<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Argument for Guns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-argument-for-guns</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Bimbam</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4091184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bimbam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 05:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4091184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What I get from this article is the utter frustration the left cannot take advantage of the False Flag operation Sandy Hook and are just MAD AND FRUSTRATED AS HELL that it isn&#039;t working.  Much to my  delight I might say.

Because they cannot reason with fact this emotionally charged Sandy Hook FF operation was their only betting card.  Now they&#039;ll just have to figure out a another massacre, but let&#039;s hope this time it&#039;s them!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I get from this article is the utter frustration the left cannot take advantage of the False Flag operation Sandy Hook and are just MAD AND FRUSTRATED AS HELL that it isn&#8217;t working.  Much to my  delight I might say.</p>
<p>Because they cannot reason with fact this emotionally charged Sandy Hook FF operation was their only betting card.  Now they&#8217;ll just have to figure out a another massacre, but let&#8217;s hope this time it&#8217;s them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspacia</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4090343</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aspacia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4090343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[True:-) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True:-) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4089976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4089976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)  
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)  
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)  
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)  
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)  
 
Have you got it yet? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)<br />
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)<br />
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)<br />
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)<br />
compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher)  </p>
<p>Have you got it yet? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4089971</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4089971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[n the United Kingdom firearms are tightly controlled by law, and while there is opposition to existing legislation from shooting organisations,[citation needed] there is little wider political debate, and public opinion favours stronger control.[1] The British Shooting Sports Council now believes that the law needs to be consolidated but it does not call for a review.[2] The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world with 0.07 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009 compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher) and to Germany&#039;s 0.21 (3 times higher).[3] ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>n the United Kingdom firearms are tightly controlled by law, and while there is opposition to existing legislation from shooting organisations,[citation needed] there is little wider political debate, and public opinion favours stronger control.[1] The British Shooting Sports Council now believes that the law needs to be consolidated but it does not call for a review.[2] The United Kingdom has one of the lowest rates of gun homicides in the world with 0.07 recorded intentional homicides committed with a firearm per 100,000 inhabitants in 2009 compared to the United States&#039; 3.0 (over 40 times higher) and to Germany&#039;s 0.21 (3 times higher).[3] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4089948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymouse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 20:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4089948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were 2 armed guards at Columbine... The second amendment qualifies the right to bear arms with the term &quot;well regulated militia&quot; does it not? WTF is &#039;well regulated&#039; about 300 million guns in circulation?  
 
Assault rifle defined by its appearance?? Just about the stupidest statement ever made. So a kid&#039;s plastic toy is now an &quot;assault rifle&quot;. Get your head out of your ass, man.  
 
Statistics quoted here- &quot;lies, damned lies and statistics&quot; or as my math teacher put it &quot;a person with a foot in ice and the other in boiling oil will, on average feel perfectly comfortable&quot; 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were 2 armed guards at Columbine&#8230; The second amendment qualifies the right to bear arms with the term &quot;well regulated militia&quot; does it not? WTF is &#039;well regulated&#039; about 300 million guns in circulation?  </p>
<p>Assault rifle defined by its appearance?? Just about the stupidest statement ever made. So a kid&#039;s plastic toy is now an &quot;assault rifle&quot;. Get your head out of your ass, man.  </p>
<p>Statistics quoted here- &quot;lies, damned lies and statistics&quot; or as my math teacher put it &quot;a person with a foot in ice and the other in boiling oil will, on average feel perfectly comfortable&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4089204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 14:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4089204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Actually, the Wiki sources can often be valid .edu and .gov sites.&quot; 
 
 
You have to evaluate them on a case by case basis. It&#039;s good to have them, so I appreciate wikipedia in that sense because it can give you leads...but it&#039;s not authoritative on its own, that&#039;s for sure. When it comes to Israel and Islam, the intense lobbying of the Jews...oops, not really. The intense lobbying of the jihadis makes it very difficult to have balanced pages even when the event being discussed should be clearly full of evidence against Fakestinians and others. 
 
