Jihadist Infiltration


Pages: 1 2

Judging from the progress that anti-Israel “Lawfare” and pro-Shari’a movements have made in advancing the “Palestinian Cause” and Shari’a compliant programs in a distressingly vast array of our society’s institutions over the past decade, one must conclude that the Muslim jihadist forces working to infiltrate our society are winning.

The most obvious peril arises from terrorist infiltration. Terrorists identified as al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and Iranian agents continue to enter our country via Mexico as illegal immigrants.  Yet, almost a decade ago the present writer and others published analyses of the danger posed to our country’s security by such infiltration.  If these agents were not bent on doing us harm, they could easily enter our country via normal ports of entry.  The fact that they disguise themselves as Mexicans and try to sneak past our border guards is a very good indication that they are here on jihadist missions and know that if they were to try to enter the USA via normal channels, they would be identified as wanted terrorists.  Once in the USA, they easily disappear into the American Muslim community, undocumented, untraceable, invisible and unstoppable.

The problem on our southern border has grown only worse since then, with continued jihadist entry via Mexico and the new alliance between Iran and Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez.  The Iran-Venezuela connection and Iran’s quest for deployable WMDs create the threat of a nuclear armed Venezuela under Iranian influence holding the USA hostage with nuclear-armed missiles having in their cross-hairs all of the southern USA from San Diego to Sarasota.

Expert witnesses reporting to congress have indicated that Iran has active agents, both Hezbollah and Iranian government operatives, in the USA:  sleeper cells awaiting orders while conducting surveillance in preparation for future attacks.  While some pundits are convinced that Iran does not plan to attack the USA on its home front, the operative word that they ignore is “yet.” Iran has successfully laid the groundwork for future terrorism inside the USA with Hezbollah and other Iranian terrorist agents primed, ready and invisible.

Less obvious, but no less perilous, is the quiet, gradual and peaceful infiltration of Muslim operatives and their supporters into our social, legal, educational and political systems under the guise of legitimate democratic activism in the form of the Divestment movement, the  BDS movement, the “One-State Solution” proponents, lawyers implementing “Lawfare,”  those who seek to legitimize Sharia law, and a host of socio-political organizations including “Jewish Voice for Peace” and other “Peace and Justice for Palestine” groups.

The Divestment movement, which sought to pressure institutions (mostly churches and universities) to divest their retirement funds from companies doing business with or in Israel, began more than twenty years ago and soon became a nation-wide phenomenon gaining support and followers in churches, on campuses, and in a variety of other institutions holding substantial retirement funds.  While few assets were actually divested, the real purpose of the movement was achieved: create a new podium from which to demonize Israel and by means of which to grab public attention and mainstream media coverage.  Over time interest in divestment waned, and presenters found themselves preaching to the choir.  So the movement morphed into” BDS,” boycotts, divestment, sanctions.  By including calls for boycott and sanctions, the proponents of this movement created a wider panoply of audiences, since boycotts and sanctions do not need investment funds that can be divested.  And as was the case with the divestment movement, the BDS movement cut a swath through college campuses enjoying large audiences on accommodating campuses with little opposition.  Later, as audience interest diminished and presenters found themselves again preaching to the choir, the forces waging the campus war against Israel re-organized to create the newest front, the “One-State Solution” movement.  Starting at the top, “One-State Solution” conferences were recently held at the University of Pennsylvania and at Harvard University, schools of international repute whose status lent credence and legitimacy to this new venue for Israel-bashing.   None of this could have happened were there not already on campuses a cadre of willing enablers, student and faculty activists and complicit or complacent administrative leadership, who energetically support these anti-Israel and anti-Jewish efforts.

Pages: 1 2

  • Ken

    How many tragedies have to happen before we wake-up to the stealthy assault on our way of life?!?

  • Matt

    Palestine as a State is going to include both settlers and Palestinians. You have Israel and then Palestine next door. Just keep building, then like SA and East Germany one day the cost becomes too much and Israel just disengages from and goes back to 1967 borders, leave millions of settlers in Palestine. The UN will have to broker a deal between the settlers and the Palestinians. Israel get a buffer zone. Israel will not give into US sanctions and pressure or the BDS they will continue the policy until the cost becomes too high and the policy collapses overnight, going by the rogues gallery of those will sanction that could be a long time a lot of new settlements. One state solution for Palestine.

    • Choi

      .And at WHAT "institution" of LOWER Education did you receive your HATE-Israel /HATE Jews degree?
      You're an example of the POISONED brains the Lefty Jihad ENABLING "academics" are turning out.
      Or ,perhaps,you ARE a Lefty Jihad Supporting "academic" BRAINWASHER yourself?

