Muslim Firsters and Israel Firsters

Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.


Pages: 1 2

If you were to suggest in a public forum that just possibly Israel’s failure to reach a peace agreement with a terrorist organization run by kleptomaniacs and homicidal maniacs, which still continues to applaud the murder of Israeli children, might possibly be due to the terrorists and not because of Israel, then according to the consensus of the left, you are an Israel Firster.

The paradigm of the Israel Firster only works if you assume that the America First position is to support Islamic terrorists. Even if we were to dismiss the threat of Islamic terrorism to the United States then a position sympathetic to the territorial claims of Islamic terrorists in Israel would still not be the America First position. It would be the Muslims First position.

The left, which deploys names like Israel Firsters, is certainly not calling for neutrality in the conflict, rather it would like us to side with the Muslim Brotherhood and the assorted Islamic terrorists scattered throughout the region. Arguably the United States has been doing this for some time already.

Obama stuck his finger in Prime Minister Netanyahu’s chest, but bowed to the Saudi King. When he visited Turkey, he made no mention of the Turkish settlements in occupied Cyprus, but when Biden visited Israel, he threw a fit over a partial approval for a few houses in Jerusalem. The United States doesn’t fund many terrorist groups, but the bulk of the funding that it allots to terrorists goes to terrorists operating in Israel and killing Israelis.

Last week the State Department put out a list of designated terrorist organization. That list includes the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade. The Brigade has not only committed numerous atrocities against Israelis, it at one point threatened to launch terrorist attacks against America. The Brigade is the military arm of the Fatah group which controls the Palestinian Authority. The Authority is the beneficiary of an average of 600 million dollars a year in direct assistance, and indirectly through the UNRWA which has already received an initial 55 million dollars from the United States in 2012.

Terrorists who murder Israelis don’t just indirectly benefit from American aid; that money is going to pay the salaries of convicted terrorists in Israeli prisons. Some of those terrorists received training and weapons from the United States. I would like to be able to say that this sort of thing is one of the innovations of the Hussein administration, but it’s an an artifact of two previous administrations.

This is usually how countries treat other countries that they are at war with. In this case it is an artifact, not of an Israel Firster policy, but of a Muslim Firster policy. There is no interpretation of Israel Firster that accommodates the United States arming and funding terrorists. But there is an extensive global policy of rewarding and appeasing Muslims.

Opponents of Israel often complain that they are being “silenced” in some intangible ways, but the United States government has certainly never criminalized criticism of Israel. However, it continues to conduct discussions with the OIC, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, on ways to suppress and censor criticism of Islam. Nor has the Secretary of State suggested that critics of Israel should be subject to “peer pressure and shaming,” which she has for critics of Islam.

American soldiers have been dying incessantly to protect Muslims for decades now. They died in Somalia to protect aid to Somali Muslims. They died in the Gulf War to liberate Kuwait and protect the Muslim holy sites of Mecca and Medina from Saddam Hussein. They died over Yugoslavia to build a state for the Muslim terrorists of the KLA. Thousands of American soldiers have died to protect Muslims from other Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq.

In the last year alone, the United States has helped overthrow secular governments to make way for Muslim ones. When the Libyan ruler refused to resign, Obama sent in NATO jets to bomb his forces into submission so that the Al Qaeda- and Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated Libyan Islamic Fighting Group could take power.

While the United States abandoned Iranian students protesting against an Islamist regime, it overthrew governments in Egypt and Tunisia to make way for Islamist takeovers. The Saudis got to use tanks in Bahrain, but Gaddafi was hunted down and killed for a genocide that never happened.

What do you call all that but a Muslim Firster foreign policy?

In “The Audacity of Hope,” a book title taken from a sermon of his vilely anti-Semitic former black Muslim mentor, Obama wrote, “I will stand with the Muslims.” And he has done it.

