40 Percent of US Muslim Voters Want Islamic Law, 12 Percent Want Death for Blasphemers


…. and 72 percent are voting for Obama.

Sharia law is a fake issue manufactured by Islamophobes. It’s a complete non-issue for everyone but the 50 percent of Muslims who want blasphemy laws, the 40 percent who want to live under Islamic law and the 12 percent who want to murder blasphemers. Oh and another 9 percent are undecided on the question of whether we should be hanging blasphemers or not.

Now this is obviously a non-issue because we will never actually prosecute people for blasphemy, even though a man who made a movie that offended Muslims was sent to jail on the orders of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. We will never actually do it, even though Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer suggested that we could do it.

But we won’t, because it can never happen here… until it does.

Let’s run a little thought experiment here. Suppose that instead of a few million Muslims in America, there were 50 or 60 million Muslims. As there will eventually be if immigration and birth rates continue on track. Suppose we have Muslim majorities in entire states such as Illinois and Michigan. And since statistics for the Muslim diaspora show that 2nd and 3rd generation Muslims are actually more “radicalized” than their immigrant parents and grandparents, what happens when half of those 50 million Muslims vote based on Islamic law, rather on the Constitution?

In Egypt and Tunisia, Sharia voters brought Islamists to power. What happens when the Muslim Brotherhood Freedom and Justice Party dominates the Democratic Party in 5 or 6 states? What happens when no Democrat can win the presidential primaries without promising to “protect the right of Muslims to live under their own religious laws”?

What happens if we continue living in denial about the political consequences of Muslim immigration?

Nearly half of 600 Muslim-American citizens polled who plan to vote in the 2012 presidential election believe parodies of Muhammad should be prosecuted criminally in the U.S., and one in eight say the offense is so serious violators should face the death penalty.

The poll also found 40 percent of Muslims in America believe they should not be judged by U.S. law and the Constitution, but by Shariah standards.

“Even more shocking: One in eight respondents said they think those Americans who criticize or parody Islam should face the death penalty, while another nine percent said they were unsure on the question,” he said.

Wenzel said even the 9 percent “undecided” on that particular question is alarming.

It will become more alarming when that 9 percent or that 12 percent doesn’t represent hundreds of thousands of people, but millions.

  • pyeatte

    These Muslims that would rather have Sharia Law should have the integrity to move to a country that has it – like Yemen. Failing that, I would have no problem just deporting them – who needs them?

    • IrishEyesAreBlue

      THEY SHOULD ALL BE DEPORTED! AT ONCE!!! THEY ARE LIKE A LETHAL FUNGUS …

    • Javidan911

      But, you don't understand the minds of Muslims. They move here in order to impose Sharia law on the United States. Their goal is to subdue each country, one at a time if they have to, until the entire world is under Islam. They are attempting to proselytize us into Islam, either by our choice or under threat of the sword. This is dictated to them as their duty by the Quran (their so-called holy book). If we don't stand up and stop this, and I don't mean by just posting our protest in a blog, we will find ourselves in the same shape as France, the Netherlands and England. Google the effect of Islam or Muslims in these countries and see what has happened to them.

    • Drakken

      There won't be any deporting, there will be civil war long before that happens. The backlash the muslims fear is coming, and when it does it will be extremely brutal and bloody.

      • Indian Hindu

        Amen.

  • morty62

    Many Muslims obviously don't make the connection that it is oppressive retrograde systems like Islam, with its repressive sharia laws, that turn countries into impoverished backwaters. They emigrate to the U.S., Great Britain and Europe so they can reap the ecomomic benefits that are the natural outgrowths of a free society but then want to impose on the West the very system they left behind. It's cognitive dissonance of the highest order.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      Islam is fatalistic. Allah decides who prospers. Their failures are used by "leaders" to convince the "sheep" that their piety is not sufficient for their success, therefore the answer to the serious Muslim is always that more Islam leads to more prosperity, sort of. Generally this eventually leads to the clear statement that Jihad is the only guarantee of salvation or happiness.

      This is why we have such a huge global problem that logic alone will not solve until we get to the root of the problem: the lies that allow people to think Islam is plausible.

  • http://twitter.com/ylem0 @ylem0

    I think we allowed enough immigration from Muslims countries. Time to lower our immigration per year and stop bringing people here who do not want to assimilte.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "stop bringing people here who do not want to assimilte"

      We need 100% screening for potential and desire to assimilate. Zero exceptions for anyone.

