<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the US Navy Big Enough to Take on China and Iran?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:30:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: dr. elm</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5458077</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dr. elm]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5458077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China has no intention of damaging their foreign trade agreements and the USA has no intention to continue to give anything but the largest possible amount of money to their defense contractors. No worries. This nonsense will carry unhindered for enough time, until China falls apart internally.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China has no intention of damaging their foreign trade agreements and the USA has no intention to continue to give anything but the largest possible amount of money to their defense contractors. No worries. This nonsense will carry unhindered for enough time, until China falls apart internally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ghenghis</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5253431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghenghis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2013 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5253431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senile McCain is up again, but only with military gibberish. McCain, after all, is just a POW in Hanoi Hilton. In contrast, Obama is a Nobel Laurette Kenyan in charge of little white House.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senile McCain is up again, but only with military gibberish. McCain, after all, is just a POW in Hanoi Hilton. In contrast, Obama is a Nobel Laurette Kenyan in charge of little white House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demise of West</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5078738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demise of West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5078738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So unless you western belligerent fiends can match your $$$ to your GDP to your uber-ultra tech to your 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 expensive military gears like B2, B3, B4, next gen MBT, submarine, aircraft carriers, laser, rail guns, particle cannon, then yes go full loadout on destroying China, Iran, Russia, NK into submission.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So unless you western belligerent fiends can match your $$$ to your GDP to your uber-ultra tech to your 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 expensive military gears like B2, B3, B4, next gen MBT, submarine, aircraft carriers, laser, rail guns, particle cannon, then yes go full loadout on destroying China, Iran, Russia, NK into submission.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demise of West</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5078633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demise of West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 04:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5078633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hold your western melee a sec, just indulge w/ me in the ageless law of nature that bestowed upon the universe; quality can killstreak w/ ease, but it can never overwhelm, while quantity cannot killstreak but it can forever overwhelm w/ ease. This rule applies to infinity BC, 2013 AD, &amp; will continue to apply in infinity AD For example, say in 99999999999999999999999999999999999 AD West have 10 uber-ultra invincible MBT that indeed can easily killstreak but her adversary acquires 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 tiger MBT of WW2 obsolete design that indeed will easily overwhelm the last stand of the 10 uber-ultra invincible MBT. Get it?  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold your western melee a sec, just indulge w/ me in the ageless law of nature that bestowed upon the universe; quality can killstreak w/ ease, but it can never overwhelm, while quantity cannot killstreak but it can forever overwhelm w/ ease. This rule applies to infinity BC, 2013 AD, &amp; will continue to apply in infinity AD For example, say in 99999999999999999999999999999999999 AD West have 10 uber-ultra invincible MBT that indeed can easily killstreak but her adversary acquires 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 tiger MBT of WW2 obsolete design that indeed will easily overwhelm the last stand of the 10 uber-ultra invincible MBT. Get it?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demise of West</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5078322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demise of West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5078322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If it wasn&#039;t for the fact that fascist powers operate from lukeworm sized land mass of a country, we&#039;ll all be speaking jap &amp; german. No technological edge can dismantle the law of nature: Big country (Russia, China, &amp; yes USA) = more resources to work with. So inspite of all your western rambling &amp; scrabbling, the West can never conquer big Russia &amp; China period. Case in point, Korean war, when China was a technologically abysmal force, the superior US &amp; literally the free world cannot conquer it then, it certainly cannot now, b/c China just like Russia, it has the competence to turn her enemies into smoldering ashes. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it wasn&#039;t for the fact that fascist powers operate from lukeworm sized land mass of a country, we&#039;ll all be speaking jap &amp; german. No technological edge can dismantle the law of nature: Big country (Russia, China, &amp; yes USA) = more resources to work with. So inspite of all your western rambling &amp; scrabbling, the West can never conquer big Russia &amp; China period. Case in point, Korean war, when China was a technologically abysmal force, the superior US &amp; literally the free world cannot conquer it then, it certainly cannot now, b/c China just like Russia, it has the competence to turn her enemies into smoldering ashes. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demise of West</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5078018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demise of West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5078018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh. look copycats of Fascist technologies proclaiming itself original &amp; great?!! ie b2 stealth bomber from nazi, satellite from soviet, m60 from mg42, grenade from china, cruise missile from nazi, ICBM from v2 nazi rockets, nuke bomb from nazi WMD projects etc. oh &amp; lets not forget M1 Abram MBT uses germany&#039;s engine technology.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh. look copycats of Fascist technologies proclaiming itself original &amp; great?!! ie b2 stealth bomber from nazi, satellite from soviet, m60 from mg42, grenade from china, cruise missile from nazi, ICBM from v2 nazi rockets, nuke bomb from nazi WMD projects etc. oh &amp; lets not forget M1 Abram MBT uses germany&#039;s engine technology.