Muslim Students and the Jihad Against the NYPD

Pages: 1 2

The NYPD has 1200 men and an annual budget of 330 million dollars focused on defeating terrorists. While the Obama era FBI has put a greater focus on “corporate fraud,” “financial institution fraud” and “health care fraud,” infiltrating “online pharmacies“ and “nursing homes,” the NYPD is still vigilant because it’s their city.

Nor can the NYPD confine itself to the five boroughs. The September 11 hijackers were outside NYPD jurisdiction until they entered New York airspace. The World Trade Center bombers came out of Jersey City. Local is good enough for small scale terrorist attacks, but the first sign of a large scale terrorist attack orchestrated out of Boston or across the river in New Jersey may be the rising flames and smoke over a New York landmark.

In Trenton, New Jersey’s Attorney General met with Muslim leaders demanding action, including the local chair of CAIR, an organization that remains an unindicted terrorist conspirator. In Chicago, Newark’s former police director, met with Muslims and promised that there would be no blanket surveillance. Back home in New York City, radical leftist mayoral candidate John Liu, whose campaign treasurer was recently charged with fraud and who appears to have been the beneficiary of a lot of donations that have come out of thin air, condemned the surveillance. He was one of the few to do so.

In New York City support for the surveillance is apolitical to a surprising extent. Mayor Bloomberg, usually a vocal advocate of Muslim causes, has been equally vocal in defending the NYPD. Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, so far to the left that he all but promised Al Sharpton an office in Albany, has declined to investigate the NYPD. The likely Democratic successors to Bloomberg remained equally mum. Even in a liberal town, no one besides the Associated Press, which makes its headquarters on the West Side, places political correctness over another September 11.

Richard Levin, the president of Yale University, issued a statement saying that, “that police surveillance based on religion, nationality, or peacefully expressed political opinions is antithetical to the values of Yale.”

A good distance away from Yale and its values, across the state border, two airplanes took off from Logan International Airport and were used as instruments of mass murder by a group of men who were not profiled by religion, nationality or their political opinions.

At last year’s commemoration of September 11, Levin claimed that the “fundamentalism” of September 11 had its precursor in the Salem witch trials and celebrated that Muslim and Jewish students had come together to read “each other’s sacred texts”. He concluded by snidely dismissing those who confront terrorism “with force”, and boasted that at Yale, “We confront fundamentalism and terrorism by other means. We challenge established beliefs.”

But while the Levins go about their merry way, challenging terrorism by challenging “established beliefs”, there are men and women who go about challenging it the old fashioned way. Some wear blue uniforms, others blue suits and still others wear turbans. They can blend in anywhere, including in the Muslim Students Association. When they monitor a mosque in Paterson NJ or a Muslim Students Association website in Ohio, which in the past featured an entire site dedicated to Bin Laden, they are doing their job by protecting the Levins of this world… and by protecting us.

We saw the values of the NYPD on September 11. We have also seen the values of the MSA in the terrorists who have sprung from its ranks. Finally we have seen the impotent and frivolous values of the Levins. It is up to all of us to make our choice.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Pages: 1 2

  • StephenD

    “We confront fundamentalism and terrorism by other means. We challenge established beliefs.”
    All the while you (Levins of the world) are “challenging” their beliefs they are plotting your demise. But, you already know that if you’ve given even a cursory glimpse to their texts which you say you challenge.
    Thugs understand only brute force. They are well behaved when they are weak (as their texts would tell them to be) and they are violent and oppressive when they are strong (as their texts would tell them to be). There is no in-between. The solution is simple. Make them weak and…keep them weak.

  • Pat C

    Weakness is an invitation to evil.

  • peter

    A bloody war is on the horizon and I will fight to save our country till there are no muslims left.

    • randy

      Was the land of this COUNTRY stolen from the natives by christians?

      • Ghostwriter

        That not even the point of the article,randy! You're unbelievable!

      • Ron Carnine

        Well Randy you are a bit off the topic of this article but I think I will answer you since made your statement which seems to suggest that since the Christians stole this country from the natives it would be ok for the Muslim to steal this country from the Christians. The first Christians to settle in this country came here for the freedom this land offered. They were brought here by a secular company that wanted to open new territory for trading. The Christians paid for their passage with money and a contract which said they would buy their supplies from a parent company. Some of those who came weren't Christians. When the Christians dealt with the natives they paid for what they were sold with goods that the natives could not get anywhere else. Even when Manhattan was purchased it was with goods the natives could not get elsewhere. Emphasis is always placed on the European price of these items, but value is accounted by whether or not you can procure items from another source. The natives felt that they had a lot of land but none of the items the Europeans brought with them to trade. While the Christians were the first to settle and tried for good relationship with the natives, there were others who came who didn't give a hang about the natives. For the natives land and everything else was procured by the old thought that "might makes right" and for centuries the stronger tribes took from the weaker tribes by force. The weaker tribes would move to an area and take that land from a still weaker tribe. This was the way things were. But you supposition that Christians were always stealing from the natives isn't good history and certainly wouldn't justify the Muslim attempts to conquer America.