Obama has stood with the Muslims in Cote d’Ivorie, where armed force was used to illegally seat a Muslim ruler against the ruling of the country’s supreme court. He has stood with the Muslims in Kenya, where his cousin and his Muslim backers forcibly wrote Sharia Law into the Constitution. He has stood with the genocidal Muslims in Indonesia, not the Christian Papuans whose land is occupied and whose representatives are persecuted.

Pages: 1 2

  • diann

    Powerful, concise article. Thank you for this – I will forward to many on my list in the hope that some will finally understand what is happening regarding Islam and the West.

  • StephenD

    Mr. Greenfield, you have once again stated clearly and concisely exactly what the problem is. I fear for my children and grandchildren that will be stifled and subjugated. The first front of this "war" will be – is against our right to speak freely. I call out Islam whenever and wherever I can. Ever since the FOGEL FAMILY MASSACRE I have drawn a line in cement. I still haven't heard condemnation for this atrocity. Yet, it is Israel that must make peace. It is America that is guilty for supporting Israel. I am sickened by the approach of appeasement our President and his Administration has taken and long for the day a REAL American is back in office. I only hope it isn’t too late by then.

    • ziontruth

      "Ever since the FOGEL FAMILY MASSACRE I have drawn a line in cement. I still haven't heard condemnation for this atrocity."

      Mine was drawn at Beslan, later coupled with the comparison to the Danish Cartoon Riots (the lack of Muslim condemnation of the former vs. their rioting at the latter).

  • Brujo Blanco

    We are in fact financing people and organizations that engage in the murder of Jews and non believers (non Muslims). One way to substantially interfere with homicidal Muslims is to cut off the money. They do not appreciate the money and us for helping and they use it to finance terrorism and murder.

  • mrbean

    Israel is the sole country in that entire region that recognizes
    individual rights. It is the only Mideast country in which people are free
    to voice their opinions. The non-violent, non-PLO-supporting Arab who
    lives in Israel enjoys far greater freedom than he would in an Arab
    nation. It is an utter perversion for the collectivized, tribalist
    Palestinians to claim that they are acting in defense of rights, when
    their aim is to obliterate rights – the rights of Israelis as well as of
    Arabs. The fundamental goal of the Palestinians is destruction. They WANT their
    terrorist attacks to lead to retaliation, so that more of their people
    will become terrorists, so that more killing takes place, and so on, in an
    endless cycle of violence, resulting in death to as many people as
    possible.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    The left, which deploys names like Israel Firsters, is certainly not calling for neutrality in the conflict, rather it would like us to side with the Muslim Brotherhood and the assorted Islamic terrorists scattered throughout the region. Arguably the United States has been doing this for some time already.

    It is not assorted Islamic terrorist, i.e., Islamic extremists, scattered throughout the region that are fighting Israel, as terrorism isn't even a manifestation of Islamic civilization. Instead, it is a jihad of conquest being waged perpetually against the Jewish unbelievers in Israel by the Islamic world and it is one of many hot and cold jihads that altogether comprise the covert global jihad being waged simultaneously around the world against many different non-Muslim unbelievers such as the Hindu unbelievers in Kashmir, Jammu, and India, the Buddhist unbelievers in Thailand, the Christian unbelievers in the Philippines, the atheist and Orthodox Christian unbelievers in Chechnya and Russia, the animist and Christian unbelievers in Cote D'Ivoire, Nigeria, Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia, and Kenya, the Orthodox Christian Serb unbelievers in Bosnia and Kosovo, etc., etc., etc. ad nauseum. Not to mention the covert global jihad being waged against the entire un-Islamic world via mass Muslim immigration that is really covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme.

    The United States doesn’t fund many terrorist groups, but the bulk of the funding that it allots to terrorists goes to terrorists operating in Israel and killing Israelis.

    Well first of all there are no terrorists operating in Israel or in the Islamic world for that matter. Instead there are jihadists, as all mainstream orthodox Muslims on earth – per the dictates of Islam – are jihadists, either violent jihadists or covert non-violent jihadists. Indeed, the notion that only a tiny minority of Islamic extremists in the region, i.e., terrorists, are fighting Israel is utterly absurd.