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demise of West</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5077843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demise of West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5077843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone know whats a word for denoting unopposed western world domination? Western Tyranny! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know whats a word for denoting unopposed western world domination? Western Tyranny! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demise of West</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-5077749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Demise of West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 03:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-5077749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[blah, blah, blah, bunch of sack of western faeces wasting life w/o combat exp scanning for porn. I support BRIC b/c i dont want an unopposed West to preponderously rape the world as it pleases. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>blah, blah, blah, bunch of sack of western faeces wasting life w/o combat exp scanning for porn. I support BRIC b/c i dont want an unopposed West to preponderously rape the world as it pleases. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shane Greenwall</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-4713879</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane Greenwall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 06:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-4713879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of now, I think it can. However, I wouldn&#039;t rule out the US building even more ships to augment its fleet. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now, I think it can. However, I wouldn&#039;t rule out the US building even more ships to augment its fleet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bujai</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-4516819</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bujai]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 15:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-4516819</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to see that US should help democratic friendly allies to build a better Navy. This would help to protect both their mutual interests against hostile countries like China or say Iran. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to see that US should help democratic friendly allies to build a better Navy. This would help to protect both their mutual interests against hostile countries like China or say Iran. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-4295893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Byrne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-4295893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ha, ha, ho, ho ha!!  Oh man, are you really comparing the &quot;colonies&#039;&quot; navy to the highly superior USN&#039;s?  Man oh man you folks in the &quot;colonies&quot; are sure full of yourself.  Too much weirdness going on over there, over there. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha, ha, ho, ho ha!!  Oh man, are you really comparing the &quot;colonies&#039;&quot; navy to the highly superior USN&#039;s?  Man oh man you folks in the &quot;colonies&quot; are sure full of yourself.  Too much weirdness going on over there, over there. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patrick byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-4295866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[patrick byrne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-4295866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[China is growing to be pretty impressive in many areas, but their naval capability, though by what this invalid article states or fails to state, is so far behind the USA&#039;s it&#039;s laughable...though we both have nuclear missiles, and that is all we need to eliminate mankind for good.  This type of one-sided article is as laughable as the capability of the Chinese navy! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>China is growing to be pretty impressive in many areas, but their naval capability, though by what this invalid article states or fails to state, is so far behind the USA&#039;s it&#039;s laughable&#8230;though we both have nuclear missiles, and that is all we need to eliminate mankind for good.  This type of one-sided article is as laughable as the capability of the Chinese navy! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Dangerfield</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-4135494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Dangerfield]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-4135494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the Falklands The Navy lost the Coventry to two outdated sky hawk bombers, and she was supposed to be the latest design in warships. don&#039;t be too confident, and don&#039;t forget we are led by Donkey&#039;s. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Falklands The Navy lost the Coventry to two outdated sky hawk bombers, and she was supposed to be the latest design in warships. don&#039;t be too confident, and don&#039;t forget we are led by Donkey&#039;s. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-4080341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-4080341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The argument is irrelevant as the US would have the navy on which the sun never sets,the best one in the world man for man ship for ship by their side. For example a type 45 Royal Navy destroyer can take out 38 fighter jets at once I&#039;d love to see an American or chinnese on do that.  You shouldn&#039;t write off the ROYAL NAVY so quickly as the majority of the equipment was made and invented by the Brits so they know it&#039;s flaws. HavIng said that the chInnese equipment is to bad to have been made in Great Britan. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argument is irrelevant as the US would have the navy on which the sun never sets,the best one in the world man for man ship for ship by their side. For example a type 45 Royal Navy destroyer can take out 38 fighter jets at once I&#8217;d love to see an American or chinnese on do that.  You shouldn&#8217;t write off the ROYAL NAVY so quickly as the majority of the equipment was made and invented by the Brits so they know it&#8217;s flaws. HavIng said that the chInnese equipment is to bad to have been made in Great Britan. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-3724993</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-3724993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Fury-World-against-America/dp/0971577900&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Fury-World-against-...&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Fury-World-against-America/dp/0971577900" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Fury-World-against-" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Dragons-Fury-World-against-</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-3724947</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-3724947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Presently the US has... I would think...ought to cover any gaps &quot; 
 