    • ObamaYoMoma

      The UN will have to broker a deal between the settlers and the Palestinians.

      I hate to rain on your totally oblivious parade, but besides the Jewish unbelievers that live in Israel, the Islamic world is also waging a permanent jihad of conquest perpetually against all non-Muslim unbelievers in the world, including you and me, to make Islam supreme. Hence, since it would be blasphemous, which in Islam constitutes a capital offense, for Muslims to make peace with any non-Muslim unbelievers on a permanent basis, you can take it to the bank that the Islamic world will never make peace on a permanent basis with the most hated of non-Muslim unbelievers of all, which are the Jewish unbelievers in Israel.

      Meanwhile, can you please explain to us how it is you moonbats can all be so incredibly ill-informed, naïve, and gullible at the same time?

      By the way, the UN has been hijacked, co-opted, and usurped by the Islamic world since in the 70s. Indeed, it is completely corrupted and has exactly zero credibility.

  • URALLAWASTEOFSPACE

    Apparently I don't have the freedom to voice my opinion here. Not surprised coming from a bunch paranoid right wing nut jobs.

    • davarino

      Please, inform

    • Choi

      POS's such as you cause normal PATRIOTS to be ON GUARD.
      F U and your poisonous opinion..
      btw, it's NOT Paranoid to OPPOSE THE ENEMY WITHIN,ie. Y.O.U.!

    • pagegl

      Ad hominem attacks will get you nowhere around here. Perhaps you should post something of substance with valid arguments.

    • Alex L. Booth

      The trouble with you left wing NUTS, You can't see past the end of your nose.. If there were as many of you during WW2 as today we would be speaking German or Japanese.. It's OK ,you can stick your head in a hole somplace.. We will protect you as always.. Somebody has to protect you .. You don't have enough guts or the will to protect yourself..

  • jacob

    You are going to get in real trouble if you call them "TERRORISTS" in contravention to OBAMA's
    "SUGGESTION" to call them "INSURGENTS" instead….

  • Schlomotion

    Although Sharia is repugnant, David Meir-Levi is fabricating and then exaggerating the threat that it poses to American Law. His borrowed term "lawfare" is hypocritical, because he vilifies Islamists for using it, but he adores Zionists like Alan Dershowitz for using it. There can be no pejorative for an activity that is done by both sides.

    His attempt to make Americans more paranoid of Mexicans in order to attack Muslims is ironic, since he himself is a purported American whose loyalties and politics lie with Israel, but whose posterior, cash flow, property, and freedom all flow from the United States. That is hardly a model US citizen. We do not tolerate IRA supporters in the Irish diaspora. We do not tolerate Castro supporters in the Cuban diaspora. Why do we tolerate Zionist racism against Mexicans and Muslims when it comes from the mouthpieces of the Jewish diaspora?

    • pagegl

      That's an interesting and completely invalid connection you're trying to make. Other than pointing out that radical middle eastern Muslims are infiltrating our southern border by posing as Mexicans, there is nothig derogatory about Hispanics in this article, so, no racist comments about Mexicans. Nice try though. Then there is the racism against Muslims bit… Islam is a religion, not an ethnic group, so, no racism there.

      Oh yeah, there are probably more IRA supporters in the USA than you believe, so, that silly statement is invalid. And finally, although there are probably next to no Castro supporters in the Cuban expats in the USA, there is no storage of them on college campuses and in other leftist groups across the country.

      • Schlomotion

        You don't think it's possible to be racist against Muslims? Don't they mean by Muslims: Brown guys with long grey beards that wag their finger and go "lelelelelelelele!" Who pray on a rug and have bad breath and beat their wives and pray to a child molester, and wear pajamas all day, and fly into fits of rage for no reason, and don't walk upright like Westerners? Isn't that what they mean by Muslims when Hasbaras refer to Muslims?

    • Choi

      Do you really think that using the word RACIST is supposed to make anybody "cower" at being called a "rrraaaaccciiiissssttttt"
      Those who are NOT RACISTS KNOW THEY'RE NOT RACISTS,just like YOU KNOW THAT YOU'RE A RACIST LEFTY ANTI-SEMITE/JEW HATING R-A-C-I-ST!

      NOW DEAL WITH THAT and THIS:
      BY BEING A JEW-HATER,YOU ARE A NAZI RACIST!!!
      A REAL RACIST.A NAZI FASCIST RRRRAAAACCCCCCIIIISSSST!