    Terrorism in the Islamic world is an un-Islamic manifestation and is therefore a blasphemous offense that is punished under the pain of death. Instead, Muslims fight jihad, which is holy fighting in the cause of Allah against non-Muslim unbelievers to make Islam supreme and that consist of both violent and non-violent means of jihad, but overall astronomically far more non-violent means of jihad are employed that for the most part unfortunately gets completely ignored.

    Not to mention as well that the news media, the political elites on both sides of the political spectrum, and the entire federal government all receive guidance from the same exact place, which is our most prestigious colleges and universities. However, the Middle East Studies Departments in our most prestigious colleges and universities have all been hijacked, co-opted, and usurped by the Islamic world and petro-dollars since in the '70s. Of course, the Left has a great deal to do with this manifestation as well.

    Hence, the information they are collectively all provided is bogus, and it doesn't matter how many prestigious colleges and universities they go to, as they have all been hijacked, co-opted, and usurped. Thus, they hold a monopoly on education and information in this country and indeed in most Western countries as well, yet all the education and information they provide is only bogus.

    Therefore, the inevitable result is we end up with only insane policies with respect to Israel, with major strategic blunders like the inevitable ones in Iraq and Afghanistan or the latest one in Egypt, and Islam gets proclaimed a so-called “Religion of Peace™” being hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists immediately after the 9/11 jihad attacks and even before all the innocent victim's dead bodies have been buried.

    It's remarkable really, it's like everything the USA has undertaken in the Islamic world for the past few decades now has inevitably blown up in its face. Yet all the inevitable failures and set backs somehow always get ignored and no one is ever held to account. Meanwhile, they always go back to the same exact well for more bogus information and advice. It is really very, very sad and tragic to observe.

    Sadly, much of the information contained in Mr. Greenfield's articles is also bogus as well because a lot of it comes from the same well that feeds our political elites, but at least he is starting to notice and to tally up many of the the recent fiascos, while starting to observe that something isn't quite right, but he just can't seem to ever put his finger on the source of the problem.

    • NorthStar

      Islam is Terrorism

      • ObamaYoMoma

        Islam is Terrorism

        I hate to rain on your gullible parade, but you are more than just a little blinded by PC multiculturalism. Meanwhile, I suppose to you mass Muslim immigration to the West for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest to make Islam supreme is not covert non-violent jihad, instead it is legitimate immigration. Go fly a kite.

        • NorthStar

          Saying something ridiculously liberal and accusing everyone who disagrees of being blinded by PC multiculturalism is a backward argument.

          But that's about what I would expect from a Romney supporter. A lot of Ann Coulter rhetoric with no conservative substance.

          • mrbean

            Newt Gingrich represents the alpha male of the GOP which is even in the non-PC world perveived by women as a threat to women and a reminder to the RINO omega males of their cowardice that always come out when the chips are down. E.G., they had a chance to take Clinton out at the impeachment trial and they caved out of fear of the media. We likely are going to be stuck with Romney so the ouster of Obama is the game plan.

          • ObamaYoMoma

            Saying something ridiculously liberal and accusing everyone who disagrees of being blinded by PC multiculturalism is a backward argument.

            With all due disrespect moonbat, being exceedingly blinded by PC multiculturalism as you are, while also being incredibly ignorant at the same time, are hallmarks of classic liberalism. Thank you very much.

            But that's about what I would expect from a Romney supporter. A lot of Ann Coulter rhetoric with no conservative substance.

            I hate to rain on your clueless parade moonbat, but Romney is the most conservative candidate in the race, plus unlike Gingrich he isn't a long time establishment Republican, a professional career politician, and a long time Washington insider maintaining offices for years on K street.

