the door to any attempts by the feds to abridge personal liberties by way of taxation. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3307680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Questions]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 15:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3307680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vote Republican!  A fine idea. The problem is that the American people as a whole didn&#039;t buy it back in 2008.  And don&#039;t count on the people reversing course in 2012.  Romney has never really ignited the swing vote or  GOP evangelicals.  I get a bad sinking feeling in my stomach that Obama will be re-elected.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote Republican!  A fine idea. The problem is that the American people as a whole didn&#039;t buy it back in 2008.  And don&#039;t count on the people reversing course in 2012.  Romney has never really ignited the swing vote or  GOP evangelicals.  I get a bad sinking feeling in my stomach that Obama will be re-elected.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluecollarbytes</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305615</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bluecollarbytes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought &#039;the economy&#039; was the big issue. Now some are telling me it&#039;s obamacare. Romney needs to find a message that encompasses that and everything else, as a package. It&#039;s implied utopia that obama is selling, an ideological view- complete with demands.  Romney needs to nail obama on the ideology. Voters are ready to listen to the argument.  The ideology gives obama and his ilk cover. Don&#039;t let them get away with that fraud. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought &#039;the economy&#039; was the big issue. Now some are telling me it&#039;s obamacare. Romney needs to find a message that encompasses that and everything else, as a package. It&#039;s implied utopia that obama is selling, an ideological view- complete with demands.  Romney needs to nail obama on the ideology. Voters are ready to listen to the argument.  The ideology gives obama and his ilk cover. Don&#039;t let them get away with that fraud. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDK</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PDK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 04:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I for one am thankful for Davids terse post. It makes manifest the simple truth that the liberals have now won the battle, but will also lose the war in November. 
 
One and done! Nobama 2012, vote republican. Thank you. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I for one am thankful for Davids terse post. It makes manifest the simple truth that the liberals have now won the battle, but will also lose the war in November. </p>
<p>One and done! Nobama 2012, vote republican. Thank you. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wesley69</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wesley69]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 03:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The more I think about it, Justice Roberts did the cause a huge favor. 
1st - He called it a TAX, not a mandate. Didn&#039;t Obama say it was not a tax? 
2nd- By keeping it Constitutional, he put the Democrats &amp; Obama on defense having to defend ObamaCare for what the Court ruled it. 
3rd-It fires up the base on an issue that is poison to Conservatives. Maybe more will come to the polls to undo what Obama and his Democrats did. 
4th-ObamaCare is the ultimate expansion on the powers and size of government. 
5th-It gives the lie to Obama&#039;s promise not to tax the Middle Class. It will be the single largest tax increase in US history. 
6th-By calling it a Tax, it is part of the budget process. When engaged in the Budget Process, 51 votes is needed in the Senate, NOT 60. THERE IS NO FILIBUSTER. Therefore, a simple majority in the House and Senate can repeal ObamaCare. It is a budget matter. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more I think about it, Justice Roberts did the cause a huge favor.<br />
1st &#8211; He called it a TAX, not a mandate. Didn&#039;t Obama say it was not a tax?<br />
2nd- By keeping it Constitutional, he put the Democrats &amp; Obama on defense having to defend ObamaCare for what the Court ruled it.<br />
3rd-It fires up the base on an issue that is poison to Conservatives. Maybe more will come to the polls to undo what Obama and his Democrats did.<br />
4th-ObamaCare is the ultimate expansion on the powers and size of government.<br />
5th-It gives the lie to Obama&#039;s promise not to tax the Middle Class. It will be the single largest tax increase in US history.<br />
6th-By calling it a Tax, it is part of the budget process. When engaged in the Budget Process, 51 votes is needed in the Senate, NOT 60. THERE IS NO FILIBUSTER. Therefore, a simple majority in the House and Senate can repeal ObamaCare. It is a budget matter. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kasandra</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kasandra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While there is a lot to what you say, the fact is that the decision changes a lot.  Let&#039;s suppose the Democrats controlled the White House and both houses of Congress.  Based on this decision, they could enact a law to saying that to spur economic growth and reduce unemployment every adult American has to purchase a new U.S. made car.  And if they don&#039;t they face a &quot;tax&quot; of $10,000.  What would distinguish that from what the Obamacare decision authorized?  The government wouldn&#039;t be asserting a right under the Commerce Clause to force citizens to buy a car.  They&#039;d just be &quot;taxing&quot; the decision not to.  While, hopefully, this decision will have the predicted electoral results it provides a dangerous precedent allowing all sorts of mischief.  I&#039;m not familiar with any prior court decision that would allow it.  This one now does. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While there is a lot to what you say, the fact is that the decision changes a lot.  Let&#039;s suppose the Democrats controlled the White House and both houses of Congress.  Based on this decision, they could enact a law to saying that to spur economic growth and reduce unemployment every adult American has to purchase a new U.S. made car.  And if they don&#039;t they face a &quot;tax&quot; of $10,000.  What would distinguish that from what the Obamacare decision authorized?  The government wouldn&#039;t be asserting a right under the Commerce Clause to force citizens to buy a car.  They&#039;d just be &quot;taxing&quot; the decision not to.  While, hopefully, this decision will have the predicted electoral results it provides a dangerous precedent allowing all sorts of mischief.  I&#039;m not familiar with any prior court decision that would allow it.  This one now does. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa_H</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa_H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 02:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is an interesting slant on Chief Justice Roberts&#039; ruling:   &lt;a href=&quot;http://whitehouse12.com/2012/06/28/chief-justice-roberts-is-a-genius/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://whitehouse12.com/2012/06/28/chief-justice-...&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting slant on Chief Justice Roberts&#039; ruling:   <a href="http://whitehouse12.com/2012/06/28/chief-justice-roberts-is-a-genius/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://whitehouse12.com/2012/06/28/chief-justice-" rel="nofollow">http://whitehouse12.com/2012/06/28/chief-justice-</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Charles Reddig Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Charles Reddig Jr.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or we could just be smart and not have bad ideas put in place and start wars that do nothing.... 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or we could just be smart and not have bad ideas put in place and start wars that do nothing&#8230;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zundfolge</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zundfolge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All I meant was the day war was declared was a dark day for the nation and today was on the same level of dark. 
 