      • Mary Sue

        The sad part is even that may not be enough; the Islamists get wise to this and have everybody who agrees with them pulling taquiyya and pretending they're not Wahhabi/Salafi/what have you.

        • Laine

          There is no test that will separate the sheep from the goats. Even Muslims cannot tell which one among them will turn themselves into a human bomb. How many times have you heard the comment from the Muslim relative of a bomber "He wasn't even religious until a short time ago he changed"? Even ending Muslim immigration per se won't stop people from lying/takiya and denying their entire religion. They are allowed to do that to advance the cause of Allah and that cause is supremacist control of the entire world. Still, an attempt must be made to curb further in-migration, starting with none allowed in from Muslim countries. Yes some "good" Muslims may be denied entry but they are needed to improve things in their own countries anyway.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            "There is no test that will separate the sheep from the goats. Even Muslims cannot tell which one among them will turn themselves into a human bomb."

            There is no absolute test, for example a "litmus test" to prove one way or the other, but screening can be very, very effective at evaluating risk. Put another way, we need strong evidence that they have ideology that is supportive of Western values. No affirmative evidence, no visa.

  • Ilana Leeds

    Islam empowers the uneducated and brings to the fore the worst aspects of human nature. It's cruelty, its corruption and its oppression of women are legendary and common knowledge but NO ONE DOES ANYTHING. We will all pay the price of inaction.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "NO ONE DOES ANYTHING"

      It seems that way, but until we have enough visibility as constituents (that clearly want leaders to overtly call Islam for what it is), the politicians will find it difficult to tackle. Allen West is the prototype of the politicians we want to support.

    • judyk

      You all should have thought of that before you elected a muslim for president..you can best believe in the next 2 years he is going to put ,more muslims in our government and more and more mulims will be bcoming here to the USA and demanding new laws just for them and HE will give them what they want. I saw tapes where he bows to the muslim leaders and tells them he will always be a muslim..

  • trickyblain

    Does Greenfield have a citation/quotation that provides evidence that Clinton and Obama directly ordered the arrest of that felon who happened to make a bad movie?

    Doe he likewise have a copy of the US Constitution? If he did — and he understood the words written — he'd know that it would, indeed, be VERY hard for Islamic law, especially relating to "blasphemy," to take hold in the US.

    • Mary Sue

      Theoretically speaking it would be difficult for islamic law to take hold in the US. Practically speaking, it is actually quite easy. All you have to do is base it on Multiculturalism.

      Ontario had for a time let Muslim groups set up little Sharia courts for themselves in that Province. I believe they have put a stop to it but for a while it was going on. And our Constitution in Canada is almost as rock solid as USA's.

    • Mary Sue

      The father of one of the slain at Benghazi reported that Hillary HERSELF told him, don't worry we will GET the guy that made the movie.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/white-ho

      "The father of Tyrone Woods, the ex-Navy SEAL killed in Benghazi, met with Obama and Clinton. And he reports that Clinton told him that they were going to “arrest and prosecute” the man behind the Mohammed movie."

      • trickyblain

        That would be hearsay. Hearsay from a rightfully angry and grieving father, but hearsay nonetheless. You report as fact, then jump to the conclusion that he was arrested on the orders of Clinton and Obama. If that's your only evidence of your conclusion your case is weak, at best.

        • Daniel Greenfield

          It's a statement from the father of a murdered American. You can call him a liar if you please.

          • trickyblain

            Slimy, yet predictable. Kind of like a worm.

            I'm not attacking the father of an American murdered by Islamic fanatics.

            I'm attacking your statements, which you state as fact, yet present no empirical evidence.

          • Daniel Greenfield

            My statement is a quote from the father of a murdered soldier.

            Are you calling him a liar?

          • Mary Sue

            Are you claiming that Daniel, or someone Daniel spoke to, fabricated the quote out of whole cloth?

        • traeh

          trickyblain,

          Hearsay is where I say Clinton said it on the basis that the father told me Clinton said it.

          But the father saying Clinton said it is NOT hearsay. The father heard it directly from Clinton. The father is acting as a direct witness, not on the basis of hearsay.

          Here's a recording of the man himself stating that Hillary Clinton said it to him. You'll hear him say it somewhere between 3 minutes in and 3.5 minutes in:
          http://video.foxnews.com/v/1924759413001/father-o

          Hearing the father say it, and then what the father says next, I don't for a second believe he's lying. Do you? No, you don't.