            For instance, unlike Gingrich, Romney doesn't support amnesty for illegal immigrants. Hence, he is serious about solving the problem once and for all unlike Gingrich. He also never conceded a debate on global warming to John Kerry or video taped a PSA with Nancy Pelosi urging congress to act on global warming and cap and trade legislation.

            Also, while Romney might have signed Romneycare in Massachusetts, let's not forget that Romneycare was based off of the leading conservative think thank Heritage Foundation's healthcare model, and that Gingrich himself wrote op-ed pieces in 2006 praising Romney and endorsing the individual mandate 100 percent, which the Wall Street Journal recently republished.

            Further, while Romney approved of the individual mandate only on a state by state basis as opposed to a federal basis, for almost 20 years Gingrich approved of an individual mandate on a federal basis as part of a federal top down healthcare solution, and as for as I know he may still support it, as he professed he did as late as last May on NBC's Meet the Mess.

            Not to mention that he claims that Congressman Paul Ryan's medicare reform proposal is right-wing social engineering. In others words, like the Dhimmicrats he supports letting it go bankrupt for political reasons.

            Additionally, don't forget that Gingrich's favorite president of all time is FDR, as Gingrich believes in the efficacy of big government. Not to mention that Gingrich also endorsed Dee Dee Scozzafava, who was George Soros' hand picked candidate.

            Moreover, Romney wasn't getting paid millions of dollars by Freddie Mac at the same time Freddie Mac was poisoning the financial system. Gingrich's explanation was that he was paid to be Freddie Mac's historian. If you believe that Gingrich was paid $30,000.00/hour to be a glorified historian, then you must believe that Bill Clinton didn't inhale.

            Furthermore, Romney never has launched Alinsky like bogus anti-capitalist and class warfare attacks against a fellow Republican and the free enterprise system like only Gingrich is doing.

            Oh, and how can we forget that Gingrich was compelled to resign as Speaker, the first and only Speaker ever compelled to do so in disgrace, when 88 percent of Republicans in Congress voted against him. Not to mention also that all of those same Republicans still serving in Congress today still denounce him and have announced that they will never endorse or support under any circumstances.

            Finally, even if a miracle occurred and that RINO, Gingrich, won the nomination, he still couldn't defeat Obama. While his generic poll numbers against Obama are the lowest of all the Republican candidates in the race but still at the same time do not appear to be all that bad relative to his competition, when you look at Gingrich's numbers in all the battleground states, Obama's lead over Gingrich is so great as to be insurmountable. In fact, Santorum and Paul have a much greater shot than Gingrich at defeating Obama should they win the nomination, and Romney has the best shot of all since he is either a couple of points ahead of Obama or only a couple of points behind Obama. While Gingrich's numbers are concentrated in the states that the Republicans are going to win anyway.

            Indeed, as I said PC multicultural blindness and immense ignorance are classic hallmarks of liberalism.

        • umustbkidding

          Peaceful Muslims are the same as the Progressive Christians – non believers.

          The big difference is that when the purging of the Muslim Mosques comes – it will be violent. The peaceful ones will either die, with their families, or buck up and prove "their love for Allah" and kill the infidels, to save the lives of themselves and their families.

          No brainer there.

          I wonder how many have to die before the press actually reports on it?

  • ObamaYoMoma

    Six-year-olds must be strip searched in airports, but the people who actually are a flight risk cannot be singled out in any way.

    Actually, that one is GWB's fault, as it was GWB that proclaimed Islam to be a so-called “Religion of Peace™” and then used the 9/11 jihad attacks as a crisis to double the size, scope, and power of the federal government, ostensibly to protect the homeland from so-called terrorist attacks, but in reality to create the false sense of security necessary to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage.

    Hence, six-year-olds and grandmothers get stripped searched in airports, while Muslim stealth jihadists that have immigrated to the USA specifically for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest get a free pass. Meanwhile, innocent Americans are still being murdered in cold blood unnecessarily in violent jihad attacks – such as the Fort Hood Massacre – and thanks to the massive expansion in the size, scope, and power of the federal government in order to continue accommodating mass Muslim immigration that is really covert non-violent jihad for the purpose of stealth demographic conquest, the USA is on the fast track to becoming the next Greece and is currently gutting its military at the same time.

