America Doesn’t Have a Gun Problem, It Has a Gang Problem

Chicago’s murder numbers have hit that magic 500. Baltimore’s murder toll has passed 200. In Philly, it’s up to 324, the highest since 2007. In Detroit, it’s approaching 400, another record. In New Orleans, it’s almost at 200. New York City is down to 414 from 508. In Los Angeles, it’s over 500. In St. Louis it’s 113 and 130 in Oakland.  It’s 121 in Memphis and 76 in Birmingham.

Washington, D.C., home of the boys and girls who can solve it all, is nearing its own big 100.

Those 12 cities alone account for nearly 3,200 dead and nearly a quarter of all murders in the United States. And we haven’t even visited sunny Atlanta or chilly Cleveland.

These cities are the heartland of America’s real gun culture. It isn’t the bitter gun-and-bible clingers in McCain and Romney territory who are racking up a more horrifying annual kill rate than Al Qaeda; it’s Obama’s own voting base.

Chicago, where Obama delivered his victory speech, has homicide numbers that match all of Japan and are higher than Spain, Poland and pre-war Syria. If Chicago gets any worse, it will find itself passing the number of murders for the entire country of Canada.

Chicago’s murder rate of 15.65 per 100,000 people looks nothing like the American 4.2 rate, the Midwestern 4.5 or the Illinois’ 5.6 rates, but it does look like the murder rates in failed countries like Rwanda, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe. To achieve Chicago’s murder rate, African countries usually have to experience a bloody genocidal civil war or decades of tyranny.

But Chicago isn’t even all that unique. Or the worst case scenario. That would be New Orleans which at an incredible 72.8 murder rate is ten times higher than the national average. If New Orleans were a country, it would have the 2nd highest murder rate in the world, beating out El Salvador.

Louisiana went red for Romney 58 to 40, but Orleans Parish went blue for Obama 80 to 17.

St. Louis has a murder rate just a little lower than Belize. Baltimore has a worse murder rate than South Africa and Detroit has a worse murder rate than Colombia. Obama won both St. Louis and Baltimore by comfortable margins. He won Detroit’s Wayne County 73 to 26.

Homicide rates like these show that something is broken, but it isn’t broken among the Romney voters rushing to stock up on assault rifles every time Obama begins threatening their right to buy them; it’s broken among Obama’s base.

Any serious conversation about gun violence and gun culture has to begin at home; in Chicago, in Baltimore, in New York City, in Los Angeles and in Washington, D.C.

Voting for Obama does not make people innately homicidal. Just look at Seattle which is agonizing over its 26 murders. That’s about the same number of murders as East St. Louis which has only 27,000 people to Seattle’s 620,000.

So what is happening in Chicago to drive it to the gates of hell ahead of Zimbabwe and Rwanda?

A breakdown of the Chicago killing fields shows that 83% of those murdered in Chicago last year had criminal records. In Philly, it’s 75%. In Milwaukee it’s 77% percent. In New Orleans, it’s 64%. In Baltimore, it’s 91%. Many were felons who had served time. And as many as 80% of the homicides were gang related.

Chicago’s problem isn’t guns; it’s gangs. Gun control efforts in Chicago or any other major city are doomed because gangs represent organized crime networks which stretch down to Mexico, and trying to cut off their gun supply will be as effective as trying to cut off their drug supply.

America’s murder rate isn’t the work of the suburban and rural homeowners who shop for guns at sporting goods stores and at gun shows, and whom news shows profile after every shooting, but by the gangs embedded in the urban areas controlled by the Democratic machine. The gangs who drive up America’s murder rate look nothing like the occasional mentally ill suburban white kid who goes off his medication and decides to shoot up a school. Lanza, like most serial killers, is a media aberration, not the norm.

National murder statistics show that blacks are far more likely to be killers than whites and they are also far more likely to be killed. The single largest cause of homicides is the argument. 4th on the list is juvenile gang activity with 676 murders, which combined with various flavors of gangland killings takes us nearly to the 1,000 mark. America has more gangland murders than Sierra Leone, Eritrea and Puerto Rico have murders.

Our national murder rate is not some incomprehensible mystery that can only be attributed to the inanimate tools, the steel, brass and wood that do the work. It is largely the work of adult males from age 18 to 39 with criminal records killing other males of that same age and criminal past.

If this were going on in Rwanda, El Salvador or Sierra Leone, we would have no trouble knowing what to make of it, and silly pearl-clutching nonsense about gun control would never even come up. But this is Chicago, it’s Baltimore, it’s Philly and NOLA; and so we refuse to see that our major cities are in the same boat as some of the worst trouble spots in the world.

Lanza and Newtown are comforting aberrations. They allow us to take refuge in the fantasy that homicides in America are the work of the occasional serial killer practicing his dark art in one of those perfect small towns that always show up in murder mysteries or Stephen King novels. They fool us into thinking that there is something American about our murder rate that can be traced to hunting season, patriotism and bad mothers.

But go to Chicago or Baltimore. Go where the killings really happen and the illusion comes apart.

There is a war going on in America between gangs of young men who bear an uncanny resemblance to their counterparts in Sierra Leone or El Salvador. They live like them, they fight for control of the streets like them and they kill like them.

America’s horrific murder rate is a result of the transformation of major American cities into Sierra Leone, Somalia, Rwanda and El Salvador. Our murder rate now largely consists of criminals killing criminals.

As David Kennedy, the head of the Center for Crime Prevention and Control, put it, “The majority of homicide victims have extensive criminal histories. This is simply the way that the world of criminal homicide works. It’s a fact.”

America is, on a county by county basis, not a violent country, just as it, on a county by county basis, did not vote for Obama. It is being dragged down by broken cities full of broken families whose mayors would like to trash the Bill of Rights for the entire country in the vain hope that national gun control will save their cities, even though gun control is likely to be as much help to Chicago or New Orleans as the War on Drugs.

Obama’s pretense that there needs to be a national conversation about rural American gun owners is a dishonest and cynical ploy that distracts attention from the real problem that he and politicians like him have sat on for generations.

We do not need to have a conversation about the NRA. We need to have a conversation about Chicago.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

  • UCSPanther

    Detroit was the murder capital for quite a while, especially after its " apocalypse" in the 1960s, when many areas were gutted by the huge race riots. Curiously, its murder rate apparently went down, and many suspect that it is due to the fact that there are just fewer people around to be murdered,

    By the way Chicago sounds with its infestation of gangers, fallling on hard times and its corrupt political establishment, I can't help but wonder if Detroit's fate also awaits Chicago.

    • Choi

      There also was a time, not that long ago, when Gary,Indiana,a SUBURB of Chicago's South Side,was America's Murder CAPITOL.

      • Don Kosloff

        Gary, Indiana is a post-induatrial city and it is not suburban. It is a stretch to call it a suburm of Chicago. I have been in Chicago, Gary and several actual suburbs of Chicago. Gary bears no resemblance to what most people would consider a suburb.

    • fuzzygracie

      The only reason the murder rates drop in these mini 3rd world cities is because of population flight.

      E.St.Louis & St.Louis have interchangeable gangs and gun houses. Both have had major population flights but gang and drug activity is still centered in both crime towns.Obama upped their welfare and school grants so they moved into neighboring towns and commute to commit crimes.

      The states and government built MetroLink, a handy criminal moving train that services the MO-IL metro area and also goes to Chicago .

    • http://twitter.com/Babylonandon @Babylonandon

      That general principle – reducing the population to jsut the folks the elites need to serve them (really solve the world's problems) is THE final goal behind the Progressive movement.

  • Mary Sue

    Funny how the same leftists, as noted, whine about how the War on Drugs is a failure, yet seem to fail to notice that the War on Guns is a spectacular failure also. Their hypocrisy knows no bounds.

    • Kenneth Olsen

      How many of the murders cited in the article above can be traced directly back to the War on Drugs? I'll bet it's quite a few, as the gangs are fighting over territory and have no access to the courts to solve disputes. The principles of liberty are clear, and the War on Drugs has led to a bloodbath because it is in violation of human nature and man's God-given rights.

      See Szasz, Dr. Thomas: Our Right to Drugs, and Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts, and Pushers.

      • patron

        Drugs do not create criminals, and legalizing drugs will create more crime and addicts. Simple possession is already plea bargained away as misdemeanors.

        Marijuana legalization will bring in the criminals as suppliers and give them legal protection. Prostitution, extortion, robbery and sexual assault goes up.

        The 1930s prohibition argument is not true. Bars and liquor stores are still very violent places and havens for criminals.