      • Schlomotion

        Are you half Korean, half Jewish? Is that why you flip out about racism all the time and try extra hard to out-Jew other Zionists here? In my experience, it is the biracial people who act as belligerent as you do about their race and ethnicity. Most of your comments are belligerent, usually swearing, and always flipping out in this passive-aggressive posture about somebody you perceive to be antisemitic. Is it because you are really Korean? Did you ever look up "dchoi" on Urban Dictionary?

        • Simon

          Perhaps you will wake up about Islam when you or a family member is maimed or killed in a Muslim jihadist terror attack. That attack could well come from a white Muslim convert jihadist. It doesn't matter about race as with Islam it's ideology that counts not what race you are. You apparently don't want to acknowledge the lying, deceptive, insidious, inherently violent nature of Islam. Perhaps you are an academic who has benefited from a Saudi Islamic study grant?

          • Schlomotion

            It is amazing what you people wish upon others.

  • Ralph Bernstein

    David Mier-Levi is a middle scholar and a very honest and courageous person. I am very familiar with all his writings, and he has been correct on most issues. I have seen him debate Middle East Studies professors and come out way ahead. He has anticipated important political problems earlier than most. Take him seriously, he has a historical and political perspective that is very honest and reliable.

    • Ralph Bernstein

      Correction – "Middle East scholar"

    • Stan Weitzman

      I second Ralph's endorsement. David thrashed Norman Finkelstein on a panel to the point where Finkelstein, could only try to cast insults at David. The Islamists in the audience loved the insults and cheered, but David clearly bested him and remained very calm. I spoke with David afterwards and with the another panel member, John Dugard, who was the UN Human Rights Council Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories. John,who is a respected International Legal authority, clearly was not familiar with many issues regarding Israel and the Palestinians. He has parroted the Palestinian line calling Israel and Apartheid state. Interesting coming from someone who was Dean of the Law School at University of Wittersand, South Africa. But he did seem receptive and I hope he learned something from being on the panel . David gave him all of his notes and we both referred him to a some excellent reading material.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The most obvious peril arises from terrorist infiltration. Terrorists identified as al-Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and Iranian agents continue to enter our country via Mexico as illegal immigrants.  Yet, almost a decade ago the present writer and others published analyses of the danger posed to our country’s security by such infiltration. If these agents were not bent on doing us harm, they could easily enter our country via normal ports of entry. 

    Actually, it's not terrorist infiltration. It's jihadists infiltration, as jihad, in stark contrast to terrorism, is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and constitutes total warfare that utilizes both violent and non-violent means of jihad.

    In fact, it is covert and deceptive non-violent means of jihad that enters this country through normal ports of entry instead of our southern Mexican border and which is employed by the Islamic world against the West astronomically far more prevalently that constitutes an exponentially far greater threat to the peace and security of the West today relative to violent jihad. Indeed, this writer habitually conflates what is really jihad as being terrorism, which is always only violent, and at the same time this flaw in his perception causes him to ignore the much more harmful and prevalently employed varieties of covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass infiltration and stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

    For instance, our colleges and universities, major institutions, and federal government agencies have all been so infiltrated by Muslim covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists that our news media, political elites on both sides of the political spectrum, and federal government today have all been rendered completely incompetent when it comes to Islam, and if our elites are incompetent and blind when it comes to Islam, then it means that unless something very drastic happens, this country too will inevitably face stealth demographic conquest the same way the delusional Euroloons are facing it today.

    By the way, all this happened via jihad, which the writer conflates as being terrorism, as jihad in stark contrast to terrorism, can be both violent and non-violent, while terrorism, on the other hand, can only be violent. Not to mention that jihad is only in the cause of Allah, while terrorism, on the other hand, can be for any number of political cause other than in the cause of Allah.

    Indeed, because of massive covert and deceptive non-violent jihad infiltration into this country, our elites, including obviously this writer as well, assume that Islam is a so-called Religion of Peace™ being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists and that the vast overwhelming majority of Muslims in the world are peaceful and moderate people. Thus, mass Muslim immigration to the West, which is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass infiltration and stealth demographic conquest, is premised on this very false PC multicultural myth and welcomed in America today with open arms instead of with resistance and opposition.

    Of course, conflating what is really jihad with terrorism, per the dictates of PC multiculturalism, also contributes tremendously to this prevailing situation because it causes America to become totally transfixed only on preventing the violent varieties of jihad which is misconstrued as being terrorism, while at the same time causing America to completely ignore the astronomically far more prevalently employed covert and deceptive non-violent varieties of jihad.