          • objectivefactsmatter

            Here's a recording of the man himself stating that Hillary Clinton said it to him. You'll hear him say it somewhere between 3 minutes in and 3.5 minutes in: http://video.foxnews.com/v/1924759413001/father-o….

            TB mutters to himself:
            "It's still hearsay or something, because you guys are all partisan, authoritarian haters."

    • Mary Sue

      also, Canada STILL has blasphemy laws on the books. They haven't been used in a very, very long time.

    • traeh

      trickyblain, do you know how many public institutions and public figures in the U.S. are censoring themselves because of death threats from Muslims? Check this out:

      Are the lights going out?

    • Drakken

      Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are not suicide pacts with muslims doing what islam commands. Your denial of reality is astounding.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "Our Constitution and Bill of Rights are not suicide pacts with muslims doing what islam commands"

        LOL, you're obviously speaking for the sane people and not the liberal leftist appeasers.

        "Your denial of reality is astounding."

        That's what it takes to be a liberal today.

    • robin

      not so hard for a liberal activist judge who feels he or she can neglect the constitution and legislate from the bench. they are out of control and clearly have little to no regard or true understanding of the original intent of this precious document.

  • objectivefactsmatter

    "indeed, be VERY hard for Islamic law, especially relating to "blasphemy," to take hold in the US"

    And they've been working very, very hard to get it. The effort alone is harmful. Wake up. We must fight it strongly now, because it will only get worse until we unify against Sharia or any anti-constitutional ideas to change our culture and values.

    • trickyblain

      Being governed by Sharia is assuredly one thing we are united against. We may disagree on whether it's right around the corner. They can try as they might, but they're not going to get Joe Six Pack to hand over his six pack very easily.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "Being governed by Sharia is assuredly one thing we are united against. We may disagree on whether it's right around the corner."

        Then you are misunderstanding the concern. The damage is being done now. They'll never succeed as they hope, but we need to be fighting it already. Clear enough?

        "They can try as they might, but they're not going to get Joe Six Pack to hand over his six pack very easily."

        So what? They don't even get most Saudis to comply. Is that a reason to be unconcerned at this point here? No. Any sign of weakness or compromise encourages them to try harder because according to Islamic ideology, Allah forces infidels to compromise with pious Muslims. THIS IS WHY appeasement CAN"T EVER WORK FOR US with Islamic supremacists.

        What your mother taught you about compromise for the sake of peace only some times works in the West and almost never works outside of Judeo Christian culture. It's not how the mind thinks naturally, and Muslims interpret it as Allah being on the side of the one who gained concessions, meaning that it goads them in to pushing more, not ever in giving in.

        We have almost 14 centuries of history to validate this.

      • Laine

        You are naive as yet, unversed in history and the Muslim way of doing things that is completely foreign to our way of thinking. They've already made huge inroads at the United Nations for example in getting a blasphemy law passed. They are successful at gaining converts in American jails, criminals who do not have to express a word of regret for their crimes according to Islam and are told they are the future rulers of the world. How toxic is that? They are making thousands of more subtle inroads every day through lawfare, local elections where they always vote as a bloc, building mosques bigger than required for even small congregations because the footprint of a mosque and surrounding Muslim occupied buildings is Allah's for eternity and distracting from Muslim attacks on non-Muslims by diverting attention to fictional "Islamophobia" as though disapproving attacks by a religtion's followers is worse than outright attacks

  • Thomas Wells

    What happens should sharia be official implemented is: Civil War II.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "What happens should sharia be official implemented is: Civil War II"

      I assume you are correct if it gets that far. I know that there are many loyal Americans who would die for the cause, but I hope the vast majority of citizens will wake up long before that point. That is precisely why we need to raise the issues now.

      • IrishEyesAreBlue

        THEN RAISE IT!!!!

        • objectivefactsmatter

          "THEN RAISE IT!!!!"

          That is what is happening here and elsewhere. Our main problem is that radical-thinking liberals bog us down and call us haters so that the uninitiated can't quite hear a clear presentation of the problem. All they hear is the partisan fighting, never sure if there is a party who might be correct.

    • Drakken

      I say it will be a Crusades on steroids. That day is coming.