        • RLEmery

          Poor Patron, you have no medical studies to back your claim! You really need to get over your fake morality as mankind has been getting buzzed in some form since the day we first stepped foot on this earth and always will.

          Really, the mob continued supplying illicit alcohol at obscene profit margins after prohibition, no.

          The mob was able to use those obscene profits to corrupt with, no, they couldnt.

          The mob was able to use those obscene profits to buy weapons and commit violence with, no!

          Yeah, went to the local liquor store yesterday, where were the bad guys? I should have been mugged and killed just walking into that store. Wait, I am not in drugs floating in bizaroo world as you are.

          So since 60% of the cartles revenues are marijuana alone, just imagine if all of a sudden the marijuana was 75% less in cost and treated like alcohol is by the govt!

          My, your not very good at doing anything but barking like a chihuahua!

      • Mary Sue

        It's not a war ON drugs that's causing the killing, it's the war OF drugs.

    • http://www.adinakutnicki.com AdinaK

      Mary Sue, not only are the Dems spectacularly wrong on all counts, but the safest places are where the 'bitter clingers', red necks', teabaggers' reside! Not only are they mostly law abiding, but having LEGAL guns renders their towns safer! Who in their right, center or left mind would dare enter their 'hood?

      HOWEVER, in lefty areas there is no such animal. It is akin to the wild west in most of their 'nabes. Why is this? Because gangsters will do what they do best – kill. And hoods will always have guns, whether there is gun control or not. So without legal gun owners protecting their families and towns, all of America will be rife for the gangbangers.

      The regime is after LEGAL guns, leaving the citizens dependent on a radical, revolutionary leadership – http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/12/27/dhs-americas-… the citizens would be suicidal to allow them to get away with it.

      Adina Kutnicki, Israel – http://www.adinakutnicki.com/about/

      • Mary Sue

        I know, right?

        Over in Vancouver there, they've started to have a more serious gang problem within the last 20 years. The gangs in question are the Bacon Brothers (lily white gangsters whose parents are so effed in the head that they're supportive of their sons openly, including the MOTHER, in a start contrast to some black or latino mothers that deny to their dying day that their sons are culpable with "My Jamal/Enrico is a good boy!"), the Red Scorpions, and the multi-ethnic "U.N. gang", so called because there's a lot of minorities in the gang (such as "South Asians" which are sourced from India). A few years ago several people were shot in a case of gang-related mistaken identity.

        Fortunately no city in Canada can be individually stupid about guns. You won't see divergent gun rules in Montreal as compared to Moose Jaw. It's all federal and all the same everywhere.

    • Ghostwriter

      To the idiots who want to legalize drugs,I've repeatedly asked this question and I will ask it again. Do you want your kids using the very things you want to legalize?

      • Jarhead1982

        To those with the fake morality BS, they already do!

        Just like they drink alcohol!

        So much of whether they do depends on YOU, and if your too stupid to give them the tools so they make a proper choices in life, then you shouldnt have been a parent!

      • waiting for the war

        I don't want kids drinking alcohol or doing drugs….you make a specious argument. Thanks for playing

    • Scott

      I'm liberal, I think the war on drugs is a failure. I also think the war on guns is a failure. People need to focus on the murderers and the cities with the high murder rates instead of the guns themselves. Figure out how to educate people in those cities and help them to make something of themselves so they don't have to join gangs and end up killing people. But don't target the guns, that's ridiculous.

  • RedWhiteAndJew

    Gangster are, by definition, law breakers. They can, and do, obtain guns through any and all means, usually illegal. Passing laws against gun ownership, or other trivia such as "assault weapons" and their magazines (which don't figure into gangland violence to any significant degree) is the reaction of left wing law makers. I am willing to grant some (but only some) are not statists who dream of the time when every knee shall bow to government hegemony, but the remaining idiots are just laying their good intention pavers into the road to you know where. As the article points out, the US cities where murder rates resemble those of Rwanda, are those which already heavily restrict, if not ban, gun ownership. Of course, all laws like that accomplish, is denial of guns to those who give a damn about obeying the law.

    The outcome is inevitable: wilding gangsters, and cowering and defenseless citizens.

    • Mary Sue

      yeah, and while Obama and company pull "Fast and Furious", they fail to realize Guns can come into USA from Mexico after having been brought in from any given 3rd world country/conflict zone. After all, Mexico is so corrupt that while keeping guns from regular Mexicans, there is NO way in HELL that they're keeping guns out of the hands of the drug cartels.

  • Tina Trent

    Meanwhile, the Soros funded anti-incarceration machine is dismantling or obstructing the criminal justice policies that lifted us out of the last bloodbath, as Rahm Emanuel dithers over the meaning of the words "500" and "murdered in Chicago," and a NYC DA breathlessly reports plans to severely punish an insane woman for saying something crazy right after she murdered someone — instead of acknowledging how insane they were to not incarcerate her because she was crazy the last six times she assaulted someone.

    Chicago is on track to becoming the American Ciudad Juarez in every way possible.

    • Mary Sue

      Well now it's not simply crazy, it's a hate crime this time. How being crazy and attacking people doesn't deserve being locked up but this does, boggles the mind.

      • Tina Trent

        I'm not saying she shouldn't be incarcerated. I'm saying it's insane to express outrage over her language, to feed the hate crimes machine. She should have been locked up long ago for other violent assaults, but the system didn't enforce those laws.

        • Mary Sue

          well yeah, but I'm talking about how the Justice system reacted. When she was just being crazy, they didn't do a damn thing. When it became a hate crime, that's when they started paying attention.

  • Questions

    Is there somewhere in this piece where race comes into play? I mean, who's kidding who? The overwhelming majority of the murderers are black or Hispanic. The problem here isn't "gangs." It's nonwhites who refuse to grow into anything even resembling adults. When was the last time a white gang terrorized an urban neighborhood? The 1920s? Deracinating a social problem isn't the way to solve it.

    I might add that the number of murders this year in Washington is way DOWN from two decades ago. Back then, annual murders were in the 300-to-400 range. Not all of the news is bad.

    • Mary Sue

      "nonwhites refusing to grow into anything even resembling adults"

      That's the very definition of a gang…

    • Ronald Chappell

      I understand that the supreme court just struck down the DC gun ban law allowing average citizens to now own guns. Could this have anything to do with the reduction in killing?

    • A 22 Year Old Man

      You've hit on a correlation with ethnicity, but it isn't causative. It's the liberal vote-machine that keeps those minorities in poverty so that they'll vote for more handouts, thus ensuring a steady Democratic voter base as long as none of them get too economically successful. The side effect of this poverty is crime. So yes, it's mostly blacks and hispanics, but it's not BECAUSE they're black and hispanic–it's because the democratic party is keeping them in economic chains because the only way the democratic party can win elections is by dividing and conquering–turning this group against the other by race hatred and class hatred.

      • A 22 Year Old Man

        You might want to search "Nocturne in Black and White" on Sultan Knish. It's an article Daniel wrote earlier this year, and it does an excellent job at explaining why you're seeing the effects you've mentioned.

    • Jarhead1982

      You do realize that in the late 1990's, Washington D.C. implemented a down town reviltalization program, where they bulldozed down large swaths of slums and dilapadated housing where the gangs and drug dealers roamed and committed mayhem into new business.

      Immeadiately thereafter their murder rate and total dropped because they had physically moved the bad guys out to other cities, not due to any laws or more effective crime fighting!

      • Rigidflexibility

        Excellent point.

        You don't control crime, you move it.

        Or if you can, black white or green, you move away from it.

  • Kostoglotov

    So true. Great article.

  • Deep Space

    Gangs + Guns = Problem. Gangs + No Guns = Nuisance

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Organized crime always finds ways to get its hands of guns. Even in gun controlled countries.

    • fuzzygracie

      Guns aren't legal in Mexico .
      Gangs kill people with everything from the knock out game to rocks.

    • Mary Sue

      do you seriously think that in gun-controlled Mexico, the immensely wealthy powerful, corrupting-of-local-officials Drug Cartels can't import them some Russian or Chinese AK-47s or UZI's if they wanted them?

    • That_Guy

      Gangs + Law Abiding Citizens + No Guns = Massive Violent Crime Rate Increase
      Rape, Breaking and Entering, Carjacking, All go up when you disarm the good guys. Don't be afraid of guns. Be afraid of the bad guys.