    Not to mention as well, but it was that same above very false PC multicultural myth about the nature of Islam and Muslims that also caused our two fantasy based nation-building missions in Iraq and Afghanistan to inevitably turn into the two biggest strategic blunders ever in American history. Indeed, if the real nature of Islam and Muslims had been correctly understood by our elites, there never would have been two incredibly fantasy based and counterproductive nation-building missions in Iraq and Afghanistan to begin with. Meanwhile, don't forget that the sole reason our elites believe in that false PC multicultural myth to begin with, is because of mass infiltration of covert and deceptive non-violent jihadists into our country that have successfully infiltrated our colleges and universities, major institutions, and our federal government.

    Hence, sealing off our borders is just one of the common sense measures we need to undertake ASAP. The other measures would be outlawing Islam on the grounds that it really isn't a religion, but instead a supremacist theo-political totalitarian ideology that masquerades as being a religion to dupe the gullible societies it intends to subjugate into a very draconian form of Islamic totalitarianism via the imposition of Sharia, and banning and reversing mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage ASAP on the grounds that it is really covert and deceptive non-violent jihad for the purpose of mass infiltration and stealth demographic conquest.

    Indeed, zero covert jihadists living in America as a fifth column would virtually eliminate the possibility of violent jihad attacks on the homeland and at the same time completely alleviate the much greater threats stemming from mass infiltration and stealth demographic conquest. Not to mention that it would also enable us to free up hundreds of billions of dollars currently being spent annually on preventing terrorist attacks, i.e., violent jihad attacks, to use for something else.

    • DogsHateRomney

      Speaking of ObamaYoMoma 106p

      Question: ~ WHY does ObamaYoMoma enjoy UNLIMITED posting privileges?

      ~ WHY is ObamaYoMoma able to harangue us AND exceed our PLEBIAN POST LIMIT- times TEN?
      (see above)

      ObamaYoMoma: YOU BLOG POODLES, & FAVORED ELITISTS, – (POSING AS REGULAR CITIZENS) HA!

      ..are a pampered, select group whom, somehow enjoy a different set of unrestricted limits on this blog –

      We may agree on some issues. – Nonetheless -

      YOU, Sir, (with your UN-PROTECTED, and EXTENDED flatulant posting perks) INSULT US!

      Because you do not play by OUR MANDATED RULES! – SCREW THAT!

      YOU aggrivate and symbolize the problem!

      • ObamaYoMoma

        First of all, numbskull, I don't appreciate the preemptive attack. Second, I am a regular American and I am no more an insulting hypocrite than you and your hideously insulting moniker of, “DogsHateRomney,” which also pretty revealingly indicates your level of intelligence, or more accurately lack thereof.

        By the way, genius, I don't enjoy unlimited posting privileges here. Instead, I enjoy the same level of posting privileges as you and everyone else does that posts on this site. However, unlike you, genius, I apparently was able to figure out how to use my posting privileges to its maximum potential, while you can only cry and complain like a spoiled adolescent. Get over yourself crybaby.

        • DogsHateRomney

          Replying to ObamaYoMoma – sir, thank you for your response.

          No One here enjoys your Poodle-Class Special Posting Word Limit privileges;

          In (only) the past 48-hours" You enjoyed,

          POST: 900 words 5673 characters
          POST: 913 words 5549 characters
          POST: 878 words 5329 characters

          (QUOTE) First of all, numbskull, I don't appreciate the preemptive attack

          Oh! An unsolicitited huffy, defamatory statement – SO Hegelian/Marsist.

          Ignore the substance. Attack the messenger.

          Are you a Mormon?

          • ObamaYoMoma

            And if WE enjoyed your Poodle-Class Special Posting Word Limit privileges; WE could "use our unlimited space to record and quote your post," – - for the record..

            I repeat everyone here has the same exact posting privileges as me, but at the same time it isn't my fault that apparently you aren't able to figure out how to maximize your posting privileges. Perhaps if you would quit worrying about everybody else like a spoiled adolescent and at the same time start concentrating instead on yourself, maybe you would too be able to figure it out as well.

            Ignore the substance. Attack the messenger.

            The substance of your unwarranted preemptive attack is that you are an envious immature adolescent too ignorant to figure out how to maximize his own posting privileges.

            Are you a Mormon?

            And apparently you are a religious bigot as well.

