How Chicago Public School Teachers are Destroying Education


The class warfare types talk a lot about greedy corporations and greedy CEO’s and greedy 1 percenters who do nothing but eat money, burp it up again and then use it to buy politicians.

But greed like this is hard to find outside the public sector. It’s greed that comes perilously close to evil.

Seventy-nine percent of the 8th graders in the Chicago Public Schools are not grade-level proficient in reading, according to the U.S. Department of Education, and 80 percent are not grade-level proficient in math.

Chicago public school teachers went on strike on Monday and one of the major issues behind the strike is a new system Chicago plans to use for evaluating public school teachers in which student improvement on standardized tests will count for 40 percent of a teacher’s evaluation. Until now, the evaluations of Chicago public school teachers have been based on what a Chicago Sun Times editorial called a “meaningless checklist.”

Oh and the greed part. Here it is.

Chicago teachers have the highest average salary of any city at $76,000 a year before benefits. The average family in the city only earns $47,000 a year. Yet the teachers rejected a 16 percent salary increase over four years at a time when most families are not getting any raises or are looking for work.

The city is being bled dry by the exorbitant benefits packages negotiated by previous elected officials. Teachers pay only 3 percent of their health-care costs and out of every new dollar set aside for public education in Illinois in the last five years, a full 71 cents has gone to teacher retirement costs.

As bad as some corporations can be, no private company could keep getting away with this for so long. And no private company’s employees would be this amoral and ruthless at the expense of the children, because companies aren’t built that way. Unions are.

“This is an amazing display of democracy,” said Rick Sawicki, a 7th grade teacher at Evergreen Middle School. “It is a wonderful lesson for children and adults alike. I’m honored that we are all sticking together. We all want what is fair. We want to make sure everyone is treated fairly, just like I teach my children.”

Statistically Rick’s children probably can’t even read and their idea of fairness is picking people’s pockets.

Maria Garcia, who lives across the street from the school, picked up her 11-year-old daughter Carla at 12:30 p.m. She said she and her husband are both unemployed.

During the strike, Garcia said, it’s good she can be with her daughter. “I understand both sides, they have their right to strike,” Garcia said in Spanish, “but it’s a shame my daughter can’t learn.”

But that’s okay, she’s probably learning more than she would in a Chicago public school.

  • aloyicious

    I think it's important to point out that all those benefits mentioned in this article apply only to Chicago teachers – downstate teachers have seen the state of Illinois raiding their pension fund for years now…

  • PaulRevereNow

    $76,000 a year salary, and they only contribute a paltry 3 percent to their health care?! WHAT the he** are they striking for? And $76,000 is the MEDIAN salary, that is, 50 percent of their salaries are ABOVE that!

  • Asher

    Its so easy to sum up this situation, once again, chaos and taking advantage of a bad situation. So, Does Obama suddenly pop in to save the day? Man are people sick of Chicago and all the failures that go with these politicians to make anything better! Some of these teachers are making $76.000 a year, and our children are not being taught true history, or the Constitution….but Socialism! Some of the teachers need to go, not salarys increased!

  • pagegl

    I heard on Fox news this morning that about 39% of Chicago teachers send their kids to private schools. I guess they know the effectiveness of the work they do. And still they demand more money. I guess it takes all kinds…

  • http://mizzima.com/edop/letters.html Nannie

    I’ve learned quite a few important things as a result of your post. I’d personally also like to convey that there is a situation where you will

    have a loan and do not need a co-signer such as a U.

    S. Student Aid Loan. When you are getting credit through a conventional financial institution then you need to be willing to have a co-signer ready to assist you.

    The lenders will probably base their decision on the few factors but the biggest will be your credit rating.

    There are some loan companies that will likewise look at your work history and decide based on that but in almost all cases it will hinge on your

    report.