  • John spielman

    The problem of “blasphemy” laws is that what’s doctrinal truth for one religion is blasphemy for another. Islam denies the deity of Christ Jesus as the only Son of God, and according to St Paul’s theology illuminated in his letter to the Galatians church, Islam is “another gospel” that was given to Mohammed by “Satan, masquerading as an angel of light”!

    • Laurie Manno

      amen brother!!!!!!

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "The problem of "blasphemy" laws is that what's doctrinal truth for one religion is blasphemy for another. Islam denies the deity of Christ Jesus as the only Son of God, and according to St Paul's theology illuminated in his letter to the Galatians church, Islam is "another gospel" that was given to Mohammed by "Satan, masquerading as an angel of light"!

      Correct. Anyone quoting the Koran is blaspheming every other religion explicitly (Judaism and Christianity) or implicitly.

      • Beth

        I believe in quoting the koran for the sake of exposing it. (Bowing down to the teachings is blasphemy)

        Koran (chapter and verse given for proof)

        047.004 – Beheadings

        033.052 – Gang Rape of female 'infidels'

        005.033 – Crucifixions

        008.067 – Treason (perjury in a non-muslim court is commanded when defending islam)

        033.061 – Genocide "without mercy"

        005.041 – Racism

        None of those teachings are legal in the US. We need leaders who will enforce the laws that already exist to rightfully ban those teachings. Freedom of religion NEVER included the right to incite the masses into violence. I'm not a lawyer, but a good place to start (I believe) is with the following:

        Article. IV. Section. 4.

        The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

  • Hank

    I want BACON for all Ass Raisers…

    • objectivefactsmatter

      Certain pictures of "prayer" can be so instructive as to what they're really doing.

  • laurie manno

    What really bothers me is that immigrants don't assimilate anymore. There was a time anyone coming thru Elise Island would get down on there knees and kiss the American soil, because they knew they had a chance for a better life, freedom, property rights, religious freedom etc!!!! What I see is Sharia law use our constitutional laws against us. We are a Christian country always have been and always will be! No one has to right under natural law(rule of law) to do honor killing!!!! This is a fight of good against evil! and good will win! God Bless America and all her people!!!!

    • Kevin Glennon

      Actually Laurie,While i agree with you that immigrants should want to assimilate.There is an important fact you seem to be ignorant of,our government is constitutionally secular.Our founding fathers knew religion has no place in the governing of a country.Therefore while we clearly are predominantly a christian people,we just happen to be.We could all convert to Judaism tomorrow and that would be fine.Fyi,the quran is no more extreme or crazy than the bible,the bible is choc full of horrible immoral commandments and the only difference when it comes to violence is that in the usa is we dont have these large religious extremist group killing infidels BUT the orders from the good book are there.If we melded church and state,that would be sharia law and it would be the same as muslim sharia law.The bible is just as violent and nonsensical as the quran or any other "holy" book.To say islam is evil and christianity is good just shows how very ignorant to both religions you are.

  • Mary Sue

    Yeah we have the "notwithstanding clause" which in and of itself is kind of tricky to implement. But yeah, it's there. It's the reason Quebec has Bill 101 (the French-Only language laws).

    • Anonymous

      Another problem with Canada is that the Supreme Court of Canada grants itself the "right" to alter the constitution as it sees fit. (There was an article in the National Post on this issue).

      • Mary Sue

        yup. Fortunately we don't have a completely insane court at this point, but it's done some nutty things in the past.

  • pinnie99

    This country will not stand for anymore Islam bulls***

  • Silver ScumbAG

    Democrats are pro Islam. Every Democrat convention has an Imam leading the closing prayers. Salam aleikum Amerika.

  • Anamah

    If this is true, Japanese people are very smart people.

    Japan & Muslims

    Have you ever read in the newspaper that a political leader or a prime
    minister from an Islamic nation has visited Japan?
    Have you ever come across news that the Ayatollah of Iran or the King of
    Saudi Arabia or even a Saudi Prince has visited Japan?