    • Pulseguy

      There are something like 300 million hand guns, which is what kills most people in the inner cities. A well-taken care of handgun can last about a hundred years. You could stop selling guns and take out all assault rifles and you would not see a reduction in handgun murder for decades. Like it, or don't, but guns are here and the bad guys will have them for a hundred years.

    • Rigidflexibility

      Uh! Check out the murder rate in Great Britian since there are no guns (at least among the law abiding folks), it has sky rocketed.

      I'm old and my trusty 1911 Colt .45 is older. We both still work and that keeps the trouble away.

      Otherwise any 18 year old punk and his buddies could kick in my door and my head with impunity.

      Which is another statistic to look up – number of "Hot"(people home) burglaries of seniors when there are no guns.

    • Greg

      Deep Space. Just exactly how are you going to disarm the Gangs to achieve your Gangs + No Guns scenario? Given the fact that a large percentage of gang members have a criminal record, gun ownership for them is already illegal. Making it MORE illegal? For them, possession of a firearm is likely a trip to jail for parole violations, yet they carry… so they will be dissuaded because we have now made it MORE ILLEGAL? Please, use logic, here. Your scenario is simply not able to stand up to even the most minimal application of logic.

    • P-Mack

      You really think you can keep guns out of gangs hands? Dream on! Thats like saying youre gonna keep drugs out of there as well. We all know how well that works.

    • CommonSense

      Guns+No gangs=No problem.

  • Rio Rancho

    So is the NRA proposing armed guards in schools in all those safe counties?

    • Mary Sue

      Police in the Schools actually started with Clinton, albeit for far different reasons. His aim was to reduce gang activity and drug dealing in schools by the presence of police. Remember the 100,000 cops thing?

      In "safe" (non-gang riddled) districts they should do well enough to have a principal or vice-principal carrying concealed.

      • LT714RET

        Clinton started the police in schools as a direct result of Columbine. He signed the Bill on April 20th 2000. He alloted $120 million. It was the 1st yer anniversary.

        • Mary Sue

          you are factually incorrect. Columbine was 1999. 100,000 Cops was 1994.

      • LT714RET

        The 100,000 cops thing was for COP Community Oriented Policing. Just a new name for a time proven police on the beat plan.

    • Jarhead1982

      You get to choose which is the best alternative.

      Armed teacher, little or no cost, no risk.

      Armed security guard $40-$50 ph normal cost.

      See most mass killing attacks it takes about 2 minutes from when the shooting begins for a call to be placed to police.

      The fastest a police officer has responded to such a call was 2 minutes at Aurora because the police happened to be very close by, a matter of luck. Most response times to active shooters are near 12 minutes.

      How many shots can an untrained shooter fire in 4 minutes, 50, 75, 100? Yeah, even when taking their time 20-25 shots fired per minute isnt unusual!

      10 round magazines, lol, at 200 rounds is 19 magazine exchanges and a slow untrained person makes that change in 3 seconds ea, so 10 round magazines only means a 40 second increase in time for the crazy to reload. At 12 minutes average response time, this means the crazy still kills just as many as if the had 30 round magazines!

      So which has the better chance of a response time, police who unless your lucky get there in 12 minutes, not preventing the bad guys from firing off 200 rounds of ammuntion in that time, or someone who can walk out of their classroom, know the facility layout and people, and engage the shooter.

      Which is better, several dead or dozens dead?

      Which costs more since you antis are so obsessed with cost?

      • cptmiller132

        totaly agree with you jarhead but unfortunatly the mommies wont… no matter what you say you will never convince them to let a teacher or anyone for that matter… to have a firearm near their "babies"

    • fwduptimeman

      I guess there is always a low-information wise guy around.
      So let me think RIO wise guy. I'll bet you do the following:
      1. lock your house up when you leave.
      2. lock your car.
      3. teach your kids to NOT go anywhere with a stranger.
      4. tell your family to be careful
      Israel stopped school shootings by arming the teachers.
      When the Guns are taken from the GOOD guys the BAD guys will romp and stomp the GOOD guys into the ground. Chicago is the proof.
      I WILL bet that you NOT support the death penalty, but do support turning loose felons and murders on the people.
      It is largely the work of adult males from age 18 to 39 with criminal records killing other males of that same age and criminal past.
      Chicago's murder rate is 3 TIMES more that the Midwest and the rest of IL. This is Chicago's problem. Why is it the big cities have this problem? What are they doing?

  • zaynab

    Liberal laws have made it very difficult to lock up the dangerously mentally ill. That's why the massacre in Connecticut happened. You have to open fire before they lock you up. Taking away people's guns increased gun violence in England, for a powerful video about that see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9ZvwPmjJu4&fe… . The video improves a lot as it goes on.

    • Sound&Fury

      Wow. Powerful video. I'm definitely going to pass this on. Thanks for sharing the truth.

    • fuzzygracie

      The CT massacre is a totally different entity than gang crime.
      The CT kid was mentally ill ,gangs are sane people who kill for very simple and primitive reasons : money,drugs,territory ,power,more guns ,alcohol and "respect."

  • crackerjack

    France, Britian, Japan,Germany, Spain, Switzerland, Italy…..all have derelict inner cities and gangs. Frontpage Mag. regularly spotlights Europe's downfall and the takeover of Islamic gangs. Yet europes inner cities have a minute fraction of US cities gun related homicide. What makes US inner cities and gangs so uniqe? Easy access to firearms.

    • bluffcreek1967

      Nope! The prevalence of feral blacks who have been duped by liberalism, and who morally depraved. This is always what happens when blacks dominate in numbers any city. Sad to say, in America we have a black problem.

      • Ghostwriter

        No,bluffcreek1967,blacks aren't the problem,the gangs are the problems. They harass the innocent blacks just like they do everybody else.

        • RoguePatriot6

          Thank you!!!!!
          Here people go again with blaming a race. That's one of the reasons why some of these problems wound up as monsterous as they are now.
          At one time, drugs were just a poor neighborhood black problem and alot of people were fine with that, well maybe not the blacks who wanted nothing to do with it. Funny how that quickly evolved into EVERYBODY'S problem.
          This isn't race related but it's linked to an attitude. AIDs used to be a GAY problem, funny how that quickly evolved into EVERYONE'S problem.
          Before the United States of America became involved with WWII, the holocaust and the Axis powers were just a Jew or German problem. We read about how that went.
          Now, don't get me wrong, I'll be the first to tell you that the biggest killers of blacks are blacks but pin the crime issue on blacks is just another divice for division. And if we start doing this the left is going to exploit it.

      • margaret frank

        Depends where you are, in Phoenix its Mexicans. During prohibition it was Italians. Things change.

    • RoguePatriot6

      What makes them such a threat is that all of the guns are in their hands, for one. The other is that Europe actually enforces their laws and treat criminals (unless your Islamic) as a criminal and victims as actual victims. We on the other hand no longer do this.

    • Mary Sue

      they're NOT getting them LEGALLY, stupid! In fact the inner city laden cities have the strictest gun control of all. You can't even OWN a gun in some of them (Including washington, DC) legally! Didn't seem to make a hell of a lot of difference, did it? Face it, criminals anywhere will get guns, and there's other ways to be killed by gangs.

    • fuzzygracie

      They are funded by Mexican drug cartels,have a huge population of repeat offenders / felons to train more criminals and are taught to not respect the laws and morals .

    • welldoneson

      using europe as an example of anything other than stupid is itself quite stupid. they have just as many injuries and deaths as any US city. besides, the question is moot. Americans have a constitutional right to have guns so if you don't like that, fine. you'll break up the country if u try to change it.

    • Mike the Limey

      The last mass shooting in the UK happened 30 months ago & left 12 dead & as many again wounded.
      The weapons used were a bolt action .22 rimfire rifle & a single barrel shotgun.
      I doubt any but the most rabid gun grabbers sees those kinds of firearm as targets for legislation.
      You cannot legislate against insanity, nor can you use laws to prevent criminality. They are there to punish the criminal when caught & to protect the public from dangerous felons – something they consistently fail to do by releasing violent offenders early to free up space for the addicts & mentally ill who should be elsewhere.

    • Warlord

      Check the actual murder rates, not just the "gun" murder rates for those countries. Much more knife killings there. Heavy islamic populations, that are knife cultures, causes more knife homicides. Punish criminals, don't demonize the innocent for criminal transgressions. Criminals do not care about the laws, period, and to disarm the law abiding, merely makes them easy prey for the jackals of society.