          • DogsHateRomney

            RE: (QUOTE) " First of all, numbskull, I don't appreciate the preemptive attack. Second, I am a regular American and I am no more an insulting hypocrite than you and your hideously insulting moniker of, “DogsHateRomney,” which also pretty revealingly indicates your level of intelligence, or more accurately lack thereof.

            The bigot card is intellectually dishonest.

            My "moniker" is a tongue in cheek jab at Romney strapping Seamus, their family pet, an Irish Setter on the roof of their car in a crate for a 12-hour drive to their vacation house.

            Why does my name violate you?

            Also, why the games, ad homenem attacks, and deception?

    • EARTHMAN911

      Yo:

      You've connected some important dots.

      Drugs and jihadists enter Europe through Islamic Albania. Drugs and jihadists enter the U.S. through Mexico.

      Immigration; the FBI and CIA all know this yet our border with Mexico is wide open and the DOJ (FBI) supplies guns to the Mexican and jihadist drug runners.

      Somebody at the FBI, CIA and Immigration is being paid off big time.

      Hasn't anyone noticed the propensity for beheadings that are committed by the "muscle" protecting the huge Mexican drug cartels? It seems logical that the Muslims that produce this huge cash crop would protect its distributors in the same way the Clinton Administration built the huge Fort Bondsteel in Bosnia to protect the drug supply coming into Western Europe from Muslim Albania.

      As Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton can move bales of 100 dollar bills in and out of the country, via her special airplane, without ever being inspected, just like the CIA moved tons of heroin out of Vietnam in body bags on Air Force transports.

      It's all about money and power. Ready for more change?

      • ObamaYoMoma

        And a lot of politicians as well. That's why for all these years it has been almost impossible to get that border sealed off.

        Indeed, former presidential candidate Gov. Rick Perry peculiarly was against building a border fence.

    • Guest

      The best way to secure our borders is to bring our troops home from Afghanistan and let them do the job of securing our country. Sadl their mission "surge to the exits" as Obama decreed is a dismal waste of American lives and treasure.

    • political_vacuum

      Replying to ObamaYoMoma

      Your post enjoys an 880 word count. It has almost 6000 characters.
      I tried to post your exact same comment as it was written and received this message:

      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      So I split your remarks as instructed:

      FIRST: I deleted the entire last paragraph from your post and re-posted it:
      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      THEN: I deleted four more paragraphs from your above comment, – I received this message:
      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      After I deleted SEVEN paragraphs, – - – I received this message:
      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      After I deleted EIGHT paragraphs from your above post, I was given the okay to print what took YOU one pass to post.

      DogsHateRomney (a funny name that only LDS would hate) – nailed you.

      Don't complain when others see through you.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    YOU ARE AN IDIOT AND A CRYBABY!

    • DogsHateRomney

      Replying to ObamaYoMoma – sir, thank you for your response.

      Answer: No.

      No One here enjoys your Special Posting Word Limit privileges;

      In (only) the past 48-hours" You enjoyed,

      POST: 900 words 5673 characters
      POST: 913 words 5549 characters
      POST: 878 words 5329 characters

      (QUOTE) "YOU ARE AN IDIOT AND A CRYBABY! "

      Nope. Just noting you play by different rules.

    • ObamaYoMoma

      My. My. Why so angry? Are you Mormon?

      Whose angry bigot?

      • DogsHateRomney

        Replying to ObamaYoMoma

        "Bigotry"? ha-ha. too funny.

        AGAIN: (third time, what's so difficult?)

        QUESTION: Are you LDS, Mormon?

        Yes or No?

        • ObamaYoMoma

          I'm not an immature adolescent bigot like you.

          • DogsHateRomney

            The "bigot" card is always an indication of intelligent life.

    • political_vacuum

      "YOU ARE AN IDIOT AND A CRYBABY! "

      So incorrect,

      Your post enjoys an 880 word count. It has almost 6000 characters.
      I tried to post your exact same comment as it was written and received this message:

      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      So I split your remarks as instructed:

      FIRST: I deleted the entire last paragraph from your post and re-posted it:
      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      THEN: I deleted four more paragraphs from your above comment, – I received this message:
      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      After I deleted EIGHT paragraphs, – - – I received this message:
      "Sorry – Your comment is a little too long. Try splitting it into multiple comments."

      Others see through your nonsense.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Expert witnesses reporting to congress have indicated that Iran has active agents, both Hezbollah and Iranian government operatives, in the USA: sleeper cells awaiting orders while conducting surveillance in preparation for future attacks.