Some pages are useful, and some resources cited are valid. But, you can&#039;t assume anything unless you really follow the leads and authenticate the claims. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Actually, the Wiki sources can often be valid .edu and .gov sites.&quot; </p>
<p>You have to evaluate them on a case by case basis. It&#039;s good to have them, so I appreciate wikipedia in that sense because it can give you leads&#8230;but it&#039;s not authoritative on its own, that&#039;s for sure. When it comes to Israel and Islam, the intense lobbying of the Jews&#8230;oops, not really. The intense lobbying of the jihadis makes it very difficult to have balanced pages even when the event being discussed should be clearly full of evidence against Fakestinians and others. </p>
<p>Some pages are useful, and some resources cited are valid. But, you can&#039;t assume anything unless you really follow the leads and authenticate the claims. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspacia</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4088900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aspacia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4088900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Vet, 
 
Actually, the Wiki sources can often be valid .edu and .gov sites.  Wiki itself sucks. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Vet, </p>
<p>Actually, the Wiki sources can often be valid .edu and .gov sites.  Wiki itself sucks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspacia</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4088893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aspacia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4088893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chap,  
 
The most violent cities implemented strong gun laws, leaving the law abiding to suffer at the hands of the violent.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chap,  </p>
<p>The most violent cities implemented strong gun laws, leaving the law abiding to suffer at the hands of the violent.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aspacia</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4088883</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[aspacia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4088883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Europe is failing, and falling to Islamism.  The only people who acquire handguns in Europe are your villains.  Try reading a few of the UK&#039;s more conservative columnists for balance. 
 
Your courts allow many free to rape and burn autos and homes because of faith.  You have 85 Sharia courts which promote violence and discrimination. What about the two UK educated Islamists who tried to murder unarmed civilians using a car in Scotland?  There are many in Europe who do want the ability to own arms, but they are not part of your group think.  There are also many who are opposed to Islamists, with several wives and children living on the UK government dole and calling for the destruction of the UK.  II know because I have many UK relatives as Mum was in a family of 8 during WWII.   
 
Cars, Knives, rope, box cutters, etc. can all be used as weapons, and frankly a solid Colt 45 is the great equalizer for a 60 year-old woman against an armed 20 year-old intruder.   
 
We have the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms because King Georgie tried to confiscate our arms and Ammo at Bunker Hill/Breed&#039;s Hill.  Washington refused to be crowned arguing that we have just overthrown one monarch, why have another.   
 
What a Twat! 
 
 
 
   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Europe is failing, and falling to Islamism.  The only people who acquire handguns in Europe are your villains.  Try reading a few of the UK&#039;s more conservative columnists for balance. </p>
<p>Your courts allow many free to rape and burn autos and homes because of faith.  You have 85 Sharia courts which promote violence and discrimination. What about the two UK educated Islamists who tried to murder unarmed civilians using a car in Scotland?  There are many in Europe who do want the ability to own arms, but they are not part of your group think.  There are also many who are opposed to Islamists, with several wives and children living on the UK government dole and calling for the destruction of the UK.  II know because I have many UK relatives as Mum was in a family of 8 during WWII.   </p>
<p>Cars, Knives, rope, box cutters, etc. can all be used as weapons, and frankly a solid Colt 45 is the great equalizer for a 60 year-old woman against an armed 20 year-old intruder.   </p>
<p>We have the 2nd Amendment right to keep and bear arms because King Georgie tried to confiscate our arms and Ammo at Bunker Hill/Breed&#039;s Hill.  Washington refused to be crowned arguing that we have just overthrown one monarch, why have another.   </p>
<p>What a Twat! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In practice the rights are the same, it is just a matter of terminology&quot; 
 
 
The same among EU members, but not equal to the rights of US citizens. With 0&#039;Bama making such incredibly traitorous declarations, I can see why anyone today might be confused on that point. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;In practice the rights are the same, it is just a matter of terminology&quot; </p>
<p>The same among EU members, but not equal to the rights of US citizens. With 0&#039;Bama making such incredibly traitorous declarations, I can see why anyone today might be confused on that point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087942</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 06:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; I take you citizens also have easy access to battle tanks and fighter jets... &quot; 
 
 
Not even the Taliban need those. Why do people need fighter jets to defend themselves against a tyrannical government? I suppose it might come to that, but the point is not to maintain the best expeditionary forces in the hands of the militia. You&#039;re clearly in way over your head and never even considered that your indoctrination might have kept you from getting educated. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot; I take you citizens also have easy access to battle tanks and fighter jets&#8230; &quot; </p>
<p>Not even the Taliban need those. Why do people need fighter jets to defend themselves against a tyrannical government? I suppose it might come to that, but the point is not to maintain the best expeditionary forces in the hands of the militia. You&#039;re clearly in way over your head and never even considered that your indoctrination might have kept you from getting educated. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Review your history. Your &quot;unique&quot; way of government was based upon ideas from French philosophers like Voltaire and Rousseau&quot; 
 
 
You are a silly man. Influenced by is NOT the same as something being &quot;based on.&quot; 
 
&quot;France itself became a republic in 1789, with mixed success&quot; 
 
I guess details matter huh? But you have a trouble with using salient facts in your arguments. 
 