You and your idol. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Presently the US has&#8230; I would think&#8230;ought to cover any gaps &quot; </p>
<p>You and your idol. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-3724939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-3724939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;And as for not being &quot;presidential&quot;, have you looked in a mirror lately ?&quot; 
 
McCain is not the president. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;And as for not being &quot;presidential&quot;, have you looked in a mirror lately ?&quot; </p>
<p>McCain is not the president. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-3724928</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-3724928</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I&#039;m a Filipino and live in this beautiful island nation since birth. I have Chinese friends and all I can say to them is, they are good in terms of running their family business, faithful and loyal friends indeed. As a young teenager in our place in Manila, we, together with my Chinese friends had conflicts with other groups. And to tell you frankly, my Chinese friends were running scared when we fought other groups, even if the advantage was on our side. All were left are my fellow Filipinos winning the rumble. If I may say so, the next American president should focus on the dwindling US economy and not on scarring the Chinese.&quot;  
  
I&#039;m glad you&#039;re happy there. However, you are aware that China is not a democracy and that most people who care at all about foreign policy consider the Chinese people to be oppressed by their government I assume. So don&#039;t think anyone cautioning against trusting China has any problems with Chinese people.  
  
&quot;It is obvious that China trembles as they watched the super aircraft carrier, USS George Washington, transit along the South China Sea and arrived here in Manila today, October 24, 2012&quot;  
  
That&#039;s the way enemy nations should feel, and friendly nations should rejoice on sight of any USA flag and especially one flying on a naval ship. But remember, if China is our enemy, it&#039;s us against the Chinese government, not the people. I think most Chinese are pro-American. But let&#039;s not get so far off topic here. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;I&#039;m a Filipino and live in this beautiful island nation since birth. I have Chinese friends and all I can say to them is, they are good in terms of running their family business, faithful and loyal friends indeed. As a young teenager in our place in Manila, we, together with my Chinese friends had conflicts with other groups. And to tell you frankly, my Chinese friends were running scared when we fought other groups, even if the advantage was on our side. All were left are my fellow Filipinos winning the rumble. If I may say so, the next American president should focus on the dwindling US economy and not on scarring the Chinese.&quot;  </p>
<p>I&#039;m glad you&#039;re happy there. However, you are aware that China is not a democracy and that most people who care at all about foreign policy consider the Chinese people to be oppressed by their government I assume. So don&#039;t think anyone cautioning against trusting China has any problems with Chinese people.  </p>
<p>&quot;It is obvious that China trembles as they watched the super aircraft carrier, USS George Washington, transit along the South China Sea and arrived here in Manila today, October 24, 2012&quot;  </p>
<p>That&#039;s the way enemy nations should feel, and friendly nations should rejoice on sight of any USA flag and especially one flying on a naval ship. But remember, if China is our enemy, it&#039;s us against the Chinese government, not the people. I think most Chinese are pro-American. But let&#039;s not get so far off topic here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-3724908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-3724908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;One Aegis Cruiser could take out 5 battleships simutaneously before they even appeared on the horizon, ONE Carrier can destroy a Nation , ONE Nuclear Sub can destroy several ,ONE Squadron of US advanced Fighters can destroy an Air Force . The Chinese Navy couldn&#039;t even scare off the Japanese Naval contingent in the dispute over that island off the Northern Japanese coast &quot; 
 
You are so clueless. I don&#039;t even know where to begin. It&#039;s another time sink. You are amusing though. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;One Aegis Cruiser could take out 5 battleships simutaneously before they even appeared on the horizon, ONE Carrier can destroy a Nation , ONE Nuclear Sub can destroy several ,ONE Squadron of US advanced Fighters can destroy an Air Force . The Chinese Navy couldn&#039;t even scare off the Japanese Naval contingent in the dispute over that island off the Northern Japanese coast &quot; </p>
<p>You are so clueless. I don&#039;t even know where to begin. It&#039;s another time sink. You are amusing though. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: objectivefactsmatter</title>
		<link>http://www.frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/is-the-us-navy-big-enough-to-take-on-china-and-iran/comment-page-1/#comment-3724892</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[objectivefactsmatter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://frontpagemag.com/?p=150411#comment-3724892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ 
&quot;Good Point .....As stealth fighters and Bombers go ? NONE&quot; 
 
Guess again. Now we know why you love Obama. You both talk out your a$$es. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_J-20&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_J-20&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
&quot;Good Point &#8230;..As stealth fighters and Bombers go ? NONE&quot; </p>
<p>Guess again. Now we know why you love Obama. You both talk out your a$$es.<br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_J-20" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chengdu_J-20</a> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Object Caching 690/717 objects using disk
Content Delivery Network via cdn.frontpagemag.com

 Served from: www.frontpagemag.com @ 2014-12-30 13:32:30 by W3 Total Cache -->