    It's too bad, GWB could have easily outlawed Islam and banned and reversed mass Muslim immigration with all of its excess baggage instead in response to 9/11 and all of the above could have been avoided. He could have also instituted a strategy to contained the spread, growth, and expansion of Islam as well, instead of declaring a ludicrous and insane war on terror, which isn't even an Islamic manifestation, and the two biggest strategic blunders in American history would have been avoided altogether.

    Now, of course, I know that when it comes to Islam and Muslims that Obama and the Dhimmicrats are far worse, as they are GWB on steroids. However, it must not go unnoticed that the political elites on the right side of the political isle are also pretty damn incompetent in their own right as well.

  • ObamaYoMoma

    What I'm really concerned about today is why is the Obama administration trying to undermine a potential Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear weapons installations? Obviously, if you go by Obama's track record with respect to always siding with Islam and Muslims, then you have to believe that Obama will not lift a finger to stop Iran from getting nukes.

    Hence, it appears that the only opportunity left to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons is for Israel to successfully attack Iran's nuclear weapons installations to delay Iran and for Obama to lose the election. Otherwise, if Obama wins reelection, Iran will acquire nukes.

    In the meantime though, it appears the Obama administration will try to betray our loyal friend and ally Israel by doing everything in its power to undermine and thwart Israel in order to stop them from attacking Iran's nuclear weapons installations or otherwise to ensure that it is a failure.

    In any event, probably the best that Israel can hope for from any attack on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities is for a temporary set back long enough for a sane US administration to be elected that will subsequently finish the job.

    Nevertheless, if Iran acquires nukes, not only will oil prices inevitably skyrocket through the roof as a result, but the Saudi owned Pakistani nuclear weapons arsenal now sitting in Pakistan will also inevitably quickly get proliferated throughout the Sunni Islamic world as well in response to a nuclear armed Shi'a Iran, and thus the Islamic world with its imperative to make Islam supreme will all of a sudden become armed to the teeth with nuclear weapons.

    When you consider that the Obama administration is backing the pro Islam forces over the military in Egypt, things may be setting up for a new nuclear world war that will make WWII seem like a pleasant stroll in the park.

  • Ghostwriter

    It seems to me that President Obama is living in a dream world. Winston Churchill was right. President Obama is living under the delusion that if he satisfies the Islamists,they'll leave the rest of the world alone. What he doesn't realize or care to realize is that the Islamists will never be satisfied until the whole world is ruled by them. Eventually,the Islamist crocodile will swallow up people like President Obama if we let them.

    • effemall

      He may not be living in a dream world at all. His indoctrination in youth to Islam dictates what is in his heart. Offspring of racially mixed couples often suffer from identity confusion. In his case it is not just a racial mix but a religious mix. The black genes in his mix gave him more of a black appearance so he chose to live as a black man. His religious mix may be even more confusing to him and deep down he will always side with Islam.

  • WilliamJamesWard

    Considering American foreign policy with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and
    Barak Hussein Obama as President and their crew of Islamist extremists, what
    can we expect to happen. Islam want's Israel destroyed and Obama and Co. are
    doing their best to weaken Israel for the Muslim war of total destruction and death.
    America is becoming a place I do not recognize and I am very concerned that
    it may be so subverted by the left and Arab money that it is about over and
    the upcoming elections will be the death knell for our Nation………….William

  • Ron Carnine

    Obama either doesn't know the history of this country or he doesn't care. Thomas Jefferson had guts enough to see that paying off the Barbary Coast, Muslim nations, didn't work so he sent in the Navy and Marines. At that point, the Muslim's let the US alone. The same is true today. If we get a President that will stand up like a man and tell them that hell is coming and it will not stop until our citizens are safe (anywhere in the world), Then and only then will they leave the US and its interests alone. Then finally, Israel will have an ally it can count on.