    By the way, I would wager that the the vast overwhelming majority if not all of those Iranian and Hezbollah covert jihadists living in America as a fifth column today entered the country through normal ports of entry as opposed to our southern Mexican border. However, I agree with the writer that sealing our borders and getting immigration under control should be one of America's highest priorities.

    Iran has successfully laid the groundwork for future terrorism inside the USA with Hezbollah and other Iranian terrorist agents primed, ready and invisible.

    Unlike the writer I fear covert and deceptive non-violent jihad far more than I do terrorism, which is really violent jihad that per the dictates of PC multiculturalism the writer conflates as being terrorism. Indeed, if not for covert and deceptive non-violent jihad all of the other things the writer raves about, i.e., “infiltration of Muslim operatives and their supporters into our social, legal, educational and political systems under the guise of legitimate democratic activism in the form of the Divestment movement, the BDS movement, the “One-State Solution” proponents, lawyers implementing “Lawfare,” those who seek to legitimize Sharia law, and a host of socio-political organizations including “Jewish Voice for Peace” and other “Peace and Justice for Palestine” groups,” wouldn't be happening today.

    Almost without exception, these groups promote the Arab side of the Israel-Arab conflict, ignore the reality of Israel’s need for defense against vicious genocidal terrorism, and act as mouthpieces for Arab anti-Israel propaganda.

    When writers in the interest of political correctness or whatever unwittingly mischaracterize the nature of the permanent Islamic jihad of conquest being waged perpetually by the Islamic world against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel primarily via their proxy the so-called Palestinians as merely an Israel-Arab conflict, they are doing a grave injustice to Israel and its cause for freedom, liberty, human rights, and peace

    For instance, the biggest threat to Israel today emanates from Iran, and Iran isn't even an Arab majority country. Does anyone believe that Pakistani and Afghan Muslims would cut the Jewish unbelievers in Israel, or any other non-Muslim unbelievers for that matter, any slack?

    Indeed, if the majority of the world understood that what is happening in Israel was really a permanent jihad of conquest being waged perpetually against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel by the Islamic world, primarily via their proxy the so-called Palestinians that were created out of whole cloth in Moscow in 1964 by the Soviet KGB as a disinformation campaign to dupe gullible useful idiots by camouflaging the Islamic world's jihad of conquest under a cloak of nationalism, I bet most people in the world would support Israel as opposed to the so-called Palestinians. Especially if they understood as well that the jihad of conquest being waged perpetually against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel is just one tiny part of the much greater global jihad at large being waged perpetually not only against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel but also against all non-Muslim unbelievers throughout the world.

    Finally, let me make it clear that on the whole I agree with and actually admire the writer of the above article. However, I do have a few problems stemming from his few PC multicultural idiosyncrasies that are probably bad habits more than anything else.

    • Simon

      You understand the problems, I agree with you. Unfortunately, with the influence that Arab oil money buys in government and academic circles it would be almost impossible to develop a consensus to the point where Islam could be banned as the anti-Western political ideology that it is. Many more people of authority need to understand Islam's insidious nature first.

  • crackerjack

    A day in the life of USA 2.2.2012.

    "Mass fatalities" in classroom shooting, California
    14 shot, 2 dead in Miami funeral shooting

    ………………….who needs jihadists? LOL

  • Ghostwriter

    Can we please get back to the subject AT HAND? Both ObamaYoMama and DogsHateRommey are acting like idiots and I wish they'd stop their silly argument and return to how best to deal with the jihadists in our midst.

    • Looking4Sanity

      Too right, mate!

  • Joseph Christopher

    It is ,Ghostwriter ,quite important that we consider all angles on how to deal with the attempted islamization of North America and the others do have a point,yet I agree with you that deviating from the objective of this blog will allow no one to grasp the importance of combining intelligences to solve this problem.

  • Linda Rivera

    To Schlomotion,

    Why do you LIE about the author? David Meir-Levi does NOT "attempt to make Americans more paranoid of Mexicans". Stop your LIES!

    It is treason for American courts to allow any sharia law. Under Islamic sharia law, women are intensely HATED. Women are treated as inferior. Non-Muslims are also regarded as utterly inferior and intensely HATED. Non-Muslims have NO rights under Islam.

    Any judge or anyone else who allows any type of Islamic sharia law in America or any other non-Muslim country should be PROSECUTED for TREASON.

    Allowing Islamic sharia law in America and other non-Muslim countries makes a mockery of the many brave heroes who fought and died in the Second World War so that we could live in freedom and safety.

  • Madman

    Glenn Beck has been right all along.