    Japan is a country keeping Islam at bay.
    Japan has put strict restrictions on Islam and ALL Muslims.
    The reasons are:
    a) Japan is the only nation that does not give citizenship to Muslims.
    b) In Japan permanent residency is not given to Muslims.
    c) There is a strong ban on the propagation of Islam in Japan.
    d) In the University of Japan, Arabic or any Islamic language is not taught.
    e) One cannot import a 'Koran' published in the Arabic language.
    f) According to data published by the Japanese government, it has given
    temporary residency to only 2 lakhs, Muslims, who must follow the Japanese
    Law of the Land. These Muslims should speak Japanese and carry their
    religious rituals in their homes.
    g) Japan is the only country in the world that has a negligible number of
    embassies in Islamic countries.
    h) Japanese people are not attracted to Islam at all.
    I) Muslims residing in Japan are the employees of foreign companies.
    j) Even today, visas are not granted to Muslim doctors, engineers or
    managers sent by foreign companies.
    k) In the majority of companies it is stated in their regulations that no
    Muslims should apply for a job.
    l) The Japanese government is of the opinion that Muslims are fundamentalist
    and even in the era of globalization they are not willing to change their
    Muslim laws.
    m) Muslims cannot even think about renting a house in Japan.
    n) If anyone comes to know that his neighbor is a Muslim then the whole
    neighborhood stays alert.
    o) No one can start an Islamic cell or Arabic 'Madrasa' in Japan
    p) There is no Sharia law in Japan.
    q) If a Japanese woman marries a Muslim then she is considered an outcast
    forever.
    r) According to Mr. Kumiko Yagi, Professor of Arab/Islamic Studies at Tokyo
    University of Foreign Studies, "There is a mind frame in Japan that Islam is
    a very narrow minded religion and one should stay away from it."
    s) Freelance journalist Mohammed Juber toured many Islamic countries after
    9/11 including Japan. He found that the Japanese were confident that
    extremists could do no harm in Japan.
    My personal estimation of the Japanese has risen dramatically!
    No doubt, if this is true they are VERY SMART PEOPLE!

    • traeh

      The Japanese, unless I'm mistaken, restrict all outsiders much more than would be considered politically possible in Europe or the U.S. The Japanese, one hopes, are especially restrictive toward Islam, as a global totalitarian religion on the rise.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      That's very interesting and I had not heard these claims before.

    • Laine

      Perhaps it takes a once totalitarian minded people (the Japanese during WWII), now pacific, to recognize another bunch of totalitarians

      • objectivefactsmatter

        You're probably right that lessons were learned from WWII and what happened in the aftermath. Now they have the USA to thank for the prosperity they feared would not come without imperial conquest.

  • Horace

    Reminder: Islam is a satanic murder cult. One principle of Islam states that part of Jihad is to emigrete in the service of Islam. (establish a seed pod in the host country to eventually take over and kill the host). The majority of muslims approve of the activities of the "brothers" -jihadis creating "a great slaughter in the land" before taking prisoners – another term for converting the host population and turning them into submitters (muslims). Submitters are prisoners obviously since the penalty for leaving islam is death. (koran). Violent jihadis are analogous to missionaries in Christian religions – dedicated prosletizers. Not every muslim can do it, but they all approve to a certain degree, or they wouldn't be muslims. Fear. Wake up.

    • objectivefactsmatter

      "Violent jihadis are analogous to missionaries in Christian religions – dedicated prosletizers."

      Correct. Another reason why moral equivalence arguments are absurd.

  • http://www.facebook.com/christian.miller.3363334 Christian Miller

    The greatest enemy of the United States is Islam, not North Korea, not Iran the nation. George Bush IS to blame for some of this when he told us that we are NOT at war with Islam. That was obviously a bald-faced lie. Not only were we, are are we, at war with Islam, we MUST be at war with Islam.

    It is Islam itself, a retrograde cult of personality that revolves around massive personal arrogance of virtually EVERY Muslim in the world–the idea that a perceived 'insult' to their idiot so-called 'Prophet' gives them, individually and as a group, the right–no, the duty–to kill a perfect stranger, a perfect stranger who is probably more educated and more worldly, and far more value to the progress of the world, than those arrogant pieces of human Muslim garbage would ever be.

    We have NO idea what life in the Muslim world is like, especially living in the United States–simply NO idea.

    • Mary Sue

      I think that's something GWB said in order to not sound like an Islamophobe.

      • objectivefactsmatter

        "I think that's something GWB said in order to not sound like an Islamophobe."

        I think most people understood that at first, but after giving the liberals and Islamic liars (CAIR etc.) a little time, they exploited that silly phrase in to what we have today.