    • effemall

      Contemporary America is not the America of Jefferson's day. Obama wouldn't have lasted three years in the White House in the America of Jefferson's day. They would have found a way to impeach him or to start a second revolution. Today's Americans are largely bourgeois and prepared to become dhimmis. A Teddy Roosevelt would have demanded billions of dollars from Saudi Arabia after 9/11 since most of the suicide bombers who hijacked the planes were Saudis and received their inspiration from Saudi Wahabi Mullahs. I don't know if America will ever become mannish again.

  • ziontruth

    Excellent article, Mr. Greenfield! There's no good defense like a good offense. Whoever brings the accusation of being an Israel-firster must himself be promptly accused of being a pro-Islam traitor.

  • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

    The author is trying to swindle away the term “Israel Firster” and redefine it as some nonsense about Muslims. An Israel Firster is and only is a Jewish Zionist who has more loyalty to Eretz Israel than to the United States and will clamor, threaten and bribe to enact a US foreign and domestic policy that harms this country. It is nothing else. The term stings and it should. Israel Firsters should be deported to Israel.

    • mrbean

      There is no moral equivalency between the realatively free and civilized state of Israel and the unfree theocracies of all the barbaric Muslim states and their proxy terrorists Hamas, Hezbolla, the Muslim Brotherhood, and include al Qaeda.

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        That’s just philosophical mumbo-jumbo.

        • mrbean

          Read Ayn Rand's "Philosophy, Who Needs It." particularly her Address To The Graduating Class Of The United States Military Academy at West Point New York — March 6, 1974. You might learn something even.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            I am familiar with her works.

    • Jerry

      Flipside wrote, "Israel Firsters should be deported to Israel."

      Well, I am sure that in order to remain logically consistent, that you also believe that "Muslim-firsters" should also be deported. Where precisely would you send Mr. Obama?

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        Yes, but unlike a Zionist, I am capable of thinking of Jews and Muslims separately. There's no conundrum with Obama. He's a bad president but he's not a Muslim. Anyway, it is not "logically consistent" to compare Muslims to Zionists in order to ensure maximum deportation. You are trying to construct some kind of logical continuum in which Muslims and Zionists are related to one another. WE HAVE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE HERE. It is not a crime to have a Muslim religion. Being a foreign national residing in the US and working for the benefit of a foreign country as a foreign national should get you deported no matter who you are.

        • Maher

          This article is factual from the first to the very last word. And what Flopside is teaching us? Blah, blah, blah… Finally Flushside should be deported to that huge all-seasons cloaca called the Arab world. Just for being an islamocryte. An idiot one.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            If America isn’t good enough for Israeli Nationalists, you know where the door is.

          • mrbean

            I bet your heroes are Noam Chomsky and Bill Ayers.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            No, actually they are not.

          • Maher

            What’s the Arabo-Muslim contribution to the American civilization? Last year alone there were 5 AMERICAN JEWS NOBEL LAUREATES. Be they (the Arabo-Muslims) in the States for a millennia they won’t succeed to have even one, I bet. You bet Flopside? (Same for the huge cloaca of billions Arabo-Muslims over the world). We badly need them for they promote an obscurantist and crime generating dogma, I don’t see any other reason.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            Algebra was a pretty good contribution to American civilization. Then again, who is talking about Arabs and Muslims but you? Nobody said Jews contributed nothing to civilization. You are hearing some big stupid voice in your own head. What was said was Israeli Nationalists are free to get the hell out of here and go live in their paradise instead of defecating where they eat.

          • ziontruth

            "…Israeli Nationalists are free to get the hell out of here and go live in their paradise instead of defecating where they eat."

            Pro-Muslim traitors like you are free to get the hell out of non-Muslim countries and go live in their beloved Islamic paradises instead of defecating where they eat.

          • Maher

            You bet, Flopside?