I&#039;m no Confederate apologist.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I meant was the day war was declared was a dark day for the nation and today was on the same level of dark. </p>
<p>I&#039;m no Confederate apologist.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schlomotion</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3305011</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schlomotion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3305011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was certainly a good thing that the Supreme Court struck down the excesses of the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. Freedom rang when Justice Roberts said: 
 
&#8220;The Commerce Clause is not a general license to regulate an individual from cradle to grave, simply because he will predictably engage in particular transactions.&#8221; 
 
It remains however, that the Constitutionality of Obomneycare or HeritageFoundationCare was upheld by only a narrow decision and only on excuse number three given by the Administration. For far too long, excesses of government have been allowed by narrow margins on the basis that &quot;the American public has already acquiesced to far stupider excesses of government&quot; and that includes all of our post 9/11 emergency powers abuses. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was certainly a good thing that the Supreme Court struck down the excesses of the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. Freedom rang when Justice Roberts said: </p>
<p>&ldquo;The Commerce Clause is not a general license to regulate an individual from cradle to grave, simply because he will predictably engage in particular transactions.&rdquo; </p>
<p>It remains however, that the Constitutionality of Obomneycare or HeritageFoundationCare was upheld by only a narrow decision and only on excuse number three given by the Administration. For far too long, excesses of government have been allowed by narrow margins on the basis that &quot;the American public has already acquiesced to far stupider excesses of government&quot; and that includes all of our post 9/11 emergency powers abuses. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa_H</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa_H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After my initial shock at the ruling, I too have started to think this is actually a positive outcome. So I&#039;m glad to know that David feels the same way. The lines are drawn, and drawn clearly now. Even those who don&#039;t think much about politics will see that this impacts them personally. And yeah! let the elections begin. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After my initial shock at the ruling, I too have started to think this is actually a positive outcome. So I&#039;m glad to know that David feels the same way. The lines are drawn, and drawn clearly now. Even those who don&#039;t think much about politics will see that this impacts them personally. And yeah! let the elections begin. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Chavez</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304954</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Chavez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we&#039;re going to find out what&#039;s in it and when those who supported Obamacare are &quot;taxed&quot; for it too, they will realized that they have been conned! 
 
WILL ILLEGALS BE EXEMPT FROM THIS ONE TOO WHILE US LEGALS WILL THE REAL PINATAS? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we&#039;re going to find out what&#039;s in it and when those who supported Obamacare are &quot;taxed&quot; for it too, they will realized that they have been conned! </p>
<p>WILL ILLEGALS BE EXEMPT FROM THIS ONE TOO WHILE US LEGALS WILL THE REAL PINATAS? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: attila the hun</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304894</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[attila the hun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 00:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a democracy you deserve the government you elect. It&#039;s your responsibility to take care  yourself when you don&#039;t  
and expect   some else do your work for you.   this is what  Get  
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a democracy you deserve the government you elect. It&#039;s your responsibility to take care  yourself when you don&#039;t<br />
and expect   some else do your work for you.   this is what  Get  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304802</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You had me agreeing with you right up to your last sentance, then you blew it. 
 