      • curmudgeon

        incredibly stupid asswhipe. there is no country on earth that legitimately belongs to the religion of peace. the arabian peninsula belonged to various jews, pagans, christians, and others. it was stolen by islam. egypt, syria, libya, tunisia, morocco, turkey, syria, lebanon, were christian, and were stolen by the religion of peace. iran and iraq were zoroastrian, and were stolen by the religion of pure evil. india was hindu, and large portions were stolen by the religion of murder. now what were you puking about countries stolen by christians? you are stupid you deserve the murder that the religion of pure evil plans for you, but the rest of us dont.

  • Raymond in DC

    "The record shows that the terrorist leaders of tomorrow are the MSA members of today."

    This pattern holds not just in the US but in the UK as well, where many MSA presidents have "graduated" to the ranks of jihad or at least jihad support.

  • lewis

    Way to go, NYPD!

  • WilliamJamesWard

    I hate to relive 9/11 but no matter what that is my permanent vision 9/ll in both eyes. Bloomberg knows
    better than to tell NYPD how to do it's job protecting the citizens of NYC, if they believe he is on the
    side of the terrorists, he ends up in the East River floating under his turban. Levin is a complete idiot
    and a disgrace to America. When the gloves finally come off it will be such a relief……………William

  • PDK

    Islam is out to conquer the world, that includes America.
    Islam is the inferiority complex, its naturally arising emotion of hate, and the subsequent pursuit of superiority via a conquer, submit and enslave policy. They are tantamount to a human cancer metastasizing globally. This is reality.
    Liberal illusion, the prefered method of liberals to deal with reality by pretending they think their illusion is reality, is dangerous and will destroy our culture.
    If conservatives do not break from liberals and liberalism, there shall one time come the day we wake to find our culture gone, and worse, wake to find we must submit to Islam.
    Liberty, once lost, is lost forever. John Adams, America patriot, founding father and President.
    Woe will be humanity, when all are enslaved to Islamic insanity. Thank you.

  • maghrebchristians

    Islam is only a religion to dictate other people's lives. For instance it has been one year of Egypt revolution would it bring peace. There is a full article here:

    Also Tunisia going through a time now if it a good idea to put Sharia law into practise, there has been arguments within Tunisian MPs.

    Blessing and thank you frontpagemag your doing ana amazing job here.



  • Henry

    Good article, but it would be great if there was a way to not use terms like liberal, far left etc. in a negative way (although the article here is noting muted criticism from even those sources). Why? Because I think the point needs to be made over and over again that Islamism is a political ideology that is not compatible with American democracy, and American civil liberties. This should be an issue that draws bi-partisan support. I think there are plenty of Democrats and "shudder" liberals who might agree with you on these issues.

  • Jaladhi

    All Muslims are terrorists. Peirod.

    • curmudgeon

      if only that were true. muslims come in two categories. those that want to kill us now, and those that are willing to wait until later. those that want to kill us now are our friends. they keep us aware of what islam is all about. the ones that would wait and kill us later are your most dangerous enemies,, because they are winning. no, jaladhi, not all muslims are terrorists. some of them are peaceful invaders, who immigrate into western countries,, breed like rats at our expense, play nice while their multiple wife bastards overrun our country, and quietly wait for the day they are the majority, and it will be safe to kill us. personaly, i prefer the terrorists. the "peaceful" jihadis are the ones who will murder my family, kill my descendants, and descend my entire country in to the dark ages of ignorance and allah-worshiping superstition.

  • zuma

    Israel has been found favour by Allah and yet muslims have fought against them in the past:
    Al-Baqara, Chapter #2, Verse #40, "O Children of ISRAEL! Remember My Favour which I bestowed upon you…"
    Al-Baqara, Chapter #2, Verse #47, "O Children of ISRAEL!…"
    Al-Baqara, Chapter #2, Verse #122, "O Children of ISRAEL! Remember My Favour which I bestowed upon you and that I preferred you to the 'Alamin [mankind and jinn (of your time-period, in the past)]."
    The paragraph below even conveys the message that Allah even ordained children of Israel not to do this or that:
    Al-Maeda, Chapter #5, Verse #32, "Because of that We ordained for the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land – it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind…"
    The above verses show that Allah was not against Israel. A question has to be raised: Should muslims be against non-muslim people?

  • zuma

    Quran does not encourage muslims to treat the children of Israel to be their enemies. The following is the proof:

    Taha, Chapter #20, Verse #47, "So go you both to him, and say: 'Verily, we are Messengers OF your Lord, so let the CHILDREN OF ISRAEL GO WITH US, AND TORMENT THEM NOT; indeed, we have come with a sign from your Lord! And peace will be upon him who follows the guidance!" The phrase, let the children of Israel go with us and torment them not, in the above extract gives us the fact that Quran does not demand muslim to treat the children of Israel to be their enemies.

    Muslims in the past did recue the children of Israel from their enemies. The following is the proof:

    Taha, Chapter #20, Verse #80, "O CHILDREN OF ISRAEL! WE DELIVERED YOU FROM YOUR ENEMY, We made a covenant with you on the right side OF the Mount, and We sent down to you Al-Manna and quails,:

    From the above extracts, it could come to the conclusion that Quran does not encourage muslims to treat the children of Israel as enemies.

  • NorthStar

    Your antisemitism gives you just as much in common with Muslims.