        • ziontruth

          "It is not a crime to have a Muslim religion."

          That's exactly the problem. Most people are ignorant of the fact that the religion of Islam is inseparable from the political program of Islam, which mandates the worldwide forcing of shariah law upon all states and peoples–a program little different from that of Nazism or Marxism.

          Nobody knowing this truth would keep believing Islam is on a par with, say, Buddhism.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            You can say the same damn thing about Jews. In fact, you stole the slur.

          • ziontruth

            "You can say the same damn thing about Jews."

            Yes, but it'd be a lie.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            It's a lie when you do it too. At the very least it's a highly imprecise truth. It's the same thing as saying that a Jew doesn't know if he is a race or a religion, or a country, or that he does know but he uses it as a lock pick. It is YOU who wants to use this racist lie or this imprecise truth on Muslims. To me it is laughable because how are they so different from you? They look similar, their words are only off from yours by an inflection. You all want to live in the same hundred square miles of the world. You can only distinguish yourselves from one another by your insipid hatred. In your section of the world that might be how you prefer to live, but in our section of the world, you should be ridiculed for it.

          • ziontruth

            "…this racist lie … on Muslims."

            Islam is not a race, any more than African-Americans are a religion. Marxist Humpty Dumpty-like "words mean what I say they mean" rhetorical fail one more time.

            "…because how are they so different from you?"

            If you don't know the difference between a religion whose politics are confined to one nation and apply to only one state, and one that is global and to be forced upon all the peoples of the world, then just what can I say, you're a hopeless case.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            Dress it in whatever golden garb you like. Zionists are simply racist religious bigots laying claim to a strip of land that is claimed by other people who look just like them. There's nothing lofty about it. You look the same, you sound the same, you act the same. You both go to madrassas, but you call it a yeshiva. And don't even try to claim that Zionism has no transnational phenomenon, because then you are just making comedy.

    • ziontruth

      Here is Flipscum, an apologist for Islamic imperialism, a defender (whether intentional or not) of the spread of shariah law, a tool of the worldwide jihad, a stooge for the global effort to institute the precepts of 7th-century Arabia everywhere.

      • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

        Your tongue is as black as your lip is hairy. I am not defending Muslims at all. I am simply telling racist Jews to shut up.

        • ziontruth

          You are a pro-Islamic imperialist traitor. Denial is admission of guilt, as per your own standards regarding Jewish accusations of dual loyalty.

          "…racist Jews…"

          Islam is not a race, any more than African-Americans are a religion. Marxist Humpty Dumpty-like "words mean what I say they mean" rhetorical fallacy once again on your part, treasonous scum.

          • http://www.contextflexed.com Flipside

            I'll explain it to you again, because you're dumb. I am not pro-Islamic. I am not an imperialist (nice Communist slur, though), and foreigners cannot accuse Americans of being "traitors" for refusing to kiss Israel's rear end. I hope that clears things up for you.

  • http://Vnnforum.com Deshawn

    “let me tell you something. We the jewish people control america, and the americans know it.” -ariel sharon jew demons are traitors.

    • Samuel

      Nice try, you Nazi POS, but that's a fictitious quote: http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_article=373&amp… All the same, your post beautifully captures the dishonesty and willful ignorance upon which this sort of anti-Semitism is built.

    • Ghostwriter

      Deshawn,has anybody ever told you that you are a disgusting human being? If not,let me be the first to tell you that.

    • Nakba1948

      Geez, "Deshawn," you even have me agreeing with that mental featherweight Ghostwriter. Go back to your racist enclave and stay there, you moron.

  • http://www.boycottscotland.com Edward

    "I am a white racist posting with a black name and I hate America and side with its enemies" – deshawn national socialist filth are traitors.

  • hammar

    islam is a false gospel that is being fed with blood and money powered by the
    the left in hopes of bringing down Israel and America Constitution as well.
    Vote to beat the phony president, and pray because there is only one Lord and God Jesus Christ.