If the South had not fired upon Ft. Sumpter, there would not have been a Civil War. They gave the Union justification for attacking the South by attacking the Union first.  
I also hope you are not implying that the South losing the civil war was a bad thing? The start of any unnecessary war is a dark day, but the liberation of millions of slaves was a cause worth fighting for. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You had me agreeing with you right up to your last sentance, then you blew it. </p>
<p>If the South had not fired upon Ft. Sumpter, there would not have been a Civil War. They gave the Union justification for attacking the South by attacking the Union first.<br />
I also hope you are not implying that the South losing the civil war was a bad thing? The start of any unnecessary war is a dark day, but the liberation of millions of slaves was a cause worth fighting for. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage on the Stage</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sage on the Stage]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[    One thing no one has mentioned--yes, Obamacare is now being touted by the Dhimmicrats as a tax; but what about the fact that the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of 2012? This is nothing less than a double-whammy on the middle and lower classes. America, is THIS what you want? Anyone but Obama in November.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>    One thing no one has mentioned&#8211;yes, Obamacare is now being touted by the Dhimmicrats as a tax; but what about the fact that the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of 2012? This is nothing less than a double-whammy on the middle and lower classes. America, is THIS what you want? Anyone but Obama in November.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304755</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[3. If the election this November fails to give us a Republican super majority with the power to override the certain Democrat fillibusters, we could end up with both Obamacare and this hideous court precedent. 
 
I truly fear for the fate of the America I grew up in and love dearly. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3. If the election this November fails to give us a Republican super majority with the power to override the certain Democrat fillibusters, we could end up with both Obamacare and this hideous court precedent. </p>
<p>I truly fear for the fate of the America I grew up in and love dearly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeloak</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steeloak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:42:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I agree with you David, that this is the best possible outcome politically for Romney &amp; the Republicans, it raises several troubling issues. 
1. While congress most certainly has the power to tax, it was extreme convoluted logic the led to calling a penalty for failure to comply with an unconstitutional mandate a tax.  The obvious counter argument is that if the mandate is unconstitutional, any part of the law enabling penalties - or taxes for failure to comply must also be unconstitutional.  Just as in contract law where if you are forced into a contract against your will, that contract is invalid and cannot be enforced. 
 
2. Even if Obamacare is ultimately repealed in it&#039;s entirety, this decision will enable any future congress to pass unconstitutional legislation that mandates behaviour on the part of citizens, simply by attaching a penalty for failure to comply with the mandate - this is an extremely dangerous precedent!  Given this ruling, it may take a constitutional amendment clarifying or limiting the congressional power to tax to prevent future abuse. 
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with you David, that this is the best possible outcome politically for Romney &amp; the Republicans, it raises several troubling issues.<br />
1. While congress most certainly has the power to tax, it was extreme convoluted logic the led to calling a penalty for failure to comply with an unconstitutional mandate a tax.  The obvious counter argument is that if the mandate is unconstitutional, any part of the law enabling penalties &#8211; or taxes for failure to comply must also be unconstitutional.  Just as in contract law where if you are forced into a contract against your will, that contract is invalid and cannot be enforced. </p>
<p>2. Even if Obamacare is ultimately repealed in it&#039;s entirety, this decision will enable any future congress to pass unconstitutional legislation that mandates behaviour on the part of citizens, simply by attaching a penalty for failure to comply with the mandate &#8211; this is an extremely dangerous precedent!  Given this ruling, it may take a constitutional amendment clarifying or limiting the congressional power to tax to prevent future abuse. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amused]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[....and yea , Conservatives lost this one .  And yes David is smiling through clenched teeth . ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.and yea , Conservatives lost this one .  And yes David is smiling through clenched teeth . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amused</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amused]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s Constitutional , so says the Supreme Court .....deal with it . Maybe the Republicans will get off their arses and do something about healthcare in this country besides saying NO . ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#039;s Constitutional , so says the Supreme Court &#8230;..deal with it . Maybe the Republicans will get off their arses and do something about healthcare in this country besides saying NO . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Gofen</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-horowitz/supreme-decision-the-best-possible-result-for-2012-1/comment-page-1/#comment-3304699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alexander Gofen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=136175#comment-3304699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;... denied affordable health care to everyone&quot;?!!  
 
Who owes health care to EVERYONE?!! And who can afford health care to EVERYONE?!! You do not notice the stupidity of your own demagogy Mr. Horowitz...  
 
The Health care bill was presented not as a tax increase. Is it logical now to reinterpret it as a tax increase?!  
 
How can a tax increase follow from the US Constitution which explicitly enumerated just a few particular things which the Federal Government can control, and Health care is not in that list?  
 
How can any tax increase follow from the Constitution if the taxes then were not imposed on the US citizens at all, but were collected as tariffs of foreign trade instead? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;&#8230; denied affordable health care to everyone&quot;?!!  </p>
<p>Who owes health care to EVERYONE?!! And who can afford health care to EVERYONE?!! You do not notice the stupidity of your own demagogy Mr. Horowitz&#8230;  </p>
<p>The Health care bill was presented not as a tax increase. Is it logical now to reinterpret it as a tax increase?!  </p>
<p>How can a tax increase follow from the US Constitution which explicitly enumerated just a few particular things which the Federal Government can control, and Health care is not in that list?  </p>
<p>How can any tax increase follow from the Constitution if the taxes then were not imposed on the US citizens at all, but were collected as tariffs of foreign trade instead? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 692/703 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-31 05:50:12 by W3 Total Cache -->