  • Deep Space

    "Our murder rate now largely consists of criminals killing criminals." This is possibly so and I have often wondered how our murder rate would look if we subtracted the top ten urban killing fields from the totals. However, this whole debate has started not because of criminals killing criminals and its been incredibly difficult for conservatives (and I generally consider myself a member of this group) to respond appropriately. In fact, the only responses to Newtown and its aftermath including comments that I have read (which may reduce the viability of my critique) have been either a kind of red faced, chest thumping bombasticy or a smirking, name calling rant against liberals. When someone remarks – as did one conservative site commentor – that "the only real assault is against my rights" I just have to ask how much that statement characterizes us as a whole and is the gap so wide that even murdered children aren't enough for us to pause in our quest to parade "my rights'. Oh, I almost forgot, I need all those rifles to help out when the government starts behaving tyrannically so my brother-in-law and I can become suburban warlords.

    • ouderkirk

      At what point are you willing to surrender my rights? If you would like to surrender yours, you are welcome to that. If you don’t want to own guns that’s your prerogative.

      I for one, will not give up my AR’s or my AK’s. Not for you or anyone else, .

      Those weapons are an insurance policy for my freedom. I could care less about your freedom as you have shown little to no desire to defend it.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      This article is a look at the facts surrounding gun violence in America, which gun controllers have used to make the argument.

      School shootings are an aberration created by media coverage and should not be used as an excuse to dismantle any part of the Bill of Rights.

      I would like to honestly understand why the left could argue that 3,000 dead should not in any way allow us to compromise the Constitution, but why a school shooting in Newtown should?

      • RoguePatriot6

        It's simple. Liberalism has always used "victims" as a spearhead for demonizing those with conservative views. Examples:

        When conservatives want to cut some of welfare programs you always hear, "You see, those racist Conservative/Republicans want to hold minorities back" A real good example of that was "food stamp president". The media immediately tagged it as a racial slur.

        When those who still believe that marriage is a sacred bond between a man and woman speak up, "You see, those bigotted Conservative/Republicans hate homosexuals"

        When those who get tired and frustrated at the media treating Islam as the special needs child who can't help but act dysfunctional and speak up about it, "You see, those conservative Islamophobes are just racist and prejudiced against those who aren't Christians"

        This is no different. If you are for the 2nd Amendment then, "Those ruthless conservatives don't care about the safety and welfare of those poor kids", yet these same Godless vipers, who are point fingers, would issue your kids condoms without your consent and teach them that sexual perversion is pefectly okay along with providing a means for them to get an abortion with you ever finding out about it.

        I've read "Never let a good crisis go to waste" alot. It should read, "Never let a victim go unexploited".

        • Mrs. Pharaoh

          Spot on! RoguePatriot6 you have summed it up very succintctly.

        • guest

          Well said sir. This entire presidency is constructed around red herrings and manufactured crisises and that includes THE Cliff. The country went off its rails quite awhile ago and there is no singular point in time or event when this has taken place.

        • Margaret Frank

          I think we need to stop fighting amongst ourselves. The problem of violence in this country needs to be solved. I dont agree with Obama. No law could have prevented Sandy Hook. I know many people with guns who will never shoot anyone, unless its dinner. The problem we have is being to angry with one another to address any of the issues. This country is becoming like a bad marriage, we scream and yell at each other and solve nothing. A bad marriage with no prospect of divorce. I think our politicians would do a better job if they were not posturing for the camera, always trying to score points with those who are far right and far left. At some point we have to
          quiet time and realise we have problems that need to be addressed.

      • margaret frank

        Sadly Daniel, few white people care about black youths killing each other. However, 20 children, now that gets attention. I feel for the parents of those young children, however, many of the fatalities in Chicago were little more than children. Poor black mothers and fathers feel the same pain. The media does not play up the deaths of the Chicago youth. No rating incentive. Perhaps if our media had given the same footage to those being murdered on Urban streets every weekend, then the issue would have been addressed sooner. After reading these posts I think people have taken sides and neither side cares about the issue of violence , what fuels it and how to stop it.

    • UCSPanther

      I will not give up my VZ 52/57 or Hakim just because some drug-addled gang hoodlums have a go at it and kill a bunch of bystanders in the process, any more than I will give up any of my rights, freedoms and lawfully acquired and owned property because some idiot lefty in la-la land says so.

    • fuzzygracie

      There are many ideas the conservatives have put forth and repeatedly stated.

      Such as mental illness. Violence on TV ,in rap music and movies.

      If you choose to ignore or discount every post that mentions those or think they are "red faced, chest thumping bombasticy or a smirking, name calling rants" then you are ignoring the reasons behind the killings .

    • welldoneson

      deep space, where you think nobody can hear you trolling. taking guns away from law abiding citizens because some defective little shiite stole guns from his dumb-as-a-post mommy is actually completely stupid.

    • Jarhead1982

      So when are you antis going to help fund more bounty squads to chase down the 1 million outstanding felony warrants in the US eh?

      When are you going to fix the BATF who has prosecuted less than1% of the 1.83 mil felons & crazies rejecetd since 1994? Or how they fail to catch anyone using a fake id, or the 95% of felons who dont even attempt to buy from a licensed source to begin with, or the BATF refusal to allow civilian access to the NICS for anonymous private sales checks?

      When are you going to hold the politicians responsible for their failure starting back in the 1970's when they closed down mental hospitals and mainstreamed the mentally ill into society, which then no one wanted the needed halfway houses in their neighborhoods and the politcians did nothing. We have no wonder where those cuckoos went.

      Then of course the politcians refusal to fund and resource the mental health reporting function to the NICS with only 1.7 mil records and 23.15 mil severely mentally ill in the US.

      Amazing how over 92% of killings by illegal use of a firearm are committed by career criminals, gang members, suiciders & crazies, with approx half the remaining murders due to domestic violence!

      Haynes vs US 390, 85, 1968 & the 5th amendment rule that 85% of the existing 22,417 gun control laws dont apply to felons & crazies because the requirement of identification violates the right of no self incrimination.

      Man, you antis have all the wrong answers, yet all you intend to do is implement laws that by law, dont affect the crazies and felons. A solution that has been proven to fail again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again…….

      Yeah, reaallllyyyyy hard not to smirk at idiots!

      • margaret frank

        I am a Liberal, Obama voting white woman who agrees with you. I do not see how implementing more gun laws will prevent the killing. No law could have prevented Sandy Hook. I have lived with people who owned guns their whole lives without incident. In this issue I disagree with Obama who has been lulled into believing he can do something to stop the violence. If they could do a house to house search on the south side of Chicago they could prevent at least 50% of the killings. However, that would be profiling. Had Europe been armed like we are, no way could Hitler have marched through one country after another murdering every one in his path. So I agree with you. The problem is not the Gun. Reminds me of a PETA recommendation to euthenize and make illegal to breed all Pit Bulls. We can"t train the owners, so get rid of the dog. Same with the gun. As I said, I agree with you.

    • Margaret Frank

      Thank you, a voice of reason. Because no matter how much we berate liberals we cannot explain the less than 60 deaths by gun in Britain compared to the 12,000 here. They have the same problems with drugs and gangs, just fewer guns. No one wants to take away hunting rifles, and it is a given that most people who own guns are responsible, law abiding persons. However, that statistic makes me pause and think, something must be done. (population of Britiain is 50 million approx. compared with our approx. 300m)

    • Margaret Frank

      Right On….If guns are not the problem then let us peacefully try and find out what is.

  • CatKD2DBI

    Deep space, since you miss the point the comments impress you with their emotional timbre.
    Please do some reading and reflecting so that you understand what others are concerned about.
    Mocking their concerns does not invalidate these concerns. Thank you.

  • David R

    It's especially a parental problem…starting from decades back. Mix that with government interference and you've got the perfect brew for an irresponsible and violent society.

    • Mary Sue

      The ghetto especially seems to have been immersed in the culture of "Head in the sand parenting". Black and Hispanic single mothers (or grandmothers of children of Single Mothers, as the case may be, who themselves may also be Single Mothers!) go into heavy denial that their son or grandson may be an emerging Future Carjacker Of America.

      Fatherlessness is the entire root of the problem, as such problems may be seen in white single parent families as well, though even in such situations the father is usually in the child's life to some degree. But added to the ghetto situation is the enshrined belief that The Man is going to "keep them down", and that the Po-lice are the enemy, and snitches get stitches. When the Family is left in shambles, the Gang becomes the Family, which is how you wind up with very young children (as I recall from several years ago) dying in gun shootouts, as participants of said shootouts, not mere innocent bystanders.