&quot;In Europe you have Kingdoms, you have Republics (most) and anything in between.&quot; 
 
Yes...and? 
 
&quot;None of the 50 or so european countries has relaxed gun laws.&quot; 
 
We don&#039;t need to go back in history to remember why we started a new system of government you more-on. We don&#039;t have the depth of traditions to hold us back, so we were able to put plenty of thought in to an ideal form of democracy with little need to deal with the baggage of legacy. Can you show any evidence at all, or even a specific rational theory to argue that our constitution is not superior to any other in ensuring liberty and equal rights for all citizens? 
 
&quot;Of course, you can find the odd individual anywhere, but do keep in mind that you have been speaking to Breivik himself.&quot; 
 
Wow. You obviously can&#039;t even think for yourself if that is your conclusion. You&#039;re totally programmed by your leftist political leaders. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Review your history. Your &quot;unique&quot; way of government was based upon ideas from French philosophers like Voltaire and Rousseau&quot; </p>
<p>You are a silly man. Influenced by is NOT the same as something being &quot;based on.&quot; </p>
<p>&quot;France itself became a republic in 1789, with mixed success&quot; </p>
<p>I guess details matter huh? But you have a trouble with using salient facts in your arguments. </p>
<p>&quot;In Europe you have Kingdoms, you have Republics (most) and anything in between.&quot; </p>
<p>Yes&#8230;and? </p>
<p>&quot;None of the 50 or so european countries has relaxed gun laws.&quot; </p>
<p>We don&#039;t need to go back in history to remember why we started a new system of government you more-on. We don&#039;t have the depth of traditions to hold us back, so we were able to put plenty of thought in to an ideal form of democracy with little need to deal with the baggage of legacy. Can you show any evidence at all, or even a specific rational theory to argue that our constitution is not superior to any other in ensuring liberty and equal rights for all citizens? </p>
<p>&quot;Of course, you can find the odd individual anywhere, but do keep in mind that you have been speaking to Breivik himself.&quot; </p>
<p>Wow. You obviously can&#039;t even think for yourself if that is your conclusion. You&#039;re totally programmed by your leftist political leaders. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087848</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Look guys, in Europe guns have been forbidden for ages and you know what, there is 0% support for relaxing gun laws. It is a non issue, NOBODY wants them back. Maybe you are different, but consider the option that you are just dumber.&quot;  
  
With such a simple argument, I&#039;d consider that you are dumber. You don&#039;t seem to have read our reasoning. We laugh at your civilization that is only truly preserved in history books. The USA still has a chance to carry freedom forward. In Europe, you&#039;re just hanging on to our coat tails. You are all little client states, so don&#039;t piss off your benefactor.  
  
It reminds me of the simplistic debates over nationalized healthcare. European countries do it, why can&#039;t the US do it too? Because the USA is the most important source for medical research. Taking away profit motive will destroy future incentives to invest and innovate. We don&#039;t have anyone to suck off of.  
  
I&#039;ve spent a lot of time in Europe and love it because it&#039;s central to important Western history. The people there however by and large are almost entirely taken in by leftist lies. What sad sacks almost every last one of you are.  
  
You seem to fit that niche perfectly. Watch how you talk to your protectors, you silly little man. We&#039;re the only ones still standing and we&#039;ve got our own potential civil war brewing. Unless you&#039;re Muslim, you want American citizens to have their own guns with plenty of ammunition. It may be the last chance you have to avoid sharia enforced on your precious &quot;gun-free&quot; society.  
  