    • Laine

      We were not at war with Islam but they most certainly are at war with us and have been for 1400 years, except when beaten back militarily (Gates of Vienna, Crusades) or roped off in their own backward enclaves. Now many of those enclaves have nuclear weapons (Pakistan) or are close to accessing them (Iran). On shudders to think what havoc an 8th century mindset with 21st century weapons can and will do.

    • Kevin Glennon

      i agree with you but i just wanted to point out that all of those things also apply to your namesake(christianity).And the way you just phrased that,if you implanted infidels for islam or muslims,youd sound just the same as one of these extremists,encouraging hate.you should just try to be more objective because you sound biased by hate

  • http://www.facebook.com/mark.bennett.52056223 Mark Bennett

    This is an idea, culled from a comment I read elsewhere, not really workable but a fun thought anyway.
    The idea is to grant Muslims their wish regarding blasphemy & sharia law, along with the following restrictions & conditions.
    All Muslims living within western society have to register themselves as followers of the islamic faith, no exceptions.
    Sharia wll be applied to Muslims only, not the watered down sharia, but the full hands chopped off for stealing & stoned to death sentence for blasphemy sharia.
    The blasphemy law applies equally across all religions, therefore any remarks deemed blasphemous made by any Muslim will be punished according to sharia, i.e, stoned to death.
    I wonder if CAIR would support this, I suspect the cry of RACIST would be deafening…

  • Laine

    One strategy of Islam is to infiltrate and colonize non-Muslim country as it is a supremacist religion-ideology and all lands must be "returned" to Allah and all devout Muslims must contribute in some way to this project. Then the people who are the canaries in the coal mine, who notice the infiltration are shouted down with cries of "crazy, racist, Islamophobe,!" until about the 10% Muslim population mark when they become blatant about their aggression with vandalism and worse. Then there's a long phase of: "It's a police matter" (while hamstringing the police with PC). Next, it's "There are too many of them to deport" (sound familiar, Mexican border states?) and next "Nothing can be done without bloodshed". Next the blood of many non-Muslims is shed and finally, westerners will end up fighting for their culture's life and likely their own with an enemy within the gates. Ask Lebanon (in late transition) and Egypt (last vestiges of a once Christian country being persecuted) how it all goes.

  • Dave

    We stand by and allow tens of millions come here Illegally in order to make life easier for a few and ignore who these people really are. They come here not be Americans. Not to obey our laws. Not to respect our hard won way of life. They have come here to take our way of life from us. Muslim radicals are just “one” of the symptoms of a much larger problem! We have another President who has lied his way into power with impunity, treating the citizens of America like unwelcome foreigners and allowing our enemies both foreign a domestic to simply steal the entire American Pie right out from under our noses and, he still gets re-elected. America has many enemies but our own government that should be protecting us has become public enemy #1.

    • Val

      Couldn't have said it better myself. America needs to wake up and fast.

    • kevin glennon

      so your a democrat right?

  • Rainbow dash

    So I guess I should start soaking my bullet heads in bacon grease?

  • Salia

    So what CAN we do about these "Colonists" and others? I agree, they aren't coming here to become Americans. They're coming here to set up Colonies from their Mother Countries. It's not just the Muslims. What legal course of action can we take to secure our "Americanism"? I'm hearing all of the complaints, but no suggestions as to a Civilized, Humane Course of Action that we can all be working towards to solve the Challenge. I have No Problem accepting Refugees, from other Countries, who come here to ESCAPE the Bad, and EMBRACE our Good. But they need to BECOME AMERICANS. America prides itself in being a Great Melting Pot. But our people have to Melt and Blend together and become One UNITED States of America. We have so many "Splinter Groups" establishing that will Fracture our once Great Nation. We have a Huge and Ever-Growing Problem Developing Here, that needs to be Fixed.

    • k glennon

      What a stupid point,Theyve come to the us to have an economic upgrade.A colonizing a country is what britain did in the us and india ect.,its government,not a few individuals

  • Joe Abraham

    {{Now this is obviously a non-issue because we will never actually prosecute people for blasphemy}}

    Well, this is actually an issue, big issue. For a Muslim who does not want Sharia Law in its Seventh Century version this would be a blasphemy and if a verdict issued by one of these proposed Sharia Courts that is the end of it. Yes, I will be protected by the US Constitution however, if I will not be able to visit my country of birth (Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Somalia, etc). I will need an army of guards to secure my safety like Salman Rushdi.