  • Gylippus

    Happy New Year Daniel. Let's hope that 2013 will be the leftist's high tide.

  • lsatenstein

    The Gang Problem is easy to fix. Legalize Drugs, and have the Fed or State governments reap taxes from its sale.
    With legal drugs, gangs will evaporate. Pushing drugs will not bring profits. What will be left is extortion, which I believe would be on a smaller scale, with fewer and much smaller gangs involved.

    • Daniel Greenfield

      Legalize crack cocaine and heroin? Unlikely, and aside from the general devastation, the gangs aren't going anywhere.

      Gangs rule parts of the world where there is no drug enforcement. There will always be a traffic in other things, including human beings.

      • Mary Sue

        I suddenly find myself wondering why Rev. Jesse Jackson is such an idiot. I mean, really. He was whining about 40% Unemployment in the inner city of Chicago. WELL DUH, of course there is, if gangs are taking out "protection" from businesses that exist in their "territory", and then the businesses close up shop and get the heck out of Dodge, it's no wonder! And yet the RRrrrrrrrrrevrrrrrrend Jacksonnnnnnnn doesn't seem to make the connection. Is he really that brain dead, or is he doing it on purpose?

    • Tina Trent

      That would be nice. But it's the opposite of what happened in California.

      Legalizing medical marijuana — not even pills, cocaine, meth — actually brought violent gangs running to the state to set up shop.

      There is literally no better way for gangsters to launder money than to sell legal pot. And the mom and pop, tax paying pot growers — that desired demographic — were the losers, along with taxpayers who found they didn't quite like living with a pot dispensary on every corner.

      One thing Chicago might do is stop paying "reformed" gang members to do "gang prevention outreach" — they sunk a cool million into one of those ridiculous schemes this year — the money's gone but the programs sort of never started, or did no good, or something.

    • Mary Sue

      I hate to burst your bubble, but the primary function of gangs is not to distribute drugs. It is one of their primary sources of revenue, but if that's taken away or diminished, they'll be doing more of what the Mafia calls "protection". (not that they don't already do so now, but they'd have to really step it up).

      Gangs instead function as a sort of a family, an organization of individuals from messed up families that go all Lord of the Flies meets Charles Dickens. For better or worse the gang members see themselves as part of a "family" in the gang, and their fellow members are highly trusted, as family members should be. I believe they learned this from the Mafia.

    • Ghostwriter

      Well,Isatenstein,I've got a question for you. Do you want your kids using drugs or do you care more about the drugs than your kids?

    • Margaret Frank

      I totally agree. Legalize drugs, tax them, a win/win for all of us except those who make a living from selling drugs and killing. However, I wonder, why have we not legalized drugs? During prohibition politicians and police personnel were in the pockets of the criminals. With drugs generating far more revenue, in the many billions, one has to wonder. Personally, I do not think anything has changed. I think the revenue goes all the way up to the near top of both parties. Otherwise, there would be more of an incentive to legalize them.

  • wgswst

    The fact that crime rates correlate positively with race, is something the lefties are desperate to downplay. Bravo for taking steps toward admitting this truth in your column. I hope others will take courage from it, and continue the discussion.

    Only if we are able to face this and discuss it openly, is there any chance for change.

    • Mary Sue

      actually it correlates very strongly with Identity Politics.

  • Danny Lemieux

    The one thing that is missing in this otherwise excellent analysis is that it is rich suburban whites (mostly but not all young whites) that support the inner-city gang culture with their insatiable needs for drugs and prostitutes. It is also inner-city politicians and businesses that overtly condemn but covertly encourage the inner-city gang culture, because of the enormous transfer of economic wealth that flows from the suburbs to the inner-city parishes and precincts and into the pockets of politicians and local businesses. So the next time you encounter a young, spoiled suburban high school kid, Chad or Trixie with a wad of cash and a recreational drug habit, understand that you are looking are directly at the core foundation of inner city violence.

    The problem of inner city violence is also cultural – we, in the United States, have three large historically violent cultural groups: Scotch Irish, poor southern blacks (which Thomas Sowell defines as "black rednecks" and Hispanic. In these groups, violence is viewed as a legitimate tool of negotiation for individuals to obtain what they want. If you Google "the world's most dangerous cities", it becomes evident that the overwhelming number of them are located in Latin America. We have been importing their culture of violence into our cities for decades now.

    Of course, with the Liberal/Left defining the rules of political correctness in our discourse, we are unable as a nation confront, debate and resolve these issues. This is why really nothing can be done to solve this problem and it will continue to be a tool utilized by the Left to assert ever greater control over the vaste majority of citizens that live peaceably and productively in our country.

    • Questions

      White suburban youths are merely enablers of thugs. Blacks are the real thugs. As for Thomas Sowell, I know all about the bad behavior of Albion's Fourth Seed — the Scots-Irish/Border English Celtic Protestants — having lived in Southwest Virginia for a good while. Still, they're not nearly as violent as the blacks.

      • Carolina Ulsterman

        Oh, yeah, lots of us Scots-Irish gangbangers running around, hopped up on Bushmills whiskey, wearing our kilts pulled down to our buttcracks, blasting bagpipe and fiddle music from our woofers and doing drive bys with our AK's.

        • Questions

          I'm DEFENDING your people from Sowell's charge that the Fourth Seed are simply the white equivalent of blacks. One of my favorite books, as a matter of fact, is "The Mark of the Scots," by Duncan Bruce (1997). The author even personally autographed it for me. Most of the Ulstermen descendants I like. Yes, there are some nasty ones, but in the larger scheme of things, they're far better and more decent than the blacks.

    • Guest

      "The one thing that is missing in this otherwise excellent analysis is that it is rich suburban whites (mostly but not all young whites) that support the inner-city gang culture with their insatiable needs for drugs and prostitutes."

      What a cowardly straw man that you've created, with literally zero evidence for this conclusion. Having grown up in an area that straddles a substantial expanse of ghetto, and having worked my way into a local privileged school, you are 100% wrong that white kids have even a remote effect on inner city drug traffic and violence. Your statement leads me to believe that your a sheltered liberal moron without a real world clue.

      Your next statement that attempts to link Irish Scotts with violence in general, let alone the type of violence levied by other groups, confirms my conclusion. You are either a transparently desperate liberal propaganda tool with weak writing skills, or you live in a cave wherein little reality ever ventures. I would say 'nice try' to sign off, but it was actually a transparent and exceedingly pathetic attempt. How embarrassing for you.

    • Margaret Frank

      I think you forgot the Italians. I have never heard the Scotch Irish referred to as a violent group. I should know I grew up on the Scottish border with England and we had zero crime. Several of my ancestors were Scotch, and they did not have a violent bone amongst them. I fail to see how you can seperate out the Scotch/Irish. Many of the new immigrants to our shores turned to crime and the violence that goes with it out of necessity. Did you some how forget the Italian Mafia, or the current problems with the Russian Mafia on the East Coast. You also overlooked the Germans. The masters of murder.

  • clarespark

    Generation Y is decadent with respect to both drugs and promiscuous sex. It is they who support violence in the inner city and/or find bad boys and bad girls cool. See http://clarespark.com/2012/07/29/girls-or-the-new…. "GIRLS, or the new Lost Generation." I blame the 60s generation and their sick notions of emancipation.

    • bluffcreek1967

      I agree that the 60s generation contributed far too much to our current state. Much, though not all of it, can be traced to what occurred among our young people during the 60s revolution. In their attempt to emancipate themselves from all moral and traditional boundaries, Leftists have enslaved themselves and caused enormous harm on the rest of our country.

  • dodo

    The democrat party has become the party of organized crime, and the republicans have become the party of law abiding citizens (who are terrified of democrat thugs)

    • Questions

      Black criminals don't Democrat. Actually, they tend not to vote.

    • simplulo

      The Republican Party (with which I generally work) has become the party of haters, and it will continue to decline until it can produce a positive message. Fortunately this is not difficult, if one is so inclined.

  • Moishe Pupick

    Monday, 12/31/12

    The gun grabbers want ultimate mass confiscation of cvilian firearms. They are working incrementally,
    trying to assure gun owners that they merely want some "sensible. . .reasonable" restrictions. Feinstein & Company think that their lives are inherently more valuable than the lives of ordinary U.S. citizens. It's o.k. for them to have fulltime armed security details and concealed-carry permits. It's those "little people" who can't be trusted. Our Founding Fathers knew much better.

  • al222

    this article begin in the middle of the problem. the beginning of the problem is the wholesale destruction of the nuclear family that makes gang culture and all of its dysfunction irresistible. yet as is tiresomely predictable, that too is the result progressive ideology, from the Great Society et al, to the pernicious notion that all definitions of "family" are equally valid

    • ILJ777

      al222, you hit the nail squarely on the head with the best comment of all: the problem is, the fathers are all missing. If we can get black and Hispanic fathers to spend time with their children, to teach them about right and wrong, to simply love them…the gang problem will be gone. So, we have to look at: Where are the fathers, and why?

  • Lost_Lenore

    Note the immigration factor, mentioned in passing. While there has always been a certain amount of gang violence perpetrated by non-immigrant populations, a sizable share of it continues to be immigrant based. We're importing much of this and we don't need to. We darn sure don't need it for their labor, do we?

    • Margaret Frank

      In Chicago, it is not the immigrant population causing the violence. It is the beakdown of the nuclear family, drugs and poverty amongst the African American southside population. I live in an area that is home to every kind of immigrant, it is like the United Nations and we have almost no crime. Most are newly arrived and seek only to make a decent and honest living. As our ancestors did when they arrived.

  • hikerdude

    My guess is alll the perps in the stated murder stats of the cities voted for the B.O. .
    The worst is yet to come .

    • Mary Sue

      the ones that bothered to vote, yeah.

      Ever noticed that the prison populations identify overwhelmingly as Democrat, and the Democrats are trying to get voting rights for convicted felons? Coincidence? I think not!

  • bluffcreek1967

    And why does America have a gang problem? It's because America has a black problem (Hispanic problem too!). Whites, admittedly, have their own gangs too – but the thug/gang culture among blacks is an especially acute problem that's so much a part of them as a people.

    One might be tempted to excuse it as a symptom of poverty or "institutional racism," but their are many ethnic groups throughout the world who suffer poverty yet they're not killing each other off in great numbers as a normative aspect of their culture or communities. The gang culture among blacks is also not due to the racism of whites. The white man isn't forcing them to murder each other or sell drugs. Blacks in America have ample opportunity to succeed, and every basic need is available to them via the nanny government. Yet the vast majority remain ignorant, uneducated and resentful toward whites. The greatest enemy to the black man isn't whites, it's blacks themselves.

    When are we going to finally admit to ourselves that the prevalence of crime, including their deep-rooted gang culture, is a reflection inherently of who blacks are? The gang problem and murder rate in Chicago is indicative of what happens whenever a large population of blacks dominate a city. This explains in part why whites justifiably become concerned when too many blacks move into their neighborhoods – and blacks have earned ounce of the suspicion they get.

    • Questions

      Finally, someone here (besides myself) gets it right. It's about race. I'll grant that there are nasty, menacing whites in Chicago, especially among the Irish and the Poles, but they don't come close to the vicious, infantile behavior of the blacks.

    • Ghostwriter

      Stop with the race talk,you two. Not every black is a gang member! It IS NOT about race!!!! Black people are as much victims by their own people as much as anything else. Your racist nonsense ISN'T helping one bit!

      • Questions

        Gimme a break, as John Stossel might say. Nobody is saying that all blacks are bad any more than all whites are good. That's a classic copout. The fact is that the frequency with which blacks engage in pathological behavior is far, far higher than it is for whites.

        Yes, blacks are victims of their own people. Most of the victims of black murderers are themselves black (all too often, by the way, via "disputes" between criminals). But a quite a few victims are whites unlucky enough to be in the wrong place at the wrong time. How would you like to live in an all-black neighborhood for a year? Let's see how long you get to live.

        "Race talk," as you call it, is reality talk. To speak of "urban Democratic machines" as the central problem is an evasion. Democrats for decades have run Seattle and Portland, and yet those cities' murder rates are but a fraction of Chicago's. I'll give you one guess as to why.

        • curmudgeon

          citizen: " i am so tired of supporting lazy racist blacks on welfare"

          indignant, holier by far than thou liberal: "but you are wrong! over half the welfare recipients are white!"

          citizen: "ok. you are right. welfare is a white problem. lets get rid of welfare, and make all those lazy white people work, instead of living at taxpayer expense!"

          liberal: " you are a racist! you want to starve the poor black people

          citizen: "but you said welfare is a white phenomenon"

          drooling liberal: dont confuse me with facts.

        • PhiloTexan78

          I'm white, and I did live in a "black neighborhood" for more than a year. In fact, I grew up there. It was in the "Stop Six" area of Fort Worth, Tx, not that that matters. It was a fairly violent place in the mid 90's, and I have seen my share of violence in the streets. What I remember most about those times wasn't that there was a huge gulf between the races, but that most people held the notion that "we're all just folk". There were gangs in our neighborhoods (Bloods, Crips, Latin Kings etc., etc.), but apart from the Latin Kings, none of the gangs were really dominated by one race of individuals. So to blame ANYTHING on race is to me a copout. Nobody can say "But, I'm jus' a po' black man.", or "I can't get an education because my 12 member mexican family can't afford it." Everyone has to start taking personal responsibility for their actions, and stop blaming their plights on outside sources. There is always a choice to make, whether it be bad or good. Some choices suck, but they are the right ones to make. I have been penniless, homeless, and malnutritioned, but never once did I make the decision to get what I absolutely needed by illegal means. I made the choice that I would either live or die by being moral and law abiding. That choice sucked, but I made it.

          Bottom line: Claiming race as your problem is a copout. Everyone needs to make the choice to be good or moral everyday or not, and except what the consequences may be as their own doing.

      • mike

        I live in chicago and it is always a black person you can't deny it i know some white people in worse neighborhoods then some blacks and they stay out of trouble

    • UCSPanther

      It's the culture that is the problem, not the race.

      • bluffcreek1967

        Nonsense! Their 'culture' (if one wishes to call it that) is a reflection of them as a racial people. This violent black culture is not limited to blacks in America who live in the inner cities. It's a world-wide phenomena in every country that has large populations of black people. They are, by nature, prone to violent criminal conduct, opportunist thieves, low IQs, disinterested in formal education, impulsive, and rather simple-minded people. This is the hard truth that most people are unwilling to acknowledge.

        People naively wish to blame black criminality on everything else (e.g., the culture, liberalism) than the very people themselves. We need to recognize that black criminal pathology is the result of who they are by nature. Granted, culture and lack of education certainly contributes to their predicament, but ultimately they are responsible for their conduct and their deplorable 'culture.' Naturally, there are exceptions as with most things, but far too many blacks have earned the suspicions that people world-wide have of them.

        • Ghostwriter

          Not ALL of them,bluffcreek1967. You continue this race talk but it's STILL wrong. You and those like you blame every black person on the planet for the actions of a bunch of rotten apples. You tar every black person on the planet for the actions of criminals. Not every German during World War II liked the Nazi party but they suffered for their crimes along with those who were.
          You deserve to be called a racist,bluffcreek1967. That's because you don't look at a person's character,you look at his or her skin color and automatically see a criminal. To me,blacks are people too,not the KKK-inspired image you seem to revel in. Many blacks don't like the criminal element or their enablers like Jesse Jackson or Rev. Al "The Loudmouth" Sharpton. For idiots like them,there are those like Herman Cain,Clarence Thomas,Thurgood Marshall,Condolezza Rice,and others like them. If you would get away from your Klan meetings and go out into the real world,you'd learn that. I prefer to look at a black person and see what TYPE of person he or she is. You don't. When you look at a black person,you see a stereotype,not a living,breathing person with thoughts and feelings of his or her own.

          One of Martin Luther King's better sayings was that we should look at the content of a person's character not the color of that person's skin. You do the opposite. You look at the person's skin color and not the person's character. And judging by the content of your character,you don't have a lot of content. Just hatred and bigotry,with nothing more to back it up than that.

          • bluffcreek1967

            There's so much wrong with your post, I almost don't know where to begin. But here's a few things to consider: (1) I've made clear many times in my post that NOT all blacks are criminals, but that a large percentage of them are. The criminal statistics also support it. (2) I won't say what I do for a living, but I deal with many blacks each day in the course of my employment. I know black people very well, and this is not a recent knowledge either. (3) My opinions about blacks in general is the direct result, in fact, of looking past their skin color and looking at the content of their character just like MLK wanted us to. And that's why I've reached the conclusions I have. It's their character! (4) I've said in many posts that there are many decent blacks, and some that I admire greatly (e.g., Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, Walter Williams). But as whole (which many perceptive blacks themselves will admit), they are a very low IQ people who have a propensity toward crime. This is why no one really wants to live in our inner cities with them. (5) It's easy to label me a KKK member or supporter, but it's not true. There are many whites just like me who wish no harm to blacks, but yet are honest and real when it comes to have blacks conduct themselves. Many of us are tired of the lies and pretending things aren't actually as we see them before our very eyes. I urge you, sir, to be more thoughtful and intellectually careful in how you reply to those with whom you differ.