Swords can be pretty deadly too, and they may not kill you for petty infractions, but you can lose a hand very quickly and with lots of blood and pain. Plus I don&#039;t think the new rulers of Eurabia will give a damn about your gun-free zones. You won&#039;t get any guns, but they&#039;ll have plenty. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Look guys, in Europe guns have been forbidden for ages and you know what, there is 0% support for relaxing gun laws. It is a non issue, NOBODY wants them back. Maybe you are different, but consider the option that you are just dumber.&quot;  </p>
<p>With such a simple argument, I&#039;d consider that you are dumber. You don&#039;t seem to have read our reasoning. We laugh at your civilization that is only truly preserved in history books. The USA still has a chance to carry freedom forward. In Europe, you&#039;re just hanging on to our coat tails. You are all little client states, so don&#039;t piss off your benefactor.  </p>
<p>It reminds me of the simplistic debates over nationalized healthcare. European countries do it, why can&#039;t the US do it too? Because the USA is the most important source for medical research. Taking away profit motive will destroy future incentives to invest and innovate. We don&#039;t have anyone to suck off of.  </p>
<p>I&#039;ve spent a lot of time in Europe and love it because it&#039;s central to important Western history. The people there however by and large are almost entirely taken in by leftist lies. What sad sacks almost every last one of you are.  </p>
<p>You seem to fit that niche perfectly. Watch how you talk to your protectors, you silly little man. We&#039;re the only ones still standing and we&#039;ve got our own potential civil war brewing. Unless you&#039;re Muslim, you want American citizens to have their own guns with plenty of ammunition. It may be the last chance you have to avoid sharia enforced on your precious &quot;gun-free&quot; society.  </p>
<p>Swords can be pretty deadly too, and they may not kill you for petty infractions, but you can lose a hand very quickly and with lots of blood and pain. Plus I don&#039;t think the new rulers of Eurabia will give a damn about your gun-free zones. You won&#039;t get any guns, but they&#039;ll have plenty. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 05:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;What bothers me though is this: In proposing to ban &quot;assault rifles&quot;, what that means is banning a form of rifle because its appearance offends the sensibilities of intellectuals.&quot; 
 
 
That may be true in some cases, but savvy leftist lawyers know that subjective language can always be used like a wedge or a foot in the door. They intend to expand the definition. That&#039;s why they&#039;re not precise. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;What bothers me though is this: In proposing to ban &quot;assault rifles&quot;, what that means is banning a form of rifle because its appearance offends the sensibilities of intellectuals.&quot; </p>
<p>That may be true in some cases, but savvy leftist lawyers know that subjective language can always be used like a wedge or a foot in the door. They intend to expand the definition. That&#039;s why they&#039;re not precise. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trickyblain</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trickyblain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disagree with your other every post on this thread, but +1 for pointing that out to our FPM friends.  
 
Breivick = FPM devotee ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree with your other every post on this thread, but +1 for pointing that out to our FPM friends.  </p>
<p>Breivick = FPM devotee </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trickyblain</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087680</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trickyblain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 04:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Money and planning are common traits amongst all these freaks, Chap.  
 
If a smart madman with money and planning really wants to slaughter lots of folks, he will. And won&#039;t really mind violating some random law in the process. 
 
Trying to put it back in the bottle? Only serves is to disarm responsible owners of firearms.   
 
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Money and planning are common traits amongst all these freaks, Chap.  </p>
<p>If a smart madman with money and planning really wants to slaughter lots of folks, he will. And won&#039;t really mind violating some random law in the process. </p>
<p>Trying to put it back in the bottle? Only serves is to disarm responsible owners of firearms.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trickyblain</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087606</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trickyblain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The American Revolution was inspired by the principles of Christianity. &quot; 
 
How so, VV? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;The American Revolution was inspired by the principles of Christianity. &quot; </p>
<p>How so, VV? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trickyblain</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4087603</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trickyblain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 03:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4087603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History? It&#039;s a bit of a stretch to claim that our republic was based on the ideas of JJR and Voltaire. Thier unattainable ideals make for good reading, bet led to internal chaos and mass suffering in practice.  
The French had very little intellectual impact (though their economic and military help was indispensable in the revolutionary era). Locke and his precursor Hobbes deserve philosophical credit, but don&#039;t discount the contributions of the US founders -- they made it happen. Europeans have reaped the benefits in spades, and yet have the nerve -- the utter gall -- to act like like they are somehow superior in intellectual and moral dealings. They are not.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History? It&#039;s a bit of a stretch to claim that our republic was based on the ideas of JJR and Voltaire. Thier unattainable ideals make for good reading, bet led to internal chaos and mass suffering in practice.<br />
The French had very little intellectual impact (though their economic and military help was indispensable in the revolutionary era). Locke and his precursor Hobbes deserve philosophical credit, but don&#039;t discount the contributions of the US founders &#8212; they made it happen. Europeans have reaped the benefits in spades, and yet have the nerve &#8212; the utter gall &#8212; to act like like they are somehow superior in intellectual and moral dealings. They are not.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viet Vet</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4084705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Viet Vet]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 08:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4084705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The American Revolution was inspired by the principles of Christianity. 
 
The French Revolution was quite the opposite. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Revolution was inspired by the principles of Christianity. </p>
<p>The French Revolution was quite the opposite. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JacksonPearson</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/david-solway/the-argument-for-guns/comment-page-1/#comment-4084470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JacksonPearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 06:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=171132#comment-4084470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, but let&#039;s hope it never gets to that point. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, but let&#039;s hope it never gets to that point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 742/799 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-29 14:14:11 by W3 Total Cache -->