California Bill to Give Obama’s DREAMer Illegal Aliens Unemployment Benefits


Retracing this towering pyramid of hypocrisy we finally come to the tawdry conclusion of a bill that was proposed in Congress as a way to legalize productive illegal aliens, that couldn’t be passed and was rammed through illegally by executive order, has now become a way for illegal aliens to get on the unemployment benefits train.

If Assembly Bill 35 passes, then the DREAM Scam will have existed only to expand the welfare state.

Legislation introduced Tuesday would give about 400,000 undocumented immigrants in California the same rights as citizens to unemployment benefits and various other government services.

Assembly Bill 35 targets a select group of undocumented immigrants, participants in President Barack Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, who came to the United States as youths and have lived generally productive lives for numerous years.

Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation, effective Jan. 1, that enables participants in the federal program to obtain California driver’s licenses. AB 35 would provide them with rights to a state ID card, unemployment benefits and state-administered medical services.

It’s funny how fast immigration for national economic benefit just becomes immigration as a way to expand the welfare state.

AB 35 was proposed by Assemblyman Roger Hernández, a West Covina Democrat who was named chairman of the Assembly Labor and Employment Committee this month.

“California embodies the greatest diversity in the world,” Hernández said in a written statement. “We recognize we will need the collective skills and talents of these young immigrants to aid our state in reaching our true potential.”

But Hernandez isn’t recognizing their skills and talent. He’s giving them a way to cash more welfare benefits out of an already bankrupt state. If they’re so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?

As labor committee chairman, Hernández said, “I am ready to carry my part in making sure their integration into our workforce, economy and society becomes a reality.”

They’re certainly becoming integrated into the Taker part of the economy.

  • JacksonPearson

    Fickle voters voted in Moonbeam Jerry Brown instead of fiscal conservative Meg Whitman. Instead of fixing a train wrecked state, Moonbeam has found more ways to doom or shorten the state's life span. With the help of a democrat controlled legislature, and sanctuary cities, Illegal immigration has fractured every facet of California's resources.

    Thousands of responsible business individuals have bailed out, because they simply didn't want to deal with Progressive legislative foolishness. Once gone, they'll never return.

  • Thomas Wells

    Try just walking over the border and getting a job in Mexico, let alone benefits.

  • TXranger

    Fools, all fools in CA.

    • John Galt

      We're not ALL fools, but the few of us who are sane are outnumbered here in the Peoples Republik of Kalifornia.

  • cynthia curran

    Well, the right is bad in California and the left worst. The right, the Lincoln Club wants to legalized the illegal hispanics in Santa ana and Anaheim to do the maids jobs while the left wants to give their kids unemployment.

  • cynthia curran

    Well, a lot of the right would not support Whitman, she's not the best on immirgation but Brown was worst and worst on other issues as well. If Republcians complain about California well Ronald Reagan caused the demographic changes by supporting his legalization act that changed the OC which use to vote over 60 percent Republcian into a swing county since hispanics went out and whites went down. All the white areas of OC still voted for Romeny.

  • Brittanicus

    FOR THOSE OPPONENTS WHO STATE THAT ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION DOESN”T COST TAXPAYERS? THIS IS ONLY ONE OF CALIFORNIA MAJOR CITY PAYOUT IN PANDERING TO ILLEGAL ALIENS. OVER A $113 BILLION DOLLARS AND RISING ANNUALLY, THAT IS BEING SWALLOWED UP ACROSS THIS SOVEREIGN LAND AND “YOU” ARE PAYING FOR IT.

    HOW MANY DOLLARS ARE TAKEN IN TAXES TO PAY FOR YOUR ILLEGAL ALIEN INVASION IN YOUR PRINCIBLE CITIES?

    PRIME EXAMPLE, LOS ANGELES COUNTY – Year-end closing 2011 figures from the Department of Public Social Services reported that over $646 million in welfare and food stamp benefits were issued to illegal alien parents for their native-born children, announced Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich. The $646.2 million consisted of $258 million in CalWORKs (welfare) and $388 million in Food Stamps) — a $21 million increase over the previous year. “With the $550 million for public safety and nearly $500 million for healthcare, the total cost for illegal aliens to this one County taxpayer exceeds $1.6 BILLION dollars a year,” said Antonovich. “These costs do not include the hundreds of millions of dollars for education.” Each of the 50 states citizens and legal residents need to contact their Representative, specifically the governors, state Senators and the Liberal State assembly and demand no more illegal alien pandering, or State taxpayers will be taxed even more from now to doomsday.

    CUT OUT ALL PUBLIC ENTITLEMENTS AND WATCH THEM GO HOME?

  • FaithBasedHate

    “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —-> “If they are so skilled and talented, why aren’t they working?” —-> They have no legal status to work —–> “They are becoming takers of this economy” —-> “Don’t give them legal status!” —-> They have no legal status to work —->