        • A 22 Year Old Man

          Bluffcreek, you would do very well to read this article by Daniel Greenfield, which explains why it looks to you like blacks are such a problem:
          http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2012/05/nocturne-

          • bluffcreek1967

            Thank you. I read it and it definitely has some valid points. The writer misses some things, but I guess it's a matter or emphasis. If the 'black problem' was simply limited to the inner cities of the US, I might be inclined to see things differently. But the fact that the 'black problem' is a worldwide phenomena wherever large populations of blacks reside, tells me this is something inherent, deep-rooted and reflective of them as a people. Others who are much more informed than me have reached the same or similar conclusions. I tend to think the 'black problem' is collection of different factors – namely, genes, low IQ, culture and morality.

            We are trying to 'fit' blacks into the civilized, white man's world, and it's not working. Whites must come to the realization NOT all humans are equal, possess the same abilities, possess the same IQ levels, share cultures that are equal in value, and on it goes. This does NOT mean blacks should be treated wrongly or that harm should come to them. It just means we need to recognize genuine differences between the races. It should also imply that we cause more problems for ourselves by allowing black Africans and Somalis to immigrate here.

          • Margaret Frank

            You sound like Adolf Hitler and his argument for killing Jews There are many African Americans that out score Caucasians on IQ tests. There is no validity for anything you say.
            White people, and I am white, have exploited people of color and kept them down in every country. Not only Caucasians, Arabs do it also. Given another 100 years of liberation we will see the black cultures catch up to us. I have no doubt.

    • Margaret Frank

      Currently it is crime in black areas that is causing the problem. in Chicago. However, in both Chicago and the Suburbs, we have many black communties with low crime rates. The crime in Chicago during prohibition was caused by the Italians, at least they garnered the most attention. It is unfair to blame all of any group. I have to question how much any of you care about black men killing other black men.
      Actually, it is the killing of 20 6 and 7 year olds by a white man that has fueled this debate.

    • otbricki

      Better examine poverty level rather than race. It turns out that the poor southern states have higher murder rates than the northern states despite cities like Chicago. It turns out that the real correlation is with economic status.

    • harold

      The fact is that southern states have a higher overall murder rate than northern states even with cities like Chicago. It is all about poverty. Race is irrelevant.

    • Trailblazer

      It is quite obvious that racist viewpoints have clouded your ability to rationally think about the problem of violence. Might I add the uproar about gun violence always occurs when there is a deadly mass shooting which often times the perpetrator is a white suburbanite. Guns and gangs go way back in American history back to the bootleggers in Chicago and other major cities and even further back to the likes of Jesse James and Billy the Kid. Violence and the human lives it claims is rooted at the core of a human heart that has rejected the grace and love of Jesus Christ. Attempting to point fingers and ignoring the many hundreds and even thousands of lives lost to gun violence doesn't make the problem go away. Mass shootings have taught us that no community is "safe". It seems to me thatt many of you need to be set free from bigotry and discrimination to first deal with your own problem so that you can more properly discern the caos and confusion in the lives of others.

  • mah29001

    How about gang, rap control? I'm tired of these thugs running the streets.

    • G. Smith

      I'm tired of these thugs running our country.

  • LindaRivera

    The Muslim Brotherhood, Obama and Clinton’s top favorites, have been placed into extremely powerful positions in the American government. The Muslim Brotherhood stated goal in America is the DESTRUCTION of civilization and global Islamic conquest. What kind of future is planned for America by Obama?

    BARENAKEDISLAM Sep 25 2012
    Barack Hussein Obama told the UN General Assembly today: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”
    I consider that statement a death threat to me and all anti-Islam bloggers, authors, and activists by the President of the United States. http://www.barenakedislam.com

    England Warns America: Don’t Let Them Take Your Guns

    England grabbed its citizens guns in 1997. Crime skyrocketed as the law-abiding were disarmed. The English citizens have a message for Americans — Don’t give up your guns!
    http://conservativevideos.com/2012/12/england-war

  • LindaRivera

    AmericanThinker September 20, 2012
    Why does Homeland Security need 1.4 billion rounds of ammunition?

    The Department of Homeland Security has purchased 1.4 billion rounds of ammunition during the last six months. This includes 450 million rounds of .40 hollow point, 200 million rounds of .223 rifle ammunition, and 176,000 rounds of .308 168-grain hollow point boat tail (HPBT) that is used almost exclusively as ammo for sniper rifles.

    Obama’s infamous 2008 quote,
    We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

    We must never forget that tyrants throughout modern history (Pol Pot, Hitler, Stalin and Mao) always disarmed their opponents before rounding them up and sending them to the killing fields. We must never forget. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2012/09/why_d

    The ammo is for DOMESTIC use in America against Americans!

  • LindaRivera

    Casuals United Blog

    Gun control and the amazing Batman coincidence
    by casualsunited

    Have a look at the links below. (You may have to copy and paste it into your browser as wordpress is on the blink)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embe

    Check this out chaps. The theory is that the US government wants to get peoples guns off them so they are behind this. The Batman references are weird don't you reckon?

    Also this
    http://theintelhub.com/2012/12/18/this-is-insane-

    Just like the British Government connected Dunblane shootings which they used to get legally owned guns off the streets.
    http://thescum.info/2011/01/10/from-dunblane-to-h

    The American Government desperately want to take guns off its citizens so they are helpless against tyranny. When you remove legally held guns only the criminals (and tyrants) will have them.

    Check out the links above and judge for yourselves if something dodgy goes on here.
    Casuals United Blog

  • Penny Haulman

    And the most dangerous is the occupant that is poaching from the White House and we all are targets. And all his glutamus kissing idiots that think they are so smart. Actually, they are just a bunch of damned lawyers. After all

  • bluffcreek1967

    Black on black crime, black on white crime, high rate of drug addiction in black communities, black illiteracy, black dependence on welfare and generational government assistance, black racism toward whites, blacks 'disenfranchised,' and on and on! Do these people ever take responsibility for themselves? Why is so much that is negative attached to them as a people? What does all of this tell us about the nature and character of black people? Why is it that blacks, by and large, do not succeed in spite of ample opportunities given to them at every turn? Why are blacks, as a people, utterly and continually dependent upon nanny government for all of their basic needs? Why are blacks and crime almost synonymous in much of our thinking? Is this perception something they have earned or is due to 'institutional racism'?

    In truth, many white Americans are suffering from negro fatigue.

  • Paul Jones

    the common theme in all these cities is a diverse culture with many blacks, every where blacks get a hold on a town it becomes a crime infested crap hole just look at what is going on in what used to be a peacfull small town Jacksonville Florida the moral is if your are white and want a safe place to raise your kids go to a place like extreme west Kentucky graves county and get away from the blacks that bully your kids and family

  • Marvin Fox

    Guns/Gangs is a very truthful discussion of the the problem. The conclusions are excellent and necessary to be used by our Republic.
    The one problem not mentioned is that our Republic is always governed by a minority political party that believes its mandate has been formulated by a minority of citizens who voted it into office. Neither political party has a mandate that exceeds the boundary of our Constitution. The same Constitution they gave their personal oath to uphold and serve.
    The American people have the legal, Constitutional, muscle to stop both Parties in their tracks. There are two major problems with the peoples use of that muscle.
    First: most of us need to be informed that we have it.
    Second: we must learn to support each other when it is used.
    The government seems to have it all. They use our money to install their corruption. They use their appointees to escape the penalties for their corruption. They use our Constitutional liberties, and money, to teach us that their corruption is really beneficial.
    The people are gaining ground on them and they know it. The corruption is in a last ditch stand to keep its contorted brand of democracy alive. They are not going to make it. We are awakening to our Christian and Constitutional heritage. When that awakening is finished; they are finished.
    Marvin Fox

  • Eric

    Sadly,this is the way this country is going do to the people that run it,,,,into the ground.

  • Ghostwriter

    I used to live in a suburb of Chicago when I was a kid and I'm saddened by what's been happening there. I'm even more saddened by the racist bilge that I've been seeing. Not every black person is a monster. I wish that idiots like bluffcreek1967 and Questions would stop going to Stormfront and go out into the real world where not every black person is a violent animal. Get with the 21st Century and stop the nonsense!

    • UCSPanther

      It's not the race that is the problem. It is the culture, the culture of entitlement and victimhood that is being promoted by the race pimps and statists wanting to ensure a steady stream of dependency.

      In the end, when it becomes unsustainable, the Dems will learn the hard way that they created a monster…

      • Questions

        Race and culture can't be separated. Even an amateur anthropologist will admit as much.

    • Questions

      News flash: I don't visit Stormfront or other neo-Nazi sites for inspiration. I consult social science literature and primary data sources. As an aside, I grew up in an area of suburban St. Louis where blacks moved in en masse. Oh, the stories I could tell you!

    • Thomas Wells

      Back in the day, when parents were a mother and a father, and most families had a pair; a person could walk around in all sections of Chicago . Imagine…

    • bluffcreek1967

      Ghostwriter, part of your problem is that you don't follow closely to what I and others have said about blacks. You frequently engage in ad-hominem attacks ('idiots,' 'racist,' etc.) which does nothing to further the discussion. Moreover, you often miss the entire point at hand because all you can see is 'racism' and you ignore many of our points of clarification. You accuse us of making sweeping statements about ALL black people, yet I've made it clear repeatedly that I'm speaking in general terms and that NOT all black folks are criminals. It's these simple nuances that you have failed to discern in the discussion. Also, I do not visit Stormfront or Neo-Nazi websites. Lastly, I work with blacks each and every day in my employment, and I know them quite well after many years of constant interaction. Some are decent and kind people, but there is a very large segment of them that care very little for human life (as Chicago and other cities can testify). If you have not done so, I urge you to live among blacks in their communities, interact with them daily for several years in different circumstances, and then tell me if your opinions of them as a people has not truly changed. It will be true eye-opener, I can assure you!

  • Thomas Wells

    Chicago needs another fire.

  • Mary Sue

    that's about what I figured. He's a big fat phony.

  • curmudgeon

    there you go, daniel, talking sense again. didnt you get the message? terrorism in the usa is caused by soldiers returning from the middle east, the extreme right, and those violent tea baggers. we need to look no further than any enemy of the democratic party to find out everything that is wrong with america. surely any area that voted overwhelmingly for the muslim in chief is an asset to our country, and could not possibly be the source of a murder epidemic. you should review your research material.

  • Spider

    I have some really bad news for liberals or should I say leftists – The problem isn't the guns the problem is the Ni***ers — plain and simple.

  • Marilyn Baker

    The murder rate in Dallas was a little over 12. Liberals want to make out that concealed gun carry is bad, but the statistics say it all..

  • FPF

    Many of those cities have tight gun control laws. Political gangsters are helping street gangsters to get risk free access to law abiding citizens and street gangsters are funneling money for the political gangsters' election in return.

  • http://1389blog.com 1389AD

    This may come in handy when talking to your family, friends, neighbors, co-workers, and elected officials about firearms:

    Larry Correia refutes the gun controllers once and for all!

  • Fact Checker

    The murder stats and comparisons are flawed.

    2011 murder rates per 100,000 for some of the mentioned places:

    El Salvador = 69
    Colombia = 36
    South Africa = 31
    New Orleans = 24
    Detroit = 10
    Baltimore = 9
    Philadelphia = 8
    St. Louis = 8
    Chicago = 6
    http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the

  • Asher

    Chicago, the LIberal city, has the most gun violence and out of control gangland murders plus the greatest crime rate, the only way to change the violence, is to change the culture…that is what is sadly lacking. Generations repeat what has been taught to them, and they know no difference. In order to change culture, economy, prosperity, you have to be willing to get rid of those legislators, who are for big government, entitlements, and re-distribution of wealth….When a government keeps giving free things to people, who do not work for them, they create dependency, and lack of self-esteem…which only enables division and violence and more of them for the next generations.

  • Joel

    Lets face it , you look look at the most dangerous cities in the USA and there is 1 common denominator .

    Answer: Blacks are the majority in those cities.

    Don’t call me a racist, I’m giving you a fact just like Men are generally taller than Women.

    • Rob

      Would I be sexist if I were to point out that most of violent crime is done by men? Would I be condemning all men? If I were a cop, would it be terrible if I focused more on men (profiling) than women when looking for criminals? This argument is about being able to speak about facts vs PC, which says that we can't speak about facts if it might offend someone. As a man, I am not offended by the fact that most crimes are committed by men. It has nothing to do with me as an individual. I make my own reputation. If a woman is nervous when she encounters me on a dark street, I am not going to be offended and think that I am now a victim of sexism, I will simply know that she is scared because we both know that men are more likely to attack a woman. I would instead try to do something that would put her at ease. In the case of black crime, it is obvious to me that blacks are WAY more dangerous than any other race and that, sadly, when an area becomes more black that it will probably become more dangerous. Does it make me a racist to notice this? Ghostwriter would say 'yes, of course he is'. But my part black wife also notices these things. And never would I hold it against my black family members (or my wife) what many other blacks are doing. It is a painful thing to see and acknowledge but denial of facts and trends leads to worse problems.

      • Rob

        Correction: As a man, I am not offended if a woman(or anyone else), points out the fact that most crimes are committed by men. It has nothing to do with me as an individual.

  • Ghostwriter

    Here's another fact for you,Joel. Not all black people are criminals. You ARE a racist. Just like bluffcreek1967 and Questions.

    • daniela metz

      that is right not all blacks are racist, but the bottom line is many black leaders are racist and they preach hate for the devil white race, the panthers call for killin whites and their babies and many young blacks look up to those people, the black caucus will do nothing unless it helps only thier blacks race, if whites ddid the same things blacks do it would be called racist and always is
      every thing blacks do is to suport only their race of blacks they could care less about the United States and it is the voices in the black leadership that are shaping the future of young blacks. just look at how blacks looked at the martin-zimmerman situation blacks hate whites so much they just had to make this into a white on black racist crime, black leaders immediatly called for pay back of whites but not one time called for payback for hispanics. blacks hate whites but they need to keep Hispanics on their side and they need to get every race to hate whitey as much as blacks do. they even have many whites hating whites

    • bluffcreek1967

      Ghostwriter likes to engage in ad-hominem attacks because he's got nothing more intelligent to contribute to the conversation. Nobody is saying that ALL blacks are criminals, so again you have missed the point. Incidentally, in Larry Elder's book, 'Ten Things You Can't Say in America,' he has a chapter on how blacks are more racist than whites. And you know what? He's right!

  • international black man

    cracker joel the time of white rule is over, you done had yo chancet fer so long , now we have been working to get a bigger population over yall fer years and now that we done got it in most cities we rule yall . now is the time to convert all Affericans to Muslim and the end is near for the cracker. read everything the black panthers say and be very affraid honky why do you think affericians hate the american anthem and the stars n stripes it held us back we be gonna have a black flag and aint crap you crackers can does about it and you know the famous revrand wright he be callin you the devil infedal white folks that gotta go

    • KarshiKhanabad

      You're not fooling anyone, paleass whitebread. Dis honky be bad ritin dat black jivetalky his ownself bro.

  • Mary Sue

    this is a great article from 2008 in the Telegraph (England) which sums up the roots of the gang problem nicely:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1895844/Fa

  • lsatenstein

    In the years following prohibition, the gangsters became the refined citizens of the day. They became legal, had families, sold booze, paid taxes, and opened gambling casinos in Vegas. And of course Prostitution.
    So, the next generation will do likewise, and become the next generation of politicians or lobbyists.

    Can I guarantee my kids would not have tasted booze by age 16 or smoked a weed?

    These products are available to high school kids, so… those who will go that route will.

  • Mr. X

    The African-American community has long been infused with variation of Islamo-Marxism in their institutions and especially in their "Christian" churches. There is a poli-Religious twist to this phenomena, which is why it Is immune to reason and/or appeasement. These ideologies are antithetical to the Judaic influence of freedoms embedded in our Constitution. This vengeance revolution has been very Successful in it's intimidation. Every country in the world seems to be afflicted with comparable revolution. Even Muslim dictatorships are being overthrown by Islamist-socialists. The The carnage set

    to ensue is going to be unbearable.

  • Neils60

    Rahm E. has the answer for Chicago, as it was announced in July that he's embraced assistance from the Rev. Louis ("Judaism is a gutter religion") Farrakhan to mediate disputes between Chicago